-
American Journal of Medical Genetics.... Jan 2016Clinical interventions and research have mostly focused on the orthopedic, genetic, and pharmacological outcomes of individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), and... (Review)
Review
Clinical interventions and research have mostly focused on the orthopedic, genetic, and pharmacological outcomes of individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), and although quality of life (QoL) has gained recognition as an important patient-outcome, it has received little attention in individuals with OI. This mixed-methods systematic review of the literature included five search engines and identified a total of 212 articles. Once study eligibility was reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this mixed-methods review (9 quantitative and 1 qualitative). Among the 10 included QoL studies, six reported on children with OI, three on adults with OI, and one on the parents of children with OI. Physical QoL in children and adults with OI appears to be less than that of the general population, with individuals with more severe OI types reporting worse QoL. On the other hand, mental and psychosocial QoL is the same or better in individuals with OI than that of the general population. Pain, scoliosis activity limitations and participation restrictions due to decreased function are associated with lower levels of physical QoL. Researchers must agree on a definition of QoL as it relates to OI and use validated measures appropriate for evaluating QoL in OI. Pediatric studies should consider both the child and the parent's QOL perceptions as these may differ. QoL in the adult population should not be dismissed in order to offer proper client-centered interventions throughout the lifespan.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Humans; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Pain; Parents; Quality of Life
PubMed: 26365089
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37377 -
International Journal of Cardiology Oct 2015Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare, inherited systemic connective tissue disease that causes decreased bioavailability of collagen type 1. Collagen type 1 is the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare, inherited systemic connective tissue disease that causes decreased bioavailability of collagen type 1. Collagen type 1 is the most abundant connective tissue in the body and a key part of many organs. While the bone phenotype in OI is well described, less is known about the effects of decreased collagen on other organs. In the heart, collagen type 1 is present in the heart valves, chordae tendineae, annuli fibrosi and the interventricular septum. It is thus likely that the heart is affected in OI.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate whether patients with OI have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared to healthy adults.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase and key scientific meetings were searched for publications fulfilling the inclusion criteria.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies were selected if at least one patient with OI was described as having cardiovascular disease. The articles should be written in English, French, Italian, Spanish, German, Norwegian or Danish or have an English abstract.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data were extracted by HA, FTJ and LF using a predefined protocol.
RESULTS
A total of 68 studies were included in the review, comprising 51 case reports, 8 small case series (n<10 patients), 4 large case series (n ≥ 10 patients) and 5 cross-sectional studies comparing patients and controls. Together, the papers comprised 499 patients and covered 45 years of medical literature. The most commonly reported heart diseases amongst the patients with OI were valvulopathies and increased aortic diameter. Findings in the large case series and the cross-sectional studies were broadly similar to each other.
CONCLUSION
The findings support the hypothesis that patients with OI have increased risk of heart disease compared to healthy controls. It is biologically plausible that patients with OI may have an increased risk of developing heart disease, and valve disease in particular.
Topics: Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26100571
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.001 -
Hormone Research in Paediatrics 2015To systematically assess contemporary knowledge regarding the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates (BPs) in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
To systematically assess contemporary knowledge regarding the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates (BPs) in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI).
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for eligible articles up to June 2014. Studies eligible for inclusion were (randomized) controlled trials assessing the effects of BPs in children with OI. Methodological quality was assessed independently by 4 reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for risk of bias.
