-
Cancers Oct 2019Approximately 20% of children with hepatoblastoma (HB) have metastatic disease at diagnosis, most frequently in the lungs. In children with HB, lung metastatic disease... (Review)
Review
Approximately 20% of children with hepatoblastoma (HB) have metastatic disease at diagnosis, most frequently in the lungs. In children with HB, lung metastatic disease is associated with poorer prognosis. Its treatment has been approached with a variety of methods that integrate chemotherapy and surgical resection. The timing and feasibility of complete extirpation of lung metastases, by chemotherapy and/or metastasectomy, is crucial for the surgical treatment of the primary liver tumor, which can vary from major hepatic resections to liver transplantation (LT). In children with unresectable HB, which can be surgically treated only by LT, the persistence of unresectable metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy excludes the possibility of recurring to LT with consequent negative impact on patients' outcomes. Due to limited evidence and experience, there is no consensus amongst oncologists and surgeons across institutions regarding the surgical treatment for HB with synchronous metastatic lung disease. This narrative review aimed to update the current management of pulmonary metastasis in children with HB and to define its role in the decision-making strategy for the surgical approach to primary liver tumours.
PubMed: 31683629
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111693 -
World Neurosurgery Aug 2019The optimal treatment of brain metastases recurring after radiosurgery (BMRS) remains an area of active investigation. Stereotactic laser ablation (SLA, also known as...
BACKGROUND
The optimal treatment of brain metastases recurring after radiosurgery (BMRS) remains an area of active investigation. Stereotactic laser ablation (SLA, also known as laser interstitial thermal therapy) has recently emerged as a potential treatment option.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the available literature on SLA as treatment of BMRS and synthesize findings on local control, overall survival, neurologic outcome, imaging findings, morbidity, and postprocedure clinical course.
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed for articles investigating SLA as treatment of BMRS.
RESULTS
Thirteen peer-reviewed publications met our search criteria. Local control was a function of the percentage of tumor that was thermally ablated. In completely ablated tumors, 3-month local control was 80%-100%. Median survival ranged from 5.8 to 19.8 months. About two-thirds of treated lesions showed postablation expansion of contrast-enhancing volume and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery volume. Expansion could start within an hour of treatment, and resolution typically occurred within 6 months. Notably, maximal expanded contrast-enhancing volume could reach >3-fold the preoperative lesion volume. The incidence of SLA-related permanent neurologic injuries was <10%. The most common complications were hemorrhage, thermal injury causing neurologic deficit, and malignant cerebral edema. Nearly all patients were treated with dexamethasone, but there was variability in the dose and duration of therapy. Median hospital stay was 1-2 days (range, 1-5 days), and most treated patients were discharged home (range, 59.5%-100%).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis provides support for continued development of SLA as a treatment of BMRS. Standardization of periprocedural management will be needed.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Humans; Laser Therapy; Metastasectomy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiosurgery; Stereotaxic Techniques
PubMed: 31051303
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.200 -
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Sep 2019Ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer (Krukenberg tumor [KT]) has no consensus treatment and the role of surgical treatment is still controversial. Identifying... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer (Krukenberg tumor [KT]) has no consensus treatment and the role of surgical treatment is still controversial. Identifying prognostic factors for KT could help guide the management of this tumor. We used a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of metastasectomy and other factors in patients with KT to develop a treatment plan. We searched literature in PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE. We analyzed hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with respect to overall survival (OS). The meta-analysis included 12 cohort studies with 1,031 patients associated with longer OS following metastasectomy (HR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.32-0.53; P < 0.001), R0 resection (HR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.26-0.53; P < 0.001), metachronous ovarian metastasis (HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.58-0.93; P = 0.012), size of KT (<5 cm) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.58-0.95; P = 0.019), ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) 0 to 1 (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29-0.80; P = 0.004), tumor confined to ovary (HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.16-0.99; P = 0.047), and tumor confined to pelvic cavity (HR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.14-0.92; P = 0.033). Shorter OS was associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.25-3.21; P = 0.004), ascites (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.19-2.31; P = 0.003) and positive CEA (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.10-1.82; P = 0.007). Gastrectomy led to a slight improvement in OS, but without statistical significance (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.47-1.02; P = 0.061). No significant difference in OS was observed in patients with signet-ring cells (HR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.91-1.51; P = 0.226), bilateral ovarian metastasis (HR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.70-1.08; P = 0.212), age ≥ 50 years (HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.71-1.22; P = 0.619), positive CA19-9 (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.75-1.35; P = 0.960), and positive CA-125 (HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.73-1.33; P = 0.915). Various factors affect OS in patients with KT.
Topics: Age Factors; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Krukenberg Tumor; Metastasectomy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31050365
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.28708 -
European Urology Oncology Mar 2019The benefit of surgical metastasectomy (SM) for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains controversial because of the lack of high-level evidence on...
