-
Journal of Cataract and Refractive... Aug 2023Interface fluid syndrome (IFS) is a complication associated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery where a fluid pocket in the corneal stroma decreases visual...
Interface fluid syndrome (IFS) is a complication associated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery where a fluid pocket in the corneal stroma decreases visual acuity. A systematic review of IFS cases using PRISMA guidelines was performed yielding a total of 33 patients. 2 outcomes were selected for logistic regression analysis: final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and need for surgical management. Results showed 33.3% of patients required surgery, 51.5% had their IFS resolve within 1 month or sooner, and 51.5% had final CDVA 20/25 or better. Higher presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and duration of IFS ≤1 month was associated with higher odds of final CDVA 20/25 or better (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, P = .04; aOR 7.71, P = .02, respectively). Endothelial cell dysfunction led to 17.55 greater odds for requiring surgical compared to medical management (aOR 0.36, P = .04). Presenting IOP and duration of IFS predicted final CDVA, while prior endothelial cell dysfunction predicted need for surgery.
Topics: Humans; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ; Retrospective Studies; Visual Acuity; Corneal Stroma; Dilatation, Pathologic; Syndrome; Glaucoma; Lasers, Excimer
PubMed: 37144645
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001214 -
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2023The purpose of the current study was to systematically identify and evaluate existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical glaucoma practice. (Review)
Review
TOPIC
The purpose of the current study was to systematically identify and evaluate existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical glaucoma practice.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Understanding and incorporating patient preferences into decision-making is now recognized as critical for optimal resource allocation, especially in technologically advancing areas, such as minimally invasive surgeries. Patient-reported outcome measures are instruments designed to evaluate the health outcomes that are most important to patients. Despite their recognized importance, especially in the era of patient-centered care, their routine use in clinical settings remains low.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in 6 databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, BIOSIS, and Web of Science) from the date of inception. Studies were included in the qualitative review if they reported measurement properties of PROMs in adult patients with glaucoma. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines were used to assess the included PROMs. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020176064).
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 2661 records. After deduplication, 1259 studies entered level 1 screening, and based on title and abstract review, 164 records proceeded to full-text screening. In 48 included studies, 70 instrument reports discuss 43 distinct instruments in 3 major categories: glaucoma-specific, vision-specific, and general health-related quality of life. Most used measures were glaucoma-specific (Glaucoma Quality of Life [GQL] and Glaucoma Symptom Scale [GSS]) and vision-specific (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI VFQ-25]). All 3 have sufficient validity (especially construct), with GQL and GSS having sufficient internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability, with reports suggesting high methodological quality.
CONCLUSION
The GQL, GSS, and NEI VFQ-25 are the 3 most used questionnaires in a research setting, having considerable validation in a patient population with glaucoma. Limited reports on interpretability, responsiveness, and feasibility in all 43 identified instruments make identifying a single optimal questionnaire for clinical use challenging and highlight the need for further studies.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Glaucoma; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 37142217
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.04.007 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Sep 2023To synthesize the outcome measures used by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for childhood glaucoma.
PURPOSE
To synthesize the outcome measures used by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for childhood glaucoma.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to February 17, 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies related to childhood glaucoma were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were extracted and the data was used to generate a literature review.
RESULTS
This review identified 42 unique reports pertaining to childhood glaucomas. Most of the studies originated from Egypt, India, and the USA. Intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes were the most frequent outcomes studied, followed by clinical outcomes and safety outcomes. Clinical outcomes were the most common secondary outcomes studied, followed by IOP outcomes and safety outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review found heterogenous outcomes with IOP outcomes as the most studied primary outcome. As the remaining outcomes were not consistently utilized, this review highlights the need for a consensus on studies of pediatric glaucoma.
