-
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2018Recent studies and experience suggest that cefazolin might be equally as effective as antistaphylococcal penicillins for methicillin-susceptible (MSSA), with a better... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Recent studies and experience suggest that cefazolin might be equally as effective as antistaphylococcal penicillins for methicillin-susceptible (MSSA), with a better safety profile and lower cost. The objective of these meta-analyses was to compare the safeties of antistaphylococcal penicillins and cefazolin. The PubMed, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases and websites for clinical trial registries through 23 June 2017 were searched. In addition, recent abstracts from infectious disease and pharmacy conferences were reviewed. We estimated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. One analysis focused on hospitalized patients, and the other focused on outpatients. Eleven retrospective studies of hospitalized patients and three retrospective studies of outpatients were included. In hospitalized patients, lower rates of nephrotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.225; 95% CI, 0.127 to 0.513), acute interstitial nephritis (Peto OR, 0.189; 95% CI, 0.053 to 0.675), hepatotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.160; 95% CI, 0.066 to 0.387), and drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions (Peto OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.089 to 0.414) were found with cefazolin. In outpatients, lower rates of nephrotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.192 to 0.722), hepatotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.313; 95% CI, 0.156 to 0.627), and hypersensitivity reactions (Peto OR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.201 to 0.687) were observed with cefazolin. Compared to antistaphylococcal penicillins, cefazolin was associated with significant reductions in nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in hospitalized patients and outpatients. Additionally, cefazolin was associated with lower likelihoods of discontinuation due to side effects in hospitalized patients and hypersensitivity reactions in outpatients. Cefazolin should be considered a first-line option for patients with MSSA infections for which efficacy is presumed to be similar to that of antistaphylococcal penicillin therapy.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefazolin; Odds Ratio; Oxacillin; Penicillins; Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 29437617
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01816-17 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2016Infective endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endocardial surface of the heart. Antibiotics are the cornerstone of treatment, but their use is not standardised,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Infective endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endocardial surface of the heart. Antibiotics are the cornerstone of treatment, but their use is not standardised, due to the differences in presentation, populations affected and the wide variety of micro-organisms that can be responsible.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the existing evidence about the clinical benefits and harms of different antibiotics regimens used to treat people with infective endocarditis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE Classic and EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index on 30 April 2015. We also searched three trials registers and handsearched the reference lists of included papers. We applied no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of antibiotic regimens for treating possible infective endocarditis diagnosed according to modified Duke's criteria. We considered all-cause mortality, cure rates and adverse events as the primary outcomes. We excluded people with possible infective endocarditis and pregnant women.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction in duplicate. We constructed 'Summary of findings' tables and used GRADE methodology to assess the quality of studies. We described the included studies narratively.
MAIN RESULTS
Four small randomised controlled trials involving 728 allocated/224 analysed participants met our inclusion criteria. These trials had a high risk of bias. Drug companies sponsored two of the trials. We were unable to pool the data due to the heterogeneity in outcome definitions and the different antibiotics used.The included trials compared the following antibiotic schedules. The first trial compared quinolone (levofloxacin) plus standard treatment (anti-staphylococcal penicillin (cloxacillin or dicloxacillin), aminoglycoside (tobramycin or netilmicin) and rifampicin) versus standard treatment alone reporting uncertain effects on all-cause mortality (8/31 (26%) with levofloxacin plus standard treatment versus 9/39 (23%) with standard treatment alone; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.56, very low quality evidence). The second trial compared daptomycin versus low-dose gentamicin plus an anti-staphylococcal penicillin (nafcillin, oxacillin or flucloxacillin) or vancomycin. This showed uncertain effects in terms of cure rates (9/28 (32.1%) with daptomycin versus 9/25 (36%) with low-dose gentamicin plus anti-staphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin, RR 0.89 95% CI 0.42 to 1.89; very low quality evidence). The third trial compared cloxacillin plus gentamicin with a glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin) plus gentamicin. In participants receiving gentamycin plus glycopeptide only 13/23 (56%) were cured versus 11/11 (100%) receiving cloxacillin plus gentamicin (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.85; very low quality evidence). The fourth trial compared ceftriaxone plus gentamicin versus ceftriaxone alone and found no conclusive differences in terms of cure (15/34 (44%) with ceftriaxone plus gentamicin versus 21/33 (64%) with ceftriaxone alone, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.10; very low quality evidence).The trials reported adverse events, need for cardiac surgical interventions, uncontrolled infection and relapse of endocarditis and found no conclusive differences between comparison groups (very low quality evidence). No trials assessed septic emboli or quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Limited and very low quality evidence suggested that there were no conclusive differences between antibiotic regimens in terms of cure rates or other relevant clinical outcomes. However, because of the very low quality evidence, this needs confirmation. The conclusion of this Cochrane review was based on randomised controlled trials with high risk of bias. Accordingly, current evidence does not support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy for treatment of infective endocarditis.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Endocarditis; Female; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27092951
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009880.pub2 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... Dec 2014To describe the spectrum of pathogens isolated from Chinese women experiencing premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) and those of their neonates, in order to provide... (Review)
Review
To describe the spectrum of pathogens isolated from Chinese women experiencing premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) and those of their neonates, in order to provide effective management of PROM. We searched Ovid Medline, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals up to April 2012. The quality of studies was assessed utilizing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement. Among the included 36 studies, 11 (30.55%) were deemed to be at Level A, 12 (33.33%) at Level B, three (8.33%) at Level C, and 10 (27.78%) at Level D. Staphylococcus and Escherichia coli were the two primary microorganisms isolated from women with PROM and their infants. Subgroup analysis showed the distribution of microorganisms from the six regions of China varied. Staphylococcus bacteria were resistant to penicillins, except oxacillin, but more sensitive to first- and second-generation cephalosporins. Escherichia were sensitive to first- and second-generation cephalosporins and were more sensitive to aztreonam than cephalosporins. The main pathogens derived from women with PROM and their newborns were Staphylococcus and E. coli, which differs from the pathogens in Western countries. Hence, one might infer that the pathogens involved in PROM should be defined in each region to maximize antibiotic effectiveness. In addition, randomized controlled studies are needed to compare prophylactic use of antibiotics versus use of antibiotics after a positive culture for newborn infants with a history of PROM.
