-
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a global public health issue, accounting for 10-20% of deaths in industrialized countries. Identification of modifiable risk factors may...
BACKGROUND
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a global public health issue, accounting for 10-20% of deaths in industrialized countries. Identification of modifiable risk factors may reduce SCD incidence.
METHODS
This umbrella review systematically evaluates published meta-analyses of observational and randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the association of modifiable risk and protective factors of SCD.
RESULTS
Fifty-five meta-analyses were included in the final analysis, of which 31 analyzed observational studies and 24 analyzed RCTs. Five associations of meta-analyses of observational studies presented convincing evidence, including three risk factors [diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking, and early repolarization pattern (ERP)] and two protective factors [implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and physical activity]. Meta-analyses of RCTs identified five protective factors with a high level of evidence: ICDs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), beta-blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with HF. On the contrary, other established, significant protective agents [i.e., amiodarone and statins along with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in heart failure (HF)], did not show credibility. Likewise, risk factors as left ventricular ejection fraction in HF, and left ventricular hypertrophy, non-sustain ventricular tachycardia, history of syncope or aborted SCD in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, presented weak or no evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
Lifestyle risk factors (physical activity, smoking), comorbidities like DM, and electrocardiographic features like ERP constitute modifiable risk factors of SCD. Alternatively, the use of MRA, beta-blockers, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and ICD in patients with HF are credible protective factors. Further investigation targeted in specific populations will be important for reducing the burden of SCD.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020216363, PROSPERO CRD42020216363.
PubMed: 35783841
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.848021 -
European Journal of Internal Medicine Sep 2022Bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular (AV) nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia (BRASH) syndrome is a recently-established entity precipitated by...
BACKGROUND
Bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular (AV) nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia (BRASH) syndrome is a recently-established entity precipitated by medication-induced AV nodal blockade. Despite its serious consequences, including death, clinical presentations, risk factors, and outcomes of the syndrome have not been well defined. We aim to summarize the existing evidence of BRASH syndrome.
METHODS
According to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we performed a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles with keywords including"BRASH syndrome" and "bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia," from the inception of these databases to March 4, 2022.
RESULTS
34 articles, including one observational study, 15 conference abstracts, and 18 case reports and case series, were included. While most patients were on beta blockers (83.3%) or calcium channel blockers (45.2%), other medications such as amiodarone were identified as precipitating agents. Atropine or glucagon were ineffective in reversing patients' symptoms, and 59.5% required inotropes or chronotropes. 7.1% expired due to BRASH syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review summarizes the clinical characteristics of BRASH syndrome. Further studies to identify risks associated with the onset of BRASH syndrome and awareness of the critical syndrome are warranted.
Topics: Atrioventricular Block; Bradycardia; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Observational Studies as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Shock; Syndrome
PubMed: 35676108
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.06.002 -
Europace : European Pacing,... Oct 2022Our objective was to compare the efficacy of pre-treatment with different classes of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Our objective was to compare the efficacy of pre-treatment with different classes of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing electrical cardioversion.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different AADs in patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion. We grouped AADs into five network nodes: no treatment or rate control, Class Ia, Class Ic, Class III, and amiodarone. Outcomes were (i) acute restoration and (ii) maintenance of sinus rhythm. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until June 2020. We used Python 3.8.3 and R 3.6.2 for data analysis. We evaluated the overall certainty of evidence with the GRADE framework. We included 28 RCTs. Compared with no treatment or rate control, Class III AADs [odds ratio (OR): 2.41; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.37 to 4.62, high certainty] and amiodarone (OR: 2.58; 95% CrI: 1.54 to 4.37, high certainty) improved restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone improved long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm when compared with no treatment or rate control (OR: 5.37; 95% CrI: 4.00-7.39, high certainty), Class Ic (OR: 1.89; 95% CrI: 1.05-3.45, moderate certainty) and Class III AADs (OR: 2.19; 95% CrI: 1.39-3.26, high certainty).
CONCLUSION
Before electrical cardioversion of AF, treatment with Class III AADs or amiodarone improves the acute restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is most likely to improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion, but Class Ic and Class III AADs are also effective.
Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35654763
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac063 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Whether early pharmacologic cardioversion is necessary for recent-onset atrial fibrillation is still controversial. Current meta-analyses were limited to evaluating the...
Effect of Early Pharmacologic Cardioversion vs. Non-early Cardioversion in the Patients With Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within 4-Week Follow-Up Period: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Whether early pharmacologic cardioversion is necessary for recent-onset atrial fibrillation is still controversial. Current meta-analyses were limited to evaluating the effects within 24 h without sufficient considering longer follow-up outcomes. We aimed to compare the effect of early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation within 4-weeks of follow-up.
METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister. eu for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before November 2021 comparing early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation and synthesized data in accordance with PRISMA-Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA). Early pharmacological cardioversion referred to immediate cardioversion with antiarrhythmic drugs (i.e., amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide, tedisamil, vernakalant, vanoxerine, and sotalol) upon admission, while non-early cardioversion involved the administration of rate-control or placebo medication without immediate cardioversion.
RESULTS
16 RCTs with 2,395 patients were included. Compared to non-early cardioversion, a systematic review showed that early pharmacologic cardioversion resulted in a higher probability of sinus rhythm maintenance within 24 h (odds ratios [OR] 2.50, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.76 to 3.54) and 1-week (2.50, 1.76 to 3.54), however, there was no significant difference in sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks (1.37, 0.90 to 2.09). In subgroup analysis, the Bayesian NMA revealed that vernakalant may be successful in sinus rhythm maintenance within both 24 h (3.55, 2.28 to 5.55) and 1-week (2.72, 1.72 to 4.31). The results were consistent with the frequentist NMA.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-early pharmacologic cardioversion may not be inferior to early cardioversion within a 4-week follow-up period in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The evidence remains insufficient to determine which antiarrhythmic agent is optimal in the longer run. Further high-quality relevant RCTs are necessary.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020166862.
PubMed: 35479281
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843939 -
The Western Journal of Emergency... Jul 2021The benefit of medications used in out-of-hospital, shock-refractory cardiac arrest remains controversial. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The benefit of medications used in out-of-hospital, shock-refractory cardiac arrest remains controversial. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of medications for out-of-hospital, shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT).
METHODS
The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials of participants older than eight years old who had atraumatic, out-of-hospital, shock-refractory VF/pVT in which at least one studied group received a medication. We conducted a database search on October 28, 2019, that included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Citations of relevant meta-analyses were also searched. We performed frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) to combine the comparisons. The outcomes were analyzed by using odds ratios (OR) and compared to placebo. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes included the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, and the neurological outcome at discharge. We ranked all outcomes using surface under the cumulative ranking score.
RESULTS
We included 18 studies with 6,582 participants. The NMA of 20 comparisons included 12 medications and placebo. Only norepinephrine showed a significant increase of ROSC (OR = 8.91, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-42.29). Amiodarone significantly improved survival to hospital admission (OR = 1.53, 95% CI, 1.01-2.32). The ROSC and survival-to-hospital admission data were significantly heterogeneous with the I2 of 55.1% and 59.1%, respectively. This NMA satisfied the assumption of transitivity.
CONCLUSION
No medication was associated with improved survival to hospital discharge from out-of-hospital, shock-refractory cardiac arrest. For the secondary outcomes, norepinephrine was associated with improved ROSC and amiodarone was associated with an increased likelihood of survival to hospital admission in the NMA.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Child; Hospitals; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35354019
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49590 -
European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular... Jun 2022This systemic review aims to provide a practical overview of the prevalence, clinical manifestation, and management of adverse photoinduced skin reactions caused by...
This systemic review aims to provide a practical overview of the prevalence, clinical manifestation, and management of adverse photoinduced skin reactions caused by frequently used cardiovascular drugs and to assess their potential relevance for skin cancer development. Data search included PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies reporting the photosensitizing and/or skin cancer-inducing properties of common cardiovascular drugs was performed and a guide to clinical management of photoinduced skin eruptions by cardiovascular drugs was provided. Study quality was assessed for major methodological biases. A total of 58 studies were identified (i.e. 23 case reports, 14 observational studies, 10 review articles, 10 experimental studies, and 1 meta-analysis). Most commonly, drug-associated adverse photoinduced cutaneous reactions were caused by phototoxic and photoallergic mechanisms. There is evidence suggesting that amiodarone and dronedarone, thiazide diuretics, thiazide-like diuretics, angiotensin receptor blockers, dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blockers, and certain angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins may cause photoinduced adverse cutaneous reactions. Other drugs such as anticoagulants, antiplatelets, aldosterone antagonists, and fibrates have not been linked with photosensitizing reactions or adverse cutaneous reactions. Some drugs, i.e. thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics, were associated with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancers (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma). Certain commonly used cardiovascular drugs have been associated with adverse photoinduced cutaneous reactions. If they occur, further diagnosis and treatment might be needed, depending on the severity and progress. Whether photosensitizing drugs increase the risk of skin cancer remains elusive and further randomized controlled trials are required.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Diuretics; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Photosensitizing Agents; Skin Neoplasms; Thiazides
PubMed: 35278085
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac017 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022To evaluate the efficiency of amiodarone in preventing the occurrence of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (RVF) after aortic cross-clamp (ACC) release in patients...
