-
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jan 2023Exogenous testosterone is vital to gender-affirming therapy for transmasculine individuals. Testosterone may be implicated in breast cancer (BCa) because it can activate...
BACKGROUND
Exogenous testosterone is vital to gender-affirming therapy for transmasculine individuals. Testosterone may be implicated in breast cancer (BCa) because it can activate androgen and estrogen receptors. To further explore this risk, we performed a systematic review to investigate the impact of exogenous testosterone on BCa risk in transmasculine individuals.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/Embase for clinical and preclinical studies assessing BCa and testosterone therapy and screened 6125 articles independently. We ascertained level of evidence using a modified tool from Cook et al (Chest. 1992;102:305S-311S) and risk of bias using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool.
RESULTS
Seventy-six studies were included. Epidemiological data suggested that BCa incidence was higher in transmasculine individuals compared with cisgender men but lower compared with cisgender women. Histological studies of transmasculine breast tissue samples also demonstrated a low incidence of precancerous lesions. Interestingly, cases demonstrated that BCa occurred at a younger average age in transmasculine individuals and was predominantly hormone receptor positive. The mechanism for BCa in transmasculine individuals may be related to androgen receptor stimulation or conversion to estradiol. Serum studies reported varied estradiol levels associated with exogenous testosterone. Animal and in vitro studies demonstrated that testosterone was growth inhibitory but may induce proliferation at higher doses or with low estradiol levels.
CONCLUSIONS
Plastic surgeons play a critical role in providing gender-affirming care for transmasculine patients. The limited studies available suggest that this patient population has decreased risk for BCa when compared with cisgender women; however, any BCa that does occur may have different clinical presentations and underlying mechanisms compared with cisgender women and men. Overall, the limitations for clinical studies and discrepancies among preclinical studies warrant further investigation.
Topics: Humans; Female; Testosterone; Transgender Persons; Breast Neoplasms; Androgens; Estradiol
PubMed: 36534108
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003321 -
JAMA Network Open Nov 2022Epidemiological evidence supports a role for statins in improving survival in advanced prostate cancer, particularly among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Epidemiological evidence supports a role for statins in improving survival in advanced prostate cancer, particularly among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies.
OBJECTIVE
To study the association between statin use and survival among men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs).
DATA SOURCES
This systemic review and meta-analysis used sources from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Clinical Trials, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science from inception to September 6, 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies reporting associations of concurrent statin use and survival outcomes (in hazard ratios [HRs]).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two authors independently abstracted all data. Summary estimates pooled multivariable HRs with 95% CIs using the generic inverse variance method with random-effects modeling. A priori specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken, and heterogeneity, study quality, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Overall mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).
RESULTS
Twenty-five cohorts of 119 878 men (65 488 statin users [55%]) with more than 74 416 deaths were included. Concurrent statin use was associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.82]; I2 = 83%) and a 35% reduction in the risk of PCSM (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.73]; I2 = 74%), with substantial heterogeneity in both estimates. Subgroup analyses identified a PCSM advantage associated with statins for men receiving ARATs compared with ADT alone (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.30-0.55] vs 0.68 [95% CI, 0.60-0.76]; P = .002 for difference). Confidence in the evidence was rated low for both outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The findings of this meta-analysis show that concurrent statin use was associated with reduced overall mortality and PCSM among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies for advanced prostate cancer. These findings are limited by the observational nature of the data and residual unexplained interstudy heterogeneity. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these results.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Androgens; Androgen Antagonists; Hormone Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 36449294
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42676 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Prostate cancer is a common malignancy affecting men worldwide. While the vast majority of newly diagnosed prostate cancers are categorized as adenocarcinomas, a...