CONTEXT
The benefit of surgical metastasectomy (SM) for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains controversial because of the lack of high-level evidence on the role of SM in terms of survival benefit in the era of systemic therapy.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the literature on the role of SM in the treatment of mRCC and discuss key issues in the SM decision-making process.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic search of the Embase and Medline databases was carried out and a systematic review of the role of SM in mRCC was performed. A total of 56 studies were finally included in the evidence synthesis.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
All the studies included were retrospective and mostly noncomparative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 36 to 142mo for those undergoing SM, compared to 8-27mo for no SM. SM was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to no SM (pooled adjusted hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 2.03-2.87; p<0.001). Morbidity and mortality were similar for SM and primary tumor surgery. The most important prognostic factor for OS was complete resection of metastases. Other prognostic factors included disease free-survival from nephrectomy, primary tumor features (T stage ≥3, high grade, sarcomatoid features, and pathological nodal status), the number of metastases, and performance status. Lung metastasectomy seemed to show the best survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
Although no randomized clinical data are available, published studies support the role of SM in selected patients in the modern era. Complete SM allows sustained survival free of systemic treatment. Integration of SM and systemic therapy in a multimodal approach remains a valid option for some patients.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Surgical resection of metastases originating from renal cell carcinoma may play a role in prolonging survival and avoiding systemic therapy when complete resection is achievable. This strategy is an option for selected patients with a limited number of metastases who still have good general health status.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Decision-Making; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Metastasectomy; Nephrectomy; Prognosis; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31017089
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.028 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Jun 2019Metastatic lesion to the pancreas accounts for approximately 2% of pancreatic neoplasms. There is no prospective, randomized or case-controlled study evaluating the role...
BACKGROUND
Metastatic lesion to the pancreas accounts for approximately 2% of pancreatic neoplasms. There is no prospective, randomized or case-controlled study evaluating the role of pancreatic metastasectomy.
METHODS
The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2017. Studies with five or more patients who received pancreatic metastasectomy and data from our institution (29 patients) were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 414 patients from 20 institutions who underwent pancreatic resections were included. Of the reported 31 kinds of primary neoplasms, renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) comprised the most (54.3%). At the time of diagnosis, although 40.3% patients were asymptomatic, abdominal pain (34.8%) and jaundice (20.6%) were relatively common. As for surgical type, pancreatoduodenectomy, total pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and enucleation took up 37.9%, 11.4%, 43.5%, and 7.2% respectively. The mortality and morbidity rates were 1.4% and 48.3% respectively. Patients with symptoms at the time of diagnosis had significantly shorter survival compared with asymptomatic patients (p = 0.017). Those with RCC as primary tumor had significantly longer survival compared with non-RCC patients (p < 0.001). Positive margin also predicts worse prognosis (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS
Pancreatic metastasectomy is safe and associated with acceptable short- and intermediate-term results. In the conditions of RCC as the primary tumor, being asymptomatic, or negative resection margin, a better prognosis after resection can be achieved.
Topics: Humans; Metastasectomy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 30924017
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07258-2 -
BMC Cancer Mar 2019A first-line biologic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still controversial. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A first-line biologic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still controversial. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of first-line cetuximab versus bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC.
METHODS
In March 2018, an electronic search of the following biomedical databases was performed: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Knowledge. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or observational cohort studies (OCSs) were included. Subgroup analyses of all RCTs were performed in all outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.3.
RESULTS
Two RCTs and three OCSs, involving a total 2576 patients, were included. The meta-analysis reported that cetuximab was associated with a longer overall survival (OS) [HR 0.89, 95% CI (0.81-0.98); p = 0.02], a higher ORR [RR 1.11, 95% CI (1.03-1.19); p = 0.006], higher complete response [RR 3.21, 95% CI (1.27-8.12); p = 0.01] and a greater median depth of response than bevacizumab. However, no significant difference was observed between cetuximab and bevacizumab groups for PFS, DCR, partial response, progressive disease, curative intent metastasectomy, EORR and incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events. In the subgroup meta-analyses of the RCTs, inconsistent results compared to the main analysis, however, were found, in the ORR, DCR and curative intent metastasectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
The current evidence indicates that compared to bevacizumab treatment, cetuximab provides a clinically relevant effect in first-line treatment against mCRC, at the cost of having lower stable disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bevacizumab; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; ras Proteins
PubMed: 30922269
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5481-z -
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases... Aug 2019Frequent recurrent hepatic metastasis after hepatic metastasectomy is a major obstacle in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). We performed the present... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Frequent recurrent hepatic metastasis after hepatic metastasectomy is a major obstacle in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). We performed the present systematic review to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent CRLM and determine factors associated with survival in these patients.
DATA SOURCES
An electronic search of PubMed database was undertaken to identify all relevant peer-reviewed papers published in English between January 2000 and July 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for prognostic factors of overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
The search yielded 34 studies comprising 3039 patients, with a median overall morbidity of 23% (range 8%-71%), mortality of 0 (range 0-6%), and 5-year OS of 42% (range 17%-73%). Pooled analysis showed that primary T3/T4 stage tumor (HR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.04-3.63), multiple tumors (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.10-2.01), largest liver lesion ≥5 cm (HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.11-3.23) and positive surgical margin (HR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.09-2.97) at initial hepatectomy, and high serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.27-2.74), disease-free interval ≤12 months (HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10-1.62), multiple tumors (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.32-2.02), largest liver lesion ≥5 cm (HR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.34-2.56), positive surgical margin (HR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.39-3.65), presence of bilobar disease (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.19-2.20), and extrahepatic metastases (HR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.23-2.09) at repeat hepatectomy were significantly associated with poor OS.
