-
CNS Drugs Mar 2021Cannabidiol (CBD), which is one major constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has anti-seizure properties and does not produce euphoric or intrusive side effects. A...
BACKGROUND
Cannabidiol (CBD), which is one major constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has anti-seizure properties and does not produce euphoric or intrusive side effects. A plant-derived, highly purified CBD formulation with a known and constant composition has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex. In the European Union, the drug has been authorized by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, in conjunction with clobazam, and is under regulatory review for the treatment of seizures in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aimed to summarize the currently available body of knowledge about the use of this US Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency-approved oral formulation of pharmaceutical-grade CBD in patients with epileptic conditions, especially developmental and epileptic encephalopathies other than Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
METHODS
The relevant studies were identified through MEDLINE and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry in October 2020. There were no date limitations or language restrictions. The following types of studies were included: clinical trials, cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional, clinical series, and case reports. Participants had to meet the following criteria: any sex, any ethnicity, any age, diagnosis of epilepsy, receiving plant-derived, highly purified (> 98% w/w) CBD in a sesame oil-based oral solution for the treatment of seizures. Data extracted from selected records included efficacy, tolerability, and safety outcomes.
RESULTS
Five hundred and seventy records were identified by database and trial register searching. Fifty-seven studies were retrieved for detailed assessment, of which 42 were eventually included for the review. The participants of the studies included patients of both pediatric and adult age. Across the trials, purified CBD was administered at dosages up to 50 mg/kg/day. In a randomized double-blind controlled trial in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex, CBD was associated with a significantly greater percent reduction in seizure frequency than placebo over the treatment period. Open-label studies suggested the effectiveness of CBD in the treatment of children and adults presenting with other epilepsy syndromes than those addressed by regulatory trials, including CDKL5 deficiency disorder and Aicardi, Dup15q, and Doose syndromes, SYNGAP1 encephalopathy, and epilepsy with myoclonic absences. The most common adverse events observed during treatment with CBD included somnolence, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and increased serum aminotransferases.
CONCLUSIONS
The currently available data suggest that response to treatment with a highly purified, plant-derived CBD oil-based solution can be seen in patients across a broad range of epilepsy disorders and etiologies. The existing evidence can provide preliminary support for additional research.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cannabidiol; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Epilepsy; Epileptic Syndromes; Humans; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Seizures
PubMed: 33754312
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00807-y -
Seizure Apr 2021Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a rare and severe infantile-onset epileptic encephalopathy. DS research focuses mainly on children. We did a systematic review, completed on... (Review)
Review
Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a rare and severe infantile-onset epileptic encephalopathy. DS research focuses mainly on children. We did a systematic review, completed on January 18, 2021, examining the number of clinical DS studies. We show that there are 208 studies on children exclusively, 28 studies on adults exclusively, and 116 studies involving adults and children combined. This 7:1 ratio of children to adult studies exclusively shows the dearth of research that addresses long-term natural history of DS into adulthood. Through this systematic review, we examine the most up-to-date information in DS adults as it pertains to seizures, electroencephalogram, imaging, treatment, motor abnormalities, cognitive and social behavior outcomes, cardiac abnormalities, sleep disturbances, diagnosis in adults, and mortality. Overall, the frequency of seizures increases in the first decade of life and then myoclonic, atypical absences and focal seizures with impaired awareness tend to decrease in frequency or even disappear in adulthood. Adults tend to have a notable reduction in status epilepticus, especially after 30 years of age. Parkinsonian features were seen in patients as young as 19 years old and are more severe in older patients, suggesting a progression of the parkinsonian symptoms. In adulthood, patients continue to present with behavior problems, associated with a lower health-related quality of life. The leading reported cause of death in DS adults is Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Further studies in older adults are needed to understand the long-term outcomes of patients with DS.
Topics: Adult; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Humans; Infant; Mutation; NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Quality of Life; Spasms, Infantile; Young Adult
PubMed: 33677403
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.025 -
Epilepsia Apr 2021Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare severe epilepsy syndrome associated with slowed psychomotor development and behavioral disorders from the second year onward in a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare severe epilepsy syndrome associated with slowed psychomotor development and behavioral disorders from the second year onward in a previously seemingly normal child. Among cognitive impairments, visuospatial, sensorimotor integration, and expressive language deficits are consistently reported. There have been independent hypotheses to deconstruct the typical cognitive development in DS (dorsal stream vulnerability, cerebellar-like pattern, sensorimotor integration deficit), but an encompassing framework is still lacking. We performed a scoping review of existing evidence to map the current understanding of DS cognitive and behavioral developmental profiles and to summarize the evidence on suggested frameworks. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE to identify reports focusing on cognitive deficits and/or behavioral abnormalities in DS published between 1978 and March 15, 2020. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Twenty-one reports were selected and tabulated by three independent reviewers based on predefined data extraction and eligibility forms. Eighteen reports provided assessments of global intelligence quotients with variable degrees of cognitive impairment. Eleven reports analyzed single subitems contribution to global cognitive scores: these reports showed consistently larger impairment in performance scales compared to verbal ones. Studies assessing specific cognitive functions demonstrated deterioration of early visual processing, fine and gross motor abilities, visuomotor and auditory-motor integration, spatial processing, visuo-attentive abilities, executive functions, and expressive language. Behavioral abnormalities, reported from 14 studies, highlighted autistic-like traits and attention and hyperactivity disorders, slightly improving with age. The cognitive profile in DS and some behavioral and motor abnormalities may be enclosed within a unified theoretical framework of the three main hypotheses advanced: a pervasive sensorimotor integration deficit, encompassing an occipito-parietofrontal circuit (dorsal stream) dysfunction and a coexistent cerebellar deficit.