Effectiveness of Amiodarone in Preventing the Occurrence of Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation After the Release of Aortic Cross-Clamp in Open-Heart Surgery Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficiency of amiodarone in preventing the occurrence of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (RVF) after aortic cross-clamp (ACC) release in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
METHODS
We searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases through January 2021 for relevant studies addressing the efficacy of amiodarone in preventing RVF after ACC release in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A complete statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to express the results of dichotomous outcomes using random or fixed-effect models. The chi-square test and test were used to calculate heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Seven studies (856 enrolled patients; 311 in the amiodarone group, 268 in the lidocaine group, and 277 in the placebo group) were selected for the meta-analysis. The incidence of RVF was significantly decreased in the amiodarone group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.50-0.94, = 0.02). However, amiodarone and lidocaine did not confer any significant difference (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.61-1.59, = 0.94). The percentage of patients requiring electric defibrillation counter shocks (DCSs) did not confer any significant difference between patients administered amiodarone and lidocaine or placebo (RR = 1.58, 95%CI: 0.29-8.74, = 0.60; RR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.27-1.10, = 0.09; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Amiodarone is more effective than a placebo in preventing RVF after ACC release in cardiac surgery. However, the amiodarone group required the same number of electrical DCSs to terminate RVF as the lidocaine or placebo groups.
PubMed: 35187132
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.821938 -
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine May 2023Amiodarone is a common anti-arrhythmic agent mostly used to treat and prevent different kinds of arrhythmia with several considerable side effects, most commonly on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Amiodarone is a common anti-arrhythmic agent mostly used to treat and prevent different kinds of arrhythmia with several considerable side effects, most commonly on the thyroid gland. We aimed to assess the frequency of hypothyroidism among chronic amiodarone users. PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were screened in the title and abstract sections with no time limitation. Relevant published records reported amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism (AIH) among patients with normal thyroid function at baseline were recruited with further analysis according to gender and study locations. We found 29 records on 14143 individuals. Total population age ranged from 18 to 92 years (males: 58.2% (8158 out of 13,999)). The AIH prevalence was found to be 14% (95% confidence interval (CI): 12-17%). Further gender stratified showed an insignificant higher AIH frequency in females versus males (17%, 95% CI: 13-22% vs. 14%, 95% CI: 11-19% P= 0.304, respectively). Despite no significant difference in AIH prevalence according to different continents, African subjects had marginally lower AIH frequency compared to Asian (7%, 95% CI: 4-13% vs. 15%, 95% CI: 12-19%, P= 0.012) and South American persons (7%, 95% CI: 4-13% vs. 54%, 95% CI: 9-93%, P= 0.038). This review suggests the occurrence of AIH is quite considerable regardless of gender and area of residence, and several periodic thyroid assessment strategies should be developed for earlier recognition and therapeutic interventions in clinical settings.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amiodarone; Prevalence; Thyrotoxicosis; Hypothyroidism; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
PubMed: 35026394
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2022.01.001 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia May 2022New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting critically unwell patients. NOAF can lead to worsening haemodynamic compromise, heart... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting critically unwell patients. NOAF can lead to worsening haemodynamic compromise, heart failure, thromboembolic events, and increased mortality. The aim of this systematic review and narrative synthesis is to evaluate the non-pharmacological and pharmacological management strategies for NOAF in critically unwell patients.
METHODS
Of 1782 studies, 30 were eligible for inclusion, including 4 RCTs and 26 observational studies. Efficacy of direct current cardioversion, amiodarone, β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, magnesium, and less commonly used agents such as ibutilide are reported.
RESULTS
Cardioversion rates of 48% were reported for direct current cardioversion; however, re-initiation of NOAF was as high as 23.4%. Amiodarone was the most commonly reported intervention with cardioversion rates ranging from 18% to 96% followed by β-antagonists with cardioversion rates from 40% to 92%. Amiodarone was more effective than diltiazem (odds ratio [OR]=1.91, P=0.32) at cardioversion. Short-acting β-antagonists esmolol and landiolol were more effective compared with diltiazem for cardioversion (OR=3.55, P=0.04) and HR control (OR=3.2, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
There was significant variation between studies with regard to the definition of successful cardioversion and heart rate control, making comparisons between studies and interventions difficult. Future RCTs comparing individual anti-arrhythmic agents, in particular magnesium, amiodarone, and β-antagonists, and studying the role of anticoagulation in critically unwell patients are required. There is also an urgent need for a core outcome dataset for studies of new onset atrial fibrillation to allow comparisons between different anti-arrhythmic strategies.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019121739.
Topics: Adult; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Diltiazem; Electric Countershock; Humans; Magnesium
PubMed: 34916053
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.016 -
Circulation. Arrhythmia and... Dec 2021
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Heart Rate; Humans; Recovery of Function; Tachycardia, Supraventricular; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34802256
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010321