-
International Journal of Surgery... Nov 2019Previous studies have indicated that there may be a difference in tumor biology between intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) and pancreatic ductal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have indicated that there may be a difference in tumor biology between intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the data are still controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and compare the outcome of IPMC and PDAC after surgical resection.
METHODS
Studies comparing IPMC and PDAC were identified using Medline and Embase search engines. Primary outcomes of interest were survival and recurrence. Secondary outcomes were clinicopathological characteristics. Meta-analysis of data was conducted using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included. Pooled analysis revealed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) for IPMC compared to PDAC (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.56). Both colloid and tubular IPMC showed improved 5-year OS compared to PDAC (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.25 and OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.54, respectively). Median survival time ranged from 21 to 58 months in the IPMC group compared to 12-23 months in the PDAC group. No meta-analysis could be performed on recurrence or on time-to-event data. Descriptive data showed no survival difference for higher TNM stages. IPMC was more often found at a TNM-stage of 1 (OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.71-7.15) and had lower rates of lymph node spread (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.57).
CONCLUSION
Available data suggest that IPMC has a more indolent course with a better 5-year OS compared to PDAC. The histopathological features are less aggressive in IPMC. The reason may be earlier detection. However, for IPMC with higher TNM stages the survival seems to be similar to that of PDAC.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Adenocarcinoma, Papillary; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31546033
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.014 -
The British Journal of Surgery May 2019Mucinous differentiation occurs in 5-15 per cent of colorectal adenocarcinomas. This subtype of colorectal cancer responds poorly to chemoradiotherapy and has a worse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mucinous differentiation occurs in 5-15 per cent of colorectal adenocarcinomas. This subtype of colorectal cancer responds poorly to chemoradiotherapy and has a worse prognosis. The genetic aetiology underpinning this cancer subtype lacks consensus. The aim of this study was to use meta-analytical techniques to clarify the molecular associations of mucinous colorectal cancer.
METHODS
This study adhered to MOOSE guidelines. Databases were searched for studies comparing KRAS, BRAF, microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), p53 and p27 status between patients with mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma. A random-effects model was used for analysis.
RESULTS
Data from 46 studies describing 17 746 patients were included. Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma was associated positively with KRAS (odds ratio (OR) 1·46, 95 per cent c.i. 1·08 to 2·00, P = 0·014) and BRAF (OR 3·49, 2·50 to 4·87; P < 0·001) mutation, MSI (OR 3·98, 3·30 to 4·79; P < 0·001) and CIMP (OR 3·56, 2·85 to 4·43; P < 0·001), and negatively with altered p53 expression (OR 0·46, 0·31 to 0·67; P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION
The genetic origins of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma are predominantly associated with BRAF, MSI and CIMP pathways. This pattern of molecular alterations may in part explain the resistance to standard chemotherapy regimens seen in mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; CpG Islands; DNA Methylation; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Microsatellite Instability; Models, Statistical; Mutation; Phenotype; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 30945755
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11142 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... May 2019This study aims to determine the association of EGFR/KRAS mutation status with histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS...
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to determine the association of EGFR/KRAS mutation status with histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification.
METHODS
Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2011 to June 2018 for studies that included patients with LAC who underwent surgical resection were classified according to the new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. EGFR/KRAS status assessment was requireded. The primary outcome was determined by the odds ratio (OR) of the incidence of mutation status of certain of each histological subtype. The reference group consisted of EGFR/KRAS mutation negative patients.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven eligible studies involving 9022 patients with mutation gene detection were included for analysis. Among them, 6717 (74.5%) patients were from the Asian region and, 2305 (25.5%) patients were from Non-Asian regions. The most prevalent subtype was acinar (34.7%), followed by papillary (22.9%), lepidic (18.9%), solid (13.6%), micropapillary (6.3%), and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (3.5%). EGFR mutations were more common in patients with resected lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (OR,1.76; 95%CI, 1.38-2.24;p < 0.01) and were rarely found in solid predominant adenocarcinoma (OR,0.28; 95%CI, 0.23-0.34;p < 0.01) or IMA (OR,0.10; 95%CI, 0.06-0.14;p < 0.01). Conversely, KRAS mutations were characterized by IMA (OR,7.01; 95%CI, 5.11-9.62;p < 0.01), and were less frequently identified in lepidic (OR,0.58; 95%CI, 0.45-0.75;p < 0.01) and acinar (OR,0.65; 95%CI, 0.55-0.78;p < 0.01) predominant subtypes. Further analyses were performed in Asian and Non-Asian groups and the results were consistent.
CONCLUSIONS
The current study confirms that the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification is associated with driver gene alterations in resected LAC.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Humans; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
PubMed: 30833014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.006 -
Gynecologie, Obstetrique, Fertilite &... Feb 2019To define follow-up modalities after an epithelial ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal cancer. To define possibilities of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and...
[Follow-up of patients treated for an epithelial ovarian cancer, place of hormone replacement therapy and of contraception: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG,...