Topics: Cognition; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Executive Function; Humans; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Neuropsychological Tests
PubMed: 33646591
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16844 -
Seizure Mar 2021Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), like other forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, shows a marked female predominance. However, few studies have specifically... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), like other forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, shows a marked female predominance. However, few studies have specifically addressed the role of sex in its long-term prognosis. We performed a systematic review of the literature relevant to JME prognosis, focusing on sex-based differences in prognostic factors and outcome.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed, considering all articles up to April 2020 in which long-term prognosis in JME had been explored and sex differences in outcome or prognostic factors were specified.
RESULTS
We included 25 articles published between 1984 and 2020. Sex differences in epilepsy outcome were explored by 21 of the 25 studies, but only three reported different outcomes in male vs female patients. All three found female sex to be associated with a later response to antiseizure medications, worse seizure control, and a higher risk of relapse in their entire study samples, which included JME patients. Eight studies found sex-based differences in possible predictors of long-term outcome: prolonged epileptiform EEG runs and the presence of eye closure sensitivity, both more frequent in women, were factors possibly linked to a poorer prognosis, as were praxis induction and generalized EEG asymmetric changes, which instead were more common in men. Valproate use, more frequent in men, was associated with a better outcome.
CONCLUSION
Most studies do not highlight sex differences in JME prognosis. However, some sex specificities do emerge, especially with regard to particular reflex traits and EEG abnormalities. Finally, sex may condition therapeutic choices, and thus have a possible impact on long-term outcome.
Topics: Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Male; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Prognosis; Seizures; Sex Characteristics
PubMed: 33524768
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.01.005 -
Seizure Feb 2021Dravet syndrome (DS) is an infantile-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy syndrome with limited treatment options. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is an infantile-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy syndrome with limited treatment options. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome using meta-analytical techniques.
METHODS
We searched for relevant randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies involving children with Dravet syndrome on fenfluramine therapy in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Web of Science database (31 July 2020). The primary outcome for the efficacy of fenfluramine was reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency. We carried out a random effect meta-analysis focusing on efficacy and safety variables. Only Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed for each study, and GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome.
RESULTS
Of 61 publications initially screened, 12 were reviewed as full-text. Seven articles including 2 RCTs, 4 uncontrolled studies (3 prospective and one retrospective study), and one case report described responses to fenfluramine in 144 DS patients (54 % male, mean age of 8.8 years, median dose of 0.4 mg/kg/day). Fenfluramine was found to be more efficacious than placebo, in terms of mean convulsive and total seizure frequency reduction (mean difference: -45.3 % (95 % CI: -48.1 %, -42.4 %, p < 0.00001) and -39.7 % (-46.7 %, -32.7 %, p < 0.00001)). A greater proportion of patients in the fenfluramine arm achieved >25 %, >50 %, >75 % and 100 % seizure reductions (odds ratios: 6.5 (3.7, 11.5, p < 0.00001), 10.6 (5.3, 21.3, p < 0.00001), 22.7(6.9, 75.3, p < 0.00001) and 9.3(1.7, 51.4, p = 0.01) respectively). The incidence of serious adverse events was not greater in the fenfluramine groups (OR: 1.02 (0.5, 2.19, p = 0.96)).
CONCLUSION
Fenfluramine appears to be a safe and efficacious antiseizure medication in patients with Dravet syndrome.
Topics: Child; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Female; Fenfluramine; Humans; Infant; Male; Seizures; Spasms, Infantile; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33461030
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.12.016 -
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Apr 2021Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe, drug-resistant, developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Despite multiple anti-epileptic drug regimens, the syndrome remains poorly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe, drug-resistant, developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Despite multiple anti-epileptic drug regimens, the syndrome remains poorly controlled and nearly half of patients still experience at least four tonic-clonic seizure per month. Recently, several clinical trials demonstrated that fenfluramine may provide a significant reduction in convulsive seizure frequency in the treatment of Dravet syndrome.
