-
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Jun 2024Isntroduction. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifaceted endocrine-gynecological condition affecting a substantial number of women during their reproductive... (Review)
Review
Comparative efficacy of metformin combined with cabergoline versus metformin alone in patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
UNLABELLED
Isntroduction. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifaceted endocrine-gynecological condition affecting a substantial number of women during their reproductive years. Metformin (MET) has been shown to improve ovarian function in PCOS-related conditions, while cabergoline is recognized for its powerful and sustained ability to reduce prolactin levels. This study investigates the potential impact of combining cabergoline with metformin while comparing it with metformin alone in the treatment of PCOS alongside hyperprolactinemia.
METHOD
To gather data, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials involving patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia. Outcome measures included changes in the levels of prolactin, testosterone, DHEAS, BMI and menstrual irregularities. RevMan version 5.4 was used to analyze outcomes.
RESULT
This study incorporated three Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving 405 participants in total. Patients receiving a combination of metformin and cabergoline experienced significant reductions in prolactin and testosterone levels (p= <0.0001 and p=<0.0001, respectively). Conversely, alterations in DHEAS levels and BMI did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19 and p = 0.71, respectively). Notably, women solely prescribed metformin exhibited significantly higher rates of menstrual irregularities compared to those receiving both metformin and cabergoline (p=<0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis underscores the synergistic effect achieved by pairing metformin and cabergoline in patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia. However, we encountered only a restricted number of studies meeting our criteria. It is imperative to consistently assess the combined effects of metformin and cabergoline to gain deeper insights into their effectiveness in addressing PCOS and hyperprolactinemia.
PubMed: 38945085
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.037 -
Journal of Dentistry Jun 2024To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain clinical attachment level (CAL), and/or reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and periodontitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Publications were searched in Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, opengrey.eu, and www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov up to May 29, 2024 with no language restriction.
STUDY SELECTION
Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Network meta-analysis utilized frequentist models.
DATA
The network meta-analysis of 30 RCTs involving 1224 patients revealed that, in short-term (2-3 months) and medium-term (4-6 months), adjunctive local treatment involving statins or metformin significantly outperformed scaling and root planning (SRP) with/without additional interventions such as photodynamic and laser therapies (PDT/LT), phytotherapy, doxycycline, bisphosphonates, antibiotics, antiseptics, or placebo for reducing PD and/or gaining CAL. In the long-term (>6 months), statins yielded the most significant additional PD reduction and CAL gain, followed by antibiotics, compared to SRP with antiseptics or placebo. Only PDT/LT demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction in the short term compared to SRP with/without statins, antiseptics, or placebo.
CONCLUSION
This study moderately supports that adding metformin or statins locally to NSPT may enhance PD reduction and CAL gain compared to SRP with/without placebo.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Clinicians are guided to optimize adjunctive therapies, enhancing the health of patients with type 2 diabetes and periodontitis. A strategic approach is proposed to tackle systemic and oral health challenges simultaneously.
PubMed: 38936456
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105212 -
PloS One 2024Stroke stands as a significant macrovascular complication among individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), often resulting in the primary cause of mortality and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stroke stands as a significant macrovascular complication among individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), often resulting in the primary cause of mortality and disability within this patient demographic. Presently, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the underlying causes of stroke in individuals with T2DM, yet the findings exhibit inconsistencies.
OBJECTIVE
This paper aims to consolidate and summarize the available evidence concerning the influential factors contributing to stroke among patients diagnosed with T2DM.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web Of Science, Embase, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu up to August 2023. Google Scholar was also searched to retrieve gray literature. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Stata software.
RESULTS
Our analysis encompassed 43 observational studies, exploring factors across sociodemographic, biochemical, complications, and hypoglycemic agent categories. The findings identified several risk factors for stroke in patients with T2DM: age, gender, T2DM duration, hypertension, body-mass index (BMI), smoking, Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), albuminuria, Triglycerides (TG), Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Coronary heart disease (CHD), Atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetic retinopathy (DR), Peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and carotid plaque. Conversely, exercise, High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), metformin (MET), pioglitazone, and metformin combination therapy emerged as protective factors.
