-
British Journal of Hospital Medicine... Jun 2024Poorly controlled pain is common after emergency laparotomy. It causes distress, hinders rehabilitation, and predisposes to complications: prolonged hospitalisation,... (Review)
Review
Poorly controlled pain is common after emergency laparotomy. It causes distress, hinders rehabilitation, and predisposes to complications: prolonged hospitalisation, persistent pain, and reduced quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the relative efficacies of pre-emptive analgesia for emergency laparotomy to inform practice. We performed a search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS for comparator studies of preoperative/intraoperative interventions to control/reduce postoperative pain in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) for general surgical pathologies. Exclusion criteria: surgery including non-abdominal sites; postoperative sedation and/or intubation; non-formal assessment of pain; non-English manuscripts. All manuscripts were screened by two investigators. We identified 2389 papers. Following handsearching and removal of duplicates, 1147 were screened. None were eligible for inclusion, with many looking at elective and/or laparoscopic surgeries. Our findings indicate there is no evidence base for pre-emptive analgesic strategies in emergency laparotomy. This contrasts substantially with elective cohorts. Potential reasons include variation in practice, management of physiological derangement taking priority, and perceived contraindications to neuraxial techniques. We urge a review of contemporary practice, with analysis of clinical data, to generate expert consensus.
Topics: Humans; Laparotomy; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia; Pain Management; Emergencies; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid
PubMed: 38941975
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0409 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Jun 2024Measurement of gastro-intestinal motility is increasingly performed under general anesthesia during endoscopic or surgical procedures. The aim of the present study was... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Measurement of gastro-intestinal motility is increasingly performed under general anesthesia during endoscopic or surgical procedures. The aim of the present study was to review the impact of different anesthetic agents on digestive motility measurements in humans.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed using the Medline-Pubmed and Web of Science databases. All articles published until October 2023 were screened by identification of key words. Studies were reviewed if patients had an assessment of digestive motility using conventional perfused manometry, high-resolution manometry, electronic barostat or functional lumen impedance planimetry with the use of inhaled or intravenous anesthetic anesthetic agents (propofol, ketamine, halogens, nitrous oxide, opioids, and neuromuscular blockades).
RESULTS
Four hundred and eighty-eight unique citations were identified, of which 42 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present review. The impact of anesthetics was mostly studied in patients who underwent esophageal manometry. There was a heterogeneity in both the dose and timing of administration of anesthetics among the studies. Remifentanil analgesia was the most studied anesthetic drug in the literature, showing a decrease in both distal latency and lower esophageal sphincter pressure after its administration, but the impact on Chicago classification was not studied. Inhaled anesthetics administration elicited a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure, but contradictory findings were shown on esophageal motility following propofol or neuromuscular blocking agents administration.
CONCLUSION
Studies of the impact of anesthetics on digestive motility remain scarce in the literature, although some agents have been reported to profoundly affect gastro-intestinal motility.
PubMed: 38934423
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14855 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jun 2024Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a frequent disease. It is a critical health concern that can influence functional capacity by restricting living activities.
BACKGROUND
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a frequent disease. It is a critical health concern that can influence functional capacity by restricting living activities.
OBJECTIVES
The current study is to investigate the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (TVNs) in the management of CLBP.
METHODS
We searched the databases on Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Pedro for randomized clinical trial (RCT) studies published in any language that looked at the effectiveness of TVNs in people with chronic LBP. The inclusion criteria were PICO. Participants in the research were people (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with persistent low back pain for more than 3 months. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane ROB 2.
RESULTS
Our database search found 1084 RCT. A number of studies that were not necessary for the issue were removed, and the overall outcome was six trials. Risk of bias (ROB) evaluations at the study level (derived from outcomes) are reported. In the six studies, two (33.3%) had an overall uncertain ROB (i.e., some concerns), whereas one (16.7%) had a high overall ROB. Three trials (50%) had a low overall RoB.
CONCLUSION
There is still no evidence to support the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as a viable therapeutic rehabilitation strategy. Therefore, we recommend high-quality trials and long-term follow-up to evaluate disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes in these patients.
Topics: Humans; Low Back Pain; Vagus Nerve Stimulation; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Chronic Pain; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 38926726
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07569-w -
Anaesthesia Jun 2024Intrathecal diamorphine is believed to provide postoperative analgesia but is associated with adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. There is little evidence of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Intrathecal diamorphine is believed to provide postoperative analgesia but is associated with adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. There is little evidence of synthesis regarding intrathecal diamorphine in the contemporary literature. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis to determine the magnitude of intrathecal diamorphine efficacy and safety.
METHODS
We systematically searched the literature for trials comparing intrathecal diamorphine with a control group in patients undergoing all types of surgery. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were intravenous morphine consumption and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 h following surgery, respectively.
