-
Human Reproduction Update 2002Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a frequently indicated therapeutic modality in infertility. Here, a systematic review of the literature was performed to examine the...
Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a frequently indicated therapeutic modality in infertility. Here, a systematic review of the literature was performed to examine the current status of clinical and laboratory methodologies used in IUI and the impact of female and male factors on pregnancy success. Emphasis was centred in questioning the following: (i) the value of IUI against timed intercourse; (ii) IUI application with or without controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; (iii) timing and frequency of IUI; and (iv) impact of various parameters (male/female) on the prediction of pregnancy outcome. The odds of multiple pregnancy occurrence and its risk factors, as well as the cost-effectiveness of IUI treatment compared with more complex assisted reproductive technologies are discussed. A computerized literature search was performed including Medline and the Cochrane library, as well as a crossover search from retrieved papers. It is concluded that although IUI is a successful contemporary treatment for appropriately selected cases of female and/or male infertility, further research is needed through well-designed studies to improve the methodologies currently utilized. Importantly, the clinical management of the infertile couple should be performed in an expedited manner taking into consideration the age of the woman, the presence of multifactorial infertility and cost-effectiveness of the available treatment alternatives.
Topics: Female; Humans; Insemination, Artificial; Male; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy, Multiple; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Uterus
PubMed: 12206471
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.4.373 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2002In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is now a widely accepted treatment for unexplained infertility (RCOG 1998). However, with estimated livebirth rates per cycle varying... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is now a widely accepted treatment for unexplained infertility (RCOG 1998). However, with estimated livebirth rates per cycle varying between 13% and 28%, it's effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated in comparison with other treatments. With increasing awareness of the role of expectant management and less invasive procedures such as intrauterine insemination, concerns about multiple complications and costs associated with IVF, it is extremely important to evaluate the effectiveness of IVF against other treatment options in couples with unexplained infertility.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this review is to determine, in the context of unexplained infertility, whether IVF improves the probability of livebirth compared with 1. expectant management 2. clomiphene citrate (CC) 3. intra uterine insemination (IUI) alone 4. IUI with controlled ovarian stimulation and 5. Gamete IntraFallopian Transfer (GIFT).
SEARCH STRATEGY
RCTs were identified using the search strategies developed for the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. See Review group for more information.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Only randomised controlled trials were included. Livebirth rate per woman was the primary outcome of interest.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Nine randomised controlled trials were identified. In two we could not extract data separately for unexplained infertility cases, two were non-randomised, one reported no valid rates (included in the review and not in the meta-analysis), leaving four trials for analysis. One trial compared two different interventions (IVF versus IUI with or without ovarian stimulation) and one study compared three interventions (IVF versus IUI with ovarian stimulation and GIFT). The number of trials assessing the effectiveness of IVF with the other treatments were as follows: IVF versus expectant management (one), IVF versus IUI (one), IVF versus IUI with ovarian stimulation (two) and IVF versus GIFT (three). Livebirth rate per woman was reported in two studies and three studies determined clinical pregnancy rate per woman. Multiple pregnancy rate was reported in three trials. Two studies reported ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as an outcome measure. There were no comparative data for clomiphene citrate, and no comparative data on livebirth rates for expectant management or GIFT. There was no evidence of a difference in livebirth rates between IVF and IUI either without (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.1) or with (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.8) ovarian stimulation. There was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rates between IVF and expectant management. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rates between IVF and GIFT (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.92). There was no evidence of a difference in the multiple pregnancy rates between IVF and either IUI with ovarian stimulation (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.70) or GIFT (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.58). Clinical heterogeneity was present among the studies included. However, there was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity, which allowed the studies to be combined for statistical analysis.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Any effect of IVF relative to expectant management, clomiphene citrate, IUI with or without ovarian stimulation and GIFT in terms of livebirth rates for couples with unexplained subfertility remains unknown. The studies included are limited by their small sample size, so that even large differences might be hidden. Livebirth rates are seldom reported. Adverse effects such as multiple pregnancies and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome have also not been reported in most studies. Larger trials with adequate power are warranted to establish the effectiveness of IVF in these women. Future trials should not only report rates per woman /couple but also include adverse effects and costs of the treatments compared as outcomes. Factors that have a major effect on these outcomes such as fertility treatment, female partner's age, duration of infertility and previous pregnancy history should also be considered.
Topics: Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer; Humans; Infertility; Insemination, Artificial; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 12076476
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Although intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used, however its effectiveness remains a matter of debate. Although IUI is less invasive and expensive than IVF or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Although intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used, however its effectiveness remains a matter of debate. Although IUI is less invasive and expensive than IVF or GIFT, it should only be applied if the probability of conception is improved significantly as compared to the natural chance of conceiving. To increase the number of available oocytes at the site of fertilization, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) can be applied in conjunction with IUI. Uncontrolled studies suggest a beneficial effect of COH in combination with IUI, also when a male factor is present. To be able to draw firm conclusions whether IUI and/or COH improve the probability of conception, several comparisons should be performed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
OBJECTIVES
To determine for male subfertility whether intrauterine insemination (IUI) improves the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse and whether the addition of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influences the results.