Topics: Child; Humans; Glaucoma; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Intraocular Pressure; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; India
PubMed: 37119307
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06061-w -
BMJ Open Apr 2023To compare the efficacy and safety of tube shunt implantation with trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with glaucoma. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety of tube shunt implantation with trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with glaucoma.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed for studies comparing tube with trabeculectomy in patients with glaucoma (final search date: 27 February 2022). Comparisons between tube and trabeculectomy were grouped by the type of tube (Ahmed, Baerveldt, Ex-PRESS and XEN). The primary endpoints included intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP reduction (IOPR), IOPR percentage (IOPR%), complete success rate (CSR), qualified success rate (QSR) and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
Forty-nine studies were included in this meta-analysis and presented data for 3795 eyes (Ahmed: 670, Baerveldt: 561, Ex-PRESS: 473, XEN: 199, trabeculectomy: 1892). Ahmed and Ex-PRESS were similar to trabeculectomy in terms of IOP outcomes and success rate (Ahmed vs trabeculectomy: IOPR%: mean difference (MD)=1.34 (-5.35, 8.02), p=0.69; Ex-PRESS vs trabeculectomy: IOPR%: MD=0.12 (-3.07, 3.31), p=0.94). The IOP outcomes for Baerveldt were worse than those for trabeculectomy (IOPR%: MD=-7.51 (-10.68, -4.35), p<0.00001), but the QSR was higher. No significant difference was shown for the CSR. XEN was worse than trabeculectomy in terms of IOP outcomes (IOPR%: MD=-7.87 (-13.55, -2.18), p=0.007), while the success rate was similar. Ahmed and Ex-PRESS had a lower incidence of AEs than trabeculectomy. Baerveldt had a lower incidence of bleb leakage/wound leakage, hyphaema and hypotonic maculopathy than trabeculectomy but a higher incidence of concurrent cataracts, diplopia/strabismus and tube erosion. The incidence of AEs was similar for the XEN and trabeculectomy procedures.
CONCLUSION
Compared with trabeculectomy, both Ahmed and Ex-PRESS appear to be associated with similar ocular hypotensive effects and lower incidences of AEs. However, Baerveldt and XEN cannot achieve sufficient reductions in IOP outcomes similar to those of trabeculectomy.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021257852.
Topics: Humans; Trabeculectomy; Glaucoma Drainage Implants; Treatment Outcome; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure
PubMed: 37080625
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065921 -
Eye (London, England) Nov 2023We conducted this research to determine the prevalence rate and presentation patterns with microcystic macular oedema (MMO) in glaucoma patients. The protocol was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We conducted this research to determine the prevalence rate and presentation patterns with microcystic macular oedema (MMO) in glaucoma patients. The protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42022316367 ). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched for articles reporting MMO in glaucoma patients. The primary outcome was the prevalence of MMO, while secondary outcomes included the comparison between MMO and non-MMO in terms of patients' characteristics (age, gender), glaucoma stage, and ocular parameters (axial length (AL), intraocular pressure, mean deviation, spherical equivalent). Data are reported as mean difference (MD) or log odds ratio (logOR) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. The quality of included studies was assessed using the NIH tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE framework. Ten studies (2128 eyes) were included, revealing an overall prevalence rate of MMO of 8% (95%CI: 5-12%). When compared to non-MMO group, MMO was associated with lower age (MD = -5.91; 95%CI: -6.02: -5.20), greater risk of advanced glaucoma stage (LogOR=1.41; 95%CI: 0.72: 2.09), and lower mean deviation of the visual field (MD = -5.00; 95%CI: -7.01: -2.99). No significant difference was noted between both groups in terms of gender, axial length, or spherical equivalent. Three studies had good quality while seven had poor quality. MMO is a prevalent observation in glaucoma patients and is associated with patients' age and stage of the disease. However, the certainty of evidence remains very low.
Topics: Humans; Macular Edema; Prevalence; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure
PubMed: 37072471
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02524-w -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2023We designed this systematic review to summarize the diabetes-related glaucoma articles produced from 2011 to 2022. We further aimed to perform a meta-analysis to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We designed this systematic review to summarize the diabetes-related glaucoma articles produced from 2011 to 2022. We further aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine the vital association between these two parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data sources like PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were used to find the relevant research. Reviews, case reports, and editorial letters were excluded. Articles inspection was conducted by the main author who extracted the study title and abstract in the first screening by using keywords to find the eligible articles. Heterogeneity was accessed by using the Cochrane Q test and I2 test.
