-
Clinical Journal of the American... Dec 2020Hyperphosphatemia is a persistent problem in individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, which may contribute to vascular and bone complications. In some dialysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Hyperphosphatemia is a persistent problem in individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, which may contribute to vascular and bone complications. In some dialysis centers, dietitians work with patients to help them manage serum phosphate. Given the regularity of hyperphosphatemia in this population and constraints on kidney dietitian time, the authors aimed to evaluate the evidence for this practice.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS
There was a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other databases were searched for controlled trials published from January 2000 until November 2019 in the English language. Included studies were required to examine the effect of phosphate-specific diet therapy provided by a dietitian on serum phosphate in individuals on hemodialysis. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method.
RESULTS
Of the 8054 titles/abstracts identified, 168 articles were reviewed, and 12 clinical trials (11 randomized, one nonrandomized) were included. Diet therapy reduced serum phosphate compared with controls in all studies, reaching statistical significance in eight studies, although overall certainty of evidence was low, primarily due to randomization issues and deviations from protocol. Monthly diet therapy (20-30 minutes) significantly lowered serum phosphate in patients with persistent hyperphosphatemia for 4-6 months, without compromising nutrition status (mean difference, -0.87 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval, -1.40 to -0.33 mg/dl), but appeared unlikely to maintain these effects if discontinued. Unfortunately, trials were too varied in design, setting, and approach to appropriately pool in meta-analysis, and were too limited in number to evaluate the timing, dose, and strategy of phosphate-specific diet therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
There is low-quality evidence that monthly diet therapy by a dietitian appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment for persistent hyperphosphatemia in patients on HD.
Topics: Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Nutritional Status; Phosphates; Phosphorus, Dietary; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 33380474
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.09360620 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2020Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone that is important for its role in calcium homeostasis to maintain skeletal health. Linear growth faltering and stunting remain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone that is important for its role in calcium homeostasis to maintain skeletal health. Linear growth faltering and stunting remain pervasive indicators of poor nutrition status among infants and children under five years of age around the world, and low vitamin D status has been linked to poor growth. However, existing evidence on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among infants and children under five years of age has not been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVES
To assess effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among infants and children under five years of age.
SEARCH METHODS
In December 2019, we searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, 14 other electronic databases, and two trials registries. We also searched the reference lists of relevant publications for any relevant trials, and we contacted key organisations and authors to obtain information on relevant ongoing and unpublished trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation, with or without other micronutrients, compared to no intervention, placebo, a lower dose of vitamin D, or the same micronutrients alone (and not vitamin D) in infants and children under five years of age who lived in any country.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures.
MAIN RESULTS
Out of 75 studies (187 reports; 12,122 participants) included in the qualitative analysis, 64 studies (169 reports; 10,854 participants) contributed data on our outcomes of interest for meta-analysis. A majority of included studies were conducted in India, USA, and Canada. Two studies reported for-profit funding, two were categorised as receiving mixed funding (non-profit and for-profit), five reported that they received no funding, 26 did not disclose funding sources, and the remaining studies were funded by non-profit funding. Certainty of evidence varied between high and very low across outcomes (all measured at endpoint) for each comparison. Vitamin D supplementation versus placebo or no intervention (31 studies) Compared to placebo or no intervention, vitamin D supplementation (at doses 200 to 2000 IU daily; or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment) may make little to no difference in linear growth (measured length/height in cm) among children under five years of age (mean difference (MD) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 to 1.68; 3 studies, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); probably improves length/height-for-age z-score (L/HAZ) (MD 0.11, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.22; 1 study, 1258 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and probably makes little to no difference in stunting (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; 1 study, 1247 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). In terms of adverse events, vitamin D supplementation results in little to no difference in developing hypercalciuria compared to placebo (RR 2.03, 95% CI 0.28 to 14.67; 2 studies, 68 participants; high-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation impacts the development of hypercalcaemia as the