-
Scientific Reports Oct 2016This systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the risk of development of concomitant strabismus due to refractive errors. Eligible studies published from 1946... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the risk of development of concomitant strabismus due to refractive errors. Eligible studies published from 1946 to April 1, 2016 were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE that evaluated any kinds of refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia) as an independent factor for concomitant exotropia and concomitant esotropia. Totally 5065 published records were retrieved for screening, 157 of them eligible for detailed evaluation. Finally 7 population-based studies involving 23,541 study subjects met our criteria for meta-analysis. The combined OR showed that myopia was a risk factor for exotropia (OR: 5.23, P = 0.0001). We found hyperopia had a dose-related effect for esotropia (OR for a spherical equivalent [SE] of 2-3 diopters [D]: 10.16, P = 0.01; OR for an SE of 3-4D: 17.83, P < 0.0001; OR for an SE of 4-5D: 41.01, P < 0.0001; OR for an SE of ≥5D: 162.68, P < 0.0001). Sensitivity analysis indicated our results were robust. Results of this study confirmed myopia as a risk for concomitant exotropia and identified a dose-related effect for hyperopia as a risk of concomitant esotropia.
Topics: Anisometropia; Astigmatism; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Esotropia; Exotropia; Female; Humans; Hyperopia; Male; Myopia; Odds Ratio; Refractive Errors; Risk Factors; Strabismus
PubMed: 27731389
DOI: 10.1038/srep35177 -
Journal of Ophthalmology 2015The aim of the present systematic review was to examine the benefits and harms associated with immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) with specific... (Review)
Review
The aim of the present systematic review was to examine the benefits and harms associated with immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) with specific emphasis on the rate of complications, postoperative anisometropia, and subjective visual function in order to formulate evidence-based national Danish guidelines for cataract surgery. A systematic literature review in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane central databases identified three randomized controlled trials that compared outcome in patients randomized to ISBCS or bilateral cataract surgery on two different dates. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE method (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). We did not find any difference in the risk of complications or visual outcome in patients randomized to ISBCS or surgery on two different dates. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low. None of the studies reported the prevalence of postoperative anisometropia. In conclusion, we cannot provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of ISBCS due to the lack of high quality evidence. Therefore, the decision to perform ISBCS should be taken after careful discussion between the surgeon and the patient.
PubMed: 26351576
DOI: 10.1155/2015/912481 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2015Current treatments for amblyopia in children, occlusion and pharmacological blurring, have had limited success, with less than two-thirds of children achieving good... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Current treatments for amblyopia in children, occlusion and pharmacological blurring, have had limited success, with less than two-thirds of children achieving good visual acuity of at least 0.20 logMAR in the amblyopic eye, limited improvement of stereopsis, and poor compliance. A new treatment approach, based on the dichoptic presentation of movies or computer games (images presented separately to each eye), may yield better results, as it aims to balance the input of visual information from each eye to the brain. Compliance may also improve with these more child-friendly treatment procedures.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether binocular treatments in children aged three to eight years with unilateral amblyopia result in better visual outcomes than conventional occlusion or pharmacological blurring treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register (last date of searches: 14 April 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 3), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to April 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Two review authors independently screened the results of the search in order to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria of the review: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled participants between the ages of three and eight years old with unilateral amblyopia, defined as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 0.200 logMAR in the amblyopic eye, and BCVA 0.200 logMAR or better in the fellow eye, in the presence of an amblyogenic risk factor such as anisometropia, strabismus, or both. Prior to enrolment, participants were to have undergone a cycloplegic refraction and comprehensive ophthalmic examination including fundal examination. In addition, participants had to have completed a period of optical treatment, if indicated, and BCVA in the amblyopic eye had to remain unchanged on two consecutive assessments despite reportedly good compliance with glasses wearing. Participants were not to have received any treatment other than optical treatment prior to enrolment. We planned to include any type of binocular viewing intervention; these could be delivered on different devices including computer monitors viewed with LCD shutter glasses or hand-held screens including mobile phone screens with lenticular prism overlay. Control groups were to have received standard amblyopia treatment; this could include occlusion or pharmacological blurring of the better-seeing eye. We planned to include full-time (all waking hours) and part-time (between 1 and 12 hours a day) occlusion regimens.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We planned to use standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. We had planned to meta-analyse the primary outcome, that is mean distance BCVA in the amblyopic eye at 12 months after the cessation of treatment.