RESULTS
10 studies were reported with 2,702,136 cases of diabetes. Out of these, 64,998 incidents of glaucoma were observed. The pooled prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 11.7% associated with glaucoma. A significant I2 value was achieved (100%) with Cochran's Q of 183.6.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we found diabetes duration, elevated IOP, and fasting glucose levels are one of the leading risk factors for glaucoma. Fasting glucose levels and diabetes are also major contributors to elevated IOP levels.
Topics: Humans; Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Glaucoma; Risk Factors; Fasting
PubMed: 37013760
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202303_31776 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2023Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding, secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels, which prevent normal drainage of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding, secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels, which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of intraocular anti-VEGF medications, alone or with one or more types of conventional therapy, compared with no anti-VEGF medications for the treatment of NVG.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register); MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; and LILACS to 19 October 2021; metaRegister of Controlled Trials to 19 October 2021; and two additional trial registers to 19 October 2021. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people treated with anti-VEGF medications for NVG.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the search results for trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence. We resolved discrepancies through discussion.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five RCTs (356 eyes of 353 participants). Each trial was conducted in a different country: two in China, and one each in Brazil, Egypt, and Japan. All five RCTs included both men and women; the mean age of participants was 55 years or older. Two RCTs compared intravitreal bevacizumab combined with Ahmed valve implantation and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with Ahmed valve implantation and PRP alone. One RCT randomized participants to receive an injection of either intravitreal aflibercept or placebo at the first visit, followed by non-randomized treatment according to clinical findings after one week. The remaining two RCTs randomized participants to PRP with and without ranibizumab, one of which had insufficient details for further analysis. We assessed the RCTs to have an unclear risk of bias for most domains due to insufficient information to permit judgment. Four RCTs examined achieving control of IOP, three of which reported our time points of interest. Only one RCT reported our critical time point at one month; it found that the anti-VEGF group had a 1.3-fold higher chance of achieving control of IOP at one month (RR 1.32, 95% 1.10 to 1.59; 93 participants) than the non-anti-VEGF group (low certainty of evidence). For other time points, one RCT found a three-fold greater achievement in control of IOP in the anti-VEGF group when compared with the non-anti-VEGF group at one year (RR 3.00; 95% CI:1.35 to 6.68; 40 participants). However, another RCT found an inconclusive result at the time period ranging from 1.5 years to three years (RR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.75; 40 participants). All five RCTs examined mean IOP, but at different time points. Very-low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs were effective in reducing mean IOP by 6.37 mmHg (95% CI: -10.09 to -2.65; 3 RCTs; 173 participants) at four to six weeks when compared with no anti-VEGFs. Anti-VEGFs may reduce mean IOP at three months (MD -4.25; 95% CI -12.05 to 3.54; 2 studies; 75 participants), six months (MD -5.93; 95% CI -18.13 to 6.26; 2 studies; 75 participants), one year (MD -5.36; 95% CI -18.50 to 7.77; 2 studies; 75 participants), and more than one year (MD -7.05; 95% CI -16.61 to 2.51; 2 studies; 75 participants) when compared with no anti-VEGFs, but such effects remain uncertain. Two RCTs reported the proportion of participants who achieved an improvement in visual acuity with specified time points. Participants receiving anti-VEGFs had a 2.6 times (95% CI 1.60 to 4.08; 1 study; 93 participants) higher chance of improving visual acuity when compared with those not receiving anti-VEGFs at one month (very low certainty of evidence). Likewise, another RCT found a similar result at 18 months (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.33 to 12.05; 1 study; 40 participants). Two RCTs reported the outcome, complete regression of new iris vessels, at our time points of interest. Low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs had a nearly three times higher chance of complete regression of new iris vessels when compared with no anti-VEGFs (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.18; 1 study; 93 participants). A similar finding was observed at more than one year in another RCT (RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.45 to 7.05; 1 study; 40 participants). Regarding adverse events, there was no evidence that the risks of hypotony and tractional retinal detachment were different between the two groups (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.12 to 3.57 and RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01 to 7.72, respectively; 1 study; 40 participants). No RCTs reported incidents of endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, no light perception, and serious adverse events. Evidence for the adverse events of anti-VEGFs was low due to limitations in the study design due to insufficient information to permit judgments and imprecision of results due to the small sample size. No trial reported the proportion of participants with relief of pain and resolution of redness at any time point.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Anti-VEGFs as an adjunct to conventional treatment could help reduce IOP in NVG in the short term (four to six weeks), but there is no evidence that this is likely in the longer term. Currently available evidence regarding the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGFs in achieving control of IOP, visual acuity, and complete regression of new iris vessels in NVG is insufficient. More research is needed to investigate the effect of these medications compared with, or in addition to, conventional surgical or medical treatment in achieving these outcomes in NVG.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Bevacizumab; Glaucoma, Neovascular; Ranibizumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 37010901
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007920.pub4 -
Genes Mar 2023The options for genetic testing continue to grow for ocular conditions, including optic atrophy, anterior segment dysgenesis, cataracts, corneal dystrophy, nystagmus,...
