-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) May 2024: Mechanical ventilation is often used in intensive care units to assist patients' breathing. This often leads to respiratory muscle weakness and diaphragmatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: Mechanical ventilation is often used in intensive care units to assist patients' breathing. This often leads to respiratory muscle weakness and diaphragmatic dysfunction, causing weaning difficulties. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been found to be beneficial in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and facilitating weaning. Over the years, different protocols and devices have been used. : The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effectiveness of low-medium (LM-IMT) and high-intensity (H-IMT) threshold inspiratory muscle training in critically ill patients. A systematic literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the electronic databases Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct. The search involved screening for studies examining the effectiveness of two different intensities of threshold IMT in critically ill patients published the last 10 years. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was chosen as the tool to assess the quality of studies. A meta-analysis was performed where possible. : Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review, with five of them having high methodological quality. : When examining LM-IMT and H-IMT though, neither was able to reach statistically significant improvement in their maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), while LM-IMT reached it in terms of weaning duration. Additionally, no statistical difference was noticed in the duration of mechanical ventilation. The application of IMT is recommended to ICU patients in order to prevent diaphragmatic dysfunction and facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. Therefore, further research as well as additional RCTs regarding different protocols are needed to enhance its effectiveness.
Topics: Humans; Critical Illness; Breathing Exercises; Respiratory Muscles; Respiration, Artificial; Intensive Care Units
PubMed: 38929486
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060869 -
European Journal of Clinical... Jun 2024To systematically evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 and provide evidence for the rational use of...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 and provide evidence for the rational use of subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19.
METHODS
This meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang Medical Network electronic databases up to 11 January 2023 to identify relevant studies. To obtain the most recent clinical studies of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19, we also searched the preprint platforms medRxiv and ChinaXiv. Furthermore, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant unpublished studies. The studies were screened based on the PICOS principle. The included studies were classified and evaluated for quality based on research type. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis, and a descriptive analysis was performed to examine relevant outcome indicators.
RESULTS
Five observational studies were obtained, involving a total of 498 patients (240 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 258 patients in the intravenous injection group). All of the studies were of the highest quality. The meta-analysis of the included studies revealed that the mortality rate of patients who received subcutaneous tocilizumab to treat COVID-19 was not significantly higher than that of the intravenous injection group [23.3% (45/193) vs. 18.4% (39/212), RD = 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.01 ~ 0.13, P = 0.11]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation between the two groups [24.5% (35/143) vs. 22% (35/159), RD = 0.03, 95% CI = - 0.07 ~ 0.12, P = 0.56].
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analyses do not provide evidence that subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab formulations for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection differ regarding their effectiveness. Considering that the meta-analyses cannot replace an appropriately powered non-inferiority study, subcutaneous formulations still need to be used with caution and only when intravenous formulations are in short supply. At present, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19, and more clinical research should be conducted.
PubMed: 38926166
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03719-0 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2024Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity in all age groups worldwide. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a salvage procedure in patients with TBI.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity in all age groups worldwide. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a salvage procedure in patients with TBI. Outcome and quality of life following DC is questionable. Basal cisternostomy (BC) has been proposed to reduce edema and leads to brain relaxation. It was initially used as an adjunct in TBI patients, thereby improving outcome. With gaining popularity among the neurosurgeons, BC was used as a standalone approach in TBI patients. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to analyse the role of BC either as an adjunct or as a standalone approach in managing TBI patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) was performed using the search strategy using the field terms and medical subheading terms (MeSH Terms) to retrieve studies describing the role of BC in patients with TBI either as an adjunct with DC or standalone treatment and their outcome.