MAIN RESULTS
We could identify no RCTs in this subject area.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Further research is required to allow decisions about implementation of binocular treatments for amblyopia in clinical practice. Currently there are no clinical trials offering standardised evidence of the safety and effectiveness of binocular treatments, but results from non-controlled cohort studies are encouraging. Future research should be conducted in the form of RCTs, using acknowledged methods of visual acuity and stereoacuity assessment with known reproducibility. Other important outcome measures include outcomes reported by users, compliance with treatment, and recurrence of amblyopia after cessation of treatment.
Topics: Amblyopia; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans
PubMed: 26263202
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub2 -
PloS One 2015Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS), the cataract surgery that is performed in both eyes simultaneously, is gaining popularity worldwide compared... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS), the cataract surgery that is performed in both eyes simultaneously, is gaining popularity worldwide compared to the traditional treatment paradigm: delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS), the surgery that is performed in each eye on a different day as a completely separate operation. ISBCS provides advantages to patients and patients' families in the form of fewer hospital visits. Additionally, patients enjoy rapid rehabilitation, lack of anisometropia - potentially reducing accidents and falls, and avoid suboptimal visual function in daily life. The hospital may benefit due to lower cost.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate ISBCS and DSBCS.
DATA SOURCES
Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED), ISI Web of Science (Thomson-Reuters) and the Cochrane Library were searched.
PARTICIPANTS
Not applicable.
METHODS
Literature was systematically reviewed using EPPI-Reviewer 4 gateway. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA v. 13.0. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were computed based on heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was done by instrument used to calculate utility score.
RESULTS
In total, 9,133 records were retrieved from multiple databases and an additional 128 records were identified through grey literature search. Eleven articles with 3,657 subjects were included for analysis. Our meta-analysis results indicated significant improvement in post-operative utility score using TTO, EQ5D, HUI3, VF-7, and VF-14 and a non-significant improvement using Catquest questionnaire for both surgeries. For ISBCS versus DSBCS, utility-specific fixed-effect model provided an overall SMD of the utility score using the TTO method as 0.12 (95% CI: -0.15, 0.40), EQ5D as 0.14 (95% CI: -0.14, 0.41), HUI3 as 0.12 (95% CI: -0.15, 0.40), VF-7 as -0.02 (95% CI: -0.15, 0.10), and Catquest Questionnaire as 1.45 (95% CI: -0.88, 2.01). The results for utility score, which were measured using various instruments, indicated non-significant improvement in the utility due to DSBCS compared to ISBCS. However, a significant improvement in post-operative utility score was seen using Catquest questionnaire for ISBCS compared to DSBCS. The included studies using VF-14 instrument were highly heterogeneous (I2 = 97.1%). Results provided SMD of -0.25 (95% CI:-1.06, 0.57) using VF-14 indicating non-significant improvement in the utility due to DSBCS compared to ISBCS surgery. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved after both surgeries (overall SMD of BCVA due to ISBCS was -1.79 (95% CI: -2.45, -1.14) and due to DSBCS was -1.53 (95% CI: -2.25, -0.81)). A non-significant improvement was seen in BCVA due to ISBCS when compared to DSBCS (SMD = -0.18; 95% CI: -0.37, 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Both surgeries, ISBCS and DSBCS significantly improve patients' quality of life and visual acuity. Further, ISBCS may deliver certain additional benefits at the individual and societal levels as well.
Topics: Cataract Extraction; Humans; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Quality of Life; Time Factors; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 26121673
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131857 -
Chinese Medical Journal 2014A systematic review of literature was performed to compare various visual function parameters including the final visual acuity outcome and/or adverse events between... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review of literature was performed to compare various visual function parameters including the final visual acuity outcome and/or adverse events between corneal refractive surgery (CLRS) and phakic intraocular lens implantation (p-IOLi) in the treatment of refractive amblyopic children.