RESULTS
Ten studies (519 children) were included. Four studies (40%) showed a low risk of bias. All studies investigating lumbar spine areal bone mineral density indicated a significant increase as a result of BP treatment. Most studies observed a significant decrease in fracture incidence. The most frequently reported adverse events were gastrointestinal complaints, fever, and muscle soreness. A significant decrease in (bone) pain due to BP treatment was observed in more than half of the studies. Most studies measuring urinary markers of bone resorption reported a significant decrease. The majority of studies with intravenous treatment showed a significant increase in lumbar projection area, whereas studies with oral treatment did not.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with oral or intravenous BPs in children with OI results in an increase in bone mineral density and seems to be safe and well tolerated.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Diphosphonates; Female; Humans; Male; Osteogenesis Imperfecta
PubMed: 26021524
DOI: 10.1159/000381713 -
Injury Aug 2015Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a group of genetic disorders, of which Type III is the most severe among survivors. The disease is characterised in particular by bone... (Review)
Review
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a group of genetic disorders, of which Type III is the most severe among survivors. The disease is characterised in particular by bone fragility, decreased bone mass and increased incidence of fractures. Other usual findings are muscle hypotonia, joint hypermobility and short stature. Fractures and weak bones may consequently cause limb and spinal deformity and chronic physical disability. Bisphosphonates have revolutionised the treatment of newborn children with severe OI type III. Surgery is still needed in most patients due to high frequency of the fractures. In this systematic review we describe the present state-of-art in treating the most severe type of OI in newborn and preschool children with their bone fractures.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Diphosphonates; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Immobilization; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Orthopedic Procedures; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Pamidronate; Physical Therapy Modalities; Prognosis
PubMed: 25943292
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.021 -
American Journal of Therapeutics 2016Epidemiological evidence suggests that bisphosphonates are the most promising drugs for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). However, data on this issue are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Epidemiological evidence suggests that bisphosphonates are the most promising drugs for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). However, data on this issue are controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture rate in patients with OI. Electronic databases were searched to find relevant studies. Two reviewers independently identified relevant randomized controlled trials, which evaluated the efficacy of bisphosphonates in patients with OI. Outcome measures were fracture incidence and BMD changes in different skeletal sites. A total of 9 randomized controlled trials including 557 patients were identified. Meta-analysis demonstrated a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates on spine BMD Z-score and area BMD (in grams per square centimeter) %. Patients treated with bisphosphonates had a lower risk of fracture [risk ratio (RR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.97] compared with those in control groups. In children, bisphosphonates were efficacious in reducing fractures (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.97), where in adults, bisphosphonates seemed equivalent to placebo in that respect (RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.42-1.59), although no significant difference was noted between these 2 RRs (test of interaction, z = -0.07; P = 0.94). There was also no significant difference in reducing fractures between oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (P = 0.23). This study showed that bisphosphonates could increase the BMD and reduce the risk of facture in patients with OI. There was no enough evidence to identify any differences in efficacy between oral and intravenous bisphosphonates on fracture reduction, as well as between children and adults.
Topics: Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Humans; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25844482
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000236 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2015Pain is one of the most common symptoms in children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) which include a wide range of diagnoses including cancer.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pain is one of the most common symptoms in children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) which include a wide range of diagnoses including cancer. The current literature indicates that pain is not well managed, however the evidence base to guide clinicians is limited. There is a clear need for evidence from a systematic review to inform prescribing.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of different pharmacological interventions used for pain in CYP with LLCs.
SEARCH METHODS
The following electronic databases were searched up to December 2014: CENTRAL (in the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. In addition, we searched conference proceedings and reference lists of included studies. For completeness, we also contacted experts in the field. No language restrictions were applied.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised studies and other studies that included a clearly defined comparator group were included. The studies investigated pharmacological treatments for pain associated with LLCs in CYP. The treatment included those specifically developed to treat pain and those that acted as an adjuvant, where the treatment was not primarily developed to treat pain but has pain relieving properties. The LLC was identified by its inclusion in the Richard Hain Directory of LLCs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Citations were screened by five review authors. Data were extracted by one review author and checked by a second. Two review authors assessed the risk of bias of included studies. A sufficient number of studies using homogeneous outcomes was not identified so a meta-analysis was not possible.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 24,704 citations from our database search. Nine trials with 379 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Participants had cerebral palsy (CP) in five of the studies and osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) in the other four. Participants across the trials ranged in age from 2 to 19 years. All studies, apart from one cross-over trial, were parallel designed RCTs. Three of the trials on CP evaluated intrathecal baclofen (ITB) and two botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A). All of the OI trials evaluated the use of bisphosphonates (two alendronate and one pamidronate). No trials were identified that evaluated a commonly used analgesic in this patient group. Pain was a secondary outcome in five of the eight identified studies. Overall the quality of the trials was mixed. Only one study involved over 100 participants.For the two ITB studies for pain in CP, in the same study population but assessed at different time points in their disease, both found an effect on pain favouring the intervention compared to the control group (standard care or placebo) (mean difference (MD) 4.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.15 to 6.25; MD 26.60, 95% CI 2.61 to 50.59, respectively). In these studies most of the adverse events related to the procedure or device for administration rather than the drug, such as swelling at the pump site. In one trial there were also eight serious adverse effects; these included difficulty swallowing and an epileptic seizure. The trial did not state if these occurred in the intervention group. At follow-up in both BoNT-A trials there was no evidence of a difference in pain between the trial arms among CP participants. The adverse events in the BoNT-A trials mostly involved those who received the intervention drug and involved seizures. Gastrointestinal problems were the most frequent adverse event in those who received alendronate. The trial investigating pamidronate found no evidence of a difference in pain compared to the control group. No adverse events were reported in this trial.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Published, controlled evidence on the pharmacological interventions for pain in CYP with LLCs is limited. The evidence that is currently available evaluated pain largely as a secondary outcome and the drugs used were all adjuvants and not always commonly used in general paediatric palliative care for pain. Based on current data this systematic review is unable to determine the effects of pharmacological interventions for pain for CYP with LLCs. Future trials with larger populations should examine the effects of the drugs commonly used as analgesics; with the rising prevalence of many LLCs this becomes more necessary.
