-
Cellular and Molecular Biology... Jun 2024Chronic heart disease (CHD) is still a major global cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions to mitigate its progression.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with chronic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chronic heart disease (CHD) is still a major global cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions to mitigate its progression. Omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) have garnered attention for their potential anti-inflammatory and endothelial-protective properties in CHD management. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of Omega-3 FA supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with CHD. To achieve this, we used the relevant keywords to search international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and extract publications evaluating the effectiveness of omega-3 FA supplementation on inflammation markers and endothelial function in patients with CHD. STATA (version 15) and the random and fixed-effects models were used to evaluate the collected data. Thirteen clinical trial studies met inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of 853 individuals (406 cases and 447 controls). The cases had a mean age of 58 ± 10.3 years. The pooled results indicated that omega-3 Omega-3 FA supplementation significantly reduced the level of circulating IL-6 (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.35, %, p < 0.001), hs-CRP (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.28, p = 0.01), and TNF-α (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -1.14 to 0.01, p < 0.001) in patients with CHD. Also, findings revealed that a daily supplement of omega-3 significantly increased FMD by 0.34% (95% CI: 0.14-0.54%, p < 0.001) as compared with placebo by a fixed-effect model in patients with CHD. These findings underscore the potential therapeutic utility of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in modulating inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with CHD.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Biomarkers; Chronic Disease; Dietary Supplements; Endothelium, Vascular; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Heart Diseases; Inflammation; Aged
PubMed: 38836663
DOI: 10.14715/cmb/2024.70.6.26 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jul 2024The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical trials, and an additional 13 folate trials have been published since then. This meta-analysis aims to fill in critical evidence gaps by comprehensively evaluating 21 published trials with particular attention given to identifying the true influences through stratification.
METHODS
PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched from inception to April 4, 2023. This study included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of folic acid with stroke as one of the reporting endpoints. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and the risk of stroke in a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Results from the 21 pooled RCTs totaling 115,559 participants showed that folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 10% (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analyses showed that folic acid efficacy was greater in areas without fortified grain or with partially-fortified grain (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93; RR = 1.04 in areas with grain fortification, P-interaction = 0.003). In this group, folic acid supplementation was most efficacious in those without a history of stroke or myocardial infarction (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; RR = 0.94 for participants with a history of stroke or myocardial infarction, P-interaction = 0.008). The efficacy of folic acid remained consistent regardless of baseline folate levels, folic acid dosage, baseline vitamin B12 levels, vitamin B12 dosage, homocysteine reduction, intervention duration, and whether folic acid was taken alone or in combination (all P-interaction>0.05). All 21 trials were free of attrition bias and reporting bias, and there was no significant publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
This is by far the largest meta-analysis of RCTs regarding folic acid supplementation and stroke, demonstrating the overall benefit of folic acid for stroke prevention. Grain fortification and history of stroke or myocardial infarction may be the most important influences on the efficacy of folic acid for stroke prevention.
Topics: Folic Acid; Humans; Stroke; Dietary Supplements; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38824900
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.034 -
PloS One 2024The primary challenge encountered by individuals diagnosed with endometriosis is the experience of pain. Emerging research indicates that oxidative stress is implicated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Vitamin C and E antioxidant supplementation may significantly reduce pain symptoms in endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
The primary challenge encountered by individuals diagnosed with endometriosis is the experience of pain. Emerging research indicates that oxidative stress is implicated in the initiation of pain associated with endometriosis. Vitamins C and E are known for their antioxidative properties. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of antioxidant supplementation, consisting of these vitamins, in the management of pain associated with endometriosis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted on the ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Europe PMC, and Medline databases up until August 23rd, 2023, utilizing a combination of relevant keywords. This review incorporates literature that examines the relationship between antioxidant supplementation and pain in endometriosis. We employed fixed-effect models to analyze the risk ratio (RR) and present the outcomes together with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
A total of five RCTs were incorporated. The results of our meta-analysis indicated that antioxidant supplementation with vitamin C and E combination was associated with higher proportion of endometriosis patients reporting reduced chronic pelvic pain (RR 7.30; 95%CI: 3.27-16.31, p<0.00001, I2 = 0%), alleviations of dysmenorrhea (RR 1.96; 95%CI: 1.25-3.07, p = 0.003, I2 = 39%), and dyspareunia (RR 5.08; 95%CI: 2.10-12.26, p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%) than patients only receiving placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests the potential ability of vitamin C and E in alleviating pain symptoms experienced by individuals with endometriosis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ascorbic Acid; Endometriosis; Antioxidants; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dietary Supplements; Vitamin E; Dysmenorrhea; Pelvic Pain; Dyspareunia
PubMed: 38820340
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301867 -
Nutrition & Diabetes May 2024Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
BACKGROUND
Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effects of vitamin D deficiency and of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on maternal and offspring health-related outcomes.