DATA SOURCES
Two reviewers independently searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases for publications from 1991 to 2013.
STUDY SELECTION
There were 25 articles, including 597 patients and 682 eyes, was included in CLRS group. Among them, 21 articles reported the use of CLRS in the treatment of myopic anisometropia for 318 patients (13 photorefractive keratectomy or laser epithelial keratomileusis and eight laser in situ keratomileusis). And 11 articles had the results of CLRS in treating hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia children. Eleven articles reported the effect of p-IOLi for treating high myopia or anisometropic amblyopia, including 61 patients (75 eyes). Age, pre- and postoperation best-corrected vision acuity (BCVA), and spherical equivalent (SE) were compared in CLRS and p-IOLi groups.
RESULTS
The average age of CLRS group and p-IOLi group has no statistically significant difference. The SE in CLRS group for myopic anisometropia amblyopia patients was (-10.13 ± 2.73) diopters (D) and for hyperopic anisometropia amblyopia patients was (5.58 ± 1.28) D. In p-IOLi group the SE was (-14.01 ± 1.93) D. BCVA was improved significantly in both groups, and even better in p-IOLi group. Refractive errors were corrected in both groups, but there was no clinically significant difference in final SE between each group. More than one-half of the children had improved binocular fusion and stereopsis function in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Both CLRS group and p-IOLi group showed their advantage in treating refractive amblyopia in children. In comparing p-IOLi with CLRS for treatment of refractive amblyopia, no statistically significant difference in final BCVA was observed.
Topics: Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Myopia
PubMed: 24890172
DOI: No ID Found -
Clinical & Experimental Optometry May 2014Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of global visual impairment. Given resource constraints in developing countries, the gold standard method of refractive... (Review)
Review
Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of global visual impairment. Given resource constraints in developing countries, the gold standard method of refractive error correction, custom-made spectacles, is unlikely to be available for some time. Therefore, ready-made and recycled spectacles are in wide use in the developing world. To ensure that refractive error interventions are successful, it is important that only appropriate modes of refractive error correction are used. As a basis for policy development, a systematic literature review was conducted of interventional studies analysing visual function, patient satisfaction and continued use outcomes of ready-made and recycled spectacles dispensed to individuals in developing countries with refractive errors or presbyopia. PubMed and CINAHL were searched by MESH terms and keywords related to ready-made and recycled spectacle interventions, yielding 185 non-duplicated papers. After applying exclusion criteria, eight papers describing seven studies of clinical outcomes of dispensing ready-made spectacles were retained for analysis. The two randomised controlled trials and five non-experimental studies suggest that ready-made spectacles can provide sufficient visual function for a large portion of the world's population with refractive error, including those with astigmatism and/or anisometropia. The follow-up period for many of the studies was too short to confidently comment on patient satisfaction and continued-use outcomes. No studies were found that met inclusion criteria and discussed recycled spectacles. The literature also notes concerns about quality and cost effectiveness of recycled spectacles, as well as their tendency to increase developing countries' reliance on outside sources of help. In light of the findings, the dispensing of ready-made spectacles should be favoured over the dispensing of recycled spectacles in developing countries.
