-
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2023Intravitreal injection of anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)is commonly used to treat patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the injection...
Intravitreal injection of anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)is commonly used to treat patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the injection alone requires high cost and compliance. Combining micropulse subthreshold laser (MPSL) and anti-VEGF is a new approach to treating DME. This study intended to answer the question of whether MPSL plus anti-VEGF is effective compared to anti-VEGF alone. The following terms were used in PubMed, clinicaltrial.gov, and Google Scholar: anti-VEGF, DME, MPSL, and diabetic retinopathy. All studies of DME comparing the intervention of MPSL plus anti-VEGF and VEGF alone between the years 2017-2021 were included. Studies with no comparison between the intervention and control group, abstract-only papers, case reports, case series, and systematic review studies were excluded. Five Randomized Controlled Trial (RCTs) and three retrospective studies were analyzed. Four studies found that best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in both therapies. Central macular thickness in six studies was also improved. The improvement differences between both therapies were insignificant and the number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower in combination therapy. These studies show equal outcomes of both therapies. The reduced number of anti-VEGF injections of the combination therapy could improve the management of DME in terms of cost-effectiveness. Further analysis should be conducted to pool the data from the studies and evaluate the overall outcome.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Retinopathy; Intravitreal Injections; Lasers; Macular Edema; Ranibizumab; Retrospective Studies; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 37870005
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_519_23 -
Ophthalmology Science 2024Though lipid and cholesterol dyshomeostasis is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), there is no consensus regarding which... (Review)
Review
TOPIC
Though lipid and cholesterol dyshomeostasis is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), there is no consensus regarding which elements of systemic lipid homeostasis are perturbed in AMD. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, an update to that performed by Wang et al in 2016, we characterized serum lipoprotein profiles in patients with AMD and its various stages.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
These findings may identify novel therapeutic approaches for AMD, a leading cause of blindness among older adults in the industrialized world.
METHODS
We used MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to identify articles from database inception to May 2022 that reported blood/serum levels of lipid subspecies (triglycerides [TGs], total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], and high-density lipoprotein [HDL]) in patients with AMD compared with controls. We meta-analyzed the data by generating multilevel random-effects models using restricted maximum likelihood estimation.
RESULTS
Our updated meta-analysis included 56 studies, almost 3 times as many studies as the 2016 meta-analysis with a total of 308 188 participants. There were no significant differences in serum TG, TC, LDL, or HDL between patients with AMD and non-AMD controls. Given significant heterogeneity, we performed subanalyses specifically in patients with early to intermediate nonexudative AMD, advanced nonexudative AMD, and advanced exudative AMD. Compared with non-AMD controls, patients with early to intermediate nonexudative AMD had significantly lower serum TG (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.06 to -0.01) and higher serum HDL (SMD: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.04-0.11). Patients with advanced exudative AMD had significantly higher serum LDL (SMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.04-0.62) compared with non-AMD controls. There were no other significant differences identified.
CONCLUSION
We found that there is significant heterogeneity in systemic lipoproteins in patients with AMD compared with non-AMD controls. The specific pattern of lipid dyshomeostasis appeared to be distinct based on AMD stage. These findings highlight both the underlying heterogeneity of AMD as well as the presence of distinct pathophysiological mechanisms involved at different stages or subtypes of AMD and may inform the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
PubMed: 37869027
DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100341 -
Seminars in Ophthalmology May 2024To investigate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) and diabetic retinopathy (DR).
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, an electronic search was done to acquire all articles describing brolucizumab use in patients with DME and DR. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022382625). Collected articles were filtered through two stages by independent reviewers. Data were extracted from the included articles and then analyzed accordingly.
RESULTS
Brolucizumab induced significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity and was either better or non-inferior to other types of anti-VEGF (MD -0.64 mu, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.13], = .01); the same observation was noted with regards to central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) (MD -138.6 mu, 95% CI [-151.9, -125.3], = .00001). Brolucizumab was reported to be relatively safe for use in diabetic patients, with few adverse events observed, with a higher frequency of adverse events in relation to the 3 mg dose compared to the 6 mg dose.
