-
Techniques in Coloproctology Feb 2018Cecal volvulus is a rare clinical entity with an average incidence of 2.8-7.1 per million people per year, accounting for 1-2% of all large bowel obstructions. Cecal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cecal volvulus is a rare clinical entity with an average incidence of 2.8-7.1 per million people per year, accounting for 1-2% of all large bowel obstructions. Cecal bascule is the rarest type of cecal volvulus, accounting for 5-20% of all cases. Although several case reports have been published, there is no consensus regarding its diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to review the literature on cecal bascule in order to summarize the etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment options.
METHODS
The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched by two independent authors. Cecal bascule was defined as anterior displacement of the distended cecum on the ascending colon without any torsion. The etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment options were analyzed.
RESULTS
Nineteen previously published papers reporting on 26 patients were included. The mean age of patients from previously reported cases was 55.1 ± 19.2 years, and 54% of all patients were males. Presenting symptoms included abdominal pain in 16 (61%), distension in 22 (84%), and vomiting in eight patients (30%). The mean time to diagnosis was 3.6 ± 2.6 days. The extent of surgery varied from cecopexy to right colectomy. There was no postoperative mortality. Cecal bascule recurred one 1 year after index surgery in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS
Cecal bascule is a rare clinical entity, which is mostly encountered in patients with peritoneal adhesions, mobile cecum, bowel dysfunction, and cecal displacement. In patients with recurrent or persistent abdominal pain and distension, cecal bascule should be considered. The majority of these patients require surgical management.
Topics: Cecal Diseases; Cecum; Colectomy; Female; Humans; Intestinal Volvulus; Male; Middle Aged
PubMed: 29159782
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1725-6 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Oct 2017Microscopic colitis (MC) is a clinical syndrome of severe watery diarrhea with few or no endoscopic abnormalities. The incidence of MC is reported similar to that of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Microscopic colitis (MC) is a clinical syndrome of severe watery diarrhea with few or no endoscopic abnormalities. The incidence of MC is reported similar to that of other inflammatory bowel diseases. The need for histological confirmation of MC frequently guides reimbursement health policies. With the advent of high-definition (HD) coloscopes, the incidence of reporting distinct endoscopic findings in MC has risen. This has the potential to improve timely diagnosis and cost-effective MC management and diminish the workload and costs of busy modern endoscopy units.
METHODS
Publications on distinct endoscopic findings in MC available until March 31st, 2017 were searched systematically (electronic and manual) in PubMed database. The following search terms/descriptors were used: collagenous colitis (CC) OR lymphocytic colitis (LC) AND endoscopy, colonoscopy, findings, macroscopic, erythema, mucosa, vasculature, scars, lacerations, fractures. An additional search for MC AND perforation was made.
RESULTS
Eighty (n=80) articles, predominantly single case reports (n=49), were found. Overall, 1582 (1159F; 61.6±14.1 years) patients (pts) with MC and endoscopic findings were reported. The majority of articles (n=62) were on CC (pts 756; 77.5% females). We identified 16 papers comprising 779 pts (69.2% females) with LC and 7 articles describing 47 pts (72.3% females) diagnosed as MC. The youngest patient was 10 and the oldest a 97-year-old. Aside diarrhea, symptoms included abdominal pain, weight loss, bloating, flatulence, edema and others. In the study group we found 615 (38.8%) persons with macroscopic lesions in gut. Isolated linear ulcerations were identified in 7 pts (1.1%) while non-ulcerous lesions i.e. pseudomembranes, a variable degree of vasculature pruning & dwindling, mucosal lacerations and abnormalities such as erythema/edema/nodularity, or surface textural alteration in 608 pts (98.1%). The location of endoscopic findings was not reported in 27 articles. The distinct endoscopic findings were described in the left (descending, sigmoid, rectum - 10/21/11 studies), right (cecum, ascending - 7/7 studies), transverse colon (n=12), as well as duodenum (n=4), and terminal ileum (n=2). In 17 (1.1%) pts colonic perforation occurred.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic findings are recognized with increased frequency in pts with MC. This could improve MC diagnosis by prompting a more extensive biopsy protocol in such cases and an earlier initiation of treatment. Procedure-related perforation has been reported in this group; therefore, cautious air insufflation is advisable when endoscopic findings are recognised.
Topics: Biopsy; Colitis, Microscopic; Colon; Colonoscopy; Humans; Intestinal Perforation
PubMed: 28847471
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.07.015 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Oct 2017Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is an infrequent but serious adverse event after colonoscopic polypectomy. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is an infrequent but serious adverse event after colonoscopic polypectomy. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors for delayed PPB, with inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aims to identify significant risk factors for delayed PPB.