RESULTS
Twelve trials were identified, which included data for 712 patients. Intrathecal doses of diamorphine ranged from 100 μg to 2500 μg. Intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively was significantly reduced in the intrathecal diamorphine group, with a mean difference (95%CI) of -8 mg (-11 to -6), I = 93%, p < 0.001. There was a significant difference between three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups but without correlation: mean differences (95%CI) -1 mg (-3-0), -26 mg (-40 to -11) and -6 mg (-15-4) in patients receiving doses of 0-200 μg, 201-400 μg and > 400 μg, respectively (p = 0.003). Intrathecal diamorphine increased postoperative nausea and vomiting with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.37 (1.19-1.58), I = 7%, p < 0.001. There were no differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting between the three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups. There was no correlation observed with meta-regression of the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low.
CONCLUSION
There is very low level of evidence that intrathecal diamorphine provides effective analgesia after surgery, while increasing postoperative nausea and vomiting with doses > 200 μg.
PubMed: 38922818
DOI: 10.1111/anae.16359 -
Canadian Journal of Pain = Revue... 2024Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit...
BACKGROUND
Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit from nerve blocks with local anesthetic and steroids. However, the evidence supporting this practice is unclear.
AIMS
This narrative systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of GON PRFN on headaches.
METHODS
Databases were searched for studies, published up to February 1, 2024, investigating PRFN of GON for adults with headaches. Abstracts and posters were excluded. Primary outcome was change in headache intensity. Secondary outcomes included effect on monthly headache frequency (MHF), mental and physical health, mood, sleep, analgesic consumption, and side-effects. Two reviewers screened and extracted data.
RESULTS
Twenty-two papers (2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 11 cohort, and 9 case reports/series) including 608 patients were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, headache diagnosis, PRF target and settings, and image-guidance was noted. PRFN settings varied (38-42°C, 40-60 V, and 150-400 Ohms). Studies demonstrated PRFN to provide significant analgesia and reduction of MHF in chronic migraine (CM) from 3 to 6 months; and significant pain relief for ON from six to ten months. Mild adverse effects were reported in 3.1% of cohort. A minority of studies reported on secondary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was low.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-quality evidence indicates an analgesic benefit from PRFN of GON for ON and CM, but its role for other headache types needs more investigation. Optimal PRFN target and settings remain unclear. High-quality RCTs are required to further explore the role of this intervention. PROSPERO ID CRD42022363234.
PubMed: 38915302
DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2355571 -
Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.) Jun 2024The administration of local anaesthesia in intraperitoneal space as part of the multi-modal analgesic regimen has shown to be effective in reducing postoperative pain....
OBJECTIVE
The administration of local anaesthesia in intraperitoneal space as part of the multi-modal analgesic regimen has shown to be effective in reducing postoperative pain. Recent studies demonstrated that intraperitoneal lidocaine may provide analgesic effects. Primary objective was to determine the impact of intraperitoneal lidocaine on postoperative pain scores at rest.
DESIGN
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
METHODS
Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from their inception date until May 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing intraperitoneal lidocaine and placebo in adults undergoing surgery were included.
RESULTS
Our systematic review included 24 RCTs (n = 1,824). The intraperitoneal lidocaine group was significantly associated with lower postoperative pain scores at rest (MD: -0.87, 95% CI: -1.04 to -0.69) and at movement (MD: -0.50, 95% Cl: -0.93 to -0.08) among adult patients after surgery. Its administration also significantly decreased morphine consumption (MD: -6.42 mg, 95% Cl: -11.56 to -1.27), lowered the incidence of needing analgesia (OR: 0.22, 95% Cl: 0.14 to 0.35). Intraperitoneal lidocaine statistically reduced time to resume regular diet (MD: 0.16 days; 95% Cl: -0.31 to -0.01), and lowered postoperative incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.54, 95% Cl: 0.39 to 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS
In this review, our findings should be interpreted with caution. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal dose of administering intraperitoneal lidocaine among adult patients undergoing surgery.
PubMed: 38913879
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnae052 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Jun 2024In this systematic review, we assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of collagenase (CCH) and tissue subcision (TS) for treating cellulite, which ranges from...
BACKGROUND
In this systematic review, we assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of collagenase (CCH) and tissue subcision (TS) for treating cellulite, which ranges from subtle to pronounced lesions.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines for CCH and TS treatment to the thigh and gluteal regions. A proportion meta-analysis was then conducted using Stata statistical software.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were incorporated into the final analysis. Nine focused on TS and five on CCH injection, collectively reporting outcomes for 1254 patients. Of these, 465 received CCH injection and 789 underwent subcision. For bruising, rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71%-96%] with CCH injection and 99% (95% CI, 85%-99%) for subcision; pain requiring analgesic was reported at 74% (95% CI, 55%-87%) for CCH and 60% (95% CI, 43%-76%) for subcision; both showed induration at 7% (95% CI, 5%-11% for CCH, 95% CI, 2%-25% for subcision), whereas skin discoloration was higher post-CCH injection at 16% (95% CI, 10%-26%) compared with 7% (95% CI, 5%-10%) postsubcision.