certainty of evidence was very low (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.90; 2 studies, 367 participants). Vitamin D supplementation (higher dose) versus vitamin D (lower dose) (34 studies) Compared to a lower dose of vitamin D (100 to 1000 IU daily; or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment), higher-dose vitamin D supplementation (200 to 6000 IU daily; or up to 600,000 IU bolus at enrolment) may have little to no effect on linear growth, but we are uncertain about this result (MD 1.00, 95% CI -2.22 to 0.21; 5 studies, 283 participants), and it may make little to no difference in L/HAZ (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.86; 2 studies, 105 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies evaluated stunting. As regards adverse events, higher-dose vitamin D supplementation may make little to no difference in developing hypercalciuria (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.35; 6 studies, 554 participants; low-certainty evidence) or in hypercalcaemia (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.18; 5 studies, 986 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to lower-dose vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D supplementation (higher dose) + micronutrient(s) versus vitamin D (lower dose) + micronutrient(s) (9 studies) Supplementation with a higher dose of vitamin D (400 to 2000 IU daily, or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment) plus micronutrients, compared to a lower dose (200 to 2000 IU daily, or up to 90,000 IU bolus at enrolment) of vitamin D with the same micronutrients, probably makes little to no difference in linear growth (MD 0.60, 95% CI -3.33 to 4.53; 1 study, 25 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No studies evaluated L/HAZ or stunting. In terms of adverse events, higher-dose vitamin D supplementation with micronutrients, compared to lower-dose vitamin D with the same micronutrients, may make little to no difference in developing hypercalciuria (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.48; 1 study, 86 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably makes little to no difference in developing hypercalcaemia (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90, 1.11; 2 studies, 126 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Four studies measured hyperphosphataemia and three studies measured kidney stones, but they reported no occurrences and therefore were not included in the comparison for these outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Evidence suggests that oral vitamin D supplementation may result in little to no difference in linear growth, stunting, hypercalciuria, or hypercalcaemia, compared to placebo or no intervention, but may result in a slight increase in length/height-for-age z-score (L/HAZ). Additionally, evidence suggests that compared to lower doses of vitamin D, with or without micronutrients, vitamin D supplementation may result in little to no difference in linear growth, L/HAZ, stunting, hypercalciuria, or hypercalcaemia. Small sample sizes, substantial heterogeneity in terms of population and intervention parameters, and high risk of bias across many of the included studies limit our ability to confirm with any certainty the effects of vitamin D on our outcomes. Larger, well-designed studies of long duration (several months to years) are recommended to confirm whether or not oral vitamin D supplementation may impact linear growth in children under five years of age, among both those who are healthy and those with underlying infectious or non-communicable health conditions.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Body Height; Child, Preschool; Confidence Intervals; Growth; Growth Disorders; Humans; Hypercalcemia; Hypercalciuria; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Micronutrients; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vitamin D; Vitamins
PubMed: 33305842
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012875.pub2 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2020Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the development of mineral bone disorder (MBD), osteoporosis, and fragility fractures. Among CKD patients, adynamic bone...
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with the development of mineral bone disorder (MBD), osteoporosis, and fragility fractures. Among CKD patients, adynamic bone disease or low bone turnover is the most common type of renal osteodystrophy. The consequences of CKD-MBD include increased fracture risk, greater morbidity, and mortality. Thus, the goal is to prevent the occurrences of fractures by means of alleviating CKD-induced MBD and treating subsequent osteoporosis. Changes in mineral and humoral metabolism as well as bone structure develop early in the course of CKD. CKD-MBD includes abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, and/or vitamin D; abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth, or strength; and/or vascular or other soft tissue calcification. In patients with CKD-MBD, using either DXA or FRAX to screen fracture risk should be considered. Biomarkers such as bALP and iPTH may assist to assess bone turnover. Before initiating an antiresorptive or anabolic agent to treat osteoporosis in CKD patients, lifestyle modifications, such as exercise, calcium, and vitamin D supplementation, smoking cessation, and avoidance of excessive alcohol intake are important. Managing hyperphosphatemia and SHPT are also crucial. Understanding the complex pathogenesis of CKD-MBD is crucial in improving one's short- and long-term outcomes. Treatment strategies for CKD-associated osteoporosis should be patient-centered to determine the type of renal osteodystrophy. This review focuses on the mechanism, evaluation and management of patients with CKD-MBD. However, further studies are needed to explore more details regarding the underlying pathophysiology and to assess the safety and efficacy of agents for treating CKD-MBD.