METHODS
A computerized literature search of Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed from inception until December 31, 2019. We included randomized placebo-controlled trials for the treatment of Dravet syndrome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) of ≥50% and 100% reduction seizure frequency from baseline, along with the treatment-related withdrawals and serious adverse events, using the fixed-effect model. Quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.
KEY RESULTS
Two trials with a total of 206 patients were included. The pooled RR of 5.49 (95% CI 3.13-9.65) showed that a significantly greater proportion in the fenfluramine group achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF). As for the complete seizure free rate, the pooled RR of 5.75 (95% CI 1.03-32.07) also demonstrated the favorable efficacy of fenfluramine, even though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.046). However, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the fenfluramine group experienced no more than one seizure during the treatment period (RR 13.82, 95% CI 2.68-71.27, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in withdrawals and serious adverse events between the two treatment groups. No valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension was observed in participants. The most common adverse events reported by included trials were diarrhea, fatigue, lethargy, nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, seizure, decreased appetite, and weight loss.
CONCLUSIONS
Fenfluramine is an effective antiepileptic drug for pediatric patients with Dravet syndrome, demonstrating clinically meaningful reduction in convulsive frequency, and generally could be well tolerated.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Fatigue; Fenfluramine; Fever; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures
PubMed: 33336426
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13387 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020This is an update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2010; it includes one additional study. Primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures are a type of generalised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This is an update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2010; it includes one additional study. Primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures are a type of generalised seizure. Other types of seizures include: absence, myoclonic, and atonic seizures. Effective control of tonic-clonic seizures reduces the risk of injury and death, and improves quality of life. While most people achieve seizure control with one antiepileptic drug, around 30% do not, and require a combination of antiepileptic drugs.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of add-on lamotrigine for drug-resistant primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, we searched these databases on 19 March 2019: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS) Web, MEDLINE Ovid, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). The CRS includes records from the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We imposed no language restrictions. We also contacted GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of lamotrigine.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled parallel or cross-over trials of add-on lamotrigine for people of any age with drug-resistant primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed standard Cochrane methodology; two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias, extracted relevant data, and GRADE-assessed evidence. We investigated these outcomes: (1) 50% or greater reduction in primary generalised tonic-clonic seizure frequency; (2) seizure freedom; (3) treatment withdrawal; (4) adverse effects; (5) cognitive effects; and (6) quality of life. We used an intention-to-treat (ITT) population for all analyses, and presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); for adverse effects, we used 99% CIs to compensate for multiple hypothesis testing.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies (total 300 participants): two parallel-group studies and one cross-over study. We assessed varied risks of bias across studies; most limitations arose from the poor reporting of methodological details. We meta-analysed data extracted from the two parallel-group studies, and conducted a narrative synthesis for data from the cross-over study. Both parallel-group studies (270 participants) reported all dichotomous outcomes. Participants taking lamotrigine were almost twice as likely to attain a 50% or greater reduction in primary generalised tonic-clonic seizure frequency than those taking a placebo (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.45; low-certainty evidence). The results between groups were inconclusive for the likelihood of seizure freedom (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.72; very low-certainty evidence); treatment withdrawal (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.99; very low-certainty evidence); and individual adverse effects: ataxia (RR 3.05, 99% CI 0.05 to 199.36); dizziness (RR 0.91, 99% CI 0.29 to 2.86; very low-certainty evidence); fatigue (RR 1.02, 99% CI 0.13 to 8.14; very low-certainty evidence); nausea (RR 1.60, 99% CI 0.48 to 5.32; very low-certainty evidence); and somnolence (RR 3.73, 99% CI 0.36 to 38.90; low-certainty evidence). The cross-over trial (26 participants) reported that 7/14 participants with generalised tonic-clonic seizures experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency with add-on lamotrigine compared to placebo. The authors reported four treatment withdrawals, but did not specify during which treatment allocation they occurred. Rash (seven lamotrigine participants; zero placebo participants) and fatigue (five lamotrigine participants; zero placebo participants) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. None of the included studies measured cognition. One parallel-group study (N = 153) evaluated quality of life. They reported inconclusive results for the overall quality of life score between groups (P = 0.74).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review provides insufficient information to inform clinical practice. Low-certainty evidence suggests that lamotrigine reduces the rate of generalised tonic-clonic seizures by 50% or more. Very low-certainty evidence found inconclusive results between groups for all other outcomes. Therefore, we are uncertain to very uncertain that the results reported are accurate, and suggest that the true effect could be grossly different. More trials, recruiting larger populations, over longer periods, are necessary to determine lamotrigine's clinical use.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Dizziness; Drug Eruptions; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic; Exanthema; Fatigue; Humans; Lamotrigine; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleepiness
PubMed: 32609387
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007783.pub3 -
Epilepsia Jun 2020To evaluate the potential impact of concomitant clobazam (CLB) use on the efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) treatment in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the potential impact of concomitant clobazam (CLB) use on the efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) treatment in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome using meta-analytical techniques.
