-
Prenatal Diagnosis Apr 2008The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of selective feticide (SF) compared to expectant management (EM) on perinatal outcome in dichorionic and monochorionic... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of selective feticide (SF) compared to expectant management (EM) on perinatal outcome in dichorionic and monochorionic twins discordant for anencephaly. For this purpose, we conducted a systematic review of literature and added ten unpublished cases. As a result, we found that in dichorionic twins, mean gestational age (GA) at birth in the SF group was 38.0 weeks versus 34.9 weeks (P = 0.0002). Mean birth weight was 2922 g in the SF group versus 2474 g (P = 0.03). In monochorionic twins, mean GA at birth was 35.2 weeks versus 32.7 weeks (P = 0.1). Mean birth weight was 2711 g versus 1667 g (P = 0.0001). We conclude that while SF does not reduce perinatal mortality, it does result in significantly longer gestations and higher birth weight, and appears to be the management of choice in dichorionic twins discordant for anencephaly. In monochorionic twins, SF also increases birth weight, but in view of the complexity of this group, no clear recommendations can be made.
Topics: Anencephaly; Diseases in Twins; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal; Pregnancy, Multiple; Prenatal Care; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 18302309
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1967 -
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine :... Nov 2007Congenital heart defects (CHDs) affect approximately 0.5% of all neonates. Recent literature points to a possible increase in the CHD prevalence among... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Congenital heart defects (CHDs) affect approximately 0.5% of all neonates. Recent literature points to a possible increase in the CHD prevalence among monochorionic/diamniotic (MC/DA) twin gestations. We hypothesized that MC/DA twin pregnancy is a risk factor for CHD.
METHODS
A systematic review of all published English literature was conducted on MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed) from January 2000 through April 2007 using the medical subject heading terms "congenital heart defect" and "monozygotic twins." Four observational studies were included in the final analysis. Published historical data were used for the population background risk of CHD. Relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by fixed and random effect models.
RESULTS
We included a total of 40 fetuses with CHDs among 830 fetuses from MC/DA twin gestations. Compared with the population, CHDs were significantly more prevalent in MC/DA twins regardless of the presence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) (RR, 9.18; 95% CI, 5.51-15.29; P < .001). Monochorionic/diamniotic twin gestations affected by TTTS were more likely to be complicated by CHDs than those that did not have TTTS (RR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.03-7.52; P = .04). Ventricular septal defects were the most frequent heart defects. Pulmonary stenosis and atrial septal defects were significantly more prevalent in pregnancies complicated with TTTS.
CONCLUSIONS
Monochorionic/diamniotic twin gestation appears to be a risk factor for CHDs. Conditions that lead to abnormal placentation may also contribute to abnormal heart development, especially in MC/DA twin pregnancies complicated with TTTS. Fetal echocardiography may be considered for all MC/DA twin gestations because ventricular septal defects and pulmonary stenosis are the most common defects.
Topics: Diseases in Twins; Female; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Internationality; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 17957043
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.11.1491 -
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2007Convergent evidence from a multitude of research designs (adoption, family, genomescan, geographical, immigrant, molecular genetic, surname, and twin studies of suicide)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Convergent evidence from a multitude of research designs (adoption, family, genomescan, geographical, immigrant, molecular genetic, surname, and twin studies of suicide) suggests genetic contributions to suicide risk. The present account provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the twin studies on this topic.
METHODS
A total of 32 studies (19 case reports, 5 twin register-based studies, 4 population-based epidemiological studies, 4 studies of surviving co-twins) located through extensive literature search strategies are summarized and discussed here. This literature corpus was published between 1812 and 2006 in six languages and reports data from 13 countries.
RESULTS
A meta-analysis of all register-based studies and all case reports aggregated shows that concordance for completed suicide is significantly more frequent among monozygotic than dizygotic twin pairs. The results of co-twin studies rule out exclusively psychosocially based explanations of this pattern. Population-based epidemiological studies demonstrate a significant contribution of additive genetic factors (heritability estimates: 30-55%) to the broader phenotype of suicidal behavior (suicide thoughts, plans and attempts) that largely overlaps for different types of suicidal behavior and is largely independent of the inheritance of psychiatric disorders. Nonshared environmental effects (i.e. personal experiences) also contribute substantially to the risk of suicidal behavior, whereas effects of shared (family) environment do not.
