-
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Jun 2024While the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) results in better of overall survival in patients with... (Review)
Review
Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: the role of combination treatment therapy.
BACKGROUND
While the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) results in better of overall survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), information regarding health related quality of life (HR-QoL) is sparse. We aimed at summarizing current evidence on the impact of ARSIs on HR-QoL.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the published literature on PubMed/EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane libraries between January 2011 and April 2022. We included only phase III randomized controlled trials (RCT), which were selected according to the PRISMA guidelines. We aimed at evaluating differences in HR-QoL, assessed by validated patient reported outcomes instruments. We analyzed global scores and sub-domains such as sexual functioning, urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, pain/fatigue, emotional and social/family wellbeing. We reported data descriptively.
RESULTS
Six RCTs were included: two used enzalutamide with ADT as intervention arms (ARCHES, ENZAMET); one used apalutamide with ADT (TITAN); two abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) with ADT (STAMPEDE, LATITUDE); and one darolutamide with ADT (ARASENS). Enzalutamide or AAP with ADT increase overall HR-QoL in comparison with ADT alone, ADT with first generation nonsteroideal anti-androgens or ADT with docetaxel, whereas apalutamide and darolutamide with ADT maintain HR-QoL similarly to ADT alone or ADT with docetaxel, respectively. Time to first deterioration of pain was longer with combination therapy with enzalutamide, AAP or darolutamide, but not with apalutamide. No worsening of emotional wellbeing was reported from the addition of ARSIs to ADT than ADT alone.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of ARSIs to ADT in mHSPC tends to increase overall HR-QoL and prolong time to first deterioration of pain/fatigue compared with ADT alone, ADT with first generation nonsteroideal anti-androgens, and ADT with docetaxel. ARSIs show a complex interaction with remaining HR-QoL domains. We advocate a standardization of HR-QoL measurement and reporting to allow further comparisons.
Topics: Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Androgen Antagonists; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Benzamides; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
PubMed: 37055663
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00668-0 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023econd-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), namely enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, are good for improving survival outcomes in prostate cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
econd-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), namely enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, are good for improving survival outcomes in prostate cancer patients, but some researchers have shown that using SGARIs increases side effects, which complicates clinicians' choice of. Therefore, we performed this network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity of several SGARIs in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to December 2022 to identify randomized controlled studies associated with SGARIs. We use Stata 16.0 and R 4.4.2 for data analysis, hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 7 studies with a total of 9488 patients. In mHSPC, enzalutamide and darolutamide had a positive effect on overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82), but we did not find a difference in their efficacy to improve OS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.75-1.89). Also in nmCRPC, enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide were beneficial for metastasis-free survival (MFS) (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.41). Compared to darolutamide, enzalutamide (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and apalutamide (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) prolonged MFS, but there was no difference in efficacy between enzalutamide and apalutamide (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.28). Finally in mCRPC, there was no significant difference in indirect effects on OS between pre- and post-chemotherapy enzalutamide (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70-1.13). However, using enzalutamide before chemotherapy to improve radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was a better option (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.62-2.73).
CONCLUSION
The SGARIs used in each trial were beneficial for the primary endpoint in the study. Firstly there was no significant difference in the effect of enzalutamide and darolutamide in improving OS in patients with mHSPC. Secondly improving MFS in patients with nmCRPC was best achieved with enzalutamide and apalutamide. In addition both pre- and post-chemotherapy use of enzalutamide was beneficial for OS in mCRPC patients, but for improving rPFS pre-chemotherapy use of enzalutamide should be preferred.The INPLASY registration number of this systematic review is INPLASY202310084.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Receptors, Androgen; Network Meta-Analysis; Phenylthiohydantoin; Androgen Receptor Antagonists
PubMed: 36967752
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1134719 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023At present, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is still the standard regimen for patients with metastatic and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The level of...
BACKGROUND
At present, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is still the standard regimen for patients with metastatic and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The level of androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has been reported to be elevated compared with that in patients diagnosed with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC).