RESULTS
Thirty-one articles were selected for full text review and eighteen articles were selected for the final analysis. BC alone group were found to have minimum in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.348; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.254 to 0.477) followed by DC combined with BC group (OR, 0.645; 95% CrI, 0.476 to 0.875). DC combined with BC group were found to have minimum duration of mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.114; 95% CrI, 0.005 to 2.451) followed by BC alone group (OR, 0.604; 95% CrI, 0.024 to 15.346). DC combined with BC group were found to have maximum Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) (OR, 1.661; 95% CrI, 0.907 to 3.041) followed by BC alone group (OR, 1.553; 95% CrI, 0.907 to 3.041).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis showed that BC alone was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in TBI patients. DC with BC had decreased requirement of mechanical ventilation. However, larger multicentric studies from other parts of the world are required to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 38925245
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.112 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Jun 2024Systematic evaluation of the safety of del Nido cardioplegia compared to cold blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Systematic evaluation of the safety of del Nido cardioplegia compared to cold blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (published by 14 January 2024) comparing del Nido cardioplegia to cold blood cardioplegia in adult. Our main endpoints were myocardial injury markers and clinical outcomes. We assessed pooled data by use of a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies were identified, incorporating 889 patients who received del Nido cardioplegia and 907 patients who received cold blood cardioplegia. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the cold blood cardioplegia, the del Nido cardioplegia had less volume of cardioplegia, higher rate of spontaneous rhythm recovery after cross clamp release, lower levels of postoperative cardiac troponin T and creatinine kinase-myocardial band, all of which were statistically significant. However, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative troponin I and postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. The clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit stay time, hospital stay time, postoperative stroke, postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation, postoperative heart failure requiring intra-aortic balloon pump mechanical circulation support, and in-hospital mortality of both are comparable.
CONCLUSION
Existing evidence suggests that del Nido cardioplegia reduced volume of cardioplegia administration and attempts of defibrillation. The superior postoperative results in CTnT and CK-MB may provide a direction for further research on improvement of the composition of cardioplegia.
Topics: Humans; Heart Arrest, Induced; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardioplegic Solutions; Adult; Potassium Chloride; Mannitol; Lidocaine; Solutions; Electrolytes; Magnesium Sulfate; Sodium Bicarbonate
PubMed: 38909234
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02846-0 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Jun 2024We systematically assessed benefits and harms of the use of ivermectin in non-hospitalized patients with early COVID-19. (Review)
Review
Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for treatment of non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials with 7,035 participants.
INTRODUCTION
We systematically assessed benefits and harms of the use of ivermectin in non-hospitalized patients with early COVID-19.
METHODS
Five databases were searched until October 17, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with COVID-19 treated with ivermectin against standard of care (SoC), placebo, or active drug. Primary outcomes were hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation (MV), clinical improvement, clinical worsening, viral clearance, and severe adverse events (SAEs). Random effects meta-analyses were performed, with quality of evidence (QoE) evaluated using GRADE methods. Pre-specified subgroup analyses (ivermectin dose, control type, risk of bias, follow-up, and country income) and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed.
RESULTS
Twelve RCTs (n=7,035) were included. The controls were placebo in nine RCTs, SoC in two RCTs, and placebo or active drug in one RCT. Ivermectin did not reduce hospitalization (relative risk [RR], 0.81, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.64-1.03; 8 RCTs, low QoE), all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.73-1.33; 9 RCTs, low QoE), or AEs (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.75-1.07; 9 RCTs, very low QoE) vs. controls. Ivermectin did not reduce MV, clinical worsening, or SAEs and did not increase clinical improvement and viral clearance vs. controls (very low QoE for secondary outcomes). Subgroup analyses were mostly consistent with main analyses, and TSA-adjusted risk for hospitalization was similar to main analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, ivermectin did not have effect on clinical, non-clinical or safety outcomes versus controls. Ivermectin should not be recommended as treatment in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
PubMed: 38908535
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107248 -
Journal of Critical Care Jun 2024To evaluate the efficacy of the novel oXiris® membrane in critically ill adult patients. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of the novel oXiris® membrane in critically ill adult patients.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 01/06/2023 for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of intervention (NRSI). The primary outcome was overall mortality. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan 5.4.1. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. (PROSPERO: CRD42023389198).