METHODS
We searched for randomized, placebo-controlled, single- or double-blinded trials. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency during the treatment period was assessed according to CLB status. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.
RESULTS
Four trials were included and enrolled 714 participants, 429 for the add-on CBD group and 285 for the add-on placebo group. Among CBD-treated patients, 240 (55.9%) were taking concomitant CLB (CLB-On) and 189 (44.1%) were not taking concomitant CLB (CLB-Off); in placebo-treated patients, 158 (55.4%) were CLB-On and 127 (44.6%) CLB-Off. The percentages of patients who had at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency during the treatment period were 29.1% in the CBD arm and 15.7% in the placebo group among CLB-Off patients (RR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.12-2.90, P = .015). Among CBL-On patients, the ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was found in 52.9% and 27.8% in the CBD and placebo groups, respectively (RR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.40-2.44, P < .001).
SIGNIFICANCE
CBD was associated with a higher rate of seizure response in comparison to placebo when added to the existing antiepileptic regimen both in patients taking and in those not taking concomitant CLB. The lack of randomization for CLB status and the limited sample size need to be considered in the interpretation of the findings.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cannabidiol; Clobazam; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Humans; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32452532
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16546 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Jul 2020Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with onset in the first year of life. At onset, the child displays normal development, but during...
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with onset in the first year of life. At onset, the child displays normal development, but during the second year of life, stagnation/slowing of neurodevelopment is seen. In addition to difficulties with intellectual development, many children display behavioral problems including autistic features, and difficulties with attention and hyperactivity.
AIM
The aim of the present study was to systematically review studies that have focused on the prevalence of cognitive/developmental quotients (DQs) consistent with intellectual disability (ID), deficits in adaptive behavior, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and behavioral difficulties. A secondary aim was to consider possible factors associated with intellectual and behavioral outcomes in individuals with DS.
METHOD
A systematic review using PubMed and Scopus following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on the 24th of September 2019. Study quality was rated by two researchers using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality assessment tools.
RESULT
Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of ID was 86% (range across studies: 50%-100%). The pooled prevalence for ASD was 31%. The mean level of adaptive behavior was more than 2 standard deviations (SDs) below average. The prevalence of behavioral difficulties on standardized instruments ranged between 37% and 100%. The only factor consistently associated with lower cognitive scores was age with older children having significantly lower cognitive scores than younger children. For behavioral difficulties, the most consistent association was with low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with better HRQoL associated with fewer behavioral difficulties. Study quality was almost universally poor or fair - 15/29 studies were rated 'poor', 13/29 studies were 'fair', and 1 was 'good'.
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of cognitive scores consistent with ID is very high in DS. Many patients also have significant deficits in adaptive behavior highlighting that the majority of patients with DS will meet criteria for ID. The prevalence of ASD would also appear to be higher than the general population but studies show a wide range. Behavioral difficulties are common, but most studies have not used instruments adapted to patients with low intelligence quotient/DQ (IQ/DQ). No study used standardized instruments to assess ADHD. Few studies have used comprehensive statistical methods to evaluate possible factors associated with worse cognitive and behavioral outcome.
CONCLUSION
It should be routine to screen for cognitive and behavioral difficulties for all patients with DS. There is a need for more robust studies regarding intellectual and behavioral disorders in patients with DS. These should be large population-based or multinational studies that employ standardized instruments.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adolescent; Attention; Child; Cognition; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Prevalence; Problem Behavior; Quality of Life
PubMed: 32334365
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107079 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B May 2020Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) show evidence of cognitive impulsivity that may be linked to later adverse psychosocial outcomes. Here, we quantify the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) show evidence of cognitive impulsivity that may be linked to later adverse psychosocial outcomes. Here, we quantify the strength of association and estimate effect size (ES) of response inhibition by pooling available evidence in a meta-analysis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases (covering 2001-2019) with a search strategy using combinations of the specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms 'juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, cognitive impulsivity, response inhibition, Stroop, cognition, personality, traits' using the 'explode' feature where possible. We also searched within references of retrieved articles. We included studies reporting ESs describing established measures of response inhibition in teenage and adult patients with JME.
RESULTS
Using the ESs pooled from 16 studies comprising 1047 patients and controls, we found ESs for response inhibition to be homogeneous with a significant moderate mean ES of d = 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.63).
CONCLUSIONS
We confirm that reduced response inhibition is a consistently observed homogeneous trait in patients with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cognition; Female; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Inhibition, Psychological; Male; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Neuropsychological Tests; Personality; Reaction Time
PubMed: 32240946
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107038