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy affecting men worldwide. While the vast majority of newly diagnosed prostate cancers are categorized as adenocarcinomas, a spectrum of uncommon tumor types occur including those with small cell and neuroendocrine cell features. Benign neuroendocrine cells exist in the normal prostate microenvironment, and these cells may give rise to primary neuroendocrine carcinomas. However, the more common development of neuroendocrine prostate cancer is observed after therapeutics designed to repress the signaling program regulated by the androgen receptor which is active in the majority of localized and metastatic adenocarcinomas. Neuroendocrine tumors are identified through immunohistochemical staining for common markers including chromogranin A/B, synaptophysin and neuron specific enolase (NSE). These markers are also common to neuroendocrine tumors that arise in other tissues and organs such as the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, lung and skin. Notably, neuroendocrine prostate cancer shares biochemical features with nerve cells, particularly functions involving the secretion of a variety of peptides and proteins. These secreted factors have the potential to exert local paracrine effects, and distant endocrine effects that may modulate tumor progression, invasion, and resistance to therapy. This review discusses the spectrum of factors derived from neuroendocrine prostate cancers and their potential to influence the pathophysiology of localized and metastatic prostate cancer.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Adenocarcinoma; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 36440195
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1012005 -
Urologic Oncology May 2023There have been a growing number of treatment options available for men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Not only have newer agents entered the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
There have been a growing number of treatment options available for men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Not only have newer agents entered the clinical landscape, there is a trend toward treatment intensification by combining multiple agents simultaneously. We aim to assess the best contemporary treatment option for men with mCSPC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We perform an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials that evaluated systemic therapies in men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We searched multiple databases up to April 2022. We included all randomized trials assessing the effect of systemic agents. We performed subgroup analyses based on disease volume and timing of presentation. Statistical analysis was performed with Bayesian methods.
RESULTS
We found 10 eligible trials with 10,065 patients who were included in this analysis. Triplet therapy with darolutamide or abiraterone with docetaxel and ADT improved overall survival. In the sensitivity analysis, the respective hazard ratios for triplet therapy was HR 0.70 (95%CI 0.61-0.80) compared to docetaxel+ADT and 0.77 (95%CI 0.65-0.91) compared to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors+ADT combinations. It was estimated that there was 96% chance that one of the triplet therapy combinations were the best treatment option from an OS perspective. Triplet therapy also improved progression-free survival. These benefits were pronounced in men with high-volume disease burden and those with de novo metastatic disease.
CONCLUSION
The finding suggest that triplet therapy is likely the most efficacious available option in men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, especially in those with high-volume disease burden.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Androgen Antagonists; Prostatic Neoplasms; Castration; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36411180
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.016 -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Mar 2023Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Association between age and efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes remains unknown. Our aim was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA) on the effect of chronological age on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapies for mHSPC.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of combination systemic therapies using ADT plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with mHSPC. We included studies, which provided separate hazard ratios (HRs) for younger vs. older patients. The selected age cut-off was 70 years (±5 years). Our outcome of interest was OS.
RESULTS
We included nine RCTs with a total of 9183 patients. Younger and older men constituted 51% and 49% of included patients, respectively. Docetaxel plus ADT significantly improved OS among both older (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04) and younger patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001) with no differences according to age. ARSI plus ADT improved OS in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001) and younger (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001) patients; younger patients did benefit more (p = 0.02). On NMA treatment ranking, triplet therapy showed the highest probability of OS benefit irrespective of age group; in older patients, the benefit of triplet therapy compared to doublet was less expressed.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with mHSPC benefit from combination systemic therapies irrespective of age; the effect is, however, more evident in younger patients. Chronological age alone seems not to be a selection criteria for the administration of combination systemic therapies.
Topics: Male; Humans; Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Hormones
PubMed: 36284192
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00607-5 -
Andrology Feb 2023Low testosterone levels are frequently present in men with obesity and insulin resistance. Currently available treatment options (testosterone replacement therapy or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Low testosterone levels are frequently present in men with obesity and insulin resistance. Currently available treatment options (testosterone replacement therapy or lifestyle changes) hold possible risks or are insufficient. Since low testosterone levels are closely related to obesity and type 2 diabetes, treatment modalities for these conditions could result into improvement of testosterone levels.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the available evidence on the effects of traditional and recent treatment modalities for diabetes mellitus on testosterone levels and androgen-deficiency-related signs and symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed was searched from the year 2000 till present using MESH terms: "hypogonadism," "testosterone," "testosterone deficiency," "functional hypogonadism," and the different classes of medications. Studies with observational and experimental designs on humans that evaluated the effect of antidiabetic medications on gonadotropins and testosterone were eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS
Current available data show no or only limited improvement on testosterone levels with the classic antidiabetic drugs. Studies with GLP1-receptor analogues show beneficial effects on both body weight and testosterone levels in men with low testosterone levels and obesity with or without type 2 diabetes. However, data are limited to small and heterogeneous study groups and only few studies report data about impact on androgen-deficiency-related signs and symptoms.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
With the recent advances in the knowledge of the pathophysiological pathways in obesity, there is an enormous progress in the development of medications for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Newer incretin-based agents have a great potential for the treatment of functional hypogonadism due to obesity since they show promising weight reducing results. However, before the use of GLP1-receptor analogues can be suggested to treat functional hypogonadism, further studies are needed.
