-
Foot and Ankle Clinics Jun 2024Biological agents like growth factors (ie, platelet rich plasma) and mesenchymal stem cells are rising in popularity among orthopedics. Orthobiologics therapy aims to... (Review)
Review
Biological agents like growth factors (ie, platelet rich plasma) and mesenchymal stem cells are rising in popularity among orthopedics. Orthobiologics therapy aims to fill the gap between conventional conservative therapies like hyaluronic acid and surgery, especially for cartilage disease. Ankle cartilage defects are very symptomatic and could lead to a severe decrease of quality of life in patients, because of pain, swelling, and inability to walk without pain. In this scenario, this paper aims to systematically review the current literature available about biological therapies for ankle cartilage.
Topics: Humans; Conservative Treatment; Cartilage, Articular; Ankle Joint; Cartilage Diseases; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Platelet-Rich Plasma
PubMed: 38679437
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.07.003 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2024Pediatric sarcomas, rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In this review, we explore the role of radiomics in reshaping... (Review)
Review
Advancing Pediatric Sarcomas through Radiomics: A Systematic Review and Prospective Assessment Using Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS).
Pediatric sarcomas, rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In this review, we explore the role of radiomics in reshaping our understanding of pediatric sarcomas, emphasizing methodological considerations and applications such as diagnostics and predictive modeling. A systematic review conducted up to November 2023 identified 72 papers on radiomics analysis in pediatric sarcoma from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 reports were included in this review. The studies, predominantly retrospective, focus on Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, utilizing diverse imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI. Manual segmentation is common, with a median of 35 features extracted. Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS) assessments reveal a consistent emphasis on non-radiomic features, validation criteria, and improved methodological rigor in recent publications. Diagnostic applications dominate, with innovative studies exploring prognostic and treatment response aspects. Challenges include feature heterogeneity and sample size variations. The evolving landscape underscores the need for standardized methodologies. Despite challenges, the diagnostic and predictive potential of radiomics in pediatric oncology is evident, paving the way for precision medicine advancements.
PubMed: 38667477
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080832 -
Biochimie Apr 2024Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are of interest in the clinic because of their immunomodulation capabilities, capacity to act upstream of inflammation, and ability to...
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are of interest in the clinic because of their immunomodulation capabilities, capacity to act upstream of inflammation, and ability to sense metabolic environments. In standard physiologic conditions, they play a role in maintaining the homeostasis of tissues and organs; however, there is evidence that they can contribute to some autoimmune diseases. Gaining a deeper understanding of the factors that transition MSCs from their physiological function to a pathological role in their native environment, and elucidating mechanisms that reduce their therapeutic relevance in regenerative medicine, is essential. We conducted a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of human MSCs in preclinical studies of autoimmune disease, evaluating 60 studies that included 845 patient samples and 571 control samples. MSCs from any tissue source were included, and the study was limited to four autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and lupus. We developed a novel Risk of Bias tool to determine study quality for in vitro studies. Using the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy's criteria to define an MSC, most studies reported no difference in morphology, adhesion, cell surface markers, or differentiation into bone, fat, or cartilage when comparing control and autoimmune MSCs. However, there were reported differences in proliferation. Additionally, 308 biomolecules were differentially expressed, and the abilities to migrate, invade, and form capillaries were decreased. The findings from this study could help to explain the pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune disease and potentially lead to improved MSC-based therapeutic applications.
PubMed: 38657832
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2024.04.009 -
Regenerative Therapy Dec 2024Cerebrovascular accidents, also known as strokes, are the leading cause of permanent disability in society, presenting significant socioeconomic and healthcare costs.... (Review)
Review
Cerebrovascular accidents, also known as strokes, are the leading cause of permanent disability in society, presenting significant socioeconomic and healthcare costs. They can be caused by ischemic factors or hemorrhages, with ischemic strokes being the most common among the population. Therapies for patients suffering from this condition are limited and primarily focus on acute-phase treatment. In recent years, there has been an increase in cellular therapies, employing Stem Cells to mitigate or eliminate the consequences arising from this disease. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) hold substantial therapeutic potential in Nervous System pathologies due to their low antigenicity and capacity to differentiate into various human tissues, such as adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic tissues. This study conducts a literature review using the "clinical trials" and "Pubmed" database, summarizing all ongoing clinical trials for ischemic strokes that utilize MSCs as treatment.
