-
Musculoskeletal Surgery Jul 2024Ankle fractures are common injuries that can significantly impact mobility and quality of life. Rehabilitation following ankle fracture treatment is crucial for... (Review)
Review
Ankle fractures are common injuries that can significantly impact mobility and quality of life. Rehabilitation following ankle fracture treatment is crucial for recovery, yet adherence to regimens remains a challenge. Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) have been suggested to improve adherence, but their effectiveness in ankle fracture rehabilitation is not well established. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of BCTs in the rehabilitation of ankle fracture patients. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, focusing on Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that incorporated BCTs into rehabilitation interventions. The effectiveness of BCTs on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), quality of life, and adverse events was analysed. Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a range of interventions that employed BCTs, most commonly including goal setting and instruction on how to perform behaviours, specifically physiotherapy exercises. The review found limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in improving PROMs. Only one study showed a significant positive effect, but it was deemed at high risk of bias. The lack of integration of behavioural theory in the design of rehabilitation interventions and the varied nature of the BCTs employed across studies may contribute to these findings. The use of BCTs in ankle fracture rehabilitation is prevalent, but this review highlights a significant gap their role of enhancing patient outcomes. Future research should incorporate a theory-based approach to intervention design, utilising a broader range of BCTs, to fully evaluate their potential in improving rehabilitation adherence and outcomes following ankle fracture .
PubMed: 38955960
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-024-00845-x -
Biology of Sport Jul 2024To observe overall, training, and match injury incidence in female youth football. We also aimed to quantify the incidence of injuries by affected tissue and body... (Review)
Review
To observe overall, training, and match injury incidence in female youth football. We also aimed to quantify the incidence of injuries by affected tissue and body location. The following databases were examined: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane and PEDro. Papers that reported overall injury incidence, training or match injury incidence were included. Additionally, studies had to be performed in adolescent female football players (13-19 years of age). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the checklist of items that must be included in epidemiological football reports were used to assess methodological quality of the included articles. For the meta-analyses, a random effect model was used. A total of 13 studies were included. There were 2,333 injuries; incidence was higher during games (12.7/1000 h) compared to training sessions (2.3/1000 h). The injury match-to-training ratio was 5.8. The lower limbs were the region in which the greatest number of injuries occurred, with the ankle (1.2/1000 h) and knee (0.8/1000 h) having the most injuries. In relation to injured tissue, ligament injuries represented an incidence of 1.3/1000 h, followed by muscle injuries (0.9/1000 h). This study represents the first step towards the creation and implementation of preventative measures in female youth football. The results suggest that attention should be focused on ankle and knee injuries, since they are the most frequent and can lead to sport retirement in some cases depending on the severity.
PubMed: 38952921
DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.132996 -
World Journal of Orthopedics Jun 2024Cheilectomy of the 1 metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus. However, there is no consensus regarding...
BACKGROUND
Cheilectomy of the 1 metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus. However, there is no consensus regarding outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC) for the management of hallux rigidus.
AIM
To evaluate outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.
METHODS
During November 2023, the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. In total, 348 patients (370 feet) underwent MIDC for hallux rigidus at a weighted mean follow-up of 37.9 ± 16.5 months. The distribution of patients by Coughlin and Shurna's classification was recorded in 4 studies as follows: I (58 patients, 27.1%), II (112 patients, 52.3%), III (44 patients, 20.6%). Three studies performed an additional 1 MTPJ arthroscopy and debridement following MIDC. Retained intra-articular bone debris was observed in 100% of patients in 1 study. The weighted mean American orthopedic foot and ankle society score improved from a preoperative score of 68.9 ± 3.2 to a postoperative score of 87.1. The complication rate was 8.4%, the most common of which was persistent joint pain and stiffness. Thirty-two failures (8.7%) were observed. Thirty-three secondary procedures (8.9%) were performed at a weighted mean time of 8.6 ± 3.2 months following the index procedure.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrated improvements in subjective clinical outcomes together with a moderate complication rate following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus at short-term follow-up. A moderate re-operation rate at short-term follow-up was recorded. The marked heterogeneity between included studies and paucity of high quality comparative studies limits the generation of any robust conclusions.
PubMed: 38947256
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.585 -
Orthopedic Reviews 2024Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) on Full Limb Radiographs (FLRs) is the gold standard for coronal knee alignment assessment. Despite the widespread utilization of the more...
Femorotibial angle on short knee radiographs fails to accurately predict the lower limb mechanical alignment. A systematic review and meta-analysis on different femorotibial angle definitions and short knee radiograph types.
INTRODUCTION
Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) on Full Limb Radiographs (FLRs) is the gold standard for coronal knee alignment assessment. Despite the widespread utilization of the more convenient femorotibial angle (FTA) on either antero-posterior (AP) or postero-anterior (PA) short knee radiographs (SKRs), its definition and correlation with HKA remains controversial. This review is the first to systematically investigate FTA-HKA correlation and the effect of different FTA methods and SKRs.