CONCLUSIONS
The totality of evidence from twin studies of suicide strongly suggests genetic contributions to liability for suicidal behavior. To further research progress in this area, an extensive discussion of design limitations, shortcomings of the literature and further points is provided, including sources of bias, gaps in the literature, errors in previous reviews, age and sex effects and twin-singleton differences in suicide risk, and notes from a history-of-science view.
Topics: Cause of Death; Diseases in Twins; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Phenotype; Population Surveillance; Risk Factors; Social Environment; Suicide; Suicide, Attempted; Twin Studies as Topic; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 17721766
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-007-0823-2 -
International Journal of Epidemiology Oct 2004An inverse association between birthweight and later blood pressure has been found in many studies in singletons. Twin studies have been used to examine whether genetic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
An inverse association between birthweight and later blood pressure has been found in many studies in singletons. Twin studies have been used to examine whether genetic factors or family environment could account for this association.
METHODS
A systematic review identified 10 studies covering 3901 twin pairs. Meta-analysis of regression coefficients for the association between birthweight and systolic blood pressure was carried out for unpaired versus paired associations and for paired associations in dizygotic versus monozygotic pairs.
RESULTS
After adjustment for current weight or body mass index (BMI), the difference in systolic blood pressure per kg birthweight was -2.0 (95% CI: -3.2, -0.8) mmHg in the unpaired analysis and -0.4 (95% CI: -1.5, 0.7) mmHg in the paired analysis in the same subjects. In the paired analysis by zygosity, in all twins the coefficients were -0.7 (95% CI: -2.3, 0.8) mmHg in dizygotic pairs and -0.8 (95% CI: -2.1, 0.4) mmHg in monozygotic pairs, but in studies which included zygosity tests the coefficients were -1.0 (95% CI: -3.3, 1.6) mmHg in dizygotic pairs and -0.4 (95% CI: -1.9, 1.3) mmHg in monozygotic pairs.
CONCLUSIONS
The attenuation of the regression coefficient in the paired analysis provides support for the possibility that factors shared by twins contribute to the association between birthweight and blood pressure in singletons. Comparison of paired analysis in monozygotic and dizygotic pairs could not provide conclusive evidence for a role for genetic as opposed to shared environmental factors.
Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Blood Pressure; Environment; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Twin Studies as Topic; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 15375085
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh260 -
Stroke Jan 2004To design appropriate molecular genetic studies, we first need to understand the genetic epidemiology of stroke. We therefore performed a systematic review of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
To design appropriate molecular genetic studies, we first need to understand the genetic epidemiology of stroke. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the heritability of stroke according to methodological quality of studies and to determine any heterogeneity in findings between studies and possible publication bias.
METHODS
We searched for twin studies and studies of family history of stroke using bibliographic databases and by hand-searching reference lists and journals. Odds ratios (ORs) for family history as a risk factor for stroke were calculated within studies and combined by meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies, methodological quality of studies, and the influence of the age at which stroke occurred in both probands and relatives were assessed.
RESULTS
We identified 53 independent studies (3 twin, 33 case-control, and 17 cohort). Monozygotic twins were more likely to be concordant than dizygotic twins (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.3; P=0.003). A positive family history was a risk factor for stroke in both case-control (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.7 to 1.9; P<0.00001) and cohort (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5; P<0.00001) studies. However, there was major heterogeneity between studies (cohort P=0.0001; case-control P<0.00001), with much stronger associations in small studies and methodologically less rigorous studies. Moreover, studies that reported insufficient data to allow meta-analysis tended to have found weaker associations. Family history of stroke was more frequent in studies that were confined to probands or relatives aged <70 years. However, few studies considered the number of affected and unaffected relatives, only 2 studies considered stroke phenotypes in detail, and only 19 studies (38%) adjusted associations for intermediate phenotypes. No twin study, only 5 cohort studies (26%), and 20 case-control studies (61%) differentiated between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the proband. Family history of stroke was more frequent in large- and small-vessel stroke than in cardioembolic stroke. There were very few data on the influence of family history on stroke severity and no data on stroke recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Twin studies suggest a small genetic contribution to stroke, but reliable interpretation of published family history studies is undermined by major heterogeneity, insufficient detail, and potential publication and reporting bias. More detailed large-scale genetic epidemiology is required.
Topics: Bias; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Epidemiologic Methods; Epidemiologic Research Design; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Publication Bias; Risk Factors; Stroke; Twin Studies as Topic
PubMed: 14684773
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000107187.84390.AA