Topics: Humans; Male; Androgens; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Eunuchism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypogonadism; Obesity; Testosterone
PubMed: 36251281
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13318 -
Environmental Health : a Global Access... Oct 2022Mixture risk assessments require reference doses for common health endpoints of all the chemicals to be considered together. In support of a mixture risk assessment for...
Systematic review of associations of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure with declining semen quality in support of the derivation of reference doses for mixture risk assessments.
BACKGROUND
Mixture risk assessments require reference doses for common health endpoints of all the chemicals to be considered together. In support of a mixture risk assessment for male reproductive health, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on associations between exposures to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and declines in semen quality. PCBs can act as Aryl-hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR)-agonists and Androgen Receptor (AR)-antagonists, both mechanisms which can affect sperm parameters. PCBs and other AR-antagonists can produce additive combination effects. Based on these observations our objective was to systematically gather data from animal and human studies to derive a reference dose for declines in semen quality for individual PCB.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed and evaluated the evidence in human epidemiological and experimental animal studies on associations between PCBs and deteriorations in semen quality. Human data and findings from animal studies with PCB mixtures were considered as supporting evidence. Information for individual congeners from animal studies was required for inclusion in mixture risk assessment. Using a robust confidence rating approach, we identified suitable studies to derive reference doses for individual PCB congeners.
RESULTS
Evaluation of human epidemiological studies revealed several reports of adverse effects on sperm parameters linked to PCB exposures, although some studies reported improved semen quality. Our review of experimental animal studies found that treatments with PCBs affected semen quality, in most cases adversely. We found robust evidence that PCB-118 and -169 were linked to declines in semen quality. Evidence for adverse effects of PCB-126, -132, -149, and -153 was moderate, whereas for PCB-77 it was slight and for PCB-180 indeterminate. Using widely accepted risk assessment procedures, we estimated reference dose values of 0.0029 µg/kg/day for PCB-118 and 0.00533 µg/kg/day for PCB-169. In addition, we derived values for PCB-126: 0.000073 µg/kg/day, PCB-132: 0.0228 µg/kg/day, PCB-149: 0.656 µg/kg/day, and PCB-153: 0.0058 µg/kg/day.
CONCLUSIONS
We found robust evidence for links between PCB exposure and deteriorations in semen quality, and derived reference doses for a set of congeners. We intend to use these values in combination with congener-specific exposure data in a mixture risk assessment for declines in semen quality, involving several other antiandrogenic chemicals.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Male; Polychlorinated Biphenyls; Receptors, Androgen; Risk Assessment; Semen; Semen Analysis
PubMed: 36217156
DOI: 10.1186/s12940-022-00904-5 -
Seminars in Oncology Oct 2022Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in men. In patients undergoing a failure after radical treatment, one of the therapeutic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in men. In patients undergoing a failure after radical treatment, one of the therapeutic option is androgen deprivation: despite initial response rates, a progression to a state of castration resistance is observed in most of the patients. In the present article, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all clinical trials assessing treatment for nmCRPC with next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors. We performed a review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials comparing new agents (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) with placebo as control arm, in the setting of nmCRPC. Patients treated with next-generation ARIs had a 26% reduction in the risk of death compared with placebo; compared with other ARIs, darolutamide had the lowest rate of grade 3 and 4 AEs and the lowest therapy discontinuation rate due to any grade AEs. This meta-analysis shows that treatment with new ARIs is safe and significantly reduces the risk of death and of metastasis onset in nmCRPC patients. Under way studies on new biomarkers such as genomic classifiers will probably allow the stratification in more specific subsets of disease. New imaging modalities such as PSMA-PET have shown greater sensibility and specificity than conventional imaging in metastases detection. All patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with a total of 2,694 who underwent next-generation ARIs (806 apalutamide, 955 darolutamide, 933 enzalutamide) and 1,423 in the placebo arm.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Androgen Antagonists; Radiation Oncologists; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36192243
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.005 -
ESMO Open Oct 2022Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) historically represented the milestone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recently, combining... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Addition of androgen receptor-targeted agents to androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) historically represented the milestone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recently, combining androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTA) or docetaxel with ADT significantly improved clinical outcomes in this setting. The efficacy of the combined use of an ARTA with docetaxel and ADT (triplet), however, was unknown, and often conflicting data derived from subgroup analysis of randomized phase III trials. In order to better define the benefits and risks of the triplet in mHSPC, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical trials.