Topics: Biomarkers; Bone and Bones; Calcium; Calcium, Dietary; Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Osteoporosis; Phosphorus; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Vitamin D
PubMed: 32961953
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186846 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2021Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were reported in several clinical trials, but mostly in small-scale studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were reported in several clinical trials, but mostly in small-scale studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ferric citrate in controlling hyperphosphataemia and iron-deficiency anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials that enrolled CKD patients receiving ferric citrate for hyperphosphataemia. Two investigators performed systematic literature search to identify eligible studies, evaluated risk of bias and extracted relevant data.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were greater compared to no active treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.15; P < 0.001) and comparable to other phosphate binders (SMD = 0.03; P = 0.61). Calcium concentrations post ferric citrate treatment did not differ compared to no active treatment (SMD = 0.15; P = 0.21) but were significantly lower compared to other phosphate binders (SMD = -0.14; P = 0.01). These led to significant reductions in calcium-phosphorus product with ferric citrate versus no active control (SMD = -1.02; P < 0.001) but no difference versus active control (SMD = -0.01; P = 0.93). Intact parathyroid hormone showed no substantial between-group difference in both comparison against no active and active controls. Ferric citrate improved iron stores and anaemia parameters, but increased risk of diarrhoea, abdominal pain and discoloured faeces.
CONCLUSION
Ferric citrate was effective in lowering phosphorus and phosphorus-calcium product versus no active treatment and had comparable effects versus other phosphate binders. Calcium levels were significantly lower with ferric citrate than with other phosphate-lowering treatment. Ferric citrate had additive effects on iron repletion and anaemia control and was associated with mostly gastrointestinal side effects.
Topics: Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Ferric Compounds; Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Phosphates; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 32470149
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14396 -
PloS One 2020Paricalcitol, a new vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA), is reported to be more effective than other VDRAs in reducing calcium and phosphorus levels in patients... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol versus other vitamin D receptor activators in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials.
Paricalcitol, a new vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA), is reported to be more effective than other VDRAs in reducing calcium and phosphorus levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol remain controversial. This analysis compares paricalcitol with other VDRAs in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI up to April 22, 2019. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were estimated to compare the outcomes of the groups. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2 and Stata 12.0. Fifteen studies (N = 110,544) were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, 11 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 were non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs). Patients receiving paricalcitol experienced better overall survival (OS) than patients receiving other VDRAs, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.91; P < 0.00001). Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were significantly reduced in the paricalcitol group compared to the group receiving other VDRAs, with a pooled SMD of -0.53 (95% CI -0.89- -0.16; P = 0.004). There was a significant increase in serum calcium levels from baseline in the paricalcitol group compared to the other VDRAs group when limiting the analysis to RCTs, with a pooled SMD of 2.14 (95% CI 0.90-3.38; P = 0.0007). Changes in serum calcium levels were significantly lower in the paricalcitol group when the analysis was limited to NRSIs, with a pooled SMD of -0.85 (95% CI -1.34--0.35; P = 0.0008). The NSRI analysis also showed a significant reduction in serum phosphorus levels in the paricalcitol group, with a pooled SMD of -0.57 (95% CI -1.00--0.13; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, or adverse events. Generally, paricalcitol seems superior to other VDRAs in reducing mortality and iPTH levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the comparative effectiveness of paricalcitol in reducing serum calcium and phosphorus levels needs further exploration. No significant difference was found in the rate of adverse events.
Topics: Calcium; Disease-Free Survival; Ergocalciferols; Female; Humans; Male; Parathyroid Hormone; Phosphorus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Calcitriol; Renal Dialysis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 32470067
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233705 -
Journal of Renal Nutrition : the... Jan 2021Bone and mineral metabolism becomes dysregulated with progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and increasing levels of parathyroid hormone serve as an adaptive...
