-
International Journal of Oral and... Aug 2023The aim of this study was to determine whether arthrocentesis is superior to conservative treatment in the management of painful temporomandibular joint disorders with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this study was to determine whether arthrocentesis is superior to conservative treatment in the management of painful temporomandibular joint disorders with restricted opening. A systematic review was undertaken of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing arthrocentesis to conservative management, identified in the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Inclusion criteria included a 6-month follow-up, with clinical assessment of the patients and painful restricted mouth opening. Data extracted included pain measured on a visual analogue scale and maximum mouth opening measured in millimetres. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 for RCTs, and a meta-analysis with the random-effects model was undertaken. Of 879 records retrieved, seven met the inclusion criteria; these RCTs reported the results at 6 months for 448 patients. One study had a low risk of bias, four studies had an uncertain risk, and two had a high risk of bias. In the meta-analysis, arthrocentesis was statistically superior to conservative management at 6 months for an increase in maximum mouth opening (1.12 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.78 mm; P = 0.001; I = 87%) and borderline superior for pain reduction (-1.09 cm, 95% confidence interval -2.19 to 0.01 cm; P = 0.05; I = 100%). However, these differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant.
Topics: Humans; Arthrocentesis; Conservative Treatment; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Pain; Temporomandibular Joint; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 36732095
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.12.005 -
Ozone for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medical Gas Research 2023Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) generate pain and difficulties for mouth opening affecting the patients' quality of life. Ozone is an emerging therapy that has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) generate pain and difficulties for mouth opening affecting the patients' quality of life. Ozone is an emerging therapy that has been proposed as a potential treatment, due to that, the evidence about its efficacy should be reviewed. Therefore, this work aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to address the efficacy of ozone therapy for the treatment of pain and limited mouth opening in patients with TMD. The design of the included studies was clinical trials and observational studies, whereas, a series of cases, in vivo, and in vitro studies were excluded. The search was performed in PubMed, ClinicalTrials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Gray literature was searched at Google Scholar. Relevant data of all included studies were recorded. The risk of bias (using RoB 2) and the quality (using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessments were carried out. Meta-analyses using random-effects models of pain and maximal mouth opening data were performed. This review included 8 studies with 404 participants suffering limited function and pain related to TMD. At the overall bias of the studies, 25% exhibited some concerns and 75% had high risk; and the quality of the studies was low. The analysis of the included studies suggests that ozone therapy can diminish pain and improve the maximal mouth opening in TMD patients. However, there is no conclusive evidence of ozone therapy as a superior treatment for TMD compared with occlusal splint and pharmacotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Ozone; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Pain; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 36571381
DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.345174 -
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2022The study aimed to assess the effect of mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea for reduction in 24-h mean blood pressure, sleep... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The study aimed to assess the effect of mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea for reduction in 24-h mean blood pressure, sleep quality, Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), and patient compliance, compared to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), other interventions, or no treatment. Three different databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched using different search terms till July 2021 as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After inclusion of studies, data extraction including risk of bias assessment was done. For each study, we used odds ratio, mean difference, and 95% confidence interval to assess and synthesize the outcomes. The quality of evidence was evaluated as per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Twenty-one randomized controlled trials were included: 497 patients in the MAD group, 239 patients in the CPAP group, and 274 patients in the sham group. In MAD-CPAP comparison, the results favored CPAP in the reduction of AHI of 3.48 (1.76-5.19). However, unclear results were found for sleep quality measured as Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), patient compliance, and 24-h mean blood pressure. In MAD-sham comparison, the results favored MAD in the reduction of AHI of - 8.39 (-10.90--5.88] and ESS of - 0.91 (-1.70--0.12) and favored sham in terms of patient compliance while, unclear results for 24-h mean blood pressure. The GRADE score indicated that the quality of evidence is very low, low, and moderate for different outcomes. CPAP in comparison to MAD and MAD in comparison to sham showed a significant AHI reduction. However, patient compliance and 24-h mean blood pressure were not significantly different in MAD-CPAP or MAD-sham. Quality of evidence is very low and low when MAD was compared with CPAP and sham, respectively, for AHI.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Advancement; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Patient Compliance; Occlusal Splints
PubMed: 36511065
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_261_22 -
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica May 2023The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative different therapeutic modalities for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain.