CONCLUSION
This study underscores the multitude of influencing factors contributing to stroke in people with T2DM patients, among which the microvascular complications of T2DM play an most important role. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of screening for microvascular complications in patients with T2DM. However, due to limitations arising from the number of articles reviewed, there remain areas where clarity is lacking. Further research efforts are warranted to expand upon and reinforce our current findings.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Stroke; Risk Factors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Glycated Hemoglobin
PubMed: 38913694
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305954 -
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and... 2024Several oral antidiabetic regimens are available for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) being one of them. We conducted...
OBJECTIVE
Several oral antidiabetic regimens are available for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) being one of them. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing DPP4i plus metformin (Met) combination with other Met-based oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) combinations used in treating patients with T2DM.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase from inception until 19th April, 2022 for phase II and phase III trials in patients with T2DM on Met-based traditional OADs. The primary outcome was assessed by change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour post-prandial blood glucose (2h-PPG). The secondary safety outcomes assessed were hypoglycemic events, serious adverse events (SAEs), cardiovascular (CV) events, and gastrointestinal (GI) events.
RESULTS
Sixty-two trials were included in the analysis. The combination of DPP4i + Met revealed a comparable mean reduction in HbA1c levels to the glinides (Gli) + Met combination (mean difference [MD]: -0.03%, 95% CI: 0.69, -0.65), although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean HbA1c reduction with DPP4i + Met was greater than with sulfonylureas (SU) + Met (MD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.29, 0.39), thiazolidinedione (TZD) + Met (MD: -0.69, 95% CI: -1.39, -0.02), and SU + TZD (MD: 0.21; 95% CI: -1.30, 1.71), with no statistical significance. DPP4i + Met demonstrated a non-significant lower incidence of CV events in comparison to TZD + Met (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.46, 2.45) and SU + Met (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.61, 2.06).
CONCLUSION
DPP4i in combination with Met was efficacious and had a well-tolerated safety profile compared with other traditional OADs. This combination can be considered as a suitable treatment option for patients with T2DM.
PubMed: 38910912
DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S450994 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024The progression of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) can partially predict the occurrence of future cardiovascular events. This network meta-analysis compared the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The progression of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) can partially predict the occurrence of future cardiovascular events. This network meta-analysis compared the effects of 14 antidiabetic drugs (acarbose, alogliptin, exenatide, glibenclamide, glimepiride, ipragliflozin, metformin, nateglinide, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, sitagliptin, tofoglifozin, troglitazone, voglibose) on the progression of cIMT.
METHOD
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to screen all clinical trials of treatment of cIMT with hypoglycemic agents before March 1, 2024. The differences in the changes in cIMT between the treatment group and control group were evaluated.
RESULT
After screening 8395 citations, 25 studies (6675 patients) were included. The results indicated that exenatide had the best efficacy in slowing down cIMT progress, and exenatide [MD=-0.13,95%CI (-0.25, -0.01)], alogliptin [MD=-0.08,95%CI (-0.13, -0.02)] and metformin [MD=-0.05, 95%CI (-0.09, -0.02)] are more effective than placebo.
CONCLUSION
Long-term treatment of exenatide, alogliptin, and metformin may be more effective than other hypoglycemic drugs in slowing the progression of cIMT.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024519474.
Topics: Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Network Meta-Analysis; Disease Progression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
PubMed: 38883606
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1403606 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Jun 2024Data is scant on impact of metformin use in gestational diabetes (GDM)/ diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) on long-term outcomes in children and mothers beyond 5-years of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Data is scant on impact of metformin use in gestational diabetes (GDM)/ diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) on long-term outcomes in children and mothers beyond 5-years of child-birth. This systematic-review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of metformin use in pregnancy on children and their mothers.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating metformin as compared to insulin for managing GDM/DIP. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in body-mass index (BMI) in children at 5-11 years age. Secondary outcomes were to assess alterations in other anthropometric measures, obesity, changes in lipids and adipo-cytokines in children and mothers.
