-
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Mar 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Female; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Autografts; Adipose Tissue; Breast Neoplasms; Transplantation, Autologous; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38368759
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.045 -
World Journal of Surgery Mar 2024TiLOOP bra has been used for over 15 years, however, evidence regarding its safety in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) for patients with breast cancer after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Application of TiLOOP bra in implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with decreased complication risk compared with other meshes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
TiLOOP bra has been used for over 15 years, however, evidence regarding its safety in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) for patients with breast cancer after mastectomy is still limited. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate its risks and benefits in IBBR comparing with other meshes.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies comparing postoperative complications between TiLOOP bra and other reconstruction techniques in IBBR with or without meshes. We also compared patient satisfaction in physical well-being between two groups. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS
Seven studies representing 1203 cases were analyzed. Compared with other meshes, the use of TiLOOP bra significantly reduced the risk of infection (RR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.32-0.86), seroma (RR = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.07-0.61), red breast syndrome (RR = 0.10, 95% CI, 0.02-0.45), and capsular contracture (RR = 0.20, 95% CI, 0.05-0.75). Patient satisfaction in physical well-being was comparable between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
TiLOOP bra in IBBR has a favored safety profile over other meshes, which significantly reduced postoperative complication risk and did not affect patient satisfaction. Although prospective well-designed controlled studies are still warranted, TiLOOP bra is safe and reliable at present.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Mastectomy; Mammaplasty; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38353413
DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12003 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Breast surgery has evolved from mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Breast oncoplastic surgery later emerged with the inclusion and development of techniques...
Breast surgery has evolved from mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Breast oncoplastic surgery later emerged with the inclusion and development of techniques used in plastic surgery for breast neoplasms. Recently, a new paradigm has been considered for mastectomy candidates with large multifocal and multicentric tumours, designated extreme oncoplasty (EO), which has allowed new techniques to be applied to tumours that would have been ineligible for BCS before. There are few publications and no uniform descriptions grouping all the technical possibilities and new indications together. We performed this a review with the objective of evaluating the indications and surgeries performed in the EO context, representing a new perspective for BCS. We observed new indications as extensive microcalcifications, locally advanced breast carcinoma with partial response to chemotherapy, small to moderate-sized non-ptotic central tumours and extreme ptosis. Small breasts are able for EO since the presence of ptosis. New surgeries are reported as disguised geometric compensation, perforators flaps, local/regional flaps, latissimus dorsi miniflap and partial breast amputation. It is important to decrease barriers to oncoplastic surgery if we want to increase the use of EO and BCS rates.
PubMed: 38352300
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1215284 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Feb 2024This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery.
METHODS
The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4.
RESULTS
These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); = 0.83].
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters.
PubMed: 38333310
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Jan 2024Breast cancer surgery related complications are a complex condition influenced by interactions among nerve pathways and the physiological responses to breast surgery.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer surgery related complications are a complex condition influenced by interactions among nerve pathways and the physiological responses to breast surgery. The intensity of this complications displays substantial heterogeneity, dependent on individual patient characteristics, the extent of the surgical procedure performed, and various contributing factors.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating interventions for post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). A network meta-analysis was performed to integrate direct and indirect evidence, enabling comparisons of multiple interventions across different outcome measures.
RESULTS
The systematic search yielded a total of 26 RCTs investigating 4 groups of different interventions for PMPS. The interventions included pharmacological agents, nerve blocks, physical therapy, and anesthesia regimens. Nerve blocks (OR: 0.34; 95% CrI: 0.24-0.46) and anesthesia (OR: 0.39; 95% CrI: 0.26-0.56) demonstrated improvements in functional outcomes and quality of life.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and network meta-analysis provide a comprehensive evaluation of interventions for PMPS, highlighting their varying efficacy in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes and quality of life. However, further research with large-scale, well-designed RCTs is warranted to strengthen the evidence base and validate the effectiveness of these interventions in managing PMPS effectively.
Topics: Humans; Female; Network Meta-Analysis; Breast Neoplasms; Nerve Block; Mastectomy; Pain
PubMed: 38285764
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.9 -
Journal of Surgical Oncology May 2024Flap fixation is the most promising solution to prevent seroma formation after mastectomy. In this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA), three different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Flap fixation is the most promising solution to prevent seroma formation after mastectomy. In this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA), three different techniques were compared. The NMA included 25 articles, comprising 3423 patients, and revealed that sutures are superior to tissue glue in preventing clinically significant seroma. In addition, running sutures seemed to be superior to interrupted sutures. An RCT comparing these suture techniques seems necessary, given the quality and nature of existing literature.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Seroma; Surgical Flaps; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 38247263
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27589 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jan 2024Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction...
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, decision aid (DA) is necessary to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better decision aid. This review discussed how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Additionally, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective.
METHODS
We searched for relevant studies published before October 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings "breast reconstruction" and "decision aid." Demographic data as well as decision, outcomes and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.
RESULTS
A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients wereincluded. 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement. 50.3% participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction. 60.3% participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. 44.5% participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase.
CONCLUSION
The review concluded that web-based decision aids are the favorable format of decision aid.