METHODS
Prior to conducting this umbrella review, we registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022368003). We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on vitamin D in pregnancy, from database inception to October 2, 2023. All outcomes related to vitamin D in pregnancy obtained from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses were extracted.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently chose studies and collected information on health outcomes. The quality of the included articles' methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2).
RESULTS
We identified 16 eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which included 250,569 women. Our results demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of preterm birth, small-for gestational age/low birth weight infants, recurrent miscarriage, bacterial vaginosis and gestational diabetes mellitus. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy increases birth weight, and reduces the risk of maternal pre-eclampsia, miscarriage, and vitamin D deficiency, fetal or neonatal mortality, as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder in childhood. In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy can reduce the risk of maternal hyperbilirubinemia, polyhydramnios, macrosomia, fetal distress, and neonatal hospitalization.
CONCLUSION
Due to the association with adverse maternal and offspring health outcomes, we recommend the vitamin D status in pregnancy should be monitored, particularly in women at high risk of vitamin D deficiency. It is suggested that pregnant women take a dose of >400 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to prevent certain adverse outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin D; Pregnancy Complications; Dietary Supplements; Pregnancy Outcome; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Infant, Newborn; Premature Birth
PubMed: 38816412
DOI: 10.1038/s41387-024-00296-0 -
BMJ Open May 2024This systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials evaluated the preventive effects of vitamin A supplements versus placebo or no intervention on clinically... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effects of primary or secondary prevention with vitamin A supplementation on clinically important outcomes: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials evaluated the preventive effects of vitamin A supplements versus placebo or no intervention on clinically important outcomes, in people of any age.
METHODS
We searched different electronic databases and other resources for randomised clinical trials that had compared vitamin A supplements versus placebo or no intervention (last search 16 April 2024). We used Cochrane methodology. We used the random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs), with 95% CIs. We analysed individually and cluster randomised trials separately. Our primary outcomes were mortality, adverse events and quality of life. We assessed risks of bias in the trials and used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS
We included 120 randomised trials (1 671 672 participants); 105 trials allocated individuals and 15 allocated clusters. 92 trials included children (78 individually; 14 cluster randomised) and 28 adults (27 individually; 1 cluster randomised). 14/105 individually randomised trials (13%) and none of the cluster randomised trials were at overall low risk of bias. Vitamin A did not reduce mortality in individually randomised trials (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I=32%; p=0.19; 105 trials; moderate certainty), and this effect was not affected by the risk of bias. In individually randomised trials, vitamin A had no effect on mortality in children (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04; I=24%; p=0.28; 78 trials, 178 094 participants) nor in adults (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13; I=24%; p=0.27; 27 trials, 61 880 participants). Vitamin A reduced mortality in the cluster randomised trials (0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93; I=66%; p=0.0008; 15 trials, 14 in children and 1 in adults; 364 343 participants; very low certainty). No trial reported serious adverse events or quality of life. Vitamin A slightly increased bulging fontanelle of neonates and infants. We are uncertain whether vitamin A influences blindness under the conditions examined.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on moderate certainty of evidence, vitamin A had no effect on mortality in the individually randomised trials. Very low certainty evidence obtained from cluster randomised trials suggested a beneficial effect of vitamin A on mortality. If preventive vitamin A programmes are to be continued, supporting evidence should come from randomised trials allocating individuals and assessing patient-meaningful outcomes.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42018104347.