CONCLUSION
Brolucizumab is a new drug that has potential advantages in efficacy over other anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of DME and DR. It showed significant improvement in BCVA and CSMT with the possibility of a lower dosing schedule compared to other agents. Although observed in low frequency, sight-threatening adverse effects appear to occur more frequently compared to other anti-VEGF agents. The main observed adverse event was retinal vasculitis which was seen more commonly with the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Retinopathy; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Edema; Ranibizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 37849309
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2271095 -
Ophthalmology. Retina Mar 2024To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold macular laser to conventional focal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of vision loss secondary to diabetic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold macular laser to conventional focal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of vision loss secondary to diabetic macular edema (DME).
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Macular laser remains an important and cost effective treatment option for vision loss secondary to DME. Although anti-VEGF therapy is often first-line, macular laser is of utility in low-resource or remote settings, for patients at risk of loss to follow-up, and for DME not meeting country-specific reimbursement criteria for anti-VEGF therapy. Subthreshold laser is a modality that does not produce clinical or histologic evidence of thermal damage, thereby potentially limiting the common complications of conventional laser.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to September 28, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects modeling. Data were collected at 12 and 24 months for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness, diabetic retinopathy severity scale, rate of adverse events, rate of enrolled patients not completing treatment, rate of patients receiving retreatment, and quality-of-life measures. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane's Risk-of-Bias version 2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) frameworks, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed between subthreshold laser modalities and evaluated with Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses tool.
RESULTS
Fourteen RCTs comprising 514 eyes receiving conventional laser and 574 eyes receiving subthreshold laser were included. Subthreshold laser likely results in no difference to BCVA (moderate GRADE certainty) compared with conventional laser. Conventional laser demonstrated a small, statistically significant improvement in central retinal thickness (low GRADE certainty); however, the magnitude of this improvement is unlikely to be clinically important. There may not be a difference in the rate of adverse events (low GRADE certainty) at 12 months when comparing subthreshold laser to conventional laser for DME.
CONCLUSION
Randomized controlled trial literature to date suggests subthreshold laser to be as effective as conventional laser in the treatment of DME. Increased follow-up duration is needed to observe any long-term safety benefit from reduced retinal damage.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Topics: Humans; Macular Edema; Diabetic Retinopathy; Ranibizumab; Bevacizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Laser Coagulation; Retina; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37805099
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.09.022 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Apr 2024To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids in the postoperative management of cataract surgery for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids in the postoperative management of cataract surgery for age-related cataract in adults.
DESIGN
Meta-analysis.
METHODS
Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched for articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022364733). Randomized controlled trials of patients undergoing age-related cataract surgery treated with corticosteroids, NSAIDs, or a combination were included.
RESULTS
A total of 19 studies were included, with 3473 patients (3638 eyes) treated following cataract surgery with NSAIDs (n = 1479), corticosteroids (n = 1307), or a combination (n = 687). Combination treatment demonstrated favorable best-corrected visual acuity compared to corticosteroids 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively (MD = -0.01 logMAR, 95% CI: -0.02, -0.01, I = 0%). NSAIDs had more favorable flare values than corticosteroids on day 7 (MD = -9.17 photons/ms, 95% CI = -16.52, -1.82, I = 94%), day 14 (MD = -5.23 photons/ms, 95% CI = -8.35, -2.11, I = 94%), and 4 to 6 weeks (MD = -1.62 photons/ms, 95% CI = -3.03, -0.20, I = 93%) postoperatively. Furthermore, 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively, patients treated with NSAIDs showed lower central macular thickness (MD = -13.26 µm, 95% CI = -18.66, -7.86, I = 81%) compared to those treated with corticosteroids. NSAIDs and combination treatment were associated with a lower incidence of central macular edema (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.07, 0.35, I = 61%; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10, 0.45, I = 31%) than corticosteroids 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
NSAIDs and combination treatments could be regarded as more effective and safer alternatives to corticosteroids alone in the postoperative management of cataract surgery. Further studies should be conducted to determine why this evidence has not been reflected in practice patterns, and to further compare the effectiveness of NSAIDs and combination treatments.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cataract; Cataract Extraction; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Macular Edema
PubMed: 37797866
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.027 -
Advances in Therapy Dec 2023A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a Treat & Extend (T&E) regime with intervals up to every 16 weeks (Q16W), relative to other therapies currently in use for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of particular interest were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies applied in flexible dosing regimens such as Pro re nata (PRN) and T&E, which are the mainstay in clinical practice.