Topics: Adolescent; Alendronate; Baclofen; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Diphosphonates; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Neuromuscular Agents; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Pain; Pamidronate; Seizures; Young Adult
PubMed: 25768935
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010750.pub2 -
BioMed Research International 2014A rare disease afflicts less than 200,000 individuals, according to the National Organization for Rare Diseases (NORD) of the United States. Over 6,000 rare disorders... (Review)
Review
A rare disease afflicts less than 200,000 individuals, according to the National Organization for Rare Diseases (NORD) of the United States. Over 6,000 rare disorders affect approximately 1 in 10 Americans. Rare genetic bone disorders remain the major causes of disability in US patients. These rare bone disorders also represent a therapeutic challenge for clinicians, due to lack of understanding of underlying mechanisms. This systematic review explored current literature on therapeutic directions for the following rare genetic bone disorders: fibrous dysplasia, Gorham-Stout syndrome, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, melorheostosis, multiple hereditary exostosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, craniometaphyseal dysplasia, achondroplasia, and hypophosphatasia. The disease mechanisms of Gorham-Stout disease, melorheostosis, and multiple hereditary exostosis are not fully elucidated. Inhibitors of the ACVR1/ALK2 pathway may serve as possible therapeutic intervention for FOP. The use of bisphosphonates and IL-6 inhibitors has been explored to be useful in the treatment of fibrous dysplasia, but more research is warranted. Cell therapy, bisphosphonate polytherapy, and human growth hormone may avert the pathology in osteogenesis imperfecta, but further studies are needed. There are still no current effective treatments for these bone disorders; however, significant promising advances in therapeutic modalities were developed that will limit patient suffering and treat their skeletal disabilities.
Topics: Bone Diseases; Bone and Bones; Humans; Osteogenesis; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 25530967
DOI: 10.1155/2014/670842 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2014Osteogenesis imperfecta is caused by a genetic defect resulting in an abnormal type I collagen bone matrix which typically results in multiple fractures with little or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Osteogenesis imperfecta is caused by a genetic defect resulting in an abnormal type I collagen bone matrix which typically results in multiple fractures with little or no trauma. Bisphosphonates are used in an attempt to increase bone mineral density and reduce these fractures in people with osteogenesis imperfecta.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates in increasing bone mineral density, reducing fractures and improving clinical function in people with osteogenesis imperfecta.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of journals and conference proceedings. We additionally searched PubMed and major conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 07 April 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing bisphosphonates to placebo, no treatment, or comparator interventions in all types of osteogenesis imperfecta.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen trials (819 participants) were included. Overall, the trials were mainly at a low risk of bias, although selective reporting was an issue in several of the trials. Data for oral bisphosphonates versus placebo could not be aggregated; a statistically significant difference favouring oral bisphosphonates in fracture risk reduction and number of fractures was noted in two trials. No differences were reported in the remaining three trials which commented on fracture incidence. Five trials reported data for spine bone mineral density; all found statistically significant increased lumbar spine density z scores for at least one time point studied. For intravenous bisphosphonates versus placebo, aggregated data from two trials showed no statistically significant difference for the number of participants with at least one fracture, risk ratio 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.30 to 1.06). In the remaining trial no statistically significant difference was noted in fracture incidence. For spine bone mineral density, no statistically significant difference was noted in the aggregated data from two trials, mean difference 9.96 (95% confidence interval -2.51 to 22.43). In the remaining trial a statistically significant difference in mean per cent change in spine bone mineral density z score favoured intravenous bisphosphonates at six and 12 months. Data describing growth, bone pain, and functional outcomes after oral or intravenous bisphosphonate therapy, or both, as compared to placebo were incomplete among all studies, but do not show consistent improvements in these outcomes. Two studies compared different doses of bisphosphonates. No differences were found between doses when bone mineral density, fractures, and height or length z score were assessed. One study compared oral versus intravenous bisphosphonates and found no differences in primary outcomes. Two studies compared the intravenous bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and pamidronate. There were no significant differences in primary outcome. However, the studies were at odds as to the relative benefit of zoledronic acid over pamidronate for lumbosacral bone mineral density at 12 months.