Topics: China; Escherichia coli; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Staphylococcus
PubMed: 25510681
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.02.003 -
American Journal of Infection Control Aug 2014Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious problem in intensive care units. However, limited literature has been reviewed to synthesize the findings... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious problem in intensive care units. However, limited literature has been reviewed to synthesize the findings about the incidence, case fatality rate, pathogen distribution, and drug resistance of neonatal VAP in China.
METHODS
A search of electronic databases was undertaken to identify the incidence, case fatality rate, pathogen distribution, and drug resistance of neonatal VAP based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was carried out using R3.0.2 software.
RESULTS
A total of 16,587 participants were included in our final analysis. The incidence and case fatality rates were 42.8% and 16.4%, respectively. Gram-negative bacteria were detected in 77.6% of cultures, followed by gram-positive bacteria (18.8%) and fungi (3.7%). Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to meropenem, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin, with resistance rates of 1.5%-25.0%, 4.9%-29.0%, and 8.5%-24.7%, respectively. Gram-positive bacteria have resistance rates as high as 72.7%-99.1% to penicillin, 62.6%-90.9% to erythromycin, and 80.3%-91.9% to oxacillin.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence and case fatality rates of neonatal VAP are high in China. VAP was mainly caused by gram-negative bacteria that were resistant to most common antibiotics. The future study of drug-resistance mechanisms should be intensified, and effective measures of hospital infection control should be considered to prevent the outbreak of drug-resistant strains.
Topics: Bacteria; China; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Mortality; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
PubMed: 25087143
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.007 -
European Journal of Emergency Medicine... Jun 2014Flucloxacillin either alone or combined with penicillin V is still the first-line antibiotic drug of choice for the treatment of cellulitis in emergency departments... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Are two penicillins better than one? A systematic review of oral flucloxacillin and penicillin V versus oral flucloxacillin alone for the emergency department treatment of cellulitis.
BACKGROUND
Flucloxacillin either alone or combined with penicillin V is still the first-line antibiotic drug of choice for the treatment of cellulitis in emergency departments (EDs) in Ireland. The rationale for this antibiotic regimen is their anti-staphylococcal and anti-streptococcal activity.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral flucloxacillin alone (monotherapy) compared with a combination of flucloxacillin with penicillin V (dual therapy) in the ED-directed outpatient treatment of cellulitis.
METHODS
We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (1950 to August 2011), EMBASE (1980 to August 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue), OpenGrey, Current Controlled Trials metaRegister of Clinical Trials (August 2011) and reference lists and websites of potential trials. We performed cross-referencing from the reference lists of major articles on the subject. We imposed no language restriction.
RESULTS
Despite a comprehensive literature search to identify relevant studies, no randomized-controlled trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were found.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite its common use, there are no published randomized-controlled trials comparing flucloxacillin monotherapy with a combination of flucloxacillin and penicillin V in the ED management of cellulitis. We discuss existing European and North American prescribing rationale and current guidelines.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Cellulitis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Floxacillin; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Ireland; Male; Penicillin V; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 23542420
DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328360d980 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Feb 2011A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of PCR-based and culture-based diagnostic tests for... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of PCR-based and culture-based diagnostic tests for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Our analysis included 74 accuracy measurements from 29 publications. Nine tests were evaluated: the PCR-based Genotype MRSA Direct and IDI-MRSA, the chromogenic media CHROMagar, Chromogenic MRSA Medium, MRSA ID, MRSA Select and ORSAB, and the nonchromogenic culture media MSA-Cefoxitin and MSA-Oxacillin. For four chromogenic media, incubation periods of 18-24 and 48 h were evaluated. Considerable heterogeneity was detected in most analyses. A significantly higher sensitivity was found for the overall PCR pooled estimate (92.5; 95% CI 87.4-95.9) and the chromogenic media after 48 h of incubation (87.6; 95% CI 82.1-91.6) compared to the overall sensitivity of chromogenic media after 18-24 h (78.3; 95% CI 71.0-84.1). The specificity of chromogenic media after 18-24 h (98.6; 95% CI 97.7-99.1) was higher than the specificity of PCR (97.0; 95% CI 94.5-98.4) but declined after 48 h of incubation (94.7; 95% CI 91.6-96.8).The most sensitive chromogenic medium after 18-24 h of incubation was Chromogenic MRSA Medium (sensitivity: 89.3; 95% CI 72.8-96.3), whereas the most specific chromogenic medium after 18-24 h of incubation was MRSA Select (specificity: 99.4; 95% CI 98.6-99.7). After 48 h of incubation, MRSA Select had the highest sensitivity (93.2; 95% CI 83.5-97.0), whereas CHROMagar had the highest specificity (96.4; 95% CI 91.3-98.5). This meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between several of the tests and the test methods evaluated. A reduction of the incubation time of chromogenic media (from 48 to 18-24 h) increases specificity but reduces sensitivity.
Topics: Bacteriological Techniques; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sensitivity and Specificity; Staphylococcal Infections
PubMed: 20219085
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03202.x