-
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine... Jan 2022
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium Channel Blockers; Digoxin; Humans
PubMed: 34860198
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001283 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2021Whether digoxin is associated with increased mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the risk of mortality and clinical effects...
Whether digoxin is associated with increased mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the risk of mortality and clinical effects of digoxin use in patients with AF. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify eligible studies comparing all-cause mortality of patients with AF taking digoxin with those not taking digoxin, and the length of follow-up was at least 6 months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. A total of 29 studies with 621,478 patients were included. Digoxin use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in all patients with AF (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.22, < 0.001), especially in patients without HF (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.47, < 0.001). There was no significant association between digoxin and mortality in patients with AF and HF (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14, = 0.110). In all patients with AF, regardless of concomitant HF, digoxin use was associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.23-1.60, < 0.001) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.50, < 0.001), and digoxin use had no significant association with all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.92-1.39, = 0.230). We conclude that digoxin use is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and SCD, and it does not reduce readmission for AF, regardless of concomitant HF. Digoxin may have a neutral effect on all-cause mortality in patients with AF with concomitant HF. https://www.crd.york.ac.ukPROSPERO.
PubMed: 34660731
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.731135 -
Clinical Therapeutics Nov 2021To best promote drug tolerability and efficacy in the clinic, data from drug-drug interaction (DDI) evaluations and subsequent translation of the results to DDI...
PURPOSE
To best promote drug tolerability and efficacy in the clinic, data from drug-drug interaction (DDI) evaluations and subsequent translation of the results to DDI prevention and/or management strategies must be incorporated into the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) product labeling in a consistent manner because differences in language might result in varied interpretations. This analysis aimed to assess the consistency in DDI labeling language in New Drug Applications (NDAs).
METHODS
NDAs of recently approved drugs (2012-2020) that increase the exposure of digoxin, midazolam, and S-warfarin, index substrates of P-glycoprotein, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and CYP2C9 activity, respectively, were fully reviewed. Noninhibitors were also evaluated to appreciate the extent of mechanistic extrapolation in case of negative index studies.
FINDINGS
After a systematic review of the DDI studies available in NDAs, FDA-approved labeling, and commonly used clinical tertiary resources, differences in DDI results presentation and resulting clinical recommendations were found, even for inhibitors that affect similarly the exposure of the same index substrate. Studies with negative results were often reported in the labels without providing mechanistic interpretation, thus limiting the possible extrapolation of this information to other known substrates.
IMPLICATIONS
The variability in language affects how the information was presented to clinicians in tertiary resources. Strategies that aim to improve the translation of mechanistic DDI index studies into consistent labeling recommendations are briefly discussed in this review.
Topics: Digoxin; Drug Interactions; Humans; Language; Midazolam; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Product Labeling; Warfarin
PubMed: 34579970
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.016 -
Disease-a-month : DM Feb 2022
Topics: Epithelium; Humans; Intestines; Magnesium; Magnesium Deficiency; RNA, Messenger; TRPM Cation Channels
PubMed: 34511254
DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101285 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Dec 2021The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements...
INTRODUCTION
The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal? Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.
METHODS
A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase ( Ovid), CINAHL ( EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews ( Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations. One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.
RESULTS
From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% ( = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% ( = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% ( = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% ( = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% ( = 484) of individuals.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death. Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Animals; Carbamazepine; Charcoal; Decontamination; Drug Overdose; Humans
PubMed: 34424785
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1961144 -
Andrologia Dec 2021Digoxin, a commonly used drug for congestive heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias, has been reported to exert cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing effects on prostate... (Review)
Review
Digoxin, a commonly used drug for congestive heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias, has been reported to exert cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing effects on prostate cancer (PCa) cells. In this study, we aimed to perform a pooled analysis to summarise all the evidence related to the effects of digoxin on PCa development. Four electronic databases were systematically searched to filter the eligible studies. The hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. This study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021226885). Ten clinical studies with a total of 108,444 participants (15,835 individuals were digoxin users) were included. The pooled result from 6 included studies demonstrated that digoxin usage was correlated with a significant decrease in PCa risk (adjusted RR = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.799-0.997, p = .044) when compared with the nonusers. Synthetic result of 4 eligible studies revealed that digoxin significantly correlated with higher prostate cancer-specific mortality than the controls (adjusted HR = 1.142, 95% CI: 1.005-1.297). No statistical heterogeneity was detected during this analysis (all I < 50%, p > .1). Our study confirmed a preventive effect of digoxin usage for the risk of PCa in men. However, digoxin use was associated with a significantly elevated risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. This finding needs more well-designed studies to better interpret the causality.
Topics: Digoxin; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 34414594
DOI: 10.1111/and.14217 -
Evidence-based Complementary and... 2021The L. leaf is gaining interest as a potential therapeutic agent for alleviating dengue- and non-dengue-associated thrombocytopaenia. In that regard, safety... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The L. leaf is gaining interest as a potential therapeutic agent for alleviating dengue- and non-dengue-associated thrombocytopaenia. In that regard, safety considerations are as important as efficacy potential. The safety evaluation of botanical products for human use is complicated by variable formulations, complex phytochemical composition, and extrinsic toxicants. This review aimed to systematically collate related safety clinical and preclinical data, as well as reports on herb-drug interactions of leaf consumption.