CONCLUSIONS
Both CCH and TS seem effective treatments for cellulite. However, upon evaluating the adverse outcomes between the two modalities, subcision demonstrated a higher incidence of bruising, albeit similar rates of induration compared with CCH injection. Conversely, the CCH injection group manifested a higher propensity for pain requiring analgesia and notably exhibited increased instances of skin discoloration compared with their subcision patient group. Further standardized research is crucial for more informed cellulite treatment decisions and for comparing efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between TS and CCH.
PubMed: 38911581
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005857 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Jun 2024Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) use has been investigated as a modifiable risk factor for post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) use has been investigated as a modifiable risk factor for post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study comprises a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of perioperative NSAID use on rates of POPF after PD.
METHODS
A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review was performed. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS
Seven studies published from 2015-2021 were included, reporting 2,851 PDs (1,372 receiving NSAIDs, 1,479 not receiving NSAIDs). There were no differences regarding blood loss (MD -99.40mL; CI -201.71-2.91; P=0.06), overall morbidity (OR 1.05; CI 0.68-1.61; P=0.83), hemorrhage (OR 2.35; CI 0.48-11.59; P=0.29), delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.98; 0.60-1.60; P-0.93), bile leak (OR 0.68; CI 0.12-3.89; P=0.66), surgical site infection (OR 1.02; CI 0.33-3.22; P=0.97), abscess (OR 0.99; CI 0.51-1.91; P=0.97), clinically relevant POPF (OR 1.18; CI 0.84-1.64; P=0.33), readmission (OR 0.94; CI 0.61-1.46; P=0.78), or reoperation (OR 0.82; CI 0.33-2.06; P=0.68). NSAID use was associated with a shorter hospital stay (MD -1.05 days; CI -1.39-0.71; P<0.00001).
CONCLUSION
The use of NSAIDs in the perioperative period for patients undergoing PD was not associated with increased rates of POPF.
PubMed: 38906318
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.016 -
World Journal of Clinical Cases Jun 2024Scientific evidence develops bit by bit from case reports, case series; to larger case-control, case-cohort; and further escalate to randomized controlled trials. This...
Scientific evidence develops bit by bit from case reports, case series; to larger case-control, case-cohort; and further escalate to randomized controlled trials. This echoed the importance of continue publishing , where novel and advancing discoveries start from a single case. In contrast, at the other end of the realm of evidence synthesis, systematic review and meta-analysis represent distinct yet interconnected processes. Butorphanol in epidural labor analgesia has long been studied since 1989, and with 70 publications from MEDLINE searches. However, there was no meta-analysis, nor any systematic review published so far. The latest in-press article published by Tang on the protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and effectiveness of butorphanol in epidural labor analgesia is encouraging. We believe the findings of this study will be valuable for clinical practice as well as for future research.
PubMed: 38899305
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2701 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024Post-operative pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, patient comfort, and satisfaction. Peripheral nerve blockade, or lumbar plexus block (LPB), has... (Review)
Review
Post-operative pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, patient comfort, and satisfaction. Peripheral nerve blockade, or lumbar plexus block (LPB), has been widely used for analgesia and regional anesthesia. This study explored the existing literature to determine the efficacy of continuous lumbar plexus blockade in managing post-operative pain following hip or femur surgery. Reviewers comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed scholarly articles reporting the efficacy of lumbar plexus block in managing post-operative pain after orthopedic surgery. The potential articles were carefully selected and assessed for the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias assessment tool. Data were systematically extracted and analyzed. The literature search yielded 206 articles, 20 of which were randomized controlled trials. Lumbar plexus block demonstrated superior pain relief compared to conventional pain management approaches like general anesthetics. In addition, LPB reduced patients' overall opioid consumption compared to controls, reduced adverse effects, and enhanced functional recovery, which underlines the broader positive impact of meticulous pain management. More patients could walk more than 40 feet after the second day post-operatively among the lumbar plexus group (14.7%) compared to the continuous femoral group (1.3%). Other parameters, including cortisol levels and hemodynamic stability, were evaluated, showing comparable outcomes. Lumbar plexus block is effective in pain management after orthopedic surgery, as shown by the lower pain scores and less opioid consumption. Additionally, patient satisfaction was relatively higher in LPB-treated patients compared to other approaches like general anesthesia.
PubMed: 38892904
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113194