-
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Jun 2024The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system serves as a sophisticated guardian of the precise functioning of the human genome. Dysregulation within this system is linked to the...
BACKGROUND
The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system serves as a sophisticated guardian of the precise functioning of the human genome. Dysregulation within this system is linked to the oncogenesis process. Reduced expression of MMR system proteins identified in salivary gland tumors (SGTs) suggests an increased risk of tumoral occurrence. This study aims to analyze the expression of MMR proteins in SGTs and discuss the relevance of this association to the development of these neoplasms.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023465590). A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest (non-peer reviewed platform) was performed to answer the question "Do DNA MMR system proteins exhibit expression in SGTs?". The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool.
RESULTS
A total of 142 patients with benign SGTs and 84 with malignant SGTs were included in this review. The literature analysis showed a notable reduction in the expression of DNA MMR system proteins (hHMS2, hMLH1, hMSH3 and hMSH6) in the percentage of marked cells.
CONCLUSIONS
The reduction in the expression of the DNA MMR system proteins suggests an interesting correlation with the development of malignant and benign SGTs. Nevertheless, further investigations are warranted to better clarify the precision of measuring biomarker protein expression.
PubMed: 38907641
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.26647 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2024
Review
PubMed: 38901486
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.050 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal...
BACKGROUND
Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs).
RESULTS
Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Chemoradiotherapy; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 38846948
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1392499 -
Gynecologic Oncology May 2024The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy has emerged as a highly promising primary option for advanced or recurrent...
BACKGROUND
The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy has emerged as a highly promising primary option for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). The study aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy of ICIs with cytotoxic chemotherapy in EC.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials up to November 11, 2023, focusing on immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for EC. The primary endpoint was the pooled hazard ratio (HR), which was further analyzed across subgroups based on mismatch repair (MMR) status, race, histology, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023475669).
FINDINGS
Four trials with 2335 patients were analyzed. ICIs with chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89) compared to chemotherapy alone. Stratification by MMR status showed substantial benefits for dMMR (PFS; HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.26-0.43; OS; HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91) over pMMR cohorts in both PFS and OS. In the subgroup analysis, there was significant PFS advantage in Caucasian (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.72) over non-Caucasian, in endometrioid histology (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78) over non-endometrioid, and in PD-L1 positive (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81) over PD-L1 negative population.
INTERPRETATION
ICIs combined with platinum-based chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS and OS in patients with advanced or recurrent EC. Patients with dMMR status, Caucasians, endometrioid histology, and positive PD-L1 status showed significant PFS benefits, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches to improve outcomes.
PubMed: 38735144
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.006 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jun 2024Gastric cancer (GC), known for its unfavorable prognosis, has been classified in four distinct molecular subtypes. These subtypes not only exhibit differences in their... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gastric cancer (GC), known for its unfavorable prognosis, has been classified in four distinct molecular subtypes. These subtypes not only exhibit differences in their genome and transcriptome but also in the composition of their tumor immune microenvironment. The microsatellite instable (MSI) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive GC subtypes show clear clinical benefits from immune checkpoint blockade, likely due to a neoantigen-driven and virus-driven antitumor immune response and high expression of immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1. However, even within these subtypes response to checkpoint inhibition is variable, which is potentially related to heterogeneity in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and expression of co-inhibitory molecules. We conducted a systematic review to outline the current knowledge about the immunological features on the TIME of MSI and EBV + GCs.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. All articles from the year 1990 and onwards addressing immune features of gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed and included based on predefined in- and exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
In total 5962 records were screened, of which 139 were included that reported immunological data on molecular GC subtypes. MSI and EBV + GCs were reported to have a more inflamed TIME compared to non-MSI and EBV- GC subtypes. Compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, MSI tumors were characterized by higher numbers of CD8 + and FoxP3 + T cells, and tumor infiltrating pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages. HLA-deficiency was most common in MSI tumors compared to other molecular GC subtypes and associated with lower T and B cell infiltrates compared to HLA-proficient tumors. EBV + was associated with a high number of CD8 + T cells, Tregs, NK cells and macrophages. Expression of PD-L1, CTLA-4, Granzyme A and B, Perforin and interferon-gamma was enriched in EBV + tumors. Overall, MSI tumors harbored a more heterogeneous TIME in terms of immune cell composition and immune checkpoints compared to the EBV + tumors.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
MSI and EBV + GCs are highly Handbook for Conducting a Literature-Based Health Assessment Using OHAT Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration.; 2019pro-inflammatory immune cell populations. Although studies on the direct comparison of EBV + and MSI tumors are limited, EBV + tumors show less intra-subgroup heterogeneity compared to MSI tumors. More studies are needed to identify how Intra-subgroup heterogeneity impacts response to immunotherapy efficacy.
Topics: Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Tumor Microenvironment; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; DNA Mismatch Repair; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Microsatellite Instability
PubMed: 38669788
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102737 -
Expert Review of Gastroenterology &... 2024A genetic predisposition seems to be involved in biliary tract cancer, but the prevalence of germline mutations in BTC remains unclear, and the therapeutic role of the...
INTRODUCTION
A genetic predisposition seems to be involved in biliary tract cancer, but the prevalence of germline mutations in BTC remains unclear, and the therapeutic role of the germline pathologic variants is still unknown.
AREA COVERED
The aim of the present work is to systematically review the data available on the hereditary predisposition of biliary tract cancer by a specific research on PubMed, in order to highlight the most important critical points and to define the current possible role of germinal testing and genetic counseling in this setting of patients.