Bone and mineral metabolism becomes dysregulated with progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and increasing levels of parathyroid hormone serve as an adaptive response to maintain normal phosphorus and calcium levels. In end-stage renal disease, this response becomes maladaptive and high levels of phosphorus may occur. We summarize strategies to control hyperphosphatemia based on a systematic literature review of clinical trial and real-world observational data on phosphorus control in hemodialysis patients with CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD). These studies suggest that current management options (diet and lifestyle changes; regular dialysis treatment; and use of phosphate binders, vitamin D, calcimimetics) have their own benefits and limitations with variable clinical outcomes. A more integrated approach to phosphorus control in dialysis patients may be necessary, incorporating measurement of multiple biomarkers of CKD-MBD pathophysiology (calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone) and correlation between diet adjustments and CKD-MBD drugs, which may facilitate improved patient management.
Topics: Calcimimetic Agents; Chelating Agents; Diet; Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Vitamin D
PubMed: 32386937
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.02.003 -
Radiology Aug 2019Background Although nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) affects the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in MRI, there continues to be limited knowledge...
Background Although nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) affects the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in MRI, there continues to be limited knowledge because of the small number of patients with NSF. Purpose To perform a systematic review of NSF. Materials and Methods PubMed database was searched by using the term "Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis" from January 2000 to February 2019. Articles reporting details on individual patients with NSF diagnosis on the basis of both clinical presentations and biopsy confirmation were included. Data were pooled and authors were contacted for clarifications. Rates of NSF were compared through 2008 versus after 2008 and for group I versus group II GBCAs, assuming equal market share. Results Included were 639 patients from 173 articles. Data regarding sex were found for 295 men and 254 women. Age at NSF symptom onset was reported for 177 patients (mean, 49 years ± 16 [standard deviation]; age range, 6-87 years). There were 529 patients with documented exposure to GBCAs including gadodiamide ( = 307), gadopentetate dimeglumine ( = 49), gadoversetamide ( = 6), gadobutrol ( = 1), gadobenate dimeglumine ( = 1), multiple ( = 41), and unknown ( = 120). Among patients with previous exposure, only seven patients were administered GBCA after 2008, yielding a lower rate of NSF after 2008 ( < .001). There were motion limitations in 70.8% (296 of 418) of patients, indicating a more serious debilitation. Associated factors reported for NSF included exposure to GBCA group I ( < .001), dialysis, proinflammatory conditions, hyperphosphatemia, β-blockers, and epoetin. For 341 patients with follow-up, 12 patients were cured and 72 patients partially improved including one during pregnancy. Among those 84 patients reported as cured or improved, in 34 patients cure or improvement occurred after renal function restoration. Four deaths were attributed to NSF. Conclusion Although 639 patients with biopsy-confirmed nephrogenic systemic fibrosis were reported, only seven were after gadolinium-based contrast agent exposure after 2008, indicating that regulatory actions and practice changes have been effective preventive measures. Improvement and sometimes cure with renal function restoration are now possible. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Davenport in this issue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Child; Contrast Media; Female; Gadolinium DTPA; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy; Organometallic Compounds; Young Adult
PubMed: 31264946
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182916 -
The Australasian Journal of Dermatology Aug 2019Calciphylaxis is a rare but life-threatening condition, most commonly affecting patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease. No universally accepted therapy exists...
Calciphylaxis is a rare but life-threatening condition, most commonly affecting patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease. No universally accepted therapy exists so far. In an attempt to avoid surgical intervention with parathyroidectomy, which is of questionable efficacy and carries several risks, a number of noninvasive treatments have been trialled with variable success. These treatments are aimed at modifying risk factors for calciphylaxis, in particular hypercalcaemia, hyperphosphataemia and hyperparathyroidism. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence to determine the potential role of cinacalcet in the treatment of calciphylaxis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively collected from the available English and non-English literature. Overall, there was a very high response rate (partial or complete) of calciphylaxis lesions to both cinacalcet monotherapy and cinacalcet as part of a combination therapy (83.4% and 82.8%, respectively). When examining complete response to treatment specifically, combination therapy with cinacalcet proved more efficacious than monotherapy (62.1% versus 41.7%). There was also an associated rapid reduction of intact parathyroid hormone over a period of 2-33 months in both groups. While there are limitations as to how our data can be interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the methods and follow-up of the included case reports and case series, prompt and consistent therapy including cinacalcet may help improve the disease outcome. Additional research needs to be performed in this area, to further define the optimal use of cinacalcet for the treatment of calciphylaxis.