Topics: Disposable Equipment; Eyeglasses; Humans; Patient Satisfaction; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 24397254
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12126 -
Journal of Cataract and Refractive... Oct 2013The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence of benefits of second-eye cataract extraction for visual function, patient-reported quality... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence of benefits of second-eye cataract extraction for visual function, patient-reported quality of life, falls, and driving ability among the elderly. We conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE using "surgery," "cataract extraction," "second eye," and "bilateral." Ten studies met the inclusion and quality criteria. We found "moderate" evidence supporting improvement in stereopsis, stereoacuity, and anisometropia over and above the benefits of first-eye surgery. We also found "moderate" evidence supporting improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and self-reported visual functioning. Studies included in the review do not provide definitive evidence of second-eye surgery benefits on health-related quality of life, visual fields, falls prevention, and driving performance. However, the heterogeneity of outcome measures and the limited number of studies likely contributed to our findings. The findings have implications for clinicians and policymakers in the health-care industry and emphasize the need for additional trials examining this important and widely performed clinical procedure.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Topics: Accidental Falls; Activities of Daily Living; Automobile Driving; Cataract; Cataract Extraction; Contrast Sensitivity; Depth Perception; Health Status; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Quality of Life; Visual Acuity; Visual Fields
PubMed: 24075161
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.033 -
JAMA Ophthalmology Sep 2013Understanding the development of common strabismus is important in locating "at-risk" populations and implementing optimal treatment. This systematic review will bring... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Understanding the development of common strabismus is important in locating "at-risk" populations and implementing optimal treatment. This systematic review will bring together reported genetic and environmental risk factors for common strabismus to reveal relationships between risk factors and guide future research.
OBJECTIVE
To identify known environmental and genetic risk factors for comitant strabismus reported in the literature.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, BioSciences Information Service Previews, Web of Science, and the OMIM database during a 2-week period in July 2011 (including all available years) using the following key words: gene, genetic environmental factor, inheritance, risk factor, esotropia, exotropia, strabismus, squint, convergent strabismus, and divergent strabismus.
STUDY SELECTION
No language restrictions were placed on the search. Exclusion criteria consisted of associated syndromes, strabismus not the primary outcome, poor study design or quality, and logarithm of the odds score less than 3.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
A study quality and extraction tool was used. Analysis was performed descriptively because of the variant characteristics of the study designs.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Risk factor, twin, pedigree, and genetic studies.
RESULTS
Forty-one articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria set out by the study, which highlighted 4 subcategories: risk factor, twin, pedigree, and genetic studies. Significant risk factors for strabismus reported by the studies included low birth weight, cicatricial retinopathy of prematurity, prematurity, smoking throughout pregnancy, anisometropia, hyperopia, and inheritance. Inheritance was further supported by twin and pedigree studies, which revealed the complexity of the inheritance pattern. At present the STBMS1 locus is the only gene location that has been supported; however, others have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Certain subgroups within the population are at higher risk of developing comitant strabismus and should be identified and monitored to allow for earlier detection. It is evident that a strong hereditary link is present particularly in intermittent and accommodative forms; however, further research is required to identify possible links between subtypes of strabismus. Further genetic research could also help to locate additional causative genes to aid the understanding of strabismus development.
Topics: Birth Weight; Child, Preschool; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pedigree; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Retinopathy of Prematurity; Risk Factors; Strabismus; Twin Studies as Topic
PubMed: 23846622
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4001 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 1996The monovision concept of correcting one eye for distance and the other for near may be utilized in presbyopes undergoing refractive surgery. We have performed a... (Review)
Review
The monovision concept of correcting one eye for distance and the other for near may be utilized in presbyopes undergoing refractive surgery. We have performed a systematic review of published literature to evaluate the factors influencing monovision success, and to determine the visual outcome in patients with monovision. Articles in MEDLINE and published bibliographies reporting monovision prescription for correction of presbyopia were systematically identified and reviewed. Pertinent data were abstracted and, when feasible, statistically analyzed. The mean success rate was 73%. The success in monovision correlated with distance correction on dominant eye, alternating dominance, less than 50 seconds of are stereoacuity reduction, and less than 0.6 prism diopter of distance esophoric shifts. Monovision resulted in significant reduction of binocular contrast sensitivity function at spatial frequencies higher than 4 cycles per degree, and 2-6% reduction in task performance, but resulted in minimal reduction of binocular visual acuity, peripheral vision, visual field width and binocular depth of focus. The published literature indicates that monovision is an effective and reasonable therapeutic modality for correcting presbyopia. Proper patient selection and clinical screening are essential for monovision success.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anisometropia; Contact Lenses; Contrast Sensitivity; Depth Perception; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Presbyopia; Vision, Binocular; Vision, Monocular; Visual Acuity; Visual Fields
PubMed: 8724641
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(96)82015-7