PURPOSE
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative different therapeutic modalities for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed) database to identify the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2001 and 2021. The following, simple or multiple conjunctions, search keywords were selected: TMD pain, TMD management or conservative treatment or treatment strategies and TMD pain, therapeutic modalities or interventions and TMD. Studies included must have patients older than 18 years, with painful TMD, which diagnosis was performed by Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD or Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Outcome variables were pain relief and post treatment pain intensity reduction. Data were analysed with non-parametric tests and the level of significance was set at <.05.
RESULTS
Out of 1599 articles obtained, 28 RCTs fulfilled all selection criteria and were included. The results of this study show that there was a significant decrease in short-term post-treatment TMD pain with the use of occlusal splint alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities when compared with the control group. Statistically significant differences were also detected between laser and photobiomodulation group and the control, in short-term treatment TMD-related pain.
CONCLUSIONS
The primary findings of the present systematic review showed that the occlusal splint alone or combined with other therapeutic intervention presented positive effect on short-term TMD pain reduction. Secondary outcome suggests that laser and photobiomodulation therapy had, also, a significant role in short term pain relief.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Pain; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Pain Management; Occlusal Splints
PubMed: 36354093
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2138967 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Oct 2023To determine the effectiveness of laser therapy for managing patients with orofacial pain (OFP). In addition, to determine which parameters provide the best treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To determine the effectiveness of laser therapy for managing patients with orofacial pain (OFP). In addition, to determine which parameters provide the best treatment effects to reduce pain, improve function, and quality of life in adults with OFP.
METHODS
Systematic review. Searches were conducted in six databases; no date or language restrictions were applied. Studies involving adults with OFP treated with laser therapy were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was performed with the Revised Cochrane RoB-2. A meta-analysis was structured around the OFP type, and outcomes. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessed the overall certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS
Eighty-nine studies were included. Most studies ( = 72, 80.9%) were considered to have a high RoB. The results showed that laser therapy was better than placebo in improving pain, maximal mouth open (MMO), protrusion, and tenderness at the final assessment, but with a low or moderate level of evidence. The best lasers and parameters to reduce pain are diode or gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) lasers, a wavelength of 400-800 or 800-1500 nm, and dosage of <25 J/cm.
CONCLUSIONS
Laser therapy was better than placebo to improve pain, MMO, protrusion, and tenderness. Also, it was better than occlusal splint to improve pain, but not better than TENS and medication.Implications for rehabilitationLaser therapy was found to be good in improving pain, maximal mouth opening, jaw protrusion, and tenderness at the end of the treatment.For patients with all types of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (myogenous, arthrogenous, and mixed), the following lasers and parameters are recommended: diode or gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) laser, wavelength of 400-800 or 800-1500 nm, and a dosage <25 J/cm.For patients with arthrogenous TMDs, the following lasers and parameters are recommended: Diode laser and a wavelength between 400 and 800 nm.For patients with myogenous TMDs, the following lasers and parameters are recommended: diode laser, wavelength between 800 and 1500 nm, and dosage of <25 J/cm.For patients with mixed TMDs, the following lasers and parameters are recommended: diode, GaAlAs, or infrared laser, a wavelength of 800-1500 nm, a dosage >100 J/cm, and an application time between 15 and 30 s or >60 seconds.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Low-Level Light Therapy; Pain Measurement; Aluminum; Quality of Life; Facial Pain; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 36263978
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2127933 -
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Jan 2023To determine the best disocclusion guidance in occlusal splints (OSs) to manage and treat temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and sleep bruxism (SB). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the best disocclusion guidance in occlusal splints (OSs) to manage and treat temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and sleep bruxism (SB).
STUDY DESIGN
The research was conducted on 7 major electronic databases and 3 gray literature sources. We included randomized trials, nonrandomized clinical trials, and before-and-after studies. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute of Critical Appraisal Tools. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to grade the certainty of evidence.
RESULTS
Qualitative synthesis included 16 surveys reporting data from 620 participants. Canine guidance (CG) was widely searched. Bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) and CG significantly decreased pain levels compared with the placebo splint. Comparing between OS and absence of therapy, only CG was assessed and showed significant improvements on mouth opening, pain, sleep quality, and muscle activity. When compared different guide types among themselves, no significant improvement was founded in any evaluated outcome. Three studies presented high RoB, 7 presented moderate RoB, and 6 presented low RoB.
CONCLUSIONS
It is suggested there is not enough evidence to support that there are any specific kind of guidance responsible for improving evaluated outcomes on TMD and SB.