METHODS
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through January 2016 for studies that investigated the risk factors for delayed PPB. Pooled odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect model, generic inverse variance method. The between-study heterogeneity of effect size was quantified using the Q statistic and I .
RESULTS
Twelve articles involving 14,313 patients were included. The pooled delayed PPB rate was 1.5% (95%CI, 0.7-3.4%), I = 96%. Cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.55), hypertension (OR = 1.53), polyp size > 10 mm (OR = 3.41), and polyps located in the right colon (OR = 1.60) were identified as significant risk factors for delayed PPB, whereas age, sex, alcohol use, smoking, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, pedunculated morphology, and carcinoma histology were not.
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, polyp size, and polyp location were associated with delayed PPB. More caution is needed when removing polyps in patients with these risk factors. Future studies are warranted to determine appropriate preventive hemostatic measures in these patients.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cecum; Colon, Ascending; Colonic Polyps; Humans; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Risk Factors; Time Factors
PubMed: 28779355
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2870-0 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Aug 2017Proximal colon adenomas can be missed during routine colonoscopy. Use of a cap or hood on the tip of the colonoscope has been shown to improve overall adenoma detection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Proximal colon adenomas can be missed during routine colonoscopy. Use of a cap or hood on the tip of the colonoscope has been shown to improve overall adenoma detection with variable rates. However, it has not been systematically evaluated for detection of proximal colon or right-sided adenomas where the cap may have maximum impact on adenoma detection rate (ADR). Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CC) on right-sided ADRs (r-ADRs) compared with standard colonoscopy (SC).
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases as well as secondary sources (bibliographic review of selected articles and major GI proceedings) were searched through October 1, 2016. Primary outcome was the pooled rate of r-ADR. Detection of flat adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), and number of right-sided adenomas per patient were also assessed. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models.
RESULTS
We screened 686 records and analyzed data from 4 studies (CC group, 2546 patients; SC group, 2547 patients) that met criteria for determination of r-ADRs, whereas 6 studies (CC group, 3159 patients; SC group, 3137 patients) were analyzed to estimate right-sided adenomas per patient. r-ADR was significantly higher with CC compared with SC (23% vs 17%; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.05; I = 79%; P = .01). CC also improved detection rates of flat adenoma (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35-3.20; P < .01) and SSA/P (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74; P = .04). The total number of right-sided adenomas (CC: 1428 [60%] vs SC: 1127 [58%]) and number of right-sided adenomas per patient (CC, .71 ± .5, vs SC, .65 ± .62 [mean ± standard deviation]) were numerically higher for CC but were not statistically significant (P = .43). Approximately 17 CCs would be required to detect an additional patient with right-sided adenoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of CC significantly improves the proximal colon ADR. In addition, flat adenoma and serrated colonic lesion detection rates are also significantly higher as compared with SC.
Topics: Adenoma; Colon, Ascending; Colon, Transverse; Colonic Neoplasms; Colonoscopy; Humans
PubMed: 28365356
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1524 -
Danish Medical Journal Feb 2017Surgery is the most important factor for radical treatment of colon cancer, and the long-term prognosis can be improved by improving the surgical treatment without... (Review)
Review
Surgery is the most important factor for radical treatment of colon cancer, and the long-term prognosis can be improved by improving the surgical treatment without increased risk of perioperative mortality. Complete mesocolic excision (CME), in which more extensive lymph node (LN) dissection is performed, has been shown in single-centre studies with historical controls to be associated with better oncological outcome. However, better evidence is needed. The main purpose of this PhD thesis was to investigate whether CME could be implemented in a colorectal surgical department in Denmark, whether more extensive dissection could demonstrate LN metastases outside the mesocolon, and to demonstrate a possible association between CME and improved oncological results without increased risk of perioperative mortality. This thesis includes five articles. Two articles (IV and V) are based on the population of patients undergoing elective resection for colon cancer in the Capital Region from June 2008 to December 2013. Two articles (II and III) are based on data from the local colon database in Hillerød, and the last article (I) is a systematic review concerning the risk of metastases from colon cancer to the central LNs in the mesocolon. Article I found a risk of metastases in central LNs to be reported in 1-22% of the cases of right-sided colon cancers, and in up to 12% of the cases with sigmoid tumours. The populations included and methods used in the studies were very heterogeneous and no definitive conclusions can be drawn. It was shown in article II that the surgical quality, i.e. quality of the specimens assessed by the pathologists, improved with implementation of CME in Hillerød. The vascular tie was higher, and the implementation was not associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Article III demonstrated a risk of LN metastases in the gastrocolic ligament along the stomach for tumours located in the transverse colon, in the ascending or descending colon close to or in the flexures. It occurred in 4% of all patients and 13% of the patients with LN metastases in mesocolon. Resection of these LNs seems advisable for these tumour locations. Article IV showed no association between increased perioperative mortality and CME (n = 529) when compared with non-CME (n = 1,701). The 30-day mortality was 4.2% after CME compared with 3.7% after non-CME (p = 0.605), and the 90-day mortalities were 6.2% and 4.9% (p = 0.219) respectively. Odds ratios for 30-day and 90-day mortalities after CME were respectively 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.80) and 1.25 (0.77-1.94) in the multi-variable logistic regression analyses. Postoperative respiratory failure and need for vasopressors were significantly more frequent in the CME group and, besides CME itself, could be associated with the fewer laparoscopic resections and more severe preoperative comorbidity in the CME Group. Article V demonstrated an association between higher four-year disease-free survival for stage I-III tumours and CME (n = 364) when compared with non-CME (n = 1,031). Most notable was the difference for stage I and II cancers. The four-year disease-free survival for stage I was 100% in the CME group compared with 89.8% (83.1-96.6) in the non-CME group (p = 0.046). For stage II the disease-free survivals were 91.9% (87.2-96.6%) in the CME group and 77.9% (71.6-84.1%) in the non-CME group (p = 0.0033), and for stage III 73.5% (63.6-83.5) and 67.5% (61.8-73.2) (p = 0.13) respectively. In the multivariable Cox regression models, CME was a significant predictive factor for higher dis-ease-free four-year survival for stage I-III patients with hazard ratios (HR) for CME of 0.59 (0.42-0.83, p = 0.0025). For stage II the HR was 0.44 (0.23-0.86, p = 0.018) and for stage III 0.64 (0.42-1.00, p = 0.048).
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Disease-Free Survival; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Mesocolon; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28157065
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced... Apr 2017To compare intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To compare intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed and Embase. The last search was performed on April 9, 2016. The outcomes of interests included intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, length of incision, conversion, lymph nodes harvested, and intraoperative complications) and postoperative outcomes (time to first flatus, time to first defecation, time to liquid diet, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, mortality, ileus, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, wound infection, hernia, and intra-abdominal abscess).
RESULTS
Fifteen articles and four conference abstracts published between 2004 and 2016 with a total of 1957 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. IA was associated with significant less blood loss, smaller length of incision, shorter time to first defecation, shorter time to liquid diet, and shorter length of hospital stay. No differences were found for operative time, conversion, lymph nodes harvested, intraoperative complications, time to first flatus, postoperative complications, mortality, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, ileus, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, or hernia between IA and EA.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis suggests that the IA for LRC improves cosmesis and results in better postoperative recovery outcomes without increasing intraoperative and postoperative complications. Furthermore, a large randomized control study is warranted to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of those two anastomosis techniques.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Humans; Ileus; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Postoperative Period; Surgical Wound Infection; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27768552
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Jun 2016Treatments for functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) differ, but symptom criteria do not reliably distinguish between them;... (Review)
Review
Treatments for functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) differ, but symptom criteria do not reliably distinguish between them; some regard FC and IBS-C as parts of a single constipation spectrum. Our goal was to review studies comparing FC and IBS-C to identify possible biomarkers that separate them. A systematic review identified 15 studies that compared physiologic tests in FC vs IBS-C. Pain thresholds were lower in IBS-C than FC for 3/5 studies and not different in 2/5. Colonic motility was decreased more in FC than IBS-C for 3/3 studies, and whole gut transit was delayed more in FC than IBS-C in 3/8 studies and not different in 5/8. Pelvic floor dyssynergia was unrelated to diagnosis. Sympathetic arousal, measured in only one study, was greater in IBS-C than FC. The most reliable separation of FC from IBS-C was shown by a novel new magnetic resonance imaging technique described in this issue of the journal. These authors showed that drinking one liter of polyethylene glycol laxative significantly increased water content in the small intestine, volume of contents in the ascending colon, and time to first evacuation in FC vs IBS-C; and resulted in less colon motility and delayed whole gut transit in FC compared to IBS-C. Although replication is needed, this well-tolerated, non-invasive test promises to become a new standard for differential diagnosis of FC vs IBS-C. These data suggest that FC and IBS-C are different disorders rather than points on a constipation spectrum.