PubMed: 38633415
DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2024.03.026 -
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports Apr 2024
PubMed: 38630360
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-024-10718-2 -
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Apr 2024Rare earth nanomaterials (RE NMs), which are based on rare earth elements, have emerged as remarkable biomaterials for use in bone regeneration. The effects of RE NMs on... (Review)
Review
Rare earth nanomaterials (RE NMs), which are based on rare earth elements, have emerged as remarkable biomaterials for use in bone regeneration. The effects of RE NMs on osteogenesis, such as promoting the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, have been investigated. However, the contributions of the properties of RE NMs to bone regeneration and their interactions with various cell types during osteogenesis have not been reviewed. Here, we review the crucial roles of the physicochemical and biological properties of RE NMs and focus on their osteogenic mechanisms. RE NMs directly promote the proliferation, adhesion, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. They also increase collagen secretion and mineralization to accelerate osteogenesis. Furthermore, RE NMs inhibit osteoclast formation and regulate the immune environment by modulating macrophages and promote angiogenesis by inducing hypoxia in endothelial cells. These effects create a microenvironment that is conducive to bone formation. This review will help researchers overcome current limitations to take full advantage of the osteogenic benefits of RE NMs and will suggest a potential approach for further osteogenesis research.
Topics: Osteogenesis; Endothelial Cells; Bone Regeneration; Osteoclasts; Nanostructures; Cell Differentiation
PubMed: 38627717
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02442-3 -
Bone Reports Jun 2024Fracture healing poses a significant challenge in orthopedics. Successful regeneration of bone is provided by mechanical stability and a favorable biological... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Fracture healing poses a significant challenge in orthopedics. Successful regeneration of bone is provided by mechanical stability and a favorable biological microenvironment. This systematic review aims to explore the clinical application of orthobiologics in treating aseptic delayed union and non-union of long bones in adults.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases were explored, with no date restrictions, using keywords related to orthobiologics and delayed union and non-union. Eligible studies included human clinical studies in English, with available full texts, examining orthobiologics such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) for treating aseptic delayed unions and non-unions in adults. Animal studies, in vitro research, and studies on non-unions due to congenital defects, tumors or infections were excluded.
RESULTS
The initial search identified 9417 studies, with 20 ultimately included in the review. These studies involved 493 patients affected by non-union and 256 patients affected by delayed union, with an average age respectively of 40.62 years and 41.7 years. The mean follow-up period was 15.55 months for non-unions and 8.07 months for delayed unions. PRP was the most used orthobiologic, and outcomes were evaluated through time to union, functional scores, and clinical examinations. The results indicated that orthobiologics, especially PRP, tended to yield better outcomes compared to surgical procedures without biological factors.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review suggests that orthobiologics, such as PRP, BMPs, and MSCs, can be effective and safe in the management of delayed union and non-union fractures. These biological treatments have the potential to improve union rates, reduce healing times, and enhance functional outcomes in patients with non-union fractures. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and determine the most suitable orthobiologic for specific patient populations and fracture types.
PubMed: 38618008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101760 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024Millions of people across the globe are affected by conditions like Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's Disease (PD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Spinal Cord...
BACKGROUND
Millions of people across the globe are affected by conditions like Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's Disease (PD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), although most occurrences are common in the elderly population. This systematic review aims to highlight the safety of the procedures, their tolerability, and efficacy of the available therapies conducted over the years using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in treating the neurological conditions mentioned above.