CONCLUSIONS
Repeat hepatectomy is a safe and effective therapy for recurrent CRLM. Long-term outcome is predicted mainly by factors related to repeat hepatectomy.
Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Metastasectomy; Middle Aged; Reoperation; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30826293
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.02.003 -
The American Surgeon Jan 2019Metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate and high rate of recurrence. Outcomes after resection for patients with limited...
Metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate and high rate of recurrence. Outcomes after resection for patients with limited disease remain poorly described. We conducted a PubMed search for articles published between 1950 and 2017 using the terms "ACC," "recurrence," and "surgery." Patients with metastatic ACC at any anatomic site who had undergone surgical resection were included. Thirteen studies met the criteria. Patients were grouped according to the recurrence site. Pulmonary metastasectomy was reported in 50 patients with moderate complications and without perioperative mortality. Disease recurrence rates range from 25 to 42 per cent, with median overall survival of 40 to 50 months. Hepatic metastasectomy was reported in 108 patients with a single perioperative mortality. Disease recurrence rates range from 65 to 100 per cent, with median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS of five to nine months and 22 to 76 months. Peritoneal cytoreduction and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been reported for 10 patients with minimal morbidity and without perioperative mortality. The disease recurrence rate was 70 per cent, with DFS of 19 months. For selected patients with recurrent ACC in the lungs, liver, or peritoneum, metastasectomy is safe and can be associated with prolonged survival. However, subsequent disease recurrence is common, and patients should be counseled accordingly.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms; Adrenocortical Carcinoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 30760340
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of B.U.ON. : Official Journal... 2018Pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma have not generally been included in the tumour types considered for metastasectomy. However, there is an increasing interest... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma have not generally been included in the tumour types considered for metastasectomy. However, there is an increasing interest that metastasectomy in well-selected patients can prolong survival. This review aims to establish the recent evidence on the surgical management of oligometastatic disease and survival outcome in patients who underwent metastasectomy focusing on isolated hepatic and pulmonary metastases.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in the PubMed database to identify all original articles on the role of metastasectomy for oligometastasis of pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Data on methodologies used, 1,3,5 - year survival and median overall survival were summarized, and used to address relevant clinical questions related to the survival outcome in patients who underwent metastasectomy.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in this review. All the studies included were retrospective and heterogenous in nature and did not have a uniform reporting on survival outcomes.
CONCLUSION
There is insufficient evidence to support a change of current practice in managing metastatic pancreatic and periampullary cancer. However, patients with ampullary cancer as the primary and any patients with first recurrence as isolated pulmonary metastases had better prognosis than patients with synchronous metastasis or metastases to the liver. This need to be explored in future studies.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Ampulla of Vater; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms; Humans; Metastasectomy; Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 30610789
DOI: No ID Found -
BioDrugs : Clinical Immunotherapeutics,... Dec 2018The last decade has seen the increasing use of biological medicines in combination with chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin or irinotecan for the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
The last decade has seen the increasing use of biological medicines in combination with chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin or irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). These combinations have resulted in increased progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mCRC; however, there are remaining concerns over the extent of their effect on overall survival (OS). Published studies to date suggest no major differences between the three currently available monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); however, there are differences in costs. In addition, there is rising litigation in Brazil in order to access these medicines as they are currently not reimbursed.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of three MoAbs (bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab) associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens and compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy alone in patients with mCRC, through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of concurrent or non-concurrent observational cohort studies, to guide authorities and the judiciary.
METHOD
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on cohort studies published in databases up to November 2017. Effectiveness measures included OS, PFS, post-progression survival (PPS), Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), response rate, metastasectomy and safety. The methodological quality of the studies was also evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 21 observational cohort studies were included. There were statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits in patients treated with bevacizumab versus no bevacizumab mainly around OS, PFS, PPS and the metastasectomy rate, but not for the disease control rates. However, there was an increase in treatment-related toxicities and concerns with the heterogeneity of the studies.
CONCLUSION
The results pointed to an advantage in favor of bevacizumab for OS, PFS, PPS, and metastasectomy. Although this advantage may be considered clinically modest, bevacizumab represents a hope for increased survival and a chance of metastasectomy for patients with mCRC. However, there are serious adverse events associated with its use, especially severe hypertension and gastrointestinal perforation, that need to be considered.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Brazil; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Fluorouracil; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Intestinal Perforation; Irinotecan; Oxaliplatin; Panitumumab; Reimbursement Mechanisms; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
PubMed: 30499082
DOI: 10.1007/s40259-018-0322-1