METHODS
An SLR identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2021 was conducted, followed by a Bayesian NMA comparing faricimab T&E treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and laser therapy. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central subfield thickness (CST), injection frequency, ocular adverse events (AE) and all-cause discontinuation, all of which were evaluated at 12 months. Subgroup analyses including patients' naïve to anti-VEGF were conducted where feasible.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies identified in the SLR were included in the NMA. Most importantly for decision making in clinical practise, faricimab T&E was associated with a statistically greater (95% credible intervals exclude zero) and clinically meaningful decrease in retinal thickness compared to all other flexible dosing regimens (greater retinal drying by 55-125 microns). Anatomical outcomes determine treatment efficacy and retreatment of patients. The NMA also showed a statistically greater increase in mean change in BCVA for faricimab T&E vs. flexible regimens using ranibizumab and bevacizumab (increase of 4.4-4.8 letters) as well as a numerical improvement vs. aflibercept PRN (two letters, 95% credible intervals including zero). Accordingly, the injection frequency was numerically lower versus other treatments using flexible dosing regimens (decrease by 0.92-1.43 injections). The analyses also indicated that the safety profile of faricimab T&E was comparable to those of ranibizumab and aflibercept, which have well-established safety profiles, with similar results for the number of all-cause discontinuations.
CONCLUSION
Faricimab provides a new treatment option in DME with dual-pathway inhibition of VEGF and angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first indirect comparison of faricimab T&E in DME. The analyses indicate that faricimab T&E is associated with superior retinal drying along with numerically fewer injections compared to all other treatments given in flexible dosing regimens. It also showed superior visual acuity outcomes compared to ranibizumab and bevacizumab.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Edema; Network Meta-Analysis; Ranibizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 37751021
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02675-y -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2023Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a degenerative condition of the back of the eye that occurs in people over the age of 50 years. Antioxidants may prevent... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a degenerative condition of the back of the eye that occurs in people over the age of 50 years. Antioxidants may prevent cellular damage in the retina by reacting with free radicals that are produced in the process of light absorption. Higher dietary levels of antioxidant vitamins and minerals may reduce the risk of progression of AMD. This is the third update of the review.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements on the progression of AMD in people with AMD.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, one other database, and three trials registers, most recently on 29 November 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared antioxidant vitamin or mineral supplementation to placebo or no intervention, in people with AMD.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methods expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 26 studies conducted in the USA, Europe, China, and Australia. These studies enroled 11,952 people aged 65 to 75 years and included slightly more women (on average 56% women). We judged the studies that contributed data to the review to be at low or unclear risk of bias. Thirteen studies compared multivitamins with control in people with early and intermediate AMD. Most evidence came from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) in the USA. People taking antioxidant vitamins were less likely to progress to late AMD (odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.90; 3 studies, 2445 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). In people with early AMD, who are at low risk of progression, this means there would be approximately four fewer cases of progression to late AMD for every 1000 people taking vitamins (one fewer to six fewer cases). In people with intermediate AMD at higher risk of progression, this corresponds to approximately 78 fewer cases of progression for every 1000 people taking vitamins (26 fewer to 126 fewer). AREDS also provided evidence of a lower risk of progression for both neovascular AMD (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.82; moderate-certainty evidence) and geographic atrophy (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.10; moderate-certainty evidence), and a lower risk of losing 3 or more lines of visual acuity (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.96; moderate-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence from one study of 110 people suggested higher quality of life scores (measured with the Visual Function Questionnaire) in treated compared with non-treated people after 24 months (mean difference (MD) 12.30, 95% CI 4.24 to 20.36). In exploratory subgroup analyses in the follow-on study to AREDS (AREDS2), replacing beta-carotene with lutein/zeaxanthin gave hazard ratios (HR) of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96), 0.78 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.26), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.03) for progression to late AMD, neovascular AMD, geographic atrophy, and vision loss, respectively. Six studies compared lutein (with or without zeaxanthin) with placebo and one study compared a multivitamin including lutein/zeaxanthin with multivitamin alone. The duration of supplementation and follow-up ranged from six months to five years. Most evidence came from the AREDS2 study in the