AIM
Herein, we performed a systematic review and cumulative analysis to evaluate whether the expression of AR-V7 was significantly higher in patients with CRPC than in HSPC patients.
METHODS
The commonly used databases were searched to identify the potential studies reporting the level of AR-V7 in CRPC and HSPC patients. The association between CRPC and the positive expression of AR-V7 was pooled by using the relative risk (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under a random-effects model. For detecting the potential bias and the heterogeneity of the included studies, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Publication bias was assessed Egger's and Begg's tests. This study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022297014).
RESULTS
This cumulative analysis included 672 participants from seven clinical trials. The study group contained 354 CRPC patients, while the other group contained 318 HSPC patients. Pooled results from the seven eligible studies showed that the expression of positive AR-V7 was significantly higher in men with CRPC compared to those with HSPC (RR = 7.55, 95% CI: 4.61-12.35, < 0.001). In the sensitivity analysis, the combined RRs did not change substantially, ranging from 6.85 (95% CI: 4.16-11.27, < 0.001) to 9.84 (95% CI: 5.13-18.87, < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, a stronger association was detected in RNA hybridization (RISH) measurement in American patients, and those studies were published before 2011 (all < 0.001). There was no significant publication bias identified in our study.
CONCLUSION
Evidence from the seven eligible studies demonstrated that patients with CRPC had a significantly elevated positive expression of AR-V7. More investigations are still warranted to clarify the association between CRPC and AR-V7 testing.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022297014.
PubMed: 36865799
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1053111 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Aug 2023The newly published ARASENS trial has demonstrated the clinical efficacy of darolutamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the use of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Based on ARASENS trial: efficacy and safety of darolutamide as an emerging option of endocrinotherapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer-an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
The newly published ARASENS trial has demonstrated the clinical efficacy of darolutamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the use of darolutamide as the latest first-line androgen receptor pathway inhibitor for mHSPC has not been compared with other androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTAs). Given the lack of head-to-head randomized trials, we performed this updated meta-analysis to conduct indirect comparison for the efficacy and safety of darolutamide with other new-generation ARTAs.
METHODS
By searching the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, 9 large randomized controlled trials evaluating ARTAs for mHSPC patients were eventually screened according to PRISMA. We extracted data from overall survival, castration-resistant progression, and adverse events for network meta-analysis using the Bayesian and standard frequentist models.
RESULTS
Darolutamide combination emerged with superiority (HR = 0.68, 95%CrI = 0.57-0.81) among four androgen receptor inhibitors for patients with high Gleason score (HR = 0.71, 95%CrI = 0.59-0.86). Darolutamide was best tolerated in several androgen suppression-related adverse events (AEs).
CONCLUSION
Darolutamide appears to be an optional androgen receptor inhibitor for mHSPC patients, especially for patients with Gleason score ≥ 8. Its well-tolerated characteristic may provide a preferred drug option for patients with poor cardiovascular function and bone health.
Topics: Male; Humans; Receptors, Androgen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Hormones; Androgen Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36856851
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04658-6 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) have been developed and approved for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is a lack of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) have been developed and approved for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is a lack of direct comparison of the therapeutic effects and adverse events between the conventional ARI (bicalutamide) and three second-generation ARIs (enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide).
METHODS
Our network meta-analysis evaluated therapeutic effects and adverse events of the conventional ARI (bicalutamide) and the second-generation ARIs in treating CRPC. We systematically searched the Pubmed, Cochrane library and Embase databases for studies published until October 2022 and only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, overall survival (PFS/PSA-PFS/OS), PSA response rate and relative adverse events (AEs) of CRPC patients were collected and synthesized. We then performed subgroup analysis. The non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC (nm/mCRPC) observations were analyzed separately. Data analyses were performed using R software (4.2.1) based on Bayesian framework.