OBJECTIVES
To define follow-up modalities after an epithelial ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal cancer. To define possibilities of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and contraceptive use after treatment.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature in French and English langage conducted on Pubmed/Medline and the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS
After the treatment of an epithelial ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal cancer, symptoms evaluation for follow-up is recommended at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and then yearly (Grade B). Only patients with an initial complete surgery (CC0, without any macroscopic signs of disease), and with a good general condition (ECOG 0) should be followed with paraclinic tests, with a serum HE4 or CA125 concentration measurement, from 6 months after the end of treatments (GradeC). Systematic follow-up with CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is not recommended (GradeC). Imaging test is recommended in case of an increased serum concentration of HE4 or CA125 (Grade B). An HRT should be proposed to women younger than 45 after a non-conservative treatment for a high grade serous (GradeC) or for a mucinous (GradeC) ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal adenocarcinoma. HRT is not contra-indicated in women older than 45 presenting a climacteric syndrome after the treatment of a high grade serous (Grade B) or of a mucinous (GradeC) ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Abdomen; Biomarkers, Tumor; CA-125 Antigen; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Continuity of Patient Care; Contraception; Female; France; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Membrane Proteins; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pelvis; Proteins; Societies, Medical; WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2
PubMed: 30685388
DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.12.006 -
Pancreas 2018This study aimed to identify factors that explain the association of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (IPMNs-PNETs),... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to identify factors that explain the association of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (IPMNs-PNETs), radiological characteristics, and factors that might guide therapy.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature to search for articles on concurrent IPMN-PNET, mixed endocrine-exocrine pancreatic tumors, and/or PNET with an intraductal growth pattern.
RESULTS
A review of the literature suggests that there is some confusion about association of IPMNs-PNETs. Regarding this association, the studies collected data from 32 patients. Eleven patients presented concurrent tumors, 9 mixed endocrine-exocrine tumors, and no data were available in the remaining 7. In addition, the relationship IPMN-PNET focuses not only on the coexistence of the 2 lesions, but also on the possibility of the intraductal growth of the endocrine lesion. In the literature, in 4 cases, the preoperative radiological diagnosis had been IPMN.
CONCLUSIONS
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and PNETs may be associated in a number of scenarios. The association may be due to the concurrent existence of independent lesions, may be a mixed endocrine-exocrine tumor, or may be due to intraductal growth of the endocrine lesion. But the literature is confusing. It is not known whether the association is accidental or whether there is an etiological reason. Further studies are needed to investigate this scenario.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Papillary; Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 29683974
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001048 -
The American Surgeon Feb 2018Appendiceal mucoceles (AMs) are rare mucin-containing neoplasms with malignant potential. Lack of evidence-based data exists defining clinicopathological features for... (Review)
Review
Appendiceal mucoceles (AMs) are rare mucin-containing neoplasms with malignant potential. Lack of evidence-based data exists defining clinicopathological features for management. MEDLINE search between 1995 and 2015 was performed using search criteria "Appendix mucocele." Systematic review of patient-, pathologic-, and treatment-related characteristics was performed and data analyzed. Among 276 cases of non-perforated AMs, 163 (59%) patients were female, with variable and nonspecific presentation. Patients were treated with appendectomy (52.1%), right hemicolectomy (17.6%), partial cecectomy (17.2%), and ileocecetomy (13.1%). Pathologic evaluation revealed the following: cystadenoma/low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (54%), unspecified/benign (25%), retention cyst (14.1%), cystadenocarcinoma (4.2%), and mucosal hyperplasia (2.9%). All 11 (4.2%) patients with cystadenocarcinoma were female (P = 0.004), odds ratio for malignancy 1.07 times higher for women. Synchronous colonic malignancy was reported in three patients (27%) with cystadenocarcinoma (P = 0.007), odds ratio of 12.1. AMs have low risk for malignancy. Treatment should begin with appendectomy-only and subsequently guided by pathologic diagnosis.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Appendectomy; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Cecum; Colectomy; Cystadenocarcinoma; Cystadenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Cystadenoma, Mucinous; Humans; Ileum; Mucocele
PubMed: 29580358
DOI: No ID Found -
Surgery Jun 2018Mural nodules (MNs) have a predominant role in the 2016 revision of the international guidelines on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic review, meta-analysis, and a high-volume center experience supporting the new role of mural nodules proposed by the updated 2017 international guidelines on IPMN of the pancreas.
BACKGROUND
Mural nodules (MNs) have a predominant role in the 2016 revision of the international guidelines on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas. The aim of this study was to evaluate MNs as predictors of invasive cancer (iCa) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in IPMNs and to investigate the role of MN size in risk prediction.
METHODS
A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on selected studies were conducted. The random effect model was adopted, and the pooled SMD (standardized mean difference) obtained. The surgical series of IPMNs at a single high-volume institution was reviewed.
