-
European Archives of Paediatric... Oct 2018This was to investigate the occurrence of malocclusion traits among children who were users of orthodontic or conventional pacifier by means of a systematic review.
AIM
This was to investigate the occurrence of malocclusion traits among children who were users of orthodontic or conventional pacifier by means of a systematic review.
METHODS
Search for articles involved five electronic databases: Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), PsycINFO, PubMed (including MedLine), Scopus and Web of Science. Grey literature was partially assessed. Observational studies with children aged 6-60 months who had used orthodontic or conventional pacifier were included. The risk of bias among included studies was assessed through the Joanna Briggs Institute Tool.
RESULTS
From the 607 initially-identified papers only three were included after the selection process. All presented moderate risk of bias. Although an anterior open bite and accentuated overjet were identified among conventional users of pacifier in one study no differences were identified in the other two selected studies. Posterior crossbite frequency was not different in any of the included studies. There was also no difference regarding frequency and duration of use, except in the study that showed higher occurrence of open bite malocclusion in conventional pacifier users.
CONCLUSIONS
The currently available evidence is insufficient to support the concept that the usage of orthodontic pacifiers is able to prevent malocclusion traits when compared to the usage of conventional pacifiers.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Equipment Design; Humans; Infant; Malocclusion; Pacifiers; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 30054865
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0359-3 -
Journal of Human Lactation : Official... Nov 2018Breastfeeding plays an important role in child health. However, there are doubts about its influence on malocclusions. Systematic reviews have yielded contradictory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breastfeeding plays an important role in child health. However, there are doubts about its influence on malocclusions. Systematic reviews have yielded contradictory results. Research aim: This study aimed to investigate whether the type and duration of breastfeeding are associated with malocclusions in primary teething.
METHODS
The review strategy included several electronic databases, lists of references, reviews, dissertation and thesis websites, experts, and other relevant documents. Published and unpublished observational studies ( N = 42) were reviewed using the Participants (children), Interventions (breastfeeding), Comparisons (bottle feeding), Outcomes (malocclusion), and Study design (observational) strategy, without restrictions on language or locale. Information about the authors, publication year, country of study, setting, study design, sample size, age, type and duration of exclusive and mixed breastfeeding, and malocclusions was recorded by two blinded evaluators. Quantitative meta-analysis ( N = 30) of the studies with available data was performed.
RESULTS
Breastfeeding was a protective factor against malocclusions. The odds of association increased with breastfeeding duration. Irrespective of duration, breastfeeding had a protective association with open bite. For those who were breastfed for up to 6 months, breastfeeding protected against overjet, open bite, posterior crossbite, and crowding. Breastfeeding for 12 months or longer was associated with lower odds of overjet, open bite, and posterior crossbite. Breastfeeding exclusively for 6 months was also a protective factor against malocclusions. However, studies on this subject presented low quality, statistical heterogeneity, and only unadjusted measures of association in most of the cases.
CONCLUSION
Breastfeeding beneficially affects primary occlusion when practiced for at least 6 months.
Topics: Bottle Feeding; Breast Feeding; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Malocclusion
PubMed: 29596751
DOI: 10.1177/0890334418755689 -
Progress in Orthodontics Mar 2018Non-nutritive sucking habits may adversely affect the orofacial complex. This systematic literature review aimed to find scientific evidence on the effect of pacifier... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Non-nutritive sucking habits may adversely affect the orofacial complex. This systematic literature review aimed to find scientific evidence on the effect of pacifier sucking on orofacial structures.
METHODS
A search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases was conducted to find all pertinent articles published from inception until February 2018, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the risk of bias judgements in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I).
RESULTS
Among the 2288 articles found, 17 articles met the selection criteria: seven prospective cohort studies, nine cross-sectional studies, and one randomized clinical trial. Using ROBINS-I, 12 studies were evaluated to have a serious overall risk of bias and five, a moderate one. These studies claimed a strong association between a pacifier sucking habit and the presence of an anterior open bite and posterior crossbite. Functional/orthodontic pacifiers were shown to cause significantly less open bites than the conventional ones.
CONCLUSIONS
High level of evidence of the effect of sucking habits on orofacial structures is missing. The available studies show severe or moderate risk of bias; hence, the findings in the literature need to be very carefully evaluated. There is moderate evidence that the use of pacifier is associated with anterior open bite and posterior crossbite, thus affecting the harmonious development of orofacial structures. Functional/orthodontic pacifiers reduce the prevalence of open bite when compared to the conventional ones, but evidence is needed concerning the effects on posterior crossbite. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to further analyze the effects of functional/orthodontic and conventional pacifiers on orofacial structures.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Malocclusion; Maxillofacial Development; Open Bite; Pacifiers; Sucking Behavior
PubMed: 29532184
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-018-0206-4 -
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics =... May 2018To systematically search the scientific literature concerning the influence of tooth position on wind instrumentalists' performance and embouchure comfort.
PURPOSE
To systematically search the scientific literature concerning the influence of tooth position on wind instrumentalists' performance and embouchure comfort.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched up to November 2017. The main orthodontic journals were searched for papers older than the inception date of PubMed. Grey literature was sought via Google Scholar. Eligible studies were critically appraised and analysed.