METHODS
Systematic literature search (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines, to evaluate studies examining the FTA-HKA correlation. Meta-analyses compared the 3 most common FTA methods, knee center determination method and SKR types.
RESULTS
17 studies (2597 patients, 3234 knees) were included. The strongest correlation with HKA (r = 0.78) was found for FTA Method 1 (angle formed by lines drawn from the midpoint of tibial spines to points 10 cm above and below the joint line). No significant differences were observed when grouping the FTA methods by knee center assessment (Group I, r = 0.78; Group II, r = 0.77). AP SKRs showed a trend towards stronger FTA-HKA correlation compared to PA SKRs, in both Method 1 (r = 0.79 vs 0.75) and Method 3 (r = 0.80 vs 0.66).
CONCLUSION
Irrespective of its definition or type of SKR used, FTA lacks reliable accuracy in predicting the HKA in most knees. FLRs should be used whenever precise estimation of the patient's alignment is necessary. Caution is warranted in interpreting studies investigating knee alignment or knee arthroplasty outcomes based on FTA.
PubMed: 38947178
DOI: 10.52965/001c.120053 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... Jun 2024Ankle arthrodesis is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage arthritis or severe ankle joint deformity. Both internal (IF) and external fixation (EF) techniques... (Review)
Review
Ankle arthrodesis is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage arthritis or severe ankle joint deformity. Both internal (IF) and external fixation (EF) techniques are valid options, but there is controversy regarding the most effective technique. This study compares the safety and efficacy of EF and IF fixation techniques for ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. A literature search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), was performed to identify all studies directly comparing the two techniques. Both fixed and random effects models of analysis were used depending on heterogeneity. Odds of union in the EF and IF groups were comparable (OR=0.60, CI 0.36-1.02, p=0.06) however, EF was associated with greater odds of deep hardware infections (OR=3.67, 1.97-6.83, p <0.05) and amputations (OR=3.17, CI 1.06-9.54, p =0.04). Odds of revision surgery and superficial wound complications were similar between groups. EF techniques had significantly longer operation times (MD=31.23, CI-25.11-37.34, p <0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (MD=46.31, CI-24.93-67.69, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in pain and functionality scores. IF and EF techniques have reasonable union rates with similar postoperative outcomes. However, IF patients are more likely to achieve primary union and less likely to have deep infections, being mindful that EF techniques were usually indicated for more complex cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PubMed: 38944233
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.010 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature regarding the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) using... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature regarding the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC), while also discussing the mid-long term functional outcomes, complications, and surgical failure rate.
METHODS
We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for studies on OLT treated with AMIC with an average follow-up of at least 2 years. Publication information, patient data, functional scores, surgical failure rate, and complications were extracted.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies were screened and included, with 12 case series selected for meta-analysis and 3 non-randomized controlled studies chosen for descriptive analysis. The improvements in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot, and Tegner scores at the last follow-up were (SMD = - 2.825, 95% CI - 3.343 to - 2.306, P < 0.001), (SMD = 2.73, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.86, P < 0.001), (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.2, P < 0.001) respectively compared to preoperative values. The surgery failure rate was 11% (95% CI 8-15%), with a total of 12 patients experiencing complications.
CONCLUSION
The use of AMIC demonstrates a positive impact on pain management, functional improvement, and mobility enhancement in patients with OLT. It is worth noting that the choice of stent for AMIC, patient age, and OLT size can influence the ultimate clinical outcomes. This study provides evidences supporting the safety and efficacy of AMIC as a viable treatment option in real-world medical practice.
Topics: Humans; Talus; Chondrogenesis; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Cartilage, Articular
PubMed: 38915104
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04864-z -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2024This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil in the management of hypertension.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil in the management of hypertension.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted across both English and Chinese databases, including the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Digital Periodical Full Text Database, and VIP Chinese Periodical Database (VIP), up to March 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating alisartan axetil for hypertension management were selected. Literature quality was assessed, and data were extracted for meta-analysis using Stata 15.1 software. The quality of evidence for outcome indicators was evaluated using the GRADE system level.
RESULTS
Six RCTs involving 767 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed that, compared to placebo, the Allisartan Isoproxil group exhibited a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [WMD = -8.08, 95% CI (-11.81, 4.10), = 0.000] and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) [SMD = -0.69, 95% CI (-1.17, 0.20), = 0.006]. However, the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was not statistically significant [WMD = -5.48, 95% CI (-11.07, 0.10), = 0.054]. Additionally, compared to calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), Allisartan Isoproxil did not significantly affect SBP [WMD = 0.20, 95% CI (-3.71, 4.10), = 0.921] or DBP [WMD = 0.16, 95% CI (-2.11, 2.43), = 0.891]. Allisartan Isoproxil demonstrated superior effects in increasing nitric oxide (NO) levels and decreasing endothelin (ET) levels compared to control groups [WMD = 9.56, 95% CI (6.42, 12.71), = 0.000], [WMD = -7.42, 95% CI (-11.13, -3.71), = 0.000], and showed a higher effective control rate of blood pressure [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.13, 1.41), = 0.000]. Subgroup analysis did not reveal significant differences. Regarding safety, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the Allisartan Isoproxil group and the control groups [RR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.74, 1.32), = 0.928], and no fatal adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION
Allisartan Isoproxil is effective in reducing SBP and baPWV, increasing NO, decreasing ET, and achieving a higher control rate of blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. These benefits are achieved with minimal adverse reactions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023467869, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023467869.