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Bisphophonates are commonly prescribed to individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta. Current evidence, albeit limited, demonstrates oral or intravenous bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density in children and adults with this condition. These were not shown to be different in their ability to increase bone mineral density. It is unclear whether oral or intravenous bisphosphonate treatment consistently decreases fractures, though multiple studies report this independently and no studies report an increased fracture rate with treatment. The studies included here do not show bisphosphonates conclusively improve clinical status (reduce pain; improve growth and functional mobility) in people with osteogenesis imperfecta. Given their current widespread and expected continued use, the optimal method, duration of therapy and long-term safety of bisphosphonate therapy require further investigation. In addition, attention should be given to long-term fracture reduction and improvement in quality of life indicators.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25054949
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005088.pub3 -
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research Oct 2013To conduct a systematic review of epidemiological literature to determine the incidence of bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw occurring either spontaneously... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review of epidemiological literature to determine the incidence of bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw occurring either spontaneously or after dental surgery, in children and adolescents diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MEDLINE, HMIC and EMBASE were used to search for English-language articles published from 1946 - 2013. Inclusion criteria consisted of population based studies of children and adolescents (24 years and younger) diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta, only studies which included a dental examination, and patients treated with intravenous bisphosphonates were included. Articles were excluded if patients had any other co-morbidity which could affect osteonecrosis of the jaw, and those which treated patients with oral bisphosphonates only.
RESULTS
Five studies consisting of four retrospective cohort studies and one case series were identified. Study populations ranged from 15 to 278 patients and number of subjects with osteogenesis imperfecta ranged from 15 to 221. Mean duration of intravenous bisphosphonate use ranged from 4.5 to 6.8 years. All patients were clinically examined and no patients were found to have osteonecrosis of the jaw.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence to support hypothesis of causal relationship between bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta. More prospective studies on bisphosphonate use in osteogenesis imperfecta needs to be carried out.
PubMed: 24478911
DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4401 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Aug 2012Little information is available on the prevalence, geographic distribution and mutation spectrum of genetic skeletal disorders (GSDs) in China. This study systematically... (Review)
Review
Little information is available on the prevalence, geographic distribution and mutation spectrum of genetic skeletal disorders (GSDs) in China. This study systematically reviewed GSDs as defined in "Nosology and Classification of genetic skeletal disorders (2010 version)" using Chinese biomedical literature published over the past 34 years from 1978 to 2012. In total, 16,099 GSDs have been reported. The most frequently reported disorders were Marfan syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia, mucopolysaccharidosis, multiple cartilaginous exostoses, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), osteopetrosis, achondroplasia, enchondromatosis (Ollier), and osteopoikilosis, accounting for 76.5% (12,312 cases) of the total cases. Five groups (group 8, 12, 14, 18, 21) defined by "Nosology and Classification of genetic skeletal disorders" have not been reported in the Chinese biomedical literature. Gene mutation testing was performed in only a minor portion of the 16,099 cases of GSDs (187 cases, 1.16%). In total, 37 genes for 41 different GSDs were reported in Chinese biomedical literature, including 43 novel mutations. This review revealed a significant imbalance in rare disease identification in terms of geographic regions and hospital levels, suggesting the need to create a national multi-level network to meet the specific challenge of care for rare diseases in China.
Topics: Bone Diseases; China; Genetic Diseases, Inborn; Humans; Publishing
PubMed: 22913777
DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-55