RESULTS
The searches retrieved 54 papers. Only two met the inclusion criteria. Searching the orthodontic journals and Google Scholar resulted in two additional eligible studies. All four studies had a cross-sectional design. The sample sizes ranged from 20-100 participants, varying from children to professional musicians. Because of a large heterogeneity in outcome variables, no meta-analysis could be performed. Descriptive analysis shows that there are indications that tooth irregularities have a negative influence on embouchure comfort and performance of a wind instrument player. A large overjet may impede the embouchure of brass musicians and may have a negative influence on trumpet player performance. A wide jaw form seems more beneficial to trumpet player performance than a small jaw form. Furthermore, players of all types of wind instruments can experience embouchure difficulties from extreme spacing or an open bite.
CONCLUSION
Tooth position can influence musical performance and embouchure comfort of wind instrumentalists. A Class I relationship without malocclusion seems appropriate for every type of wind instrument. The more extreme the malocclusion, the greater the interference with wind instrumentalists' performance and embouchure comfort. Evidence however is limited.
Topics: Diastema; Humans; Jaw; Lip; Malocclusion; Mouth; Music; Tongue; Tooth
PubMed: 29532091
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-018-0128-2 -
Journal of the American Dental... Aug 2017Researchers have purported that breast-feeding can decrease the risk of malocclusions. The authors studied the relationship of breast-feeding on malocclusions in young... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Researchers have purported that breast-feeding can decrease the risk of malocclusions. The authors studied the relationship of breast-feeding on malocclusions in young children by means of conducting a systematic review of association (etiology).
TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED
The authors used a 3-step search strategy, including electronic searches. They considered studies whose investigators included healthy children with primary dentition with a history of breast-feeding and in which the study investigators had assessed specific malocclusion outcomes to be eligible for inclusion in this review. The authors considered prospective and retrospective (longitudinal) studies, case-control studies, and analytical cross-sectional studies. Two of the authors, using standardized instruments, independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted data from the included studies. For situations for which there were a sufficient number of studies, the authors conducted meta-analyses using the random-effects model, supplemented with the fixed-effects model in situations for which statistical heterogeneity was 50% or less, assessed using the I statistic.
RESULTS
The authors identified 7 studies that were included in the review. They found that children who had breast-fed suboptimally had an increased risk of developing malocclusions and that a strong and significant association existed between a shorter duration of breast-feeding (less than 12 months) and the development of an anterior open bite (n = 1,875; risk ratio, 3.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.55 to 5.03; P < .00001) and a class II canine relationship (n = 1,203; risk ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 1.97; P < .00001).
CONCLUSIONS
Young children with a history of suboptimal breast-feeding have a higher prevalence and risk ratio for malocclusions. These children have an increased risk of developing a class II canine relationship, posterior crossbite, and anterior open bite.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Dental health care professionals should continue to encourage and promote breast-feeding; however, patients should be aware that children still can develop malocclusions, despite having received optimal breast-feeding, owing to the multifactorial etiology of malocclusions.
Topics: Breast Feeding; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Malocclusion; Risk Factors; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 28754184
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.05.018 -
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Mar 2017The present systemic review was conducted with the main purpose to evaluate the quantitative effects of orthognathic surgeries, extraction versus non-extraction... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The present systemic review was conducted with the main purpose to evaluate the quantitative effects of orthognathic surgeries, extraction versus non-extraction treatment, and the type of malocclusion in the stability of anterior open-bite (AOB) correction over the long-term.
METHODS
The systematic search for studies was conducted through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsychINFO, various key journals, and review articles; November 30, 2016, was the last date for the search. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to grade the methodological quality of the studies.
RESULTS
The present review included 14 studies. Stability of the corrected AOB ranged from 61.9% to 100%. The studies with orthognathic surgeries showed a stability of 70-100%. The studies without orthognathic surgeries showed the stability of 61.9-96.7%. All of the studies were retrospective. The mean change in AOB before (T1) and after treatment (T2-T1) was 0.1 mm to 6.93 mm and the mean change in overbite from T2 to T3 (T3-T2) was -0.06 mm to 2.5 mm.
CONCLUSION
Studies with orthognathic surgeries presented with high amount of long-term stability in corrected AOB. No significant difference was noticed in relation to the type of malocclusion and extraction or non-extraction cases.
PubMed: 30112488
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.010 -
Progress in Orthodontics Dec 2016The treatment options for the early treatment of anterior open bite are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual available evidence on... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The treatment options for the early treatment of anterior open bite are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual available evidence on treatments of anterior open bite in the mixed dentition in order to assess the effectiveness of the early treatment in reducing open bite, the most efficacious treatment strategy and the stability of the results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature survey was done on November 15, 2015, by means of appropriate Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, VHL, and WEB OF SCIENCE. Randomized clinical trials and studies with a control group (treated or untreated) were then selected by two authors. Trials including patients with syndromes or in the permanent dentition and studies concerning treatment with extractions, full-fixed appliances, or surgery were not considered. Full articles were retrieved for abstracts or titles that met the initial inclusion criteria or lacked sufficient detail for immediate exclusion.