Topics: Calciphylaxis; Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents; Cinacalcet; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 30666627
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12992 -
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics &... Jun 2019End-stage renal disease is associated with significant comorbidity and mortality. Among its implications, hyperphosphatemia constitutes a consistent and independent risk... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
A systematic review of the economic evaluations of non-calcium-containing phosphate binders, sevelamer and Lanthanum, in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia.
INTRODUCTION
End-stage renal disease is associated with significant comorbidity and mortality. Among its implications, hyperphosphatemia constitutes a consistent and independent risk factor. The use of benchmark treatment, low-cost calcium-based binders declined due to a potential calcification effect on coronary arteries.
AREAS COVERED
Given the increasing prevalence of end-stage renal disease and the high cost of hyperphosphatemia's new primary modality, the non-calcium based phosphate binders, we set-off to systematically assess the economic evaluations of non-calcium containing phosphate binders, sevelamer and lanthanum. The study was performed based on a systematic review of the economic evaluations of sevelamer and lanthanum. The cost-effectiveness profile of the two non-calcium-containing Phosphate Binders compared to calcium-based phosphate binders depends on several factors such as future dialysis costs, utility values, age, survival, and phosphorus levels.
EXPERT OPINION
The comparison between the two agents is rather inconclusive; nevertheless, current review suggests that non-calcium-based phosphate binders may yield a positive cost-effectiveness ratio in patients with inadequate phosphorus management and patient with longer life-expectancy. It is crucial that the literature is endowed with more data, specifically on survival, future dialysis costs, and calcification.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lanthanum; Life Expectancy; Renal Dialysis; Sevelamer
PubMed: 30664365
DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1567336 -
Medicine Oct 2018Recent evidence has shown that nicotinamide treatment may have an impact on phosphorus metabolism in hemodialysis patients. Nevertheless, the treatment remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence has shown that nicotinamide treatment may have an impact on phosphorus metabolism in hemodialysis patients. Nevertheless, the treatment remains controversial. This study aimed to precisely estimate the efficacy and safety of nicotinamide on phosphorus, calcium and iPTH in hemodialysis patients.
METHODS
We searched numerous information sources regarding randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of nicotinamide treatment in hemodialysis patients, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS
Nine relevant studies (n = 428) were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that levels of serum phosphorus (SMD -1.06; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.85, P < .001), parathyroid hormone (SMD -1.09; 95% CI, -1.49 to -0.70, P < .001), and calcium-phosphorus (SMD -0.65; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.34, P < .001) in the nicotinamide group were significantly lower than those of the control group. There was no significant difference in the levels of serum calcium (SMD 0.08; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.30, P = .51) between the groups. The meta-analysis showed that the nicotinamide group had a significantly higher risk of adverse events (OR 3.99; 95% CI, 1.94-8.23, P < .001) than did the control group, especially for thrombocytopenia (OR 49.00; 95% CI, 2.68-897.36, P = .009). However, no serious adverse reactions were observed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of withdrawal (OR 3.51; 95% CI, 0.49-25.00, P = .21) between the groups.
CONCLUSION
Evidence to date clearly indicates that nicotinamide is safe and effective for improving phosphorus metabolism in hemodialysis patients. However, nicotinamide probably causes thrombocytopenia. Further large-sample size, high-quality RCTs are needed.
Topics: Calcium; Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Lipids; Niacinamide; Parathyroid Hormone; Phosphorus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 30313075
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012731