Topics: Humans; Vitamin A; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dietary Supplements; Primary Prevention; Secondary Prevention; Quality of Life; Vitamins
PubMed: 38816049
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078053 -
PeerJ 2024The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and lower doses of protein supplementation for nutritional support in critically ill patients.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials that compared higher (≥1.2 g/kg per day) lower (<1.2 g/kg per day) doses of protein supplementation among critically ill adult patients. This search spanned from the inception of relevant databases to November 20, 2023. Our primary endpoint of interest was overall mortality, while secondary endpoints included length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies including 2,965 critically ill patients were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed no significant difference in overall mortality (RR 1.03, 95%CI [0.92-1.15], = 0.65, I = 0%), length of intensive care unit stay (MD 0.19, 95%CI [-0.67 to 1.04], = 0.66, I = 25%), length of hospital stay (MD 0.73, 95%CI [-1.59 to 3.04], = 0.54, I = 27%), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -0.14, 95%CI [-0.83 to 0.54], = 0.68, I = 8%), and incidence of acute kidney injury (RR 1.11, 95%CI [0.87-1.41], = 0.38, I = 0%) between critically ill patients receiving higher or lower doses of protein supplementation.
CONCLUSIONS
For critically ill patients, the protein supplementation dose had no significant effect on clinical outcomes, including overall mortality, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
Topics: Humans; Critical Illness; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Length of Stay; Respiration, Artificial; Acute Kidney Injury; Intensive Care Units; Dietary Proteins; Dietary Supplements; Nutritional Support; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 38799065
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17433 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024The published data on the vitamin status of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) is contradictory; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The published data on the vitamin status of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) is contradictory; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the vitamin status of PKU patients. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, and Scopus) was finished in March 2024. The included studies compared vitamin levels between individuals diagnosed with early-treated PKU and healthy controls while excluding pregnant and lactating women, untreated PKU or hyperphenylalaninemia cases, control groups receiving vitamin supplementation, PKU patients receiving tetrahydrobiopterin or pegvaliase, and conference abstracts. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The effect sizes were expressed as standardised mean differences. The calculation of effect sizes with 95% CI using fixed-effects models and random-effects models was performed. A -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024519589). Out of the initially identified 11,086 articles, 24 met the criteria. The total number of participants comprised 770 individuals with PKU and 2387 healthy controls. The meta-analyses of cross-sectional and case-control studies were conducted for vitamin B12, D, A, E, B6 and folate levels. PKU patients demonstrated significantly higher folate levels (random-effects model, SMD: 1.378, 95% CI: 0.436, 2.320, = 0.004) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations (random-effects model, SMD: 2.059, 95% CI: 0.250, 3.868, = 0.026) compared to the controls. There were no significant differences in vitamin A, E, B6, B12 or 25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. The main limitations of the evidence include a limited number of studies and their heterogeneity and variability in patients' compliance. Our findings suggest that individuals with PKU under nutritional guidance can achieve a vitamin status comparable to that of healthy subjects. Our study provides valuable insights into the nutritional status of PKU patients, but further research is required to confirm these findings and explore additional factors influencing vitamin status in PKU.
Topics: Phenylketonurias; Humans; Vitamins; Vitamin D; Folic Acid; Vitamin B 12; Vitamin A
PubMed: 38791104
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105065 -
PloS One 2024Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) have a substantial impact on morbidity, healthcare utilization, and functional decline among older adults. Therefore, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) have a substantial impact on morbidity, healthcare utilization, and functional decline among older adults. Therefore, we systematically reviewed evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in preventing ARIs in older adults.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 1 February 2024. RCTs evaluating the use of vitamin D supplements to protect older adults from ARIs were included. Two reviewers independently screened papers, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Data were summarised as relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random effects meta-analyses were used to synthesise the results. GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. All the analysis were performed with Stata version 17.