RESULTS
Two thousand five hundred sixty-nine studies about open bite were available; the search strategy selected 240 of them. Twenty-four articles have been judged suitably for the final review, and their relevant data were analyzed.
DISCUSSION
Although this review confirms the effectiveness of early treatment of open bite, particularly when no-compliance strategies are employed, meta-analysis was unfeasible due to lack of standardization, important methodological limitations, and shortcomings of the studies.
CONCLUSIONS
A more robust approach to trial design in terms of methodology and error analysis is needed. Besides, more studies with longer periods of follow-up are required.
Topics: Dentition, Mixed; Dentition, Permanent; Humans; Malocclusion; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Open Bite; Orthodontic Appliances; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Orthodontics, Corrective; Orthopedic Procedures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27615261
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0142-0 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Sep 2016Rare diseases (RD) are those that present a lower prevalence than 5 cases per 10.000 population. The main objective of this review was to study the effect on oral health... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Rare diseases (RD) are those that present a lower prevalence than 5 cases per 10.000 population. The main objective of this review was to study the effect on oral health in rare diseases, while the secondary objective of the study is theme upgrade.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Comparative observational case-control studies were analysed and a systematic review was conducted in PubMed. Each rare disease listed on the statistical data record of the Health Portal of the Ministry of Equality, Health and Social Policies Board of Andalusia was associated with "oral health". The variables studied included dental, oral mucosa and occlusion alterations, oral pathologies (caries, periodontal disease) and other alterations (mouth breathing, parafunctional habits, etc). A bias analysis of the variable caries was conducted.
RESULTS
Six RD were selected through our inclusion and exclusion criteria (hypogammaglobulinemia, Rett syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, cystic fibrosis and Cri du chat syndrome) in a total of 8 publications, of which four trials were classified as high risk of bias and one of them as medium risk. There were not trials with low risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The main statistically significant differences found by Syndrome compared to a control group were in Hypogammaglobulinemia with a greater tendency to enamel hypoplasia and dry mouth. The Rett syndrome had, as well, a greater tendency to an anterior open bite, ogival palate, bruxism, mouth breathing and tongue thrusting. Prader-Willi syndrome had a tendency of dental erosion, and Cri du chat syndrome showed a higher association to Tannerella forsythia.
Topics: Bruxism; Cri-du-Chat Syndrome; Dental Caries; Humans; Oral Health; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 27475682
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.20972 -
Dental Traumatology : Official... Oct 2016The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to search for scientific evidence regarding the factors associated with traumatic dental injury (TDI) in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to search for scientific evidence regarding the factors associated with traumatic dental injury (TDI) in the primary dentition.
METHODOLOGY
An electronic search addressing factors associated with TDI was conducted in the PubMed, ISI, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Data were extracted and analyzed regarding risk factors, statistical test, effect measures, and study design.
RESULTS
The online search strategy led to the initial retrieval of 2566 articles. After evaluating the titles and abstracts, 24 papers were selected for complete review and data collection. TDI was associated with males (OR: 1.24; 95%CI: 1.09-1.41), inadequate lip coverage (OR: 1.81; 95%CI: 1.50-2.17), overbite (OR: 1.438; 95%CI: 0.94-2.19), and age (1 vs 2 years - OR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.38-0.58; 2 vs 3 years - OR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.67-0.91; 3 vs 4 years - OR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.71-0.95). Overjet and anterior open bite were associated with TDI in the majority of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Males, older children, and those with inadequate lip coverage, overbite, or overjet are more likely to have TDI in the primary dentition.
Topics: Child; Family Characteristics; Female; Humans; Male; Overbite; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Tooth Injuries; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 26990348
DOI: 10.1111/edt.12268 -
Progress in Orthodontics 2016The objective of the study is to assess the effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices on the vertical facial morphology and mandibular rotation during... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study is to assess the effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices on the vertical facial morphology and mandibular rotation during open bite treatment in the permanent dentition.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the published data in seven electronic databases up to September 2015. We considered studies for inclusion if they were examining the effects of posterior teeth intrusion on the vertical facial morphology with open bite malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data-extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis was not possible due to dissimilarity and heterogeneity among the included studies.
RESULTS
Out of the 42 articles that met the initial eligibility criteria, 12 studies were finally selected. Low level of scientific evidence was identified after risk of bias assessment of the included studies with no relevant randomized controlled trial performed. Out of the 12 selected studies, five studies used miniplates and seven studies used miniscrews. Mandibular counterclockwise rotation was found to be between 2.3° and 3.9° in six studies (as sassed by mandibular plane angle, between MeGo or GoGn and SN or FH plane) while it was less than 2° in the remaining studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Current weak evidence suggests that molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices may cause mandibular counterclockwise autorotation. Future well-conducted and clearly reported multicenter randomized controlled trials that include a non-treatment control group are needed to make robust recommendations regarding the amount of mandibular rotation during open bite treatments.
Topics: Cephalometry; Humans; Mandible; Molar; Open Bite; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 26980200
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0122-4