RESULTS
6,993 subjects from seven eligible RCTs were analyzed. Enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide were more effective than bicalutamide in treating CRPC, and the performance of darolutamide was slightly worse than the other two second-generation ARIs. Similar adverse events rate were observed among the second-generation ARIs and bicalutamide. Apalutamide showed a slightly higher rate of Grade 3+ AEs, percentages of AE-related drug withdrawals and AE-related mortality. Patients receiving enzalutamide had significantly higher rate of hypertension and fatigue. In subgroup analysis, enzalutamide showed better therapeutic effects compared with bicalutamide in both nmCRPC and mCRPC groups. In nmCRPC group, enzalutamide and apalutamide had more benefits on PFS and PSA-PFS compared with darolutamide. We displayed the probability ranking map of PFS, PSA-PFS, OS, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, PSA response rate and relative AE outcomes.
CONCLUSION
The current network meta-analysis indicated that the second-generation ARIs were superior to the conventional ARI, bicalutamide. The three second-generation ARIs showed incomplete equivalence on CRPC treatment. The darolutamide was slightly less effective compared with enzalutamide and apalutamide. The adverse events of apalutamide were worse than the others, but no statistical significance was observed among these vital AEs. All ARIs were generally well-tolerated. These results may provide reference to clinical decision and further direct comparison trials.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022370842.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Receptors, Androgen; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Androgen Receptor Antagonists
PubMed: 36843606
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1131033 -
Cancers Feb 2023Meningiomas are, in most cases, low grade intracranial tumors. However, relapses are frequent. To date, only a few prognostic markers are described in the literature.... (Review)
Review
Meningiomas are, in most cases, low grade intracranial tumors. However, relapses are frequent. To date, only a few prognostic markers are described in the literature. Several studies have discussed the expression of progesterone, estrogen, androgen, and somatostatin receptors. The utility of analyzing these expressions for prognostic, theragnostic, and therapeutic purposes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to report the expression of these receptors, based on immunohistochemistry. Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and PRISMA statements were followed. We did an online search in PubMed using the MeSH database. References were selected if the investigations occurred from 1990 to 2022. 61 references were included (34 descriptive observational studies, 26 analytical observational studies, and one case report). In this review, we describe the expression of these receptors in function of age, sex, hormonal context, localization, histological subtype, grade, and recurrence.
PubMed: 36765937
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030980 -
The Lancet. Oncology Feb 2023Although similar phenotypically, there is evidence that male and female breast cancer differ in their molecular landscapes. In this systematic review, we consolidated... (Review)
Review
Although similar phenotypically, there is evidence that male and female breast cancer differ in their molecular landscapes. In this systematic review, we consolidated all existing prognostic biomarker data in male breast cancer spanning genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenetics, and phenotypic features of prognostic value from articles published over a 29-year period (March 16, 1992, to May 1, 2021). We identified knowledge gaps in the existing literature, discussed limitations of the included studies, and outlined potential approaches for translational biomarker discovery and validation in male breast cancer. We also recognised STC2, DDX3, and DACH1 as underexploited markers of male-specific prognostic value in breast cancer. Finally, beyond describing the cumulative knowledge on the extensively researched markers oestrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, HER2, androgen receptor, and BRCA2, we highlighted ATM, CCND1, FGFR2, GATA3, HIF1-α, MDM2, TP53, and c-Myc as well studied predictors of poor survival that also aligned with several hallmarks of cancer.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Prognosis; Breast Neoplasms, Male; Breast Neoplasms; Transcriptome; Proteomics; Biomarkers, Tumor; Genomics; Epigenesis, Genetic
PubMed: 36725152
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00633-7 -
European Urology Oncology Jun 2023Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) agents are emerging as standard treatments for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum, but much remains unknown... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) agents are emerging as standard treatments for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum, but much remains unknown regarding how their side-effect profiles compare.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the literature regarding adverse events (AEs) between the ARSi drugs abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried for double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ARSi therapy up to September 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two teams reviewed titles and abstracts, and 14 RCTs were included for analysis.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Forest plots were used to summarize risk ratios for the most common AEs. According to surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, enzalutamide was ranked as the most toxic treatment regarding hypertension outcomes (SUCRA 0%, most likely to be the bottom-ranked treatment) in both mCRPC and nmCRPC (SUCRA 0%). Enzalutamide was also ranked as the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer entities (SUCRA 0%, for mCRPC, 1% for nmCRPC, and 3% for mCSPC).