RESULTS
Twelve trials (41552 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. It showed that vitamin D supplementation probably does not reduce the incidence of ARIs (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02, I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). No significant effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of ARI was observed for any of the subgroups defined by baseline 25(OH)D concentration, control treatments, dose frequency, study duration, and participants' condition. However, there was a possibility, although not statistically significant, that vitamin D may reduce the risk of ARI in patients with a baseline 25(OH)D concentration <50 nmol/L (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04, I2 = 14.7%). Additionally, vitamin D supplements might result in little to no difference in death due to any cause, any adverse event, hypercalcinemia, and kidney stones.
CONCLUSIONS
Vitamin D supplementation among older adults probably results in little to no difference in the incidence of ARIs. However, further evidence is needed, particularly for individuals with vitamin D deficiency and populations residing in low and middle income countries.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023451265).
Topics: Humans; Vitamin D; Respiratory Tract Infections; Dietary Supplements; Aged; Acute Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38787821
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303495 -
Allergy May 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate evidence on dietary interventions for atopic eczema/dermatitis (AD) skin symptoms in children without food... (Review)
Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional and dietary interventions in randomized controlled trials for skin symptoms in children with atopic dermatitis and without food allergy: An EAACI task force report.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate evidence on dietary interventions for atopic eczema/dermatitis (AD) skin symptoms in children without food allergies, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Systematic review updates were conducted in May 2022 and June 2023, focusing on randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) involving children with AD but without food allergies. Specific diets or supplements, such as vitamins, minerals, probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, or postbiotics, were explored in these trials. Exclusions comprised descriptive studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, letters, case reports, studies involving elimination diets, and those reporting on food allergens in children and adolescents. Additionally, studies assessing exacerbation of AD due to food allergy/sensitization and those evaluating elimination diets' effects on AD were excluded. Nutritional supplementation studies were eligible regardless of sensitization profile. Evaluation of their impact on AD clinical expression was performed using SCORAD scores, and a meta-analysis of SCORAD outcomes was conducted using random-effect models (CRD42022328702). The review encompassed 27 RCTs examining prebiotics, Vitamin D, evening primrose oil, and substituting cow's milk formula with partially hydrolyzed whey milk formula. A meta-analysis of 20 RCTs assessing probiotics, alone or combined with prebiotics, revealed a significant reduction in SCORAD scores, suggesting a consistent trend in alleviating AD symptoms in children without food allergies. Nonetheless, evidence for other dietary interventions remains limited, underscoring the necessity for well-designed intervention studies targeting multiple factors to understand etiological interactions and propose reliable manipulation strategies.
PubMed: 38783644
DOI: 10.1111/all.16160 -
Scientific Reports May 2024Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant global health challenge, prompting exploration of innovative treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant global health challenge, prompting exploration of innovative treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin C supplementation in adults undergoing treatment for CAP. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trials.gov databases from inception to 17 November 2023 identified six randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion criteria. The primary outcome analysis revealed a non-significant trend towards reduced overall mortality in the vitamin C group compared to controls (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.09; p = 0.052; I = 0; p = 0.65). Sensitivity analysis, excluding corona-virus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) studies and considering the route of vitamin C administration, confirmed this trend. Secondary outcomes, including hospital length-of-stay (LOS), intensive-care-unit (ICU) LOS, and mechanical ventilation, exhibited mixed results. Notably, heterogeneity and publication bias were observed in hospital LOS analysis, necessitating cautious interpretation. Adverse effects were minimal, with isolated incidents of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and tachycardia reported. This meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of vitamin C supplementation in CAP treatment. However, inconclusive findings and methodological limitations warrants cautious interpretation, emphasising the urgency for high-quality trials to elucidate the true impact of vitamin C supplementation in CAP management.
Topics: Humans; Ascorbic Acid; Community-Acquired Infections; Dietary Supplements; Pneumonia; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Length of Stay; COVID-19; Respiration, Artificial
PubMed: 38783029
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62571-5