METHODS
A literature search with no data restriction using Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and American Society of Clinical Oncology/European Society for Medical Oncology (ASCO/ESMO) Meeting abstracts was carried out up to April 2022. The meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint; progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were secondary endpoints. For OS and PFS, summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated; for safety, risk ratio (RR) was assessed. Random- or fixed-effects models were used, depending on studies heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Five randomized clinical trials fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The triplet significantly improved OS (fixed-effect, HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (fixed-effect; HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared with docetaxel plus ADT. We did not show heterogeneity between treatment efficacy and the disease burden, metachronous versus synchronous presentation, concomitant versus sequential strategy. Compared with docetaxel + ADT, the triplet did not increase the risk of adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.00, P = 0.27 for any-grade AEs; RR = 1.13, P = 0.14 for severe AEs), except for severe hypertension (RR = 1.73, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Emerging evidence supports the combination of an ARTA plus docetaxel and ADT in mHSPC patients. Given the availability of several strategies in this setting, clinical characteristics and drug safety profile may help clinicians select the appropriate treatment for mHSPC patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment intensification.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Androgen Antagonists; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgens; Receptors, Androgen; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 36152486
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100575 -
Drugs Sep 2022Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine condition in women, impacting several aspects of a woman's life, including reproductive, mental,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The Effect of Oral Antidiabetic Drugs on Improving the Endocrine and Metabolic States in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine condition in women, impacting several aspects of a woman's life, including reproductive, mental, cardiovascular, and metabolic health. Antidiabetic drugs may have beneficial effects on the endocrine and metabolic states in women with PCOS.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare the effects of oral antidiabetic drugs on reproductive hormones, metabolic and anthropometric markers, and menstrual frequency, in patients with PCOS using network meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies published up to May 31, 2021. Randomised clinical trials enrolling participants with PCOS were included, for which sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, metformin (Met), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) (alone or in combination) were compared with either each other, placebo, or no treatment. A network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approach was performed. The outcomes included changes in endocrine outcomes, metabolic results, menstrual frequency, and anthropometric findings. All research was conducted according to a protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021248314).
RESULTS
In total, we retrieved 3383 studies, of which 47 articles enrolling 2626 participants were included for the network meta-analysis. In comparison to the control groups, Met (MD - 0.41, 95% CI - 0.73 to - 0.09) was more beneficial in reducing serum total testosterone, and GLP-1RAs+Met (MD - 5.44, 95% CI - 10.06 to - 0.89) reduced free androgen index (FAI) more effectively. Thiazolidinediones (MD 9.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 17.99) had a greater effect on sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) than Met. For decreasing androstenedione, Met (MD - 1.87, 95% CI - 2.73 to - 1.01), DPP-4 inhibitors (MD - 2.64, 95% CI - 4.77 to - 0.49), GLP-1RAs (MD - 3.06, 95% CI - 5.53 to - 0.62), and GLP-1RAs+Met (MD - 2.97, 95% CI - 5.85 to - 0.09) were more effective than TZDs. The confidence in evidence was often low or very low.
CONCLUSIONS
In this network meta-analysis, GLP-1 receptor agonists in combination with metformin appear to be preferable for improving hyperandrogenaemia. Metformin and TZDs offer the added benefit of improving fasting blood glucose (FBG) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) when compared to the control groups. Metformin combined with GLP-1 receptor agonists or TZDs could be associated with a beneficial effect on menstrual recovery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Hypoglycemic Agents; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Metformin; Thiazolidinediones
PubMed: 36129662
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01779-z