IMPORTANCE
The options for genetic testing continue to grow for ocular conditions, including optic atrophy, anterior segment dysgenesis, cataracts, corneal dystrophy, nystagmus, and glaucoma. Gene panels can vary in content and coverage, as we and others have evaluated in inherited retinal disease (IRD).
OBJECTIVE
To describe gene panel testing options for inherited eye disease phenotypes and their differences. This review is important for making diagnostic decisions.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A licensed, certified genetic counselor (RP) used Concert Genetics and the search terms optic atrophy, corneal dystrophy, cataract, glaucoma, anterior segment dysgenesis, microphthalmia/anophthalmia, and nystagmus to identify available testing options performed by CLIA-certified commercial genetic testing laboratories. Other co-authors were surveyed with respect to genetic panels used for the indications of interest. Ophthalmic panels were then compared using Concert Genetics in addition to their own websites.
FINDINGS
Panels from each clinical category were included and summarized. This comparison highlighted the differences and similarities between panels so that clinicians can make informed decisions.
CONCLUSIONS
Access to genetic testing is increasing. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing is increasing. Each panel is different, so phenotyping or characterizing clinical characteristics that may help predict a specific genotype, as well as pre-test hypotheses regarding a genotype, should shape the choice of panels.
Topics: Humans; Genetic Testing; Glaucoma; Cataract; Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary; Optic Atrophy
PubMed: 36981008
DOI: 10.3390/genes14030738 -
Eye (London, England) Oct 2023Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having been published since the previous meta-analysis, we believe it is important to clarify this association. Hence, in this study we meta-analyse the recent literature regarding the association between OSA and glaucoma.
METHODS
Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till the 28th February 2022 for observational as well as cross-sectional studies examining the association between OSA and glaucoma. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, graded the quality of included non-randomized studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyse the maximally covariate- adjusted associations.
RESULTS
48 studies were included in our systematic review, with 46 suitable for meta-analysis. Total study population was 4,566,984 patients. OSA was associated with a higher risk of glaucoma (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.70 to 7.90, I = 98%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for various important confounders including age, gender and patient comorbidities such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, patients with OSA had up to 40% higher odds of glaucoma. Substantial heterogeneity was eliminated through subgroup and sensitivity analyses after consideration of glaucoma subtype, OSA severity and adjustment for confounders.