PubMed: 38232225
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011292 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Apr 2024Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard modality of treatment for breast cancer. The exposure of patients to drugs that effect the cells and processes involved in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard modality of treatment for breast cancer. The exposure of patients to drugs that effect the cells and processes involved in healing prior to reconstructive surgical procedures is a source of concern for reconstructive surgeons. The reported effects of NAC on autologous and tissue expander to implant-based breast reconstruction vary from study to study and have not been comprehensively reviewed on a large scale. There is also significant variation from study to study regarding which outcomes are evaluated. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on common and significant outcomes including total complication, reconstruction loss, and SSI (Surgical Site Infection) rates in breast reconstruction. The second aim of this study is to evaluate whether NAC has differing effects on implant-based reconstruction compared with autologous flap reconstruction. A systematic review of the literature published from 1991 to 2019 in the PubMed and Scopus library database was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes of breast reconstruction in patients receiving NAC. A meta-analysis was then performed. Primary outcomes reviewed included overall complication rates, SSI rates, and total loss of reconstruction (flap necrosis or premature tissue expander or implant removal). Outcomes were analyzed using a random effects model and chi-square statistical test. Our literature search yielded 22 manuscripts with a total of 3680 patients that fit our inclusion criteria, of which 12 reported on reconstruction loss, 14 reported on SSI rates, and 10 reported on overall complication rates. There was no significant difference in overall breast reconstruction loss rate (OR 1.30, P = .35), complication rate (OR 1.21, P = .06), and rate of SSI (OR 1.28, P = .85) between NAC vs. non-NAC groups. In patients undergoing autologous flap reconstruction there were no significant differences in complication (23.4% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.076), loss of reconstruction (3.1% vs. 4.4%, P = .393), or SSI (5.3% vs. 3.4%, P = .108) rates in patients who were treated with NAC compared to those who were not. Likewise, in patients undergoing TE/implant-based reconstruction there were no significant differences in complication (19.6 vs. 24.2 P = .069), loss of reconstruction (17.4% vs. 13.3%, P = .072), or SSI (7.9% vs. 5.1%, P = .073) rates in patients who were treated with NAC compared to those who were not. NAC was not associated with any significant differences in overall complication, reconstruction loss, or SSI rates in patients receiving implant-based or autologous flap breast reconstruction. Additionally, the lack of effect of NAC on overall complication, reconstruction loss or SSI rates did not differ with or depend on the type of reconstruction.
Topics: Humans; Female; Mastectomy; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Mammaplasty; Retrospective Studies; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38228449
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.12.004 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Jan 2024Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) arose to decrease the deformity following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. In this meta-analysis (MA), we pool...
Patient-reported Outcomes Utilizing the Breast-Q Questionnaire After Breast Conserving Surgery With and Without Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) arose to decrease the deformity following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. In this meta-analysis (MA), we pool Breast-Q™ questionnaire data to compare quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients who received BCS alone or in combination with Level I or II oncoplastic breast surgery (BCS+OBS). All relevant databases were searched following the PRISMA and QUOROM guidelines. All prospective or retrospective studies with a BCS or BCS+OBS cohort that reported QOL as assessed with the Breast-Q™ questionnaire were eligible. Fifty-five studies (75 distinct patient cohorts; 11,186 patients) were included in the MA, with 12 studies reporting both pre- and postoperative values and eligible for a pairwise MA. The pairwise MA showed a significant postoperative improvement in the overall satisfaction with the breast (MD +8.0%, p=0.003) and in the psychosocial well-being (MD +9.2%, 3.5-14.8, p=0.001) of the entire cohort (BCS and BCS+OBS). A subgroup MA of proportions highlighted a superiority of BCS+OBS to BCS in terms of overall satisfaction with the breast (72.0%, 68.0-76.1, versus 62.9%, 58.3-67.5; p=0.02) and psychosocial well-being (78.9%, 71.5-86.4, versus 73.3%, 67.3-76.5, p=0.0001). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of the pairwise MA and the MA of proportions. Oncoplastic breast surgery effectively improves QoL based on the patient-reported outcomes assessed using the Breast-Q™ questionnaire. The improvements were associated with acceptable complication rates, further supporting the use of BCS followed by OBS where mastectomy would otherwise be necessary.
PubMed: 38195101
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjae002 -
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand... Jan 2024There are several techniques for reconstructing breasts after mastectomy, but little scientific evidence for which technique is superior. The aim of this systematic...
BACKGROUND
There are several techniques for reconstructing breasts after mastectomy, but little scientific evidence for which technique is superior. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous reconstruction and to evaluate the overall certainty of evidence, as well as the quality of reporting of the included studies.
METHODS
Studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap compared to implant-based reconstruction, meeting criteria defined in a PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome), were included. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, CinahL, EconLit, and NHS EED databases were searched. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence, and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard (CHEERS) 2022 was used to evaluate the quality of reporting.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
A total of 256 abstracts were retrieved from the search, and after scrutiny, seven studies were included. The findings of this present systematic review should be interpreted with caution as the overall certainty of evidence is low (GRADE ƟƟОО). The included studies suggest that DIEP-flaps are cost-effective compared with implant-based breast reconstruction when the applied cost-effectiveness thresholds of $50,000 to $100,000 per quality-adjusted life years are used. It is noteworthy that no high level evidence exists regarding cost-effeciency, to support recommendations and decision in breast reconstruction. Methodological issues that can be improved in future studies are presented.
Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Databases, Factual; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Perforator Flap; Humans
PubMed: 38189784
DOI: 10.2340/jphs.v59.19649