USA; almost all participants in AREDS2 also took the original AREDS supplementation formula. People taking lutein/zeaxanthin may have similar or slightly reduced risk of progression to late AMD (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.01), neovascular AMD (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02), and geographic atrophy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05) compared with control (1 study, 4176 participants, 6891 eyes; low-certainty evidence). A similar risk of progression to visual loss of 15 or more letters was seen in the lutein/zeaxanthin and control groups (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; 6656 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire) was similar between groups (MD 1.21, 95% CI -2.59 to 5.01; 2 studies, 308 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). One study in Australia randomised 1204 people to vitamin E or placebo with four years of follow-up; 19% of participants had AMD. The number of late AMD events was low (N = 7) and the estimate of effect was uncertain (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.31 to 6.05; very low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of any effect of treatment on visual loss (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.47; low-certainty evidence). There were no data on neovascular AMD, geographic atrophy, or quality of life. Five studies compared zinc with placebo. Evidence largely drawn from the largest study (AREDS) found a lower progression to late AMD over six years (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98; 3 studies, 3790 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), neovascular AMD (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.93; moderate-certainty evidence), geographic atrophy (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.10; moderate-certainty evidence), or visual loss (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00; 2 studies, 3791 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data on quality of life. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the main reported adverse effect. In AREDS, zinc was associated with a higher risk of genitourinary problems in men, but no difference was seen between high- and low-dose zinc groups in AREDS2. Most studies were too small to detect rare adverse effects. Data from larger studies (AREDS/AREDS2) suggested there may be little or no effect on mortality with multivitamin (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.25; low-certainty evidence) or lutein/zeaxanthin supplementation (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.31; very low-certainty evidence), but confirmed the increased risk of lung cancer with beta-carotene, mostly in former smokers.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplementation (AREDS: vitamin C, E, beta-carotene, and zinc) probably slows down progression to late AMD. People with intermediate AMD have a higher chance of benefiting from antioxidant supplements because their risk of progression is higher than people with early AMD. Although low-certainty evidence suggested little effect with lutein/zeaxanthin alone compared with placebo, exploratory subgroup analyses from one large American study support the view that lutein/zeaxanthin may be a suitable replacement for the beta-carotene used in the original AREDS formula.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Antioxidants; Vitamins; Geographic Atrophy; beta Carotene; Lutein; Zeaxanthins; Minerals; Dietary Supplements; Macular Degeneration; Vitamin A; Vitamin K; Zinc; Malnutrition
PubMed: 37702300
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000254.pub5 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Dec 2023We systematically reviewed the literature on the prevalence of geographic atrophy (GA) in Nordic populations, conducted meta-analyses on age-stratified estimates, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Prevalence of geographic atrophy in Nordic countries and number of patients potentially eligible for intravitreal complement inhibitor treatment: A systematic review with meta-analyses and forecasting study.
We systematically reviewed the literature on the prevalence of geographic atrophy (GA) in Nordic populations, conducted meta-analyses on age-stratified estimates, and calculated current and future number of patients and those potentially eligible for intravitreal complement inhibitor treatment. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and our protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Ten databases were searched on 22 April 2023 for population-based studies of GA prevalence. Based on clinical descriptive analyses of GA and eligibility criteria of the phase III studies for intravitreal pegcetacoplan (complement C3 and C3b inhibitor), we were able to calculate the proportion of patients with GA potentially eligible for therapy. Finally, we extracted population data for Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) from Eurostat, applied prevalence statistics to the extracted census and forecasting data to estimate the number of patients with GA, and then applied the proportion eligible for intravitreal pegcetacoplan therapy. We identified six studies with a total of 10 159 individuals. Prevalence of GA was estimated to 0.4% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.2%-0.8%), 1.5% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.6%), and 7.6% (95% CI: 4.6%-11.3%) for individuals aged 60-69, 70-79, and 80+ years, respectively. In Nordic countries, we estimate a total of 166 307 individuals with GA in 2023, increasing to 277 893 in 2050. Of these, 90 803 individuals in 2023, increasing to 151 730 in 2050, are potentially eligible for intravitreal complement inhibitor treatment. Considering these large numbers, our study highlights the importance of this topic in the coming years and its potential to significantly impact our clinical practice, organization, and staffing.
