-
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) May 2023Meniscal lesions in skeletally immature patients can lead to joint degradation and knee instability. Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) surgery is a solution to... (Review)
Review
Meniscal lesions in skeletally immature patients can lead to joint degradation and knee instability. Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) surgery is a solution to maintain knee stability. There is a lack of consensus on MAT surgery outcomes in pediatric patients. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched from 1965 to June 2022. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Three studies were selected, and 58 patients were included (mean age 15.9 years) in total. The lateral meniscus was involved in 82.8% of all MAT surgeries. Post-meniscectomy syndrome and discoid meniscus were the main indications for MAT surgery. All studies reported improved subjective clinical scores and levels of sport after the surgery. The complication rate was 27.5%. Partial meniscectomy, meniscus knot removal, chondral defect treatment and lysis of adhesions were the most frequent procedures performed during reoperation. MAT surgery can improve clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with strictly selected indications. MAT surgery is safe when there are no limb asymmetries or malalignments, but it remains a challenging procedure with a high complication rate. Long-term follow-up is needed for definitive statements on the use of MAT in skeletally immature patients.
PubMed: 37174854
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11091312 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2023Complete meniscus root tear is associated with meniscus extrusion; this causes a loss of meniscus function and accelerated osteoarthritis of the knee. Existing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Complete meniscus root tear is associated with meniscus extrusion; this causes a loss of meniscus function and accelerated osteoarthritis of the knee. Existing small-scale retrospective case-control studies suggested that the outcomes were different between medial and lateral meniscus root repair. This meta-analysis aims to study whether such discrepancies exist via a systematic review of the available evidence in the literature.
METHODS
Studies evaluating the outcomes of surgical repair of posterior meniscus root tears, with reassessment MRI or second-look arthroscopy, were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The degree of meniscus extrusion, healing status of the repaired meniscus root, and functional outcome scores after repair were the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
Among the 732 studies identified, 20 studies were included in this systematic review. 624 knees and 122 knees underwent MMPRT and LMPRT repair, respectively. The amount of meniscus extrusion following MMPRT repair was 3.8 ± 1.7 mm, which was significantly larger than the 0.9 ± 1.2 mm observed after LMPRT repair ( < 0.001). Significantly better healing outcomes were observed on reassessment MRI after LMPRT repair ( < 0.001). The postoperative Lysholm score and IKDC score was also significantly better after LMPRT than MMPRT repair ( < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
LMPRT repairs resulted in significantly less meniscus extrusion, substantially better healing outcomes on MRI, and superior Lysholm/IKDC scores, when compared to MMPRT repair. This is the first meta-analysis we are aware of that systematically reviews the differences in the clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic results of MMPRT and LMPRT repair.
Topics: Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Retrospective Studies; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Arthroscopy; Rupture
PubMed: 37173149
DOI: 10.1177/10225536231175233 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2024Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is...
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is not without potential complications.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the reported incidence of complications and adverse events after isolated MMPR repair.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases with the following search terms combined with Boolean operators: "meniscus,""root," and "repair." Inclusion criteria consisted of level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English or English-language translation reporting complications and adverse events after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repairs. The overall incidence of specific complications was estimated from the pooled sample of the included studies.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with a total pooled sample of 442 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 58.1 years, while the mean final follow-up time was 37.2 months (range, 12-84.8 months). The overall incidence of complications was 9.7% (n = 43/442), with the most commonly reported complication being progressive degenerative changes within the knee (10.4%; n = 25/240; n = 5 studies). A total of 1.25% (n = 3/240) of patients who experienced degenerative changes required conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Repair failures were reported in 3.1% (n = 10/327; n = 8 studies) of patients.