METHODS
PubMed was used to search for published data from clinical trials performed using mesenchymal stem cells. Studies that provided the necessary information that mentioned the efficacy and adverse effects of the treatment in patients were considered for this review.
RESULTS
In total, 43 manuscripts were selected after a strategic search, and these studies have been included in this systematic review. Most included studies reported the safety of the procedures used and the treatment's good tolerability, with mild adverse events such as fever, headache, mild pain at the injection site, or nausea being common. A few studies also reported death of some patients, attributed to the progression of the disease to severe stages before the treatment. Other severe events, such as respiratory or urinary infections reported in some studies, were not related to the treatment. Different parameters were used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment based on the clinical condition of the patient.
CONCLUSION
Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation has so far proven to be safe and tolerable in select studies and patient types. This systematic review includes the results from the 43 selected studies in terms of safety and tolerability of the procedures, and several adverse events and therapeutic benefits during the follow-up period after administration of MSCs.
PubMed: 38601118
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1361723 -
Eye (London, England) Apr 2024Cell therapy has shown promising results for treating uveitis in preclinical studies. As the field continues to grow towards clinical translation, it is important to... (Review)
Review
Cell therapy has shown promising results for treating uveitis in preclinical studies. As the field continues to grow towards clinical translation, it is important to review and critically appraise existing studies. Herein, we analysed and critically appraised all preclinical studies using cell therapy or cell derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) for uveitis, and provided insight into mechanisms regulating ocular inflammation. We used PubMed, Medline, and Embase to search for preclinical studies examining stem cell therapy (e.g., mesenchymal stem cells [MSC]) and secreted EVs. All included studies were assessed for quality using the SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) checklist. Sixteen preclinical studies from 2011 to 2022 were analysed and included in this review of which 75% (n = 12) focused only on cell therapy, 18.7% (n = 3) studies focused on EVs, and 6.3% (n = 1) study focused on both cells and EVs. MSCs were the most common type of cells used in preclinical studies (n = 15) and EVs were commonly isolated from MSCs (n = 3). Overall, both MSCs and EVs showed improvements in ocular inflammation (seen on fundoscopy/slit lamp and histology) and electroretinogram outcomes. Overall, MSC and MSC-derived EVs shown great potential as therapeutic agents for treating uveitis. Unfortunately, small sample size, risk of selection/performance bias, and lack of standardized cell harvesting or delivery protocols are some factors which limits clinical translation. Large scaled, randomized preclinical studies are required to understand the full potential of MSCs for treating uveitis.
PubMed: 38600361
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03057-6 -
Ageing Research Reviews Jun 2024Organismal aging involves the progressive decline in organ function and increased susceptibility to age-associated diseases. Regardless of its origin, cellular aging is... (Review)
Review
Organismal aging involves the progressive decline in organ function and increased susceptibility to age-associated diseases. Regardless of its origin, cellular aging is consequently reflected at the level of organ and associated systems dysfunction. Aging of stem cell populations within the body and their decreased ability to self-renew, differentiate, and regenerate damaged tissues, is a key contributor to organismal decline. Based on this, supplementing young stem cells may delay tissue aging, improve frailty and extend health and lifespan. This review investigates studies in rodents using stem cell transplantation from either mice or human donors. The aim is to consolidate available information on the efficacy of stem cell therapies in rodent models and provide insights to guide further research efforts. Out of the 21 studies included in this review, the methodology varied significantly including the lifespan measurement. To enable comparison the median lifespan was calculated using WebPlotDigitizer 4.6 if not provided by the literature. A total of 18 out of 21 studies evidenced significant lifespan extension post stem cell transplant, with 7 studies demonstrating benefits in reduced frailty and other aging complications.
Topics: Animals; Longevity; Humans; Stem Cell Transplantation; Rodentia; Aging; Mice
PubMed: 38588866
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102295