EXPERT OPINION
Basing on data already available, we decided to start in our institution a specific genetic protocol focused on biliary tract cancer patients, which includes genetic counseling and, if indicated, germline test. The inclusion criteria are: 1) Patient with personal history of oncologic disease other than BTC, 2) Patient with familiar history of oncologic disease (considering relatives of first and second grade), 3) Patient with ≤ 50 years old, 4) Patient presenting a somatic mutation in genes involved in DNA damage repair pathways and mismatch repair. The aim of the presented protocol is to identify germline pathogenic variants with prophylactic and therapeutic impact, and to collect and integrate a significant amount of clinical, familial, somatic, and genetic data.
Topics: Humans; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Genetic Counseling; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genetic Testing; Germ-Line Mutation; Phenotype; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38584510
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2337000 -
Clinical & Translational Oncology :... Jul 2024Molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC) has become a promising information to tailor preoperatively the surgical treatment. We aimed to evaluate the rate of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC) has become a promising information to tailor preoperatively the surgical treatment. We aimed to evaluate the rate of lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with EC according to molecular profile.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching in two major electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus), including original articles reporting lymph node metastases according to the molecular classification of EC as categorized in the ESGO-ESMO-ESP guidelines.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies enrolling 3056 patients were included. Pooled prevalence LNM when considering only patients undergoing lymph node assessment was 4% for POLE-mutated (95%CI: 0-12%), 22% for no specific molecular profile (95% CI: 9-39%), 23% for Mismatch repair-deficiency (95%CI: 10-40%) and 31% for p53-abnormal (95%CI: 24-39%).
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of LNM seems to be influenced by molecular classification. P53-abnormal group presents the highest rate of nodal involvement, and POLE-mutated the lowest.
Topics: Humans; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Lymphatic Metastasis; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; Mutation; Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins; DNA Polymerase II; Lymph Nodes; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 38578538
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03401-y -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Jun 2024In April 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorsed neoadjuvant immunotherapy for select patients with nonmetastatic mismatch repair deficient colon...
BACKGROUND
In April 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorsed neoadjuvant immunotherapy for select patients with nonmetastatic mismatch repair deficient colon cancer. Approximately 15% of incident colon cancers are mismatch repair deficient, resulting in a distinct molecular subtype with high microsatellite instability that is responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the existing evidence supporting neoadjuvant immunotherapy for mismatch repair deficient, microsatellite unstable nonmetastatic colon cancer.
DATA SOURCES
A medical librarian performed PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science searches most recently on April 24, 2023. The PubMed search was re-run on September 26, 2023, to identify any additional studies published between April 24 and September 26, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Two authors screened titles and abstracts in the published studies. The inclusion criteria were 1) English language, 2) adults with primary cancer of the colon, 3) nonmetastatic disease, 4) neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and 5) reporting on 10 or more cases.
INTERVENTION
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Safety (grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events) and efficacy (complete pathologic responses).
RESULTS
From 7691 studies identified, 6370 were screened and 8 were included. Various agents, dosing regimens, and treatment durations were used, with durations of immunotherapy ranging from 1 to 16 cycles. Complete R0 resections were consistently achieved in 98% to 100% of resections. Of patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and underwent resection, 50% to 91% had ypT0N0 pathology. The safety profiles were generally favorable, with grade 1 to 2 treatment-related adverse events (mostly immune-related) during immunotherapy reported in 22.2% to 70% of patients. Postoperative complications after neoadjuvant immunotherapy were reassuring, with no severe complications reported.
LIMITATIONS
Small number of heterogeneous and uncontrolled studies precluding a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with high rates of pathologic complete responses in locally advanced colon cancer. The literature is limited, particularly for postoperative outcomes, and more studies are needed to understand the safety and positioning of these regimens in the neoadjuvant context.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Colonic Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; DNA Mismatch Repair; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Microsatellite Instability
PubMed: 38479009
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003263 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Mismatch Repair; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 38452372
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003325 -
Oncology Letters Apr 2024Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced or metastatic...
Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with either mismatch repair proficient or metastatic microsatellite stable disease: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). ICIs, in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) possessing anti-angiogenic properties, serve as a potential strategy for circumventing the resistance exhibited by MSS or pMMR mCRC to immunotherapeutic interventions. The present study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ICIs + TKIs and provide a reference for the treatment of CRC. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to July 28, 2023. A total of 14 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses, with a total of 819 patients enrolled. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores of the 14 cohort studies included were ≥7, indicating they were of a high quality. The objective response rate (ORR) of ICIs + TKIs was 14% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.24; P=0.132] in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. The disease control rate (DCR) was 65% (95% CI, 0.58-0.74; P<0.0001). The overall incidence of adverse events of varying severity linked to combination of ICIs and TKIs in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC was 64% (95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P<0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions was 24% (95% CI, 0.14-0.4; P<0.0001). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the exclusion of individual studies did not yield statistically significant variations in combined analysis results. Based on the examination of publication bias, ORR and DCR, Begg's and Egger's tests had P-values of 0.114 and 0.395, respectively. Overall publication bias overall was absent in the Begg's funnel plot, as there was no apparent asymmetry. Nonetheless, the P-values of the Egger's and Begg's tests for adverse reactions and adverse reactions grade ≥3 were P=0.008 and P=0.048, respectively. The asymmetry of the Begg's funnel plots was evident, suggesting the presence of potential publication bias regarding adverse event results. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs and TKIs demonstrates a favorable effectiveness and notable safety profile in the management of patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.
PubMed: 38406596
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14286