-
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Apr 2014In the light of post-marketing reports of persistent sexual dysfunction with the use of finasteride, analysis of the extent of risk associated with 5α-reductase... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In the light of post-marketing reports of persistent sexual dysfunction with the use of finasteride, analysis of the extent of risk associated with 5α-reductase inhibitor treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is warranted. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of 5α-reductase inhibitors using the outcomes hair count, global photographic assessment and patient self-assessment and evaluate the benefits of treatment versus the risk of global sexual dysfunction.
METHODS
A systematic review identified all relevant randomized controlled trials of finasteride 1 mg, 5 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg. The efficacy outcome hair count was analyzed using pair-wise meta-analysis, while the efficacy outcomes global photographic assessment and patient self-assessment as well as the safety outcome global sexual dysfunction were analyzed through network meta-analyses. A benefit-risk assessment was also performed.
RESULTS
The active interventions were not significantly different than each other in efficacy and were not significantly different from placebo in eliciting sexual dysfunction. Benefit-risk analysis resulted in an arbitrary ranking due to the lack of statistically significant difference between active treatments.
DISCUSSION
Analysis results reiterate the efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors for the treatment of AGA and may support the approval of dutasteride 0.5 mg as an additional treatment option, following further study.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Alopecia; Azasteroids; Dutasteride; Finasteride; Humans; Male; Photography; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Self Report
PubMed: 23768246
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2013.813011 -
Asian Journal of Andrology Nov 20115α-reductase inhibitors (5α-RIs), including finasteride and dutasteride, are commonly used medical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Many studies... (Review)
Review
5α-reductase inhibitors (5α-RIs), including finasteride and dutasteride, are commonly used medical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Many studies reported that preoperative 5α-RI had impact on intraoperative haemorrhage during surgery for BPH, but it was still in controversial. So, we conducted a systematic review of the effects and mechanisms of 5α-RIs on intraoperative bleeding for BPH. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trail Register of Controlled Trials and the reference lists of retrieved studies were searched in the analysis. Sixteen publications involving 15 different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 1156 patients were used in the analysis, including 10 RCTs for finasteride and five RCTs for dutasteride. We found that preoperative finasteride treatment decreases microvessel density (MVD) in resected prostate specimens. Total blood loss, blood loss per gram of resected prostate tissue and decreases in haemoglobin were all greatly reduced in the finasteride group as compared to controls. Dutasteride appeared to have no effect on bleeding. This meta-analysis shows that preoperative finasteride treatment could decrease intraoperative haemorrhage during surgery for BPH. Preoperative dutasteride had no effect on intraoperative haemorrhage, but further high-quality prospective studies are still needed to confirm this observation.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Azasteroids; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dutasteride; Finasteride; Humans; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21892196
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.86 -
5-α-Reductase inhibitors for prostate cancer chemoprevention: an updated Cochrane systematic review.BJU International Nov 2010• To estimate the benefits and harms of 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-α-RIs) in preventing prostate cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
• To estimate the benefits and harms of 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-α-RIs) in preventing prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
• We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library through June 2010 to identify randomized trials. • We included articles if they examined 5-α-RI vs control, were ≥ 1 year in duration and provided clinical outcomes. • Our primary outcome was prostate cancer period-prevalence 'for-cause'.
RESULTS
• Eight studies met inclusion criteria but only the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events were designed to assess the impact of 5-α-RIs on prostate cancer period-prevalence. The mean age of enrolees was 64 years, 92% were White, and mean PSA level was 3.1 ng/mL. For-cause prostate cancers comprised 54% of all cancers detected in placebo-controlled studies. • Compared with placebo, 5-α-RI resulted in a 25% relative risk (RR) reduction in prostate cancers detected for-cause [RR 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.83; 1.4% absolute risk reduction (3.5% vs 4.9%)]. One BPH trial reported that the risk of prostate cancers detected for-cause was significantly reduced with dutasteride and combined dutasteride plus tamsulosin compared with tamsulosin monotherapy. • Six trials vs placebo assessed prostate cancers detected overall. There was a 26% RR reduction favouring 5-α-RI [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.00; 2.9% absolute risk reduction (6.3% vs 9.2%)]. There were reductions across categories of age, race and family history of prostate cancer. • One placebo-controlled trial of men that investigators considered at greater risk for prostate cancer (based on age, elevated PSA level and having a previous suspicion of prostate cancer leading to a prostate biopsy) reported that dutasteride did not reduce prostate cancers detected for-cause based on needle-biopsy but did reduce risk of overall incident prostate cancer detected by biopsy by 23%[RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.85; absolute reduction 16.1% vs 20.8%]. There were reductions across age, family history of prostate cancer, PSA level, and prostate volume subgroups. • Incidences of erectile dysfunction, ejaculate volume, decreased libido, and gynaecomastia were greater with 5-α-RI vs placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
• 5-α-RIs reduce the risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer among men who are screened regularly for prostate cancer. • Information is inadequate to assess the effect of 5-α-RIs on prostate cancer or all-cause mortality. • 5-α-RIs increase sexual and erectile dysfunction.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Aged; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Azasteroids; Dutasteride; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 20977593
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09714.x -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Dec 2006Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and sexual dysfunction such as erectile dysfunction (ED), are highly prevalent in men... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND SCOPE
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and sexual dysfunction such as erectile dysfunction (ED), are highly prevalent in men over the age of 50. LUTS and ED have a negative impact on sexual function and when comorbid, result in reduced quality of life. The goal of this article is to discuss the relationship between ED and LUTS, describe the diagnostic workup of these disorders, explore the current treatment options, and examine how treatments may affect this population. Medline (1980-2006), Cochrane reviews, and the American Urological Association 2006 General Meeting abstracts were searched for relevant clinical trials and reviews with the terms: benign prostatic hyperplasia, lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists, alpha-blockers, 5alpha-reductase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, transurethral resection of the prostate, transurethral microwave thermotherapy, transurethral needle ablation, adverse events, alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, terazosin, dutasteride, finasteride, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil. However, because of the volume of literature, this article is not a systematic review.
FINDINGS
Although age is an independent risk factor for both LUTS and ED, studies report that LUTS is also an independent risk factor for ED. Treatments for LUTS include pharmacologic, minimally invasive, and surgical therapies. Among pharmacologic options, alpha1-adrenergic receptor (alpha1-AR) antagonists provide effective treatment with a low risk of sexual side-effects; some of these drugs have been reported to improve sexual function. The treatment of LUTS may improve ED. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5s) are considered first-line therapy for ED. Comorbid LUTS and ED are treated with an alpha1-AR antagonist and a PDE-5; however, this combination must be used with caution because of vasodilatory adverse events associated with both classes of drugs.
CONCLUSIONS
Optimal management includes screening to identify patients with comorbid LUTS and ED, and the use of treatments that minimize both vasodilatory and sexual side-effects.
Topics: 3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Cholestenone 5 alpha-Reductase; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Quality of Life; Sexual Behavior; Urination Disorders
PubMed: 17265598
DOI: 10.1185/030079906x154141