CONCLUSIONS
In this meta-analysis, OSA was associated with higher risk of glaucoma, as well as more severe ocular findings characteristic of the glaucomatous disease process. We suggest more clinical studies looking into the effects of OSA treatment on the progression of glaucoma to help clinical decision making for patients.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Glaucoma; Cardiovascular Diseases; Data Collection
PubMed: 36977937
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02471-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2023Diabetic retinopathy is a common complication of diabetes and a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Research has established the importance of blood... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Diabetic retinopathy is a common complication of diabetes and a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Research has established the importance of blood glucose control to prevent development and progression of the ocular complications of diabetes. Concurrent blood pressure control has been advocated for this purpose, but individual studies have reported varying conclusions regarding the effects of this intervention.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the existing evidence regarding the effect of interventions to control blood pressure levels among diabetics on incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy, preservation of visual acuity, adverse events, quality of life, and costs.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched several electronic databases, including CENTRAL, and trial registries. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 September 2021. We also reviewed the reference lists of review articles and trial reports selected for inclusion.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which either type 1 or type 2 diabetic participants, with or without hypertension, were assigned randomly to more intense versus less intense blood pressure control; to blood pressure control versus usual care or no intervention on blood pressure (placebo); or to one class of antihypertensive medication versus another or placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Pairs of review authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of records identified by the electronic and manual searches and the full-text reports of any records identified as potentially relevant. The included trials were independently assessed for risk of bias with respect to outcomes reported in this review.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 29 RCTs conducted in North America, Europe, Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East that had enrolled a total of 4620 type 1 and 22,565 type 2 diabetic participants (sample sizes from 16 to 4477 participants). In all 7 RCTs for normotensive type 1 diabetic participants, 8 of 12 RCTs with normotensive type 2 diabetic participants, and 5 of 10 RCTs with hypertensive type 2 diabetic participants, one group was assigned to one or more antihypertensive agents and the control group to placebo. In the remaining 4 RCTs for normotensive participants with type 2 diabetes and 5 RCTs for hypertensive type 2 diabetic participants, methods of intense blood pressure control were compared to usual care. Eight trials were sponsored entirely and 10 trials partially by pharmaceutical companies; nine studies received support from other sources; and two studies did not report funding source. Study designs, populations, interventions, lengths of follow-up (range less than one year to nine years), and blood pressure targets varied among the included trials. For primary review outcomes after five years of treatment and follow-up, one of the seven trials for type 1 diabetics reported incidence of retinopathy and one trial reported progression of retinopathy; one trial reported a combined outcome of incidence and progression (as defined by study authors). Among normotensive type 2 diabetics, four of 12 trials reported incidence of diabetic retinopathy and two trials reported progression of retinopathy; two trials reported combined incidence and progression. Among hypertensive type 2 diabetics, six of the 10 trials reported incidence of diabetic retinopathy and two trials reported progression of retinopathy; five of the 10 trials reported combined incidence and progression. The evidence supports an overall benefit of more intensive blood pressure intervention for five-year incidence of diabetic retinopathy (11 studies; 4940 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.92; I = 15%; moderate certainty evidence) and the combined outcome of incidence and progression (8 studies; 6212 participants; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89; I = 42%; low certainty evidence). The available evidence did not support a benefit regarding five-year progression of diabetic retinopathy (5 studies; 5144 participants; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.12; I = 57%; moderate certainty evidence), incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, clinically significant macular edema, or vitreous hemorrhage (9 studies; 8237 participants; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.04; I = 31%; low certainty evidence), or loss of 3 or more lines on a visual acuity chart with a logMAR scale (2 studies; 2326 participants; RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.08; I = 90%; very low certainty evidence). Hypertensive type 2 diabetic participants realized more benefit from intense blood pressure control for three of the four outcomes concerning incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. The adverse event reported most often (13 of 29 trials) was death, yielding an estimated RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.00; 13 studies; 13,979 participants; I = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Hypotension was reported in two trials, with an RR of 2.04 (95% CI 1.63 to 2.55; 2 studies; 3323 participants; I = 37%; low certainty evidence), indicating an excess of hypotensive events among participants assigned to more intervention on blood pressure.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Hypertension is a well-known risk factor for several chronic conditions for which lowering blood pressure has proven to be beneficial. The available evidence supports a modest beneficial effect of intervention to reduce blood pressure with respect to preventing diabetic retinopathy for up to five years, particularly for hypertensive type 2 diabetics. However, there was a paucity of evidence to support such intervention to slow progression of diabetic retinopathy or to affect other outcomes considered in this review among normotensive diabetics. This weakens any conclusion regarding an overall benefit of intervening on blood pressure in diabetic patients without hypertension for the sole purpose of preventing diabetic retinopathy or avoiding the need for treatment for advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Retinopathy; Blood Pressure; Macular Edema; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36975019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006127.pub3