-
The Lancet. Oncology Apr 2022The clinical presentation and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma are unclear when compared with hepatocellular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical characteristics, surveillance, treatment allocation, and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The clinical presentation and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma are unclear when compared with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. We aimed to establish the prevalence, clinical features, surveillance rates, treatment allocation, and outcomes of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception until Jan 17, 2022, for articles in English that compared clinical features, and outcomes of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma versus hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies and excluded paediatric studies. Study-level data were extracted from the published reports. The primary outcomes were (1) the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to NAFLD, (2) comparison of patient and tumour characteristics of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma versus other causes, and (3) comparison of surveillance, treatment allocation, and overall and disease-free survival outcomes of NAFLD-related versus non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. We analysed proportional data using a generalised linear mixed model. Pairwise meta-analysis was done to obtain odds ratio (OR) or mean difference, comparing NAFLD-related with non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. We evaluated survival outcomes using pooled analysis of hazard ratios.
FINDINGS
Of 3631 records identified, 61 studies (done between January, 1980, and May, 2021; 94 636 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma cases secondary to NAFLD was 15·1% (95% CI 11·9-18·9). Patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma were older (p<0·0001), had higher BMI (p<0·0001), and were more likely to present with metabolic comorbidities (diabetes [p<0·0001], hypertension [p<0·0001], and hyperlipidaemia [p<0·0001]) or cardiovascular disease at presentation (p=0·0055) than patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. They were also more likely to be non-cirrhotic (38·5%, 27·9-50·2 vs 14·6%, 8·7-23·4 for hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes; p<0·0001). Patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma had larger tumour diameters (p=0·0087), were more likely to have uninodular lesions (p=0·0003), and had similar odds of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages, TNM stages, alpha fetoprotein concentration, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status to patients with non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. A lower proportion of patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma underwent surveillance (32·8%, 12·0-63·7) than did patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes (55·7%, 24·0-83·3; p<0·0001). There were no significant differences in treatment allocation (curative therapy, palliative therapy, and best supportive care) between patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma and those with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1·05, 95% CI 0·92-1·20, p=0·43), but disease-free survival was longer for patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma (0·79, 0·63-0·99; p=0·044). There was substantial heterogeneity in most analyses (I>75%), and all articles had low-to-moderate risk of bias.
INTERPRETATION
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with a higher proportion of patients without cirrhosis and lower surveillance rates than hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. Surveillance strategies should be developed for patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis who are at high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
PubMed: 35255263
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00078-X -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative multisystem disorder. A minority of AT patients can present late-onset atypical presentations...
Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative multisystem disorder. A minority of AT patients can present late-onset atypical presentations due to unknown mechanisms. The demographic, clinical, immunological and genetic data were collected by direct interview and examining the Iranian AT patients with late-onset manifestations. We also conducted a systematic literature review for reported atypical AT patients. We identified three Iranian AT patients (3/249, 1.2% of total registry) with later age at ataxia onset and slower neurologic progression despite elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels, history of respiratory infections, and immunological features of the syndrome. Of note, all patients developed autoimmunity in which a decrease of naïve T cells and regulatory T cells were observed. The literature searches also summarized data from 73 variant AT patients with atypical presentation indicating biallelic mild mutations mainly lead to an atypical phenotype with an increased risk of cancer. Variant AT patients present with milder phenotype or atypical form of classical symptoms causing under- or mis- diagnosis. Although missense mutations are more frequent, an atypical presentation can be associated with deleterious mutations due to unknown modifying factors.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Ataxia; Ataxia Telangiectasia; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Iran; Male; Mutation, Missense; Phenotype; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Young Adult; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 35095854
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.779502 -
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Jan 2022Congenital nasopharyngeal masses (CNMs) are rare. Presenting symptoms vary, and the differential diagnoses cover a wide spectrum of possibilities. As it is uncommon,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Congenital nasopharyngeal masses (CNMs) are rare. Presenting symptoms vary, and the differential diagnoses cover a wide spectrum of possibilities. As it is uncommon, most examples discussed in literature are described as case reports or series. Guidelines on CNM patient management do not exist. In this study, we present two (2) cases of neonates with CNMs that were encountered at our tertiary center. Additionally, to best elaborate a comprehensive, case-based approach to CNM management, we offer an up-to-date, diagnosis-to-treatment review of current literature.
METHODS
Case series and systematic literature review.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight (28) studies are included since January 2000 to October 2021, with a total of 41 cases. Most common diagnosis was teratoma (78%). Female-to-male ratio was 2.5:1. Twenty percent of cases presented prenatally with polyhydramnios or elevated alpha-fetoprotein. Postnatally, the presenting symptoms most frequently encountered were respiratory distress (78%), oral mass (52%), and feeding difficulties (29%). Seventy-five percent of affected newborns showed symptoms within the first 24 hours of life. Forty percent of cases had comorbidities, especially in the head and neck region.