Topics: Humans; Occlusal Splints; Sleep Bruxism; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Splints; Pain
PubMed: 36241594
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.07.009 -
Cranio : the Journal of... Sep 2022The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of conservative interventions in pain relief in patients with intracapsular...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of conservative interventions in pain relief in patients with intracapsular temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched until January 1, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) presenting patients with diagnosis of intracapsular TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), conservative approaches as interventions, and pain intensity as outcome.
RESULTS
Out of 3372 papers, 13 RCTs were included, with 844 study participants. Most of them (n = 7) investigated the efficacy of splint appliance. Meta-analysis revealed that rehabilitative interventions had a significant overall effect size of 0.75 [0.17, 1.34], reporting splint appliance and laser therapy as significantly effective treatments.
CONCLUSION
Findings of this systematic review with network meta-analysis suggested that conservative approaches might be effective in pain relief of intracapsular TMD patients.
PubMed: 36148997
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2022.2126079 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Oct 2022The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of diverse therapies for disc displacement (DD)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of diverse therapies for disc displacement (DD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China Academic Journals full-text database (CNKI), and Wanfang databases was performed to identify relevant studies available up to 31 July 2021. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed for all included studies, while the outcomes of interest contained post-therapeutic maximum mouth opening and pain intensity. Interventions consisted of arthrocentesis, injections with diverse drugs, occlusal splints, or a combination of two to three of the above. Controls were regarded as oral analgesics, self-exercise, massage, or health instruction. Twenty-six studies appeared to meet the inclusion criteria and were subjected to further examination. Our data of the entire network showed that the most invasive therapies performed better than non-invasive therapies, while arthrocentesis + platelet-rich plasma injection and platelet-rich plasma injection in Grade I performed well in both mouth opening improvement and pain alleviation. Platelet-rich plasma injection is probably the best treatment overall for patients with DD owing to its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and lubricating effects.
Topics: Analgesics; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Arthrocentesis; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35803786
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.04.004 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Aug 2022Mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy is the most commonly used second-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but MAD may be ineffective in a subgroup... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of the phenotypic characteristics between responders and non-responders to obstructive sleep apnea treatment using mandibular advancement devices in adult patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy is the most commonly used second-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but MAD may be ineffective in a subgroup of patients. The aim of this systematic review is to identify predictors of the efficacy of oral appliance (OA) therapy for OSA in adult patients. This review focuses on performing the quantitative analysis by subgroups based on the response criteria used in the literature and based on the type of device. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify potentially relevant studies published until Dec 2021. The search identified 1343 preliminary references. A total of 99 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review, and 60 in the meta-analysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane scale. Based on meta-analysis, and considering a low to moderate evidence profile according to the GRADE scale, responders are younger patients, with smaller neck circumference, lower body mass index. Responders have shorter maxillary length, lower anterior and posterior facial height, a shorter distance from the hyoid bone to the third cervical vertebra, a shorter airway length, a smaller minimum airway cross-sectional area and a higher minimum oxygen saturation during sleep. Responders needed a lower optimal continuous positive airway pressure than non-responders. The type of device has not affected the results of the meta-analysis. The criterion "AHI <10 and reduction AHI >50%" is the one that provides the "weight" of significance for several variables. This criterion should be taken into consideration for future studies to predict OSA treatment by OA.
Topics: Adult; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Humans; Mandibular Advancement; Occlusal Splints; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35653952
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101644 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2022There is still a gap in the scientific knowledge on the linkage between craniofacial structure and spinal postural control in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients.... (Review)
Review
There is still a gap in the scientific knowledge on the linkage between craniofacial structure and spinal postural control in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. This systematic review aimed to assess the role of occlusal splints on spinal posture of TMD patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until 5 January 2022 to identify observational studies with a longitudinal study design presenting: patients with diagnosis of TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD); occlusal splint therapy as intervention; postural assessment as outcome. Out of 133 records identified, 104 were suitable for data screening, and only 7 articles were included satisfying the eligibility criteria. We found that occlusal splints might have a positive effect on posture in TMD patients, albeit there is little evidence of appropriate investigation for postural assessment. This systematic review suggested that the occlusal splint might be considered a non-invasive therapeutic approach for patients with TMD. However, the low number of studies with high-quality methodology in these patients showed an urgent need for further research using combined force platform stabilometry and kinematic evaluation of the spine to investigate the impact of occlusal splints on posture.
PubMed: 35455916
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040739