Topics: Humans; Geographic Atrophy; Prevalence; Complement Inactivating Agents; Scandinavian and Nordic Countries; Iceland
PubMed: 37680141
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15768 -
BioDrugs : Clinical Immunotherapeutics,... Nov 2023Several observational studies have reported acute kidney injury from intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs for retinal diseases.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several observational studies have reported acute kidney injury from intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs for retinal diseases. However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials on this critical topic are scant.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate acute kidney injury risk associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs in patients with retinal diseases.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on 12 July, 2023, and included randomized controlled trials reporting acute kidney injury between anti-VEGF drugs (e.g., aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, and ranibizumab) and controls for retinal diseases (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, diabetic retinopathy/diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, and myopic choroidal neovascularization). Data were synthesized by a fixed-effects model for pooling odds ratios (ORs) using the Peto method.
RESULTS
We included 13 randomized controlled trials (four and nine trials for aflibercept and ranibizumab, respectively) with a total of 4282 participants. The meta-analysis indicated intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs did not increase the acute kidney injury risk, compared with controls (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-2.04, I: 0%), and no differences in the acute kidney injury risk were observed between different anti-VEGF drugs (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.27-4.43, I: 0% for aflibercept; OR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.42-2.22, I: 0% for ranibizumab) and between different retinal diseases (OR: 4.61, 95% CI 0.07-284.13, I: not applicable for age-related macular degeneration; OR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.42-1.93, I: 0% for diabetic retinopathy/diabetic macular edema; OR: 1.57, 95% CI 0.16-15.88, I: 0% for retinal vein occlusion).
CONCLUSIONS
Intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs were not associated with an acute kidney injury risk, regardless of which anti-VEGF drugs (aflibercept or ranibizumab) or retinal diseases (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy/diabetic macular edema, or retinal vein occlusion) were involved.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021267854.
Topics: Humans; Acute Kidney Injury; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; Endothelial Growth Factors; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Degeneration; Macular Edema; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ranibizumab; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retinal Diseases; Retinal Vein Occlusion; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
PubMed: 37676536
DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00621-6 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Jan 2024To systematically review and report the rate of exudative progression over time in patients with nonexudative macular neovascularization (MNV) in age-related macular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To systematically review and report the rate of exudative progression over time in patients with nonexudative macular neovascularization (MNV) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
DESIGN
Systematic review with prevalence meta-analyses and individual participant meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched 10 literature databases on March 26, 2023, for studies of consecutive patients with treatment-naïve nonexudative MNV in AMD. The primary outcome of interest was time from diagnosis to exudative progression. We conducted meta-analyses on the prevalence of exudative progression at 1 and 2 years. Where possible, we extracted individual participant data from studies and conducted an individual participant meta-analysis and explored the exudative progression using a time-to-event curve.
RESULTS
We identified 16 eligible studies with a total of 384 eyes with nonexudative MNV. Exudative progression had occurred in 20.9% (95% CI 13.1%-29.8%) of eyes at 1 year and in 30.7% (95% CI 21.8%-40.4%) at 2 years. Similar results were observed in the individual participant meta-analysis, showing exudative progression in 18.9% (95% CI 13.5%-26.3%) of eyes at 1 year and 31.3% (95% CI 24.2%-40.0%) at 2 years. Risk factors for a fast exudative progression were the presence of subretinal lipid globules, large MNV areas, rapid MNV growth, growth in pigment epithelium detachment height and width, appearance of a branching pattern, and development of a hyporeflective halo around the MNV.
CONCLUSIONS
Nonexudative MNVs in AMD are at high risk of exudative progression. Recognition of these lesions may allow for better individualized follow-up regimens in which closer monitoring may facilitate earlier diagnosis of exudative progression.
Topics: Humans; Fluorescein Angiography; Macular Degeneration; Choroidal Neovascularization; Risk Factors; Eye; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37659600
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.08.020