CONCLUSIONS
Congenital nasopharyngeal masses can be detected antenatally, or symptomatically immediately after birth. Airway protection is a cornerstone in the management. Selecting the right imaging modality and convening a multidisciplinary team meeting are important toward the planning of next steps/therapeutic approach. Typically, a transnasal or transoral surgical approach will be deemed sufficient to address the problem, with a good overall prognosis.
PubMed: 35089125
DOI: 10.5041/RMMJ.10463 -
Transplantation Reviews (Orlando, Fla.) Jan 2022Data on predictors of post-recurrence survival (PRS) of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) have not been reviewed and analysed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Data on predictors of post-recurrence survival (PRS) of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) have not been reviewed and analysed systematically. We aimed to systematically analyse all published data on the predictors for PRS.
METHODS
In accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, online search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was done for all reports that evaluate the predictors of PRS based on multivariate analyses. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were conducted to assess the potential predictors of PRS.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Among the 11,868 patients involved, 1921 (16%) had HCC recurrence within a median time of 16 months. The following were recurrence and tumour-related predictors: time to recurrence (<1 year; HR: 1.97; p < 0.001), AFP level at recurrence(≥100 ng/ml; HR: 1.82; p < 0.001), multiple recurrence (HR: 1.22; p < 0.001), bone recurrence (HR: 2.10; p < 0.001), poor differentiation (HR: 1.52; p < 0.001), intrahepatic recurrence (HR: 0.91; p = 0.03), extrahepatic recurrence (HR: 1.87; p < 0.001), Milan criteria at LT (HR: 1.34; p < 0.001), microvascular invasion (HR: 1.59; p < 0.001), multiorgan recurrence (HR: 1.28; p < 0.001), and recurrent HCV infection (HR: 1.21; p < 0.001). The treatment-related predictors were as follows: surgical resection (HR: 0.33; p < 0.001), mTOR inhibitors (HR: 0.63; p < 0.001), sorafenib (HR: 1.00; p = 0.01), palliative treatment (HR: 3.07; p < 0.001), RFA (HR: 0.47; p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (HR: 1.19; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Systematic evaluation of these predictors could guide surgeons to design risk-adapted algorithms for the management of post-LT HCC recurrence to construct reliable predictive models and to design future prospective studies or clinical trials.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 34999555
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100676 -
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2022Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lacks a suitable biomarker for minimally-invasive disease detection. Methylated (mSEPT9) is an emerging liquid biopsy test. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis: the diagnostic accuracy of methylated for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and the clinical evaluation of its use in combination with other surveillance modalities.
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lacks a suitable biomarker for minimally-invasive disease detection. Methylated (mSEPT9) is an emerging liquid biopsy test. We aimed to investigate recent studies that applied mSEPT9 for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, we evaluated the combinations of other surveillance modalities for the detection of HCC.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on the diagnostic accuracy of mSEPT9 for the detection of HCC. Using a bivariate model, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Additionally, Fagan's nomograms were used to calculate the pre-test and post-test probabilities of HCC for various combinations of surveillance modalities.
RESULTS
Six full texts were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of mSEPT9 for the detection of HCC, were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94). The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.92. The probability of having HCC for the combinations of mSEPT9+ ultrasound scan (USS) and mSEPT9+ Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) were 0.7% and 1.2% respectively if both tests were negative (in a population with 10% HCC prevalence). The combination of USS and AFP would miss relatively fewer cancers for 1000 patients in comparison to other combinations of two surveillance modalities.
CONCLUSION
Test combinations have superior performance for the detection of HCC than any individual test. mSEPT9 has shown promise in the detection of HCC with higher estimates of performance accuracy. mSEPT9 has potential for use as an HCC surveillance modality in adjunct with other tests to improve detection rates. However, cost effectiveness of this approach needs further evaluation.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 34957898
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.2020331 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2021This study aims to comprehensively analyze the influence of spontaneous tumor rupture on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients following hepatic resection....
This study aims to comprehensively analyze the influence of spontaneous tumor rupture on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients following hepatic resection. We systematically searched four online electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, for eligible studies published from inception to March 2021. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This meta-analysis included 21 observational articles with 57,241 cases. The results revealed that spontaneous tumor rupture was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-2.05) and DFS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.80) in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients. This phenomenon was observed in most subgroups, which were classified by recorded survival time, age, country, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration, liver cirrhosis, and microvascular invasion. However, in subgroups of macrovascular invasion positive, spontaneous tumor rupture was not a risk factor for OS (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99-2.42) and DFS (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.65) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy. For macrovascular invasion negative, compared with non-ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients, ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients exhibited worse prognosis for OS (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99-2.42) and DFS (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.65) following hepatectomy. Spontaneous tumor rupture was a prognostic risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatic resection. However, in macrovascular invasion patients, spontaneous tumor rupture was not a prognostic risk factor.
PubMed: 34869566
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.769233 -
Frontiers in Genetics 2021The lack of an accurate biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has hindered early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), which can be used...