CONCLUSION
Repairing MMPR tears is critical in preventing accelerated progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients without significant knee osteoarthritis preoperatively. While this repair is still recommended and necessary in appropriate patients, this review found that the incidence of complications after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repair was 9.7%, primarily involving the presence of progressive degeneration, while repair failure was reported in 3% of patients.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Child; Menisci, Tibial; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Knee Injuries; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Knee Joint; Meniscus; Retrospective Studies; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 37129097
DOI: 10.1177/03635465231157758 -
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral... Jun 2023Temporomandibular joint ankylosis is a disabling condition which affects joint movements causing difficulty in speech, mastication and hygiene. Over time various... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis is a disabling condition which affects joint movements causing difficulty in speech, mastication and hygiene. Over time various interposition materials like meniscus, muscle, fascia, skin, cartilage, fat, dura and alloplastic materials have been used for the treatment of ankylosis and improve joint functions.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of dermis fat graft and temporalis myofascial flap as an interpositional material in treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis and to compare the effectiveness of the two materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Google scholar, and Cochrane library search in combination with hand search of relevant journals were conducted published in English from January 2000 to August 2021. Randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included. Outcome measure included improvement in mouth opening. Risk of bias assessment was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
RESULTS
A total of 144 articles were found from the primary search which on thorough assessment, duplicate and exclusion removal resulted in 9 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the studies included reported significant improvement in mouth opening after interposition of the 2 materials. Four studies compared temporalis myofascial flap with dermis fat graft, 2 studies reported dermis fat graft gives better outcomes, whereas 1 study reported temporalis myofascial flap to be better and 1 study has been inconclusive.
CONCLUSION
Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn as there are number of limitations in the studies included. However a general consensus has been toward dermis fat graft owing to fewer complications.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12663-023-01869-9.
PubMed: 37122786
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-023-01869-9 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) refers to the protrusion of the medial meniscus beyond the tibial edge by more than 3 mm, leading to a deficiency of the hoop strain.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, higher body mass index and medial meniscal root tears are significantly associated with medial meniscus extrusion with OA or medial meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) refers to the protrusion of the medial meniscus beyond the tibial edge by more than 3 mm, leading to a deficiency of the hoop strain. MME commonly occurs in conjunction with osteoarthritis (OA) or medial meniscal tears (MMT). However, factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT have not been systematically reviewed. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify factors associated with concomitant MME in OA or MMT.
METHODS
The systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA. A literature search was conducted in 4 databases. All original human studies that reported the available evidence on factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT were included. Pooled binary variables were analyzed by odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs, and pooled continuous variables were evaluated by mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs.
RESULTS
Ten studies on OA (5993 patients) and eight studies on MMT (872 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled incidence of MME was 43% (95% CI, 37-50%) for OA, 61% (95% CI 43-77%) for MMT, and 85% (95% CI 72-94%) for medial meniscal root tears (MMRT). For the population with OA, Factors significantly associated with MME included radiographic OA [OR 4.24; 95% CI 3.07-5.84; P < 0.0001], bone marrow lesions [OR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.61-6.99; P = 0.0013], cartilage damage [OR, 3.25; 95% CI 1.60-6.61; P = 0.0011], and higher body mass index (BMI) [MD, 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.48; P < 0.0001]. Factors strongly associated with increased risk of MME for MMT included medial meniscal root [OR, 8.39; 95% CI 2.84-24.82; P < 0.0001] and radial tears [OR, 2.64; 95% CI 1.18-5.92; P < 0.0001].
CONCLUSION
Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, cartilage damage, and higher BMI were significantly associated with concomitant MME with OA. Furthermore, medial meniscal root and radial tears were significantly associated with an increased risk of MME in patients with MMT.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Body Mass Index; Bone Marrow; Retrospective Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Osteoarthritis; Cartilage Diseases; Bone Diseases
PubMed: 37099153
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07418-8 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2024The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial.
PURPOSE
This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established.
RESULTS
The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; > .05).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of <10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.