RESULTS
Children at 9-years age, born to mothers who were treated with metformin during pregnancy had similar BMI [MD1.09kg/m(95%CI:-0.44-2.62);P=0.16;I=16%], waist-circumference to height-ratio [MD0.13(95%CI:-0.05-0.30);P=0.16;I=94%], dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) total fat-mass [MD0.68kg(95%CI:-2.39-3.79);P=0.66;I=70%], DXA-total fat-percent [MD 0.04%(95%CI:-3.44-3.51);P=0.98;I=56%], DXA-total fat-free mass [MD 0.81kg (95%CI:-0.96-2.58);P=0.37;I=55%], MRI visceral adipose tissue [MD 80.97cm(95%CI:-136.47-298.41); P=0.47;I=78%] and magnetic-resonance spectroscopy liver-fat percentage [MD 0.27%(95% CI:-1.26-1.79);P=0.73;I=0%], compared to those born to mothers who were treated with insulin. Serum adiponectin, leptin, alanine-aminotransferase and ferritin were comparable among groups. In children between 9-11 years age, occurrence of obesity, diabetes or challenges in motor and social development were comparable between the 2 groups. After 9 years of childbirth, BMI and risk of developing diabetes were similar in the two groups of women.
CONCLUSION
Metformin use in pregnancy did not show any adverse effects when compared to insulin on long-term outcomes in children and their mothers.
PubMed: 38876183
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.05.017 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Jun 2024
PubMed: 38866699
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae132 -
Farmacia Hospitalaria : Organo Oficial... Jun 2024Pharmacogenetics evaluates how genetic variations influence drug responses. Nowadays, genetic tests have advanced, becoming more affordable, and its integration is... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Pharmacogenetics evaluates how genetic variations influence drug responses. Nowadays, genetic tests have advanced, becoming more affordable, and its integration is supported by stronger clinical evidence. Guidelines such as those from CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) and resources like PharmGKB facilitate genotype-based prescribing; and organizations like the FDA promote genetic testing before initiating certain medications. Preventive pharmacogenetic panels seem promising, but further research on biomarkers and diverse populations is needed. The aim of this review is to analyze recent evidence on the genotype-drug response relationship to examine how the genetic profile of patients influences the clinical response to treatments, and analyze the areas of research that need further study to advance towards a genetic-based precision medicine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was conducted on PubMed to identify articles investigating the genotype-drug response relationship. The search strategy included terms such as "pharmacogenetics", "personalized treatment", "precision medicine", "dose adjustment", "individualized dosing", "clinical routine" and "clinical practice." Clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses published in English or Spanish between 2013 and 2023 were included. The initial search resulted in a total of 136 articles for analysis.
RESULTS
49 articles were included for the final analysis following review by two investigators. A relationship between genetic polymorphisms and drug response or toxicity was found for drugs such as opioids, GLP-1 agonists, tacrolimus, oral anticoagulants, antineoplastics, atypical antipsychotics, efavirenz, clopidogrel, lamotrigine, anti-TNF-α agents, voriconazole, antidepressants, or statins. However, for drugs like metformin, quetiapine, irinotecan, bisoprolol, and anti-VEGF agents, no statistically significant association between genotype and response was found.
CONCLUSION
The studies analyzed in this review suggest a strong correlation between genetic variability and individual drug responses, supporting the use of pharmacogenetics for treatment optimization. However, for certain drugs like metformin or quetiapine, the influence of genotype on their response remains unclear. More studies with larger sample sizes, greater ethnic diversity, and consideration of non-genetic factors are needed. The lack of standardization in analysis methods and accessibility to genetic testing are significant challenges in this field. As a conclusion, pharmacogenetics shows immense potential in personalized medicine, but further research is required.