PubMed: 38903964
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1355014 -
Prosthetics and Orthotics International Jun 2024The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical...
The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical parameters. However, there is currently no established recommendation for the suitable leading limb in this population. The systematic review was aimed to propose a preferred leading limb for gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations based on biomechanical parameters. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Knowledge, were searched. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research question. A total of seven studies were included in this review, and the Downs and Black's checklist was used by three researchers to assess the risk of bias. The review included a total of 61 adults with unilateral transtibial amputations, with a mean age range of 41 to 64.43 years. The confidence level of the included studies was poor, and the observational cohort was the most common study design (n = 5). Most of the studies were not replicable. Four of the included studies recommended the prosthetic limb as the preferred leading limb. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations may experience biomechanical benefits, including a more normal center of pressure path, reduced limb loading, and increased ankle energy generation, when leading with their prosthetic limb during gait initiation. However, further research is necessary to establish a more conclusive recommendation for the preferred leading limb in this population.
PubMed: 38896544
DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024(1) Background: Marker-based 3D motion capture systems (MBS) are considered the gold standard in gait analysis. However, they have limitations for which markerless... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Accuracy, Validity, and Reliability of Markerless Camera-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems versus Marker-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems in Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
(1) Background: Marker-based 3D motion capture systems (MBS) are considered the gold standard in gait analysis. However, they have limitations for which markerless camera-based 3D motion capture systems (MCBS) could provide a solution. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the accuracy, validity, and reliability of MCBS and MBS. (2) Methods: A total of 2047 papers were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines on 7 February 2024, in two different databases: Pubmed (1339) and WoS (708). The COSMIN-tool and EBRO guidelines were used to assess risk of bias and level of evidence. (3) Results: After full text screening, 22 papers were included. Spatiotemporal parameters showed overall good to excellent accuracy, validity, and reliability. For kinematic variables, hip and knee showed moderate to excellent agreement between the systems, while for the ankle joint, poor concurrent validity and reliability were measured. The accuracy and concurrent validity of walking speed were considered excellent in all cases, with only a small bias. The meta-analysis of the inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed, step time, and step length resulted in a good-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.81; 0.98). (4) Discussion and conclusions: MCBS are comparable in terms of accuracy, concurrent validity, and reliability to MBS in spatiotemporal parameters. Additionally, kinematic parameters for hip and knee in the sagittal plane are considered most valid and reliable but lack valid and accurate measurement outcomes in transverse and frontal planes. Customization and standardization of methodological procedures are necessary for future research to adequately compare protocols in clinical settings, with more attention to patient populations.
Topics: Humans; Gait Analysis; Gait; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Biomechanical Phenomena; Reproducibility of Results; Motion Capture
PubMed: 38894476
DOI: 10.3390/s24113686 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jun 2024Current literature lacks comprehensive information comparing the clinical outcomes of plantar and dorsal approaches for Civinini-Morton syndrome, also known as Morton's... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Current literature lacks comprehensive information comparing the clinical outcomes of plantar and dorsal approaches for Civinini-Morton syndrome, also known as Morton's neuroma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of neurectomy for Morton's neuroma, focusing on the differences between the plantar and dorsal approach.
METHODS
Our comprehensive literature review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and utilized databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Data investigated in this study included postoperative sensory loss, scar tenderness, reoperation, histopathology, complications, pain score, patient satisfaction, functional scores, and time to weight bearing.
RESULTS
Total eight studies were included in this study. In aggregate, 237 neuromas underwent excision using the plantar approach, while 312 neuromas were treated via the dorsal approach. A significantly higher rate of postoperative reduced sensory was found in the dorsal group: 48.5 % (64/132) Vs. 62.0 % (80/129) with the relative ratio (RR) of 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.64-0.97). A significantly higher rate of postoperative scar tenderness was noted in the plantar group: 16.7 % (32/192) Vs. 6.2 % (14/225) with the RR of 2.27 (95 % CI, 1.28-4.04). Regarding the histopathology, 99.3 % (143/144) and 97.1 % (134/138) accuracy rate was confirmed in the plantar approach and dorsal approach, respectively, with the RR of 1.02 (95 % CI, 0.98-1.07). Overall reoperations and complications were not different between groups at 5.3 % (10/189) and 8.8 % (19/216) in the plantar group versus 6.1 % and 12.0 % (35/291) in dorsal group.
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend detailed discussions with patients prior to surgery to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
PubMed: 38880729
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.018