Topics: Biomarkers; Constipation; Diagnosis, Differential; Gastrointestinal Motility; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Laxatives
PubMed: 27214096
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12852 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Sep 2015No consensus exists on the optimal treatment of acute malignant right-sided colonic obstruction (RSCO). This systematic review aims to compare procedure-related... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Emergency resection versus bridge to surgery with stenting in patients with acute right-sided colonic obstruction: a systematic review focusing on mortality and morbidity rates.
PURPOSE
No consensus exists on the optimal treatment of acute malignant right-sided colonic obstruction (RSCO). This systematic review aims to compare procedure-related mortality and morbidity rates between primary resection and stent placement as a bridge to surgery followed by elective resection for patients with acute RSCO.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for all relevant literature. Primary endpoints were procedure-related mortality and morbidity. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria.
RESULTS
Fourteen cohort studies were eligible for analysis. A total of 2873 patients were included in the acute resection group and 155 patients in the stent group. Mean mortality rate for patients who underwent acute resection with primary anastomosis was 10.8% (8.1-18.5%). Overall mortality for patients initially treated with a colonic stent followed with elective resection was 0%. Major morbidity was 23.9% (9.3-35.6%) and 0.8% (0-4.8%), respectively. Both mortality and major morbidity were significantly different. In addition, stent placement shows lower rates of anastomotic leakages (0 vs 9.1%) and fewer permanent ileostomies (0 vs 1.0%).
CONCLUSION
Primary resection for patients with acute RSCO seems to be associated with higher mortality and major morbidity rates than stent placement and elective resection. In addition, stent placement resulted in fewer anastomotic leakages and permanent ileostomies. However, as no high-level studies are available on the optimal treatment of RSCO and proximal stenting is considered technically challenging, future comparative studies are warranted for the development of an evidence-based clinical decision guideline.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Colonic Diseases; Emergencies; Humans; Ileostomy; Intestinal Obstruction; Stents
PubMed: 25935448
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2216-8 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Sep 2014By systematic review, we assessed the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of Clostridium difficile (CD)-associated diarrhea. (Review)
Review
GOAL
By systematic review, we assessed the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of Clostridium difficile (CD)-associated diarrhea.
BACKGROUND
Fecal microbiota microbiota transplantation from a healthy donor into an individual with CD infection (CDI) can resolve symptoms.
STUDY
We conducted systematic searches in PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The last search was run on February 8, 2013. The following Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords were used alone or in combination: Clostridium difficile; Clostridium infection; pseudomembranous colitis; feces; stools; fecal suspension; fecal transplantation; fecal transfer; fecal infusion; microbiota; bacteriotherapy; enema; nasogastric tube; colonoscopy; gastroscopy; fecal donation; donor. A critical appraisal of the clinical research evidence on the effectiveness and safety of FMT for the treatment of patients with CD-associated diarrhea was made.
RESULTS
Twenty full-text case series, 15 case reports, and 1 randomized controlled study were included for the final analysis. Almost all patients treated with donors' fecal infusion experienced recurrent episodes of CD-associated diarrhea despite standard antibiotic treatment. Of a total of 536 patients treated, 467 (87%) experienced resolution of diarrhea. Diarrhea resolution rates varied according to the site of infusion: 81% in the stomach; 86% in the duodenum/jejunum; 93% in the cecum/ascending colon; and 84% in the distal colon. No severe adverse events were reported with the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
FMT seems efficacious and safe for the treatment of recurrent CDI. Hospitals should encourage the development of fecal transplantation programs to improve therapy of local patients.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Diarrhea; Feces; Humans; Microbiota; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24440934
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000046 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Apr 2014A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome of single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome of single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.
METHOD
A systematic search of databases was carried out to extract comparative studies (randomized and non-randomized, prospective and retrospective). Data were analysed according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed when the data permitted this form of analysis.
RESULTS
Nine comparative studies were retrieved comprising 241 patients with single incision and standard laparoscopy. None of these was randomized. There was no significant difference between the two methods for the primary end-points of mortality, morbidity and cancer-specific parameters and for the secondary end-points of operation time, blood loss, ileus, hospital stay and conversion. It was not possible to analyse pain and cosmetics data owing to insufficient information.
CONCLUSION
Single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is comparable with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in primary and secondary outcomes. Given current information it is justified to use single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, but there is a need for a prospective randomized study.
Topics: Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Colonic Diseases; Colonic Neoplasms; Colonic Polyps; Crohn Disease; Diverticulosis, Colonic; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24354622
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12526