RESULTS
Ten studies (2 RCTs and 8 NRSIs) with 481 patients were included. None had low risk of bias. Treatment using oXiris® was associated with reduced overall mortality (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62-0.98; p = 0.03; 6 NRSI). One RCT reported 28-day mortality, finding no significant difference between groups. Besides, pooled NRSIs results showed significant reductions in SOFA scores, norepinephrine dosage, and several inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], lactate, and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) post oXiris® treatment. However, other clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration) were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION
In critically ill patients, the use of oXiris® membrane was associated with reduced overall mortality, norepinephrine dosage, CRP, IL-6, lactate levels, along with improved organ function. However, the certainty of evidence was very low, necessitating high-quality RCTs to further evaluate its efficacy in this population.
PubMed: 38901069
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154844 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024It is unclear whether other cardiac biomarkers than NT-proBNP can be useful in the risk stratification of patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. The aim of this... (Review)
Review
It is unclear whether other cardiac biomarkers than NT-proBNP can be useful in the risk stratification of patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to summarize the role of ischemic cardiac biomarkers in predicting spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or extubation failure. : We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published before January 2024 that reported the association between ischemic cardiac biomarkers and SBT or extubation failure. Data were extracted using a standardized form and methodological assessment was performed using the QUIPS tool. Seven observational studies investigating four ischemic cardiac biomarkers (Troponin-T, Troponin-I, CK-MB, Myoglobin) were included. One study reported a higher peak Troponin-I in patients with extubation failure compared to extubation success (50 ng/L [IQR, 20-215] versus 30 ng/L [IQR, 10-86], = 0.01). A second study found that Troponin-I measured before the SBT was higher in patients with SBT failure in comparison to patients with SBT success (100 ± 80 ng/L versus 70 ± 130 ng/L, = 0.03). A third study reported a higher CK-MB measured at the end of the SBT in patients with weaning failure (SBT or extubation failure) in comparison to weaning success (8.77 ± 20.5 ng/mL versus 1.52 ± 1.42 ng/mL, = 0.047). Troponin-T and Myoglobin as well as Troponin-I and CK-MB measured at other time points were not found to be related to SBT or extubation failure. However, most studies were underpowered and with high risk of bias. : The association with SBT or extubation failure is limited for Troponin-I and CK-MB and appears absent for Troponin-T and Myoglobin, but available studies are hampered by significant methodological drawbacks. To more definitively determine the role of ischemic cardiac biomarkers, future studies should prioritize larger sample sizes, including patients at risk of cardiac disease, using stringent SBTs and structured timing of laboratory measurements before and after SBT.
PubMed: 38892952
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113242 -
Nutrients May 2024Medical nutrition therapy provides the opportunity to compensate for muscle wasting and immune response activation during stress and trauma. The objective of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Medical nutrition therapy provides the opportunity to compensate for muscle wasting and immune response activation during stress and trauma. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the safety and effectiveness of early enteral nutrition (EEN) in adults with sepsis or septic shock.
METHODS
The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP tools were searched from inception until July 2023. Conference proceedings, the reference lists of included studies, and expert content were queried to identify additional publications. Two review authors completed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment; disagreements were resolved through discussion. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) comparing the administration of EEN with no or delayed enteral nutrition (DEE) in adult populations with sepsis or septic shock.
RESULTS
Five RCTs ( = 442 participants) and ten NRSs ( = 3724 participants) were included. Low-certainty evidence from RCTs and NRSs suggests that patients receiving EEN could require fewer days of mechanical ventilation (MD -2.65; 95% CI, -4.44-0.86; and MD -2.94; 95% CI, -3.64--2.23, respectively) and may show lower SOFA scores during follow-up (MD -1.64 points; 95% CI, -2.60--0.68; and MD -1.08 points; 95% CI, -1.90--0.26, respectively), albeit with an increased frequency of diarrhea episodes (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.115-4.34). Even though the patients with EEN show a lower in-hospital mortality rate both in RCTs (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39-1.23) and NRSs (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13), this difference does not achieve statistical significance. There were no apparent differences for other outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-quality evidence suggests that EEN may be a safe and effective intervention for the management of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock.
