-
European Urology Jan 2019The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the targeted therapy (TT) era is controversial.
CONTEXT
The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the targeted therapy (TT) era is controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To assess if CN versus no CN is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC treated in the TT era and beyond, characterize the morbidity of CN, identify prognostic and predictive factors, and evaluate outcomes following treatment sequencing.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 4, 2018 for English-language clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating patients with mRCC who underwent and those who did not undergo CN. The primary outcome was OS. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaborative tools.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We identified 63 reports on 56 studies. Risk of bias was considered moderate or serious for 50 studies. CN was associated with improved OS among patients with mRCC in 10 nonrandomized studies, while one randomized trial (CARMENA) found that OS with sunitinib alone was noninferior to that with CN followed by sunitinib. The risk of perioperative mortality and Clavien ≥3 complications ranged from 0% to 10.4% and from 3% to 29.4%, respectively, with no meaningful differences between upfront CN or CN after presurgical systemic therapy (ST). Notably, 12.9-30.4% of patients did not receive ST after CN. Factors most consistently prognostic of decreased OS were progression on presurgical ST, high C-reactive protein, high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, poor International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC)/Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk classification, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, and poor performance status. At the same time, good performance status and good/intermediate IMDC/MSKCC risk classification were most consistently predictive of OS benefit with CN. In a randomized trial investigating the sequence of CN and ST (SURTIME), an OS trend was observed with CN after a period of ST in patients without progression compared with upfront CN. However, the study was underpowered and results are exploratory.
CONCLUSIONS
Currently, ST should be prioritized in the management of patients with de novo mRCC who require medical therapy. CN maintains a role in patients with limited metastatic burden amenable to surveillance or metastasectomy, and may potentially be considered in patients with favorable response after initial ST or for symptom's palliation.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In the contemporary era, receiving systemic therapy is the priority in metastatic kidney cancer. Nephrectomy still has a role in patients with limited burden of metastases, well-selected patients based on established prognostic and predictive factors, and patients with a favorable response after initial systemic therapy.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nephrectomy
PubMed: 30467042
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.016 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Dec 2018The aim of this study is to review the contemporary evidence comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) versus no radiotherapy (no RT) in patients with stage IV rectal... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to review the contemporary evidence comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) versus no radiotherapy (no RT) in patients with stage IV rectal cancer.
METHODS
Literature was searched for studies using the following databases: Pubmed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies reporting outcomes for stage IV rectal cancer patients who underwent NRT or no RT were selected.
RESULTS
A total of eight studies were included in this review (one RCT, five retrospective cohorts, two population-based studies). The only RCT in this review reported no significant difference in 2- and 5-year local recurrence (NRT versus no RT) 10.1% versus 23.8%, and 15.9% versus 26.9%, respectively. However, multivariate analysis showed the effect of treatment might not have differed between subgroups according to stage. Pooled analysis from five retrospective studies showed significantly improved local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) with NRT (risk ratio [RR] 1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31, p = 0.03), which was maintained in the subgroup who underwent metastasectomy. (RR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.37, p = 0.04). Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) showed a statistically significant benefit with NRT (RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.14-1.89, p = 0.003), which was not seen in the subgroup who underwent metastasectomy (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.94-1.82, p = 0.11).
CONCLUSION
The current available evidence shows an LRFS benefit with NRT over no RT in patients with stage IV rectal cancer. The review also suggests a possible OS benefit with NRT, although this finding should be interpreted with caution.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Proctectomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30043227
DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0141-0 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Sep 2018Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare tumor for which survival data per treatment modality and disease stage are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare tumor for which survival data per treatment modality and disease stage are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the current literature on patient outcome after surgical, (neo)adjuvant, and palliative treatment in patients with DA.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, to 25 April 2017. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), specified for treatment strategy or disease stage. Random-effects models were used for the calculation of pooled odds ratios per treatment modality. Included papers were also screened for prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 26 observational studies, comprising 6438 patients with DA, were included. Of these, resection with curative intent was performed in 71% (range 53-100%) of patients, and 29% received palliative treatment (range 0-61%). The pooled 5-year OS rate was 46% after curative resection, compared with 1% in palliative-treated patients (OR 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.09, p < 0.0001). Both segmental resection and pancreaticoduodenectomy allowed adequate assessment of lymph node involvement and resulted in similar OS. Lymph node involvement correlated with worse OS (pooled 5-year survival rate 21% for nodal metastases vs. 65% for node-negative disease; OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11-0.27, p < 0.0001). In the current literature, no survival benefit for adjuvant therapy after curative resection was found.