PubMed: 38851909
DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.010 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma...
BACKGROUND
There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
METHODS
Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using and as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
DISCUSSION
The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.
PubMed: 38846983
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399693 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2024Metformin has been used in the management of diabetes for decades. It is an effective, low-cost intervention with a well-established safety profile. Emerging evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Metformin has been used in the management of diabetes for decades. It is an effective, low-cost intervention with a well-established safety profile. Emerging evidence suggests that metformin targets a number of pathways that lead to chronic kidney damage, and long-term use may, therefore, slow the rate of kidney function decline and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effect of metformin therapy on kidney function decline in patients with CKD with or without diabetes mellitus and assess the safety and dose tolerability in this population.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 19 July 2023 with assistance from an Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported kidney-related outcomes with a minimum duration of 12 months delivery of the metformin intervention and whose eligibility criteria included adult participants with either i) a diagnosis of CKD of any aetiology and/or ii) those with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Comparisons included placebo, no intervention, non-pharmacological interventions, other antidiabetic medications or any other active control. Studies that included patients on any modality of kidney replacement therapy were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently carried out data extraction using a standard data extraction form. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
MAIN RESULTS
This review included 11 studies reporting on 8449 randomised participants. Studies were conducted in patient populations with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) (four studies) or diabetes mellitus (seven studies). Six studies compared metformin with no active control, four studies compared metformin with active controls (rosiglitazone, glyburide, pioglitazone, or glipizide), and one study included treatment arms that randomised to either metformin, diet and lifestyle modifications, or other antidiabetic therapies. The risk of bias in included studies varied; two studies were abstract-only publications and were judged to have a high risk of bias in most domains. Other included publications were judged to have a low risk of bias in most domains. Across comparisons, GRADE evaluations for most outcomes were judged as low or very low certainty, except for those relating to side effects, tolerance, and withdrawals, which were judged as moderate certainty. The evidence suggests that compared to placebo, metformin may result in i) a slightly smaller decline in kidney function (3 studies, 505 participants: MD 1.92 mL/min, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.51; I = 0%; low certainty), ii) very uncertain effects on the incidence of kidney failure (1 study, 753 participants: RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.17 to 8.49), iii) little or no effect on death (3 studies, 865 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.32; I = 0%; moderate certainty), iv) little or no effect on the incidence of serious adverse events (3 studies, 576 participants: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.72; I = 0%; moderate certainty), and v) likely higher incidence of intolerance leading to study withdrawal than placebo (4 studies, 646 participants: RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.27; I = 0%; moderate certainty). The certainty of the evidence for proteinuria was very uncertain. Compared to other active controls (rosiglitazone, glyburide, pioglitazone, or glipizide), metformin i) demonstrated very uncertain effects on kidney function decline, ii) may result in little or no difference in death (3 studies, 5608 participants: RR 0.95 95% CI 0.63 to 1.43; I = 0%; low certainty), iii) probably results in little or no difference in intolerance leading to study withdrawal (3 studies, 5593 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.08; I = 0%; moderate certainty), iv) probably results in little or no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events (2 studies, 5545 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71; I = 0%; moderate certainty), and v) may increase the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (2 studies, 3836 participants: MD 14.61, 95% CI 8.17 to 21.05; I = 0%; low certainty). No studies reported the incidence of kidney failure.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review highlights the lack of RCTs reporting on the effects of metformin on kidney function, particularly in patients with CKD. Future research in this field requires adequately powered RCTs comparing metformin to placebo or standard care in those with CKD. Seven ongoing studies were identified in this review, and future updates, including their findings, may further inform the results of this review.
Topics: Metformin; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Disease Progression; Hypoglycemic Agents; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Adult; Bias
PubMed: 38837240
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013414.pub2