SEARCH STRATEGY
1. The specialist database of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. 2. Medline search. 3. Embase search. 4. DDFU search. 5. BIOSIS search. 6. SCIsearch. 7. Manual searching of references mentioned in the obtained studies. 8. Personal communication and write letters to experts (14) in the field. 9. Abstracts of The American Society for Reproductive Medicine and European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Meetings. When important information is lacking from the original publications the authors will be contacted.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials only.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Independently by the first 2 authors: 1. Trial design characteristics. 2. Baseline characteristics of participants. 3. Types of intervention. 4. Outcomes where pregnancy is the outcome of main interest. Number of multiple pregnancies and number of cycles with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are secondary outcomes. Analysis of agreement between the two observers was determined for the following items: inclusion or exclusion of a trial, method of randomization, definition of male subfertility, design of the trial, number of pregnancies and completed cycles. Sensitivity analysis is performed.
MAIN RESULTS
Seventeen trials fulfilled the selection criteria for this review and were included. Four trials are pending. Crude agreement concerning inclusion or exclusion of trials occurred for 41 of 43 (95%) trials reviewed (kappa 0.90). The included trials comprised 3,662 completed cycles. In natural cycles intrauterine insemination (IUI) significantly improved the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse (TI) (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.43, 1.54 - 3.83). In cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) IUI significantly improved the probability of conception also compared with TI (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.14, 1.30 - 3.51). Despite clinical heterogeneity, these results are based on strong evidence. Intrauterine insemination in cycles with COH improved the probability of conception compared with IUI in natural cycles but significance was not reached (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 1.79, 0.98 - 3.25). Comparing IUI in COH-cycles with TI in natural cycles the first treatment modality significantly improved the probability of conception (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 6.23, 2.35 - 16.52).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Intra-uterine insemination offers couples with male subfertility benefit over timed intercourse, both in natural cycles and in cycles with COH. In the case of a severe semen defect (with more than 1 million motile sperm after semen preparation and no triple sperm defect) IUI in natural cycles should be the treatment of first choice. The value of COH need to be further investigated in RCTs. Mild ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotrophins is advised in cases with less sever
Topics: Coitus; Female; Fertilization; Humans; Insemination, Artificial; Male; Ovulation Induction
PubMed: 10796711
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Artificial insemination with sperm is used to improve the chances of conception for various causes of infertility. Traditionally, sperm is deposited in or around the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Artificial insemination with sperm is used to improve the chances of conception for various causes of infertility. Traditionally, sperm is deposited in or around the endocervical canal (cervical insemination - CI). Some studies reported higher pregnancy rates if sperm was deposited in the uterine cavity itself (intrauterine insemination - IUI), but most were uncontrolled. However the cost and the risks (infection and anaphylaxis) of IUI may also be higher.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of depositing donor sperm in the uterine cavity (intrauterine insemination) compared to cervical insemination.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The Cochrane Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials was searched.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials comparing intrauterine insemination and cervical insemination, using fresh or cryopreserved semen, with or without ovarian hyperstimulation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS
Twelve studies were included. They comprised 697 patients undergoing 2215 treatment cycles. Ten trials used frozen semen, with three using ovarian hyperstimulation. Overall the methodological quality of the trials was low. The overall pregnancy rate per cycle in the intrauterine insemination group was 18% compared to 5% for cervical insemination. When cryopreserved donor sperm was used, the overall chance of pregnancy in spontaneous or clomiphene-corrected cycles was significantly higher with intrauterine insemination. This was irrespective of whether pregnancy rates were calculated on a per cycle (odds ratio 2. 63, 95% confidence interval 1.85 to 3.73) or per patient (odds ratio 3.86, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 8.25) basis. The greatest benefit appeared in trials with poor pregnancy rates (less than 6%) for cervical insemination. There was no difference in pregnancy rate between intrauterine and cervical insemination when fresh donor sperm was used (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 2. 24).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Intrauterine insemination appears to be beneficial when cervical insemination using cryopreserved donor sperm has had low pregnancy rates. This applies to spontaneous, clomiphene corrected and gonadotrophin stimulated cycles. However it may offer little benefit where high pregnancy rates have been achieved with cervical insemination. There appears to be no additional benefit from intrauterine insemination when fresh sperm is used for donor insemination.
Topics: Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Insemination, Artificial; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Uterus
PubMed: 10796709
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000317 -
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) Sep 1997A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination (IUI) with or without ovarian stimulation using gonadotrophin in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination (IUI) with or without ovarian stimulation using gonadotrophin in the treatment of persistent infertility. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified by a diverse strategy including a hand search of 43 core journals from 1966 to the present. Two approaches to meta-analysis were used to summarize data. First, using a standard Mantel-Haenszel approach, eight trials comparing FSH/IUI with FSH/timed intercourse for unexplained infertility were combined. The common odds ratio for pregnancy was 2.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43, 3.90], suggesting a significant improvement with IUI following ovulation induction in this patient group. Although the data were statistically homogeneous, clinically important heterogeneity was present. Second, across all diagnostic groups, the independent effects of treatment with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), clomiphene citrate, IUI, as well as the diagnoses of male factor and endometriosis were assessed using stepwise logistic regression. Based on 5214 cycles reported in 22 trials, the odds ratio for pregnancy associated with FSH use was 2.35 (95% CI, 1.87, 2.94) for IUI, 2.82 (95% CI, 2.18, 3.66) for male factor, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37, 0.61), and for endometriosis 0.45 (95% CI, 0.27, 0.76). This summary of the best available evidence may prove useful in counselling couples who are considering FSH and/or IUI therapy.
Topics: Clomiphene; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Humans; Infertility; Insemination, Artificial; Logistic Models; Male; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 9363697
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.9.1865