Topics: Humans; Follow-Up Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Knee Joint; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Menisci, Tibial
PubMed: 37022676
DOI: 10.1177/03635465231158385 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023To compare post-operative clinical outcomes of discoid meniscus tear procedures such as saucerization with or without repair with those of non-discoid meniscus tears... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To compare post-operative clinical outcomes of discoid meniscus tear procedures such as saucerization with or without repair with those of non-discoid meniscus tears such as meniscectomy or repair in skeletally mature patients with no concomitant injuries.
METHODS
Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 3rd, 2022 for literature describing patient-reported outcome measures after meniscus surgery in discoid or non-discoid meniscus tears. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Clinical outcome data on Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), revision rates, and complications were recorded, with MINORS and Detsky scores used for quality assessment.
RESULTS
A total of 38 studies comprising 2213 patients were included with a mean age of 38.6 years (range: 9.0-64.4). The mean follow-up time was 54.1 months (range: 1-234) and the average percentage of female participants was 46.8% (range: 9.5-95.5). The mean change between pre-operative and post-operative Lysholm scores ranged from 21.0-39.0, 7.4-24.1, and 24.2-48.4 in the discoid, non-discoid meniscectomy, and non-discoid repair groups, respectively. The mean change in Tegner scores ranged from 0.0 to 2.3, 1.3, and 0.4-1.3 in the discoid, non-discoid meniscectomy, and non-discoid repair groups, respectively. Pre-operative IKDC scores were not reported, however mean post-operative IKDC scores ranged from 77.4 to 96.0, 46.9 to 85.7, and 63.1 to 94.0 in discoid, non-discoid meniscectomy, and non-discoid repair groups, respectively. Revision rates for discoid procedures, non-discoid meniscectomies, and non-discoid meniscus repairs ranged from 3.2 to 44.0%, 8.3 to 56.0%, and 5.9 to 28.0%, respectively. The most common reasons for revision were acute trauma and persistent pain.
CONCLUSION
Discoid saucerization procedures with or without repair leads to similar Lysholm scores as non-discoid repair procedures, and similar IKDC scores and revision rates compared to non-discoid meniscectomy or repair procedures. Patients undergoing discoid procedures appeared to have slightly higher Tegner activity scores compared to patients undergoing non-discoid procedures; however this is to be considered in the context of a younger population of patients undergoing discoid procedures than non-discoid procedures. This information can help guide surgeons in the decision-making process when treating patients with discoid menisci, and should guide further investigations on this topic.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Female; Adult; Menisci, Tibial; Follow-Up Studies; Arthroscopy; Knee Joint; Joint Diseases; Cartilage Diseases; Lower Extremity Deformities, Congenital; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37016177
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07398-9 -
International Orthopaedics Oct 2023Although the mechanisms of injury are similar to ACL rupture in adults, publications dealing with meniscal lesions resulting from fractures of the intercondylar eminence... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Although the mechanisms of injury are similar to ACL rupture in adults, publications dealing with meniscal lesions resulting from fractures of the intercondylar eminence in children are much rarer. The main objective was to measure the frequency of meniscal lesions associated with tibial eminence fractures in children. The second question was to determine whether there is any available evidence on association between meniscal tears diagnostic method, and frequencies of total lesions, total meniscal lesions, and total entrapments.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported data on intercondylar tibial fracture, or tibial spine fracture, or tibial eminence fracture, or intercondylar eminence fracture. Article selection was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
In total, 789 studies were identified by the literature search. At the end of the process, 26 studies were included in the final review. This systematic review identified 18.1% rate of meniscal tears and 20.1% rate of meniscal or IML entrapments during intercondylar eminence fractures. Proportion of total entrapments was significantly different between groups (17.8% in the arthroscopy group vs. 6.2% in the MRI group; p < .0001). Also, we found 20.9% of total associated lesions in the arthroscopy group vs. 26.1% in the MRI group (p = .06).