METHODS
A systematic search using predetermined keywords on electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library Central, LILACS, and Web of Science) and grey literature was conducted. Relevant clinical and preclinical studies were identified, screened, and analysed to present an overall safety profile of leaf consumption.
RESULTS
A total of 41 articles were included (23 clinical, 5 ongoing trials, and 13 preclinical) for descriptive analysis on study characteristics, adverse reactions, toxicity findings, and herb-drug interactions, from which 13 randomised controlled and quasiexperimental trials were further assessed for risk of bias and reporting quality. Overall, leaf consumption (in the form of juice and standardised aqueous extract) was well tolerated by adult humans for short durations (
digoxin, ciprofloxacin, and artemisinin were accounted. CONCLUSION
leaf consumption in adults is generally safe for short-term use though cautioned in pregnancy and people with liver impairment. It has potential herb-drug interactions with oral hypoglycaemic agents, p-glycoprotein substrates, and antibiotics with cation chelating properties.
PubMed: 34040647
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5511221 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Nov 2021Recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Our study aimed to estimate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Our study aimed to estimate the comparative efficacy of different pharmacologic interventions for the prevention of GIB, through a network meta-analysis (NMA). A total of 13 observational studies comparing six strategies. Among those, 4 were for primary, and 9 were for secondary prevention of GIB. On NMA, thalidomide (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.016, Credible interval [CrI]I: 0.00053-0.12), omega-3-fatty acid (HR:0.088, CrI: 0.026-0.77), octreotide (HR: 0.17, CrI: 0.0589-0.41) and danazol (HR:0.17, CrI: 0.059-0.41) reduced the risk of GIB. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) and digoxin were not associated with any significant reduction. Based on NMA, combining indirect treatment comparisons, thalidomide, danazol, and octreotide treatments were associated with decreased risk of recurrent GIB. Additionally, Omega 3 fatty acids were associated with a lower risk of the primary episode of GIB in the LVAD patient population.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Failure; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 33992428
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100835 -
European Journal of Heart Failure Apr 2021The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the effect of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) pharmacotherapy on health-related quality of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the effect of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) pharmacotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
METHODS AND RESULTS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in June 2020. Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating contemporary HFrEF pharmacotherapy and reporting HRQoL as an outcome were included. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and GRADE certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was HRQoL at last available follow-up analysed using a random-effects model. We included 37 studies from 5770 identified articles. Risk of bias was low in 10 trials and high/unclear in 27 trials. High certainty evidence from meta-analyses demonstrated improved HRQoL over placebo with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.23] and intravenous iron (SMD 0.52, 95% CI 0.04-1.00). Furthermore, high certainty evidence from ≥1 landmark trial further supported improved HRQoL with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.17), ivabradine (SMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.23), hydralazine-nitrate (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.04-0.44) vs. placebo, and for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.17). Findings were inconclusive for ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, digoxin, and oral iron based on low-to-moderate certainty evidence.
CONCLUSION
ARBs, ARNIs, SGLT2 inhibitors, ivabradine, hydralazine-nitrate, and intravenous iron improved HRQoL in patients with HFrEF. These findings can be incorporated into discussions with patients to enable shared decision-making.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 33634543
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2141 -
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and... May 2021Digoxin is a cardiac glycoside that was introduced to cardiovascular medicine more than 200 years ago. Its use is associated with large variability, which complicates...
BACKGROUND
Digoxin is a cardiac glycoside that was introduced to cardiovascular medicine more than 200 years ago. Its use is associated with large variability, which complicates achieving the desired therapeutic outcomes.
OBJECTIVES
To present a synthesis of the available literature on the population pharmacokinetics of digoxin in adults and to identify the sources of variability in its pharmacokinetics.
METHODS
This is a PROSPERO registered systematic review (CRD42018105300). A literature search was conducted using the ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases to identify digoxin population pharmacokinetic studies of adults that utilized the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling approach.
RESULTS
Sixteen articles were included in the present analysis. Only two studies were conducted in elderly subjects as a separate population. Both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin were investigated in one study. Furthermore, the reviewed studies were mostly conducted in East Asian populations (68.8%). Digoxin's pharmacokinetics were usually described by a one-compartment model because of the nature of the collected data. Weight, age, kidney function, presence of heart failure, and co-administered medications such as calcium channel blockers were the most commonly identified predictors of digoxin clearance. The value of apparent clearance in a typical study individual ranged from 0.005 to 0.2 l/h/kg, while the value of the apparent volume of distribution ranged from 3.14 to 15.2 l/kg. The quality of model evaluation was deemed excellent only in 31.3% of the studies.
CONCLUSION
This review provides information about variables that need to be considered when prescribing digoxin. The results highlight the need for prospective studies that allow two-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to be established, with a special focus on the elderly subpopulation.
Topics: Adult; Cardiotonic Agents; Digoxin; Humans; Models, Biological; Research Design; Tissue Distribution
PubMed: 33616855
DOI: 10.1007/s13318-021-00672-6