RESULTS
This review included 70 studies and 2297 resected IPMNs. MNs have a positive predictive value for malignancy of 62.2%. The meta-analysis suggested that MN size has a considerable effect on predicting IPMNs with both iCa or HGD with a mean SMD of 0.79. All studies included in the meta-analysis used contrast-enhanced endosonography (CE-EUS) to assess MNs. Due to the heterogeneity of the proposed thresholds, no reliable MN size cut-off was identified. Of 317 IPMNs resected at our institution, 102 (32.1%) had a preoperative diagnosis of MN. Multivariate analysis showed that MN is the only independent predictor of iCa and HGD for all types of IPMNs.
CONCLUSION
MNs are reliable predictors of iCa and HGD in IPMNs as proposed by the 2016 IAP guidelines. CE-EUS seems to be the best tool for characterizing size and has the best accuracy for predicting malignancy. Further studies should determine potential MN dimensional cut-offs.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Hospitals, High-Volume; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 29454468
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.009 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Mar 2018Predicting the biologic behavior of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) remains challenging. Current guidelines utilize patient symptoms and imaging... (Review)
Review
Can we better predict the biologic behavior of incidental IPMN? A comprehensive analysis of molecular diagnostics and biomarkers in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.
PURPOSE
Predicting the biologic behavior of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) remains challenging. Current guidelines utilize patient symptoms and imaging characteristics to determine appropriate surgical candidates. However, the majority of resected cysts remain low-risk lesions, many of which may be feasible to have under surveillance. We herein characterize the most promising and up-to-date molecular diagnostics in order to identify optimal components of a molecular signature to distinguish levels of IPMN dysplasia.
METHODS
A comprehensive systematic review of pertinent literature, including our own experience, was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Molecular diagnostics in IPMN patient tissue, duodenal secretions, cyst fluid, saliva, and serum were evaluated and organized into the following categories: oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, glycoproteins, markers of the immune response, proteomics, DNA/RNA mutations, and next-generation sequencing/microRNA. Specific targets in each of these categories, and in aggregate, were identified by their ability to both characterize a cyst as an IPMN and determine the level of cyst dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS
Combining molecular signatures with clinical and imaging features in this era of next-generation sequencing and advanced computational analysis will enable enhanced sensitivity and specificity of current models to predict the biologic behavior of IPMN.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Incidental Findings; Male; MicroRNAs; Needs Assessment; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pathology, Molecular; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 29218397
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1644-z -
Pancreas Oct 2017The aim of this study was to pool incidences of increased cyst size, malignant branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs), pancreatic malignancy,...
Incidences of Pancreatic Malignancy and Mortality in Patients With Untreated Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Undergoing Surveillance: A Systematic Review.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to pool incidences of increased cyst size, malignant branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs), pancreatic malignancy, and pancreatic malignancy-related death during follow-up (FU) of BD-IPMN patients.
METHODS
Searches were performed from January 2010 to April 2016. All hits were checked on inclusion criteria, and outcomes were extracted. Incidences were pooled. Three subgroups were defined: (1) including only BD-IPMN patients, (2) short-interval FU (maximum 6 months), and (3) long-interval FU (>6 months).
RESULTS
Thirty-one articles were enrolled, including 8455 patients (mean age, 66.4 years). Twenty-two studies included subgroup 1; 10 and 6 studies included, respectively, subgroups 2 and 3. Incidence of increased cyst size was 17.4%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 20.0%, 17.2%, and 31.7%. Incidence of malignant BD-IPMN was 2.5. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 3.0%, 2.4%, and 3.3%. Incidence of pancreatic malignancy was 2.6%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 2.3%, 1.2%, and 4.0%. Incidence of death was 0.5%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 0.4%, 0.04%, and 0.12%.
CONCLUSIONS
Although not significant, all incidences on long-interval FU were higher; therefore, short-interval FU seems necessary to find resectable lesions.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Aged; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28902778
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000907 -
Pancreas Aug 2017Guidelines regarding the surveillance of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are controversial because of uncertain risk of malignancy, agnosticism... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Guidelines regarding the surveillance of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are controversial because of uncertain risk of malignancy, agnosticism regarding the use of endoscopic ultrasound, and their recommendation to stop surveillance after 5 years. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of malignancy and other end points and estimate the value of endoscopic ultrasound for surveillance.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE for studies with a cohort of patients with presumed branch-duct IPMN who initially were managed nonsurgically. Data regarding study characteristics, surveillance, and outcomes were extracted. Incidence rates of morphologic progression, malignancy, surgery, and death were calculated with a random effects model.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies with 3440 patients and 13,097 patient-years of follow-up were included. Rates of morphologic progression, surgery, malignancy, and death were 0.0379, 0.0250, 0.0098, and 0.0043 per patient-year, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound was not associated with significantly different rates of these outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The risk of malignancy calculated in this study was low and in line with recent systematic reviews. Endoscopic ultrasound does not have marginal use in surveillance. Given the limitations of a systematic review of nonrandomized studies, further studies are needed to determine the optimal surveillance of branch-duct IPMNs.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Adenocarcinoma, Papillary; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Cohort Studies; Endosonography; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28697134
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000858