CONCLUSION
Although incidence of meniscal injuries in children tibial eminence fractures is lower than that in adults ACL rupture, pediatric meniscal tears and entrapments need to be systematically searched. MRI does not appear to provide additional information about the entrapment risk if arthroscopy treatment is performed. However, pretreatment MRI provides important informations about concomitant injuries, such as meniscal tears, and should be mandatory if orthopaedic treatment is retained. MRI modalities have yet to be specified to improve the diagnosis of soft tissues entrapments.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review of the literature REGISTRATION: PROSPERO N° CRD42021258384.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Knee Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Knee Injuries; Meniscus; Tibial Fractures; Arthroscopy; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
PubMed: 36961530
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05787-w -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2023Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) has received significant interest because of its correlation with medial meniscus root tears (MMRTs), its potential as a diagnostic tool,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) has received significant interest because of its correlation with medial meniscus root tears (MMRTs), its potential as a diagnostic tool, and its significance in the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA).
PURPOSE
To (1) evaluate if MMRTs significantly increase MME compared with nonroot tears (NRTs) and no tears and (2) determine the clinical outcomes of increased MME.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Electronic database searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were conducted on June 6, 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist criteria. The searches were conducted using the keywords "meniscus tear" and "extrusion." No restrictions were placed on the date of publication. Quality and sensitivity assessments were conducted on included studies. Major MME was defined as an extrusion ≥3 mm.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies involving 7882 knees were included. Compared with patients with NRTs, those with MMRTs had a 1.12-mm greater mean absolute meniscal extrusion (AME) and were 3.45 times more likely to have major MME ( < .001 for both). Compared with patients with no tears, those with MMRTs had a 2.13-mm greater AME ( < .001). Within patients with MMRT, those with widely displaced MMRT had a 1.01-mm greater AME compared with nondisplaced MMRT ( < .001). Patients with OA had a 0.73-mm greater AME and were 3.86 times more likely to have major MME compared with patients without OA ( < .001 for both). Within patients who were not stratified according to MMRT, NRT, or no tears, those who eventually developed OA had a 0.79-mm greater AME than those who did not have OA ( = .02).
CONCLUSION
Patients with MMRTs had higher MME values compared with those with other types of meniscal tears and those without any meniscal tears. Patients with knee OA were more likely to have higher MME compared with those without OA.
PubMed: 36909671
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231151698 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2023The efficacy and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid in the treatment of meniscal injuries were evaluated by Meta-analysis to provide an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The efficacy and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid in the treatment of meniscal injuries were evaluated by Meta-analysis to provide an evidence-based basis for the selection of clinical treatment options.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science English databases, and Chinese databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WAN FANG, VIP, and China SinoMed had been searched up to June 2021. Quality evaluation was performed concerning the Cochrane Systematic Evaluation Tool. The obtained data were analyzed using the statistical software Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total of 955 patients were eventually included, 473 in the arthroscopic combined with hyaluronic acid group (combined treatment group) and 482 in the arthroscopy alone group (surgery group). The results of the study revealed that the excellent treatment [OR = 3.44, 95% CI (2.10, 5.65), < .00,001], the VAS score [MD = -0.99, 95% CI (-1.50, -0.48), = .0002], the Lysholm score [MD = 9.70, 95% CI (6.41, 12.99), < .00,001] and the joint mobility [MD = 6.31, 95% CI (0.84, 11.78), = .02] of the combined treatment group were significantly better than the surgery group, the difference was statistically significant. The complications rate was comparable in both groups [OR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.29, 2.53), = .78], with no statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSION
Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injury can improve the efficiency of treatment compared with arthroscopic surgery alone, as well as the efficacy in relieving joint pain and improving joint function and mobility, without increasing the incidence of complications. Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid administration has good effectiveness and safety profile. Therefore, hyaluronic acid supplementation is recommended after arthroscopic surgery when treating meniscal injuries.
Topics: Humans; Arthroscopy; Combined Modality Therapy; Hyaluronic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Meniscus
PubMed: 36856463
DOI: 10.1177/10225536231156699