The lack of an accurate biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has hindered early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), which can be used as novel biomarkers in liquid biopsies, have been brought to light as a result of the advances in research on molecular biomarkers and the progression of genomic medicine. We conducted a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of serum/plasma circRNAs or the combination of circRNAs and α-fetoprotein (AFP) in HCC. We identified eight studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The data were pooled, and the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The areas under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves (AUCs) were also calculated. The sensitivity of circRNAs was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), and the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86). The sensitivity of AFP was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68), and the specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93). The AUC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91) for circRNAs and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81) for AFP. The sensitivity of the combination of circRNAs and AFP was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted based on the control groups used; the diagnostic accuracy was particularly high in the comparison of HCC vs. healthy controls. In summary, serum/plasma circRNAs are accurate biomarkers suitable for clinical use for detecting HCC, and the combination of circRNAs and AFP improved the diagnostic accuracy.
PubMed: 34659344
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.722208 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Mar 2022Many prognostic models for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) have been developed to inform patients and doctors about individual prognosis. Previous reviews of these models... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Many prognostic models for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) have been developed to inform patients and doctors about individual prognosis. Previous reviews of these models were qualitative and did not assess performance at external validation. We assessed the performance of prognostic models for HCC and set a benchmark for biomarker studies.
METHODS
All externally validated models predicting survival for patients with resected HCC were systematically reviewed. After selection, we extracted descriptive statistics and aggregated c-indices using meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight validated prognostic models were included. Models used on average 7 (IQR:4-9) prognostic factors. Tumor size, tumor number, and vascular invasion were almost always included. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was commonly incorporated since 2007. Recently, the more subjective items ascites and encephalopathy have been dropped. Eight established models performed poor to moderate at external validation, with a pooled C-index below 0.7; including the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, the Cancer of the Liver Italian (CLIP) Program, and the Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) score. Out of 24 prognostic models predicting OS, only 6 (25%) had good performance at external validation with pooled C-indices above 0.7; the Li-post (0.77), Li-OS (0.74), Yang-pre (0.74), Yang-post (0.76), Shanghai-score (0.70), and Wang-nomogram (0.71). Models improved over time, but overall performance and study quality remained low.
CONCLUSIONS
Six validated prognostic models demonstrated good performance for predicting survival after resection of HCC. These models can guide patients and doctors and are a benchmark for future models incorporating novel biomarkers.
Topics: Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; China; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis
PubMed: 34602315
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.012 -
Medicine Sep 2021The present network meta-analysis was conducted to perform an indirect comparison among ramucirumab, regorafenib, and cabozantinib in patients with advanced... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy and safety for second-line treatment with ramucirumab, regorafenib, and cabozantinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma progressed on sorafenib treatment: A network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The present network meta-analysis was conducted to perform an indirect comparison among ramucirumab, regorafenib, and cabozantinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progressed on sorafenib treatment.
METHODS
A systematic review through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library was developed, with eligible randomized clinical trials been included. Hazard ratios (HRs) including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), odds ratios of disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events were compared indirectly with network meta-analysis using random model in software STATA version 13.0.
RESULTS
A total of 4 randomized clinical trials including 2137 patients met the eligibility criteria and enrolled. Indirect comparisons showed that there was no statistical difference observed in the indirect comparison of PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR among agents of regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in advanced HCC patients with elevated α-fetoprotein (AFP) (400 ng/mL or higher). However, in patients with low-level AFP (lower than 400 ng/mL), regorafenib was the only agent associated with significant superiority in OS, compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI, 0.50-0.90).
CONCLUSIONS
The present network meta-analysis revealed that there might be no statistical difference observed in the indirect comparison of PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR among regorafenib, cabozantinib, or ramucirumab in advanced HCC patients with elevated AFP (400 ng/mL or higher). However, in patients with low-level AFP (lower than 400 ng/mL), regorafenib might be associated with significant superiority in OS, compared to placebo, which need further investigation in clinical practice.
Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sorafenib; Ramucirumab
PubMed: 34559096
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027013 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Aug 2021We aimed to systematically evaluate the incidence of inadequate US in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and determine the risk factors. Original studies...
We aimed to systematically evaluate the incidence of inadequate US in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and determine the risk factors. Original studies reporting the incidence or risk factors for inadequate US were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. The pooled incidence of inadequate US was calculated using a random effects model, and subgroup analyses were performed. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each risk factor for inadequate US. Six eligible articles were identified from 756 screened articles (4250 patients). The pooled incidence of inadequate US was 21.5%. Significantly higher rates of inadequate US were noted in studies including patients with and without hepatic observations compared with those evaluating only patients with hepatic observations (23.2% vs. 18.8%), studies using US alone compared with US plus alpha-fetoprotein (28.0% vs. 20.8%), and those using pathology and imaging as a reference standard compared with imaging only (23.2% vs. 17.9%). Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (OR = 2.3 (1.07-4.84)), Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (OR = 2.2 (1.10-4.37)), and high body mass index (OR = 2.2 (1.12-4.24)) were significant risk factors for inadequate US ( ≤ 0.04). In patients at risk of HCC, 21.5% of US surveillance was inadequate. An alternative surveillance modality might be considered in patients with risk factors.
PubMed: 34441831
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163535