Topics: Humans; Enteral Nutrition; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Sepsis; Shock, Septic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38892494
DOI: 10.3390/nu16111560 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024This study aimed to distinguish between healthy controls and patients with OSAHS regarding homocysteine (HCY) levels and investigate how individuals with OSAHS respond... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to distinguish between healthy controls and patients with OSAHS regarding homocysteine (HCY) levels and investigate how individuals with OSAHS respond to continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (CPAP) in terms of serum and plasma HCY levels.
METHODS
To ascertain published articles about OSAHS, an exhaustive search was performed across medical databases, encompassing PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Cochrane Library, until January 2, 2024. This study reviewed the literature regarding HCY levels in individuals with OSAHS and control groups, HCY levels under pre- and post-CPAP treatment, the Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients between HCY levels and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and the hazard ratio (HR) of HCY levels concerning the occurrence of major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with OSAHS. Meta-analyses were performed using weighted mean difference (WMD), correlation coefficients, and HR as effect variables. The statistical analysis was conducted using the R 4.1.2 and STATA 11.0 software packages.
RESULTS
In total, 33 articles were selected for the final analysis. The OSAHS group exhibited significantly higher serum/plasma HCY levels than the control group (WMD = 4.25 μmol/L, 95% CI: 2.60-5.91, < 0.001), particularly among individuals with moderate and severe OSAHS. Additionally, subgroup analysis using mean age, ethnicity, mean body mass index, and study design type unveiled significantly elevated levels of HCY in the serum/plasma of the OSAHS group compared to the control group. CPAP treatment can significantly decrease serum/plasma HCY levels in patients with OSAHS. Moreover, elevated HCY levels in individuals with OSAHS could be one of the risk factors for MACCEs (adjusted HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.10-2.58, = 0.017). AHI scores show a positive correlation with serum/plasma HCY levels.
CONCLUSION
Patients with OSAHS had elevated serum/plasma HCY levels compared to healthy controls; however, CPAP therapy dramatically decreased HCY levels in patients with OSAHS. In patients with OSAHS, elevated HCY levels were linked with an increased risk of MACCEs, and HCY was positively connected with AHI values. HCY levels may serve as a useful clinical indicator for determining the severity and efficacy of OSAHS treatments.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024498806.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Homocysteine; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
PubMed: 38887264
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1378293 -
International Archives of Allergy and... Jun 2024This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and...
Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
INTRODUCTION
This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock.
METHODS
We conducted a database search in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HAT against placebo/standard of care or against hydrocortisone in sepsis/septic shock patients. Outcomes included mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), vasopressor durations, mechanical ventilation durations, change in SOFA at 72 h, and adverse events. RCT results were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
RESULTS
Fifteen RCTs (N = 2,594) were included. At 72 h, HAT reduced SOFA scores from baseline (mean difference [MD] -1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.58 to -0.74, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT also reduced the duration of vasopressor use (MD -18.80 h, 95% CI: -23.67 to -13.93, I2 = 64%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT increased hospital LOS (MD 2.05 days, 95% CI: 0.15-3.95, I2 = 57%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on very low quality of evidence. HAT did not increase incidence of adverse events compared to placebo/SoC.
CONCLUSIONS
HAT appears beneficial in reducing vasopressor use and improving organ function in sepsis/septic shock patients. However, its advantages over hydrocortisone alone remain unclear. Future research should use hydrocortisone comparators and distinguish between sepsis-specific and comorbidity- or care-withdrawal-related mortality.
PubMed: 38870923
DOI: 10.1159/000538959