CONCLUSION
Resection with curative intent, either pancreaticoduodenectomy or segmental resection, and lack of nodal metastases, favors survival for DA. Further studies exploring multimodality (neo)adjuvant therapy are warranted to investigate their benefit.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Duodenal Neoplasms; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Metastasectomy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Palliative Care; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29946997
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6567-6 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Sep 2018Despite the amelioration of systemic therapy, overall survival (OS) of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients remains poor. Liver is a common metastatic site and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Despite the amelioration of systemic therapy, overall survival (OS) of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients remains poor. Liver is a common metastatic site and retrospective series suggest a potential OS benefit from hepatectomy, with interesting 5-year (5 y) and 10-year (10 y) OS rates in selected patients. We aim to evaluate the impact of liver resection and related prognostic factors on long-term outcome in this setting.
METHODS
We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Abstracts/posters from international meetings since 1990. Data were extracted from publish papers. Random effects models meta-analyses and meta-regression models were built to assess 5yOS and the impact of different prognostic factor. Heterogeneity was assessed using between study variance, I and Cochran's Q. Funnel plot were used to assess small study bias.
RESULTS
Thirty-three observational studies (for a total of 1304 patients) were included. Our analysis demonstrates a 5yOS rate of 22% (95%CI: 18-26%) and 10yOS rate of 11% (95%CI: 7-18%) among patients undergoing radical hepatectomy. A favorable effect on OS was shown by several factors linked to primary cancer (lower T and N stage, no lympho-vascular or serosal invasion) and burden of hepatic disease (≤3 metastases, unilobar involvement, greatest lesion < 5 cm, negative resection margins). Moreover, lower CEA and CA19.9 levels and post-resection chemotherapy were associated with improved OS.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical resection of liver metastases from GC seems associated with a significant chance of 5yOS and 10yOS and compares favourably with results of medical treatment alone. Prospective evaluation of this approach and validation of adequate selection criteria are needed.
Topics: Biomarkers; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29860024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.010 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Mar 2018Despite the improvements in the early detection and treatment of non-metastatic esophageal cancer, more than half of patients undergoing a curative treatment for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite the improvements in the early detection and treatment of non-metastatic esophageal cancer, more than half of patients undergoing a curative treatment for esophageal cancer will develop recurrence within three years. The prognosis of these patients is poor. However, a wide range in overall survival has been reported, depending on the pattern of recurrence, and no optimal treatment strategy following recurrence has yet been uniformly accepted.
AIM
In this article, we aimed to systematically review the literature for the role of surgical resection of metachronous distant metastasis following primary treatment of esophageal cancer. Furthermore, we discuss possible factors that could possibly predict which patients may benefit from a surgical approach. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed using combinations of keywords.
RESULTS
Patients with recurrence may benefit of a multimodality treatment. Regarding the isolated recurrence of esophageal cancer in solid visceral organs, operative intervention has been proposed as a treatment that may offer a survival benefit in an individual basis. No definitive conclusions regarding the potential survival advantage offered by the surgical treatment of solitary recurrent lesions can be drawn. However, recent improvements in surgical treatment and optimization of perioperative management guarantee an acceptable operative risk, making surgical resection of solitary recurrence lesions a considerable therapeutic option.
CONCLUSIONS
It can be conferred from the available studies that the surgical treatment of isolated recurrence from esophageal cancer may offer a survival benefit for properly selected patients. Prospective, multicenter studies might be useful to gain a better insight into those factors that affect selection of patients to take benefit from an operative intervention.