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that the ARSi side-effect profiles do not significantly differ, except that enzalutamide was ranked the most toxic regarding hypertension in mCRPC and nmCRPC, and the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer settings. These results highlight the importance of close blood-pressure monitoring for enzalutamide, and future research should explore possible connections between cardiovascular and neurological risk with ARSi therapy. In addition, these comparisons rely on the validity of cross-trial comparisons.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We reviewed the side-effect profiles of second-generation antiandrogen drugs for the treatment of prostate cancer. Side effects were similar, apart from higher risk of high blood pressure and headache risk with enzalutamide.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Receptors, Androgen; Network Meta-Analysis; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Headache; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36682938
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.001 -
Andrology Sep 2023Although selective estrogen receptor modulators have been proposed as a treatment for men with central functional hypogonadism, only a few data have been produced in men... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although selective estrogen receptor modulators have been proposed as a treatment for men with central functional hypogonadism, only a few data have been produced in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether and to what extent selective estrogen receptor modulators are an effective and safe therapy in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A thorough search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing testosterone levels before and after treatment. Mean differences with 95% coefficient intervals were combined using random effects models. Funnel plot, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill analysis were used to assess publication bias.
RESULTS
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria providing information on 292 men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency treated with clomiphene citrate (12.5-50 mg daily) or enclomiphene citrate (12.5-25 mg daily) for 1.5-4 months. The pooled estimates indicated a significant increase in testosterone levels both with clomiphene (mean difference: 11.56 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 9.68, 13.43; I = 69%, p = 0.01) and enclomiphene citrate (mean difference: 7.50 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 6.52, 8.48; I = 4%, p = 0.37). After the exclusion of one study on severely obese men, who exhibited the highest response rate to clomiphene citrate, the heterogeneity disappeared (mean difference: 10.27 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 9.39, 11.16; I = 0%, p = 0.66). No publication bias was revealed by Egger's test and trim-and-fill analysis. No treatment-related unexpected findings regarding safety profile were registered.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Treatment with clomiphene citrate and enclomiphene citrate may be an effective and safe alternative to testosterone replacement therapy in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency. Further long-term studies are warranted to define clinical reflections of the selective estrogen receptor modulators-induced increase in testosterone levels and to better clarify the safety profile.
Topics: Humans; Male; Androgens; Clomiphene; Enclomiphene; Eunuchism; Hypogonadism; Obesity; Receptors, Estrogen; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Testosterone
PubMed: 36604313
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13373 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Dec 2022In recent years, significant changes have occurred in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) management, where docetaxel and new androgen receptor pathway... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Addition of New Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors to Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.
In recent years, significant changes have occurred in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) management, where docetaxel and new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) compared to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent data could once again radically change mHSPC treatment. PEACE-1 and ARASENS trials demonstrated a survival benefit of the addition of ARPI to docetaxel and ADT combination (triplet therapy), compared to docetaxel and ADT. With multiple options to choose from, it is crucial to identify the patients who would benefit most from triplet therapy. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the activity of the triplet therapy versus docetaxel plus ADT in mHSPC. A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the proceedings of major international meetings was performed. Five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PEACE-1 and ARASENS studies reported disease-free survival (DFS) and OS. Post hoc analysis of three other trials evaluated the combination of ARPI, docetaxel and ADT. Globally, 2538 patients were included (1270 triplet therapy; 1268 docetaxel + ADT). Triplet therapy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-0.83, < 0.00001). A statistically significant benefit was shown in high-volume mHSPC patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.97, = 0.03) and in patients with de novo metastatic disease (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82, < 0.00001). The addition of ARPI to standard therapy was associated with DFS improvement (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.49, < 0.00001). This metanalysis shows a significant OS benefit from concomitant administration of ARPI, docetaxel and ADT in high volume and de novo mHSPC.
Topics: Humans; Male; Androgens; Docetaxel; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36547161
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120747