Topics: Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29540179
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1357-y -
World Journal of Surgery Jul 2018Lung is the most common extrahepatic metastatic organ of liver cancer. Surgical resection is a common local treatment for pulmonary metastasis. But the long-term... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Lung is the most common extrahepatic metastatic organ of liver cancer. Surgical resection is a common local treatment for pulmonary metastasis. But the long-term prognosis of pulmonary metastasectomy varies greatly due to the small sample size and different results of previous studies. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the combined 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy in liver cancer.
METHODS
Key words such as liver cancer pulmonary metastasis and metastasectomy were retrieved firstly in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Wanfang databases. Eligible studies were identified by manual searches. Each included study should report 5-year OS rate and/or prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment, and heterogeneity was estimated by I. We calculated the combined 5-year survival rates and determined the prognostic factors for OS by the hazard ratios (HR) and number of events.
RESULTS
Seventeen cohort studies with a total of 513 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The combined 5-year survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy were 33% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 29-37%]. The poor prognostic factors were disease-free interval (DFI) < 12 months (HR = 2.421 95% CI 1.384 4.236) and existence of cirrhosis (HR = 1.936 95% CI 1.031 3.636).
CONCLUSION
The 5-year OS rate of patients with pulmonary metastasectomy after resection of primary liver cancer is 33%. DFI < 12 months and existence of cirrhosis are probably poor prognostic factors.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Metastasectomy; Pneumonectomy; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29435629
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4431-7 -
Bladder Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jan 2018Currently, a diagnosis of non-organ confined bladder cancer (NOCBCa) confers a grave prognosis. The mainstay of treatment consists of systemic chemotherapy. However, it...
BACKGROUND
Currently, a diagnosis of non-organ confined bladder cancer (NOCBCa) confers a grave prognosis. The mainstay of treatment consists of systemic chemotherapy. However, it must be recognized that NOCBCa is a heterogeneous disease state with important clinical distinctions. While surgical extirpation has traditionally been regarded as overly aggressive for all NOCBCa patients, its utility as part of a multimodal treatment strategy in various clinical scenarios has not been thoroughly investigated.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a review of the literature regarding the role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (RC-LND) in the setting of NOCBCa.
METHODS
Medline, and Pubmed electronic database were queried for English language articles from January 1990 to Nov 2016 on RC-LND for cT4, lymph node positive, and metastatic urothelial cancer. NOCBCa was separated into four distinct clinical scenarios: 1. Locally advanced/unresectable disease (cT4bN0M0); 2. Occult pelvic nodal disease (pN+) (cTxN0M0 and pTxN1-3Mx); 3. Clinical node positive disease (cN+) (cTxN1-3M0); and 4. Distant metastatic disease (TxNxM1). Evidence for the role of RC-LND in each of these clinical scenarios was summarized.
RESULTS
cT4b may be more effectively treated by presurgical chemotherapy (PSC) than other forms of NOCBCa. Although clinical response predicted improved survival, surgical factors, such as surgical margin status may also play a role in determining outcomes. In well selected patients, 5-year CSS may reach 60% after consolidative RC-LND. Survival in patients found to have pathologic nodal metastases without PSC was dictated not only by the histologically verified metastatic nodal disease burden, but also by the meticulousness of the lymph node dissection. In these patients, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival. On the other hand, in patients undergoing RC-LND after PSC, pathologic complete response (pCR) was the strongest predictor of improved CSS. The results of population based studies have suggested a therapeutic role by consolidative RC-LND in both patients with cN+ and metastatic BCa (mBCa). For the cN+ population, 5-year OS was 31% in patients undergoing RC-LND after PSC vs. 14% in those receiving chemotherapy alone. Similarly, consolidative intensive local therapy improved OS by approximately 5 months in patients with mBCa. Metastasectomy has also been shown to be effective in small retrospective series and may especially be useful in patients with solitary pulmonary lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
Extirpative treatment of the primary tumor may be an important step in the management of de novo NOCBCa. The current retrospective and population based studies have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in patients with NOCBCa following RC-LND, especially in those with favorable response to PSC. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery and the enhanced post-surgical recovery protocols, RC-LND has not only been demonstrated to be feasible, but also tolerable in the setting of advanced BCa. Well designed, prospective trials are needed to definitively assess the value of surgical extirpation for NOCBCa patients.
PubMed: 29430505
DOI: 10.3233/BLC-170130 -
European Urology Apr 2018The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear.
CONTEXT
The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
In this collaborative review article, we reviewed the contemporary literature on the surgical management of metastatic BCa and factors associated with outcomes to support the development of clinical guidelines as well as informed clinical decision-making.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic search of English language literature using PubMed-Medline and Scopus from 1999 to 2016 was performed.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The beneficial role of consolidation surgery in metastatic BCa is still unproven. In patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis, data suggest a survival advantage for patients undergoing postchemotherapy radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy, especially in those with measurable response to chemotherapy (CHT). Intraoperatively identified enlarged pelvic lymph nodes should be removed. Anecdotal reports of resection of pulmonary metastasis as part of multimodal approach suggest possible improved survival in well-selected patients. Cytoreductive radical cystectomy as local treatment has also been explored in patients with metastatic disease, although its benefits remain to be assessed.
CONCLUSIONS
Consolidative extirpative surgery may be considered in patients with clinically evident pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases but only if they have had a response to CHT. Surgery for limited pulmonary metastases may also be considered in very selected cases. Best candidates are those with resectable disease who demonstrate measurable response to CHT with good performance status. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis and decisions made together with the patient and multidisciplinary teams.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Surgical resection of metastases is technically feasible and can be safely performed. It may help improve cancer control and eventually survival in very selected patients with limited metastatic burden. In a patient who is motivated to receive chemotherapy and to undergo extirpative surgical intervention, surgery should be discussed with the patient among other consolidation therapies in the setting of multidisciplinary teams.
Topics: Clinical Decision-Making; Cystectomy; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 29122377
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.030 -
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2017The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to examine morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival after surgical resection of hepatic metastases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to examine morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival after surgical resection of hepatic metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients.
BACKGROUND
Patients with hepatic metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are facing a dilemma of whether to make hepatic resection.
METHODS
A systematic literature research was undertaken through computerized databases as well as manually research from unpublished data. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the differences in the efficacy of liver resection and non-surgical treatments based on the evaluation of morbidity, 30-day mortality, and 1-, 3-, or 5-year survival.
RESULTS
11 cohort studies with 1147 patients were identified in the pool. Compared with the non-surgical approach, hepatic resection can be performed in a safe and feasible manner for all pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastases (p = 0.13 for overall morbidity; p = 0.63 for mortality). For surgical group, the median 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival were 40.9%, 13.3%, 2.9%, respectively, with a median survival of 9.9 months. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases was associated with a significantly improved overall 1-year and 3-year survival (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Hepatic resection is a safe procedure; furthermore, it is worth doing such an extended surgery for PDAC patients due to additional survival benefit in the medium-term (less than 3 years). However, further randomized, controlled trials are urgently needed.
Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29081375
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.066 -
Urologia Internationalis 2018Breast cancer (BrC) has the highest incidence among females world over and it is one of the most common causes of death from cancer overall. Its high mortality is mostly... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer (BrC) has the highest incidence among females world over and it is one of the most common causes of death from cancer overall. Its high mortality is mostly due to its propensity to rapidly spread to other organs through lymphatic and blood vessels in spite of proper treatment. Bladder metastases from BrC are rare, with 50 cases having been reported in the last 60 years. This review aims to discuss some critical points regarding this uncommon condition. First, we performed a systematic review of the literature in order to draw a clinical and pathological profile of this entity. On this basis, its features in terms of diagnostic issues, imaging techniques, and survival are critically examined. Most bladder metastases from BrC are secondary lobular carcinoma, which mimic very closely the rare variant of urothelial cancer with lobular carcinoma-like features (uniform cells with an uncohesive single-cell, diffusely invasive growth pattern); thus, immunohistochemistry is mandatory to arrive at a correct diagnosis. This article summarizes the current knowledge regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of bladder metastases in patients with BrC.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cystectomy; Female; Humans; Metastasectomy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 29055945
DOI: 10.1159/000481576