-
Cancers Feb 2024: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex... (Review)
Review
: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. : A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. : Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. : RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.
PubMed: 38398084
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040693 -
World Journal of Urology Feb 2024Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) can be performed either by a transperitoneal (TP) or a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. However, the superiority of one approach... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) can be performed either by a transperitoneal (TP) or a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. However, the superiority of one approach over the other is not established. Hence, the primary aim of this review was to compare perioperative outcomes between these two surgical approaches.
METHODS
Literature was systematically searched to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes following TP RAPN and RP RAPN. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023399496). The primary outcome was comparing complication rates between the two approaches.
RESULTS
This review included 22 studies, 5675 patients, 2524 in the RP group, and 3151 in the TP group. The overall complications were significantly lower in the RP group [Odds ratio (OR) 0.80 (0.67, 0.95), p = 0.01]. However, the rate of major complications was similar between the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter with the RP group [Mean Difference (MD)-16.7 (- 22.3, - 11.0), p = < 0.0001]. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and need for blood transfusion (BT) were significantly lower in the RP group. There was no difference between the two groups for conversion to radical nephrectomy [OR 0.66 (0.33, 1.33), p = 0.25] or open surgery [OR 0.68 (0.24, 1.92, p = 0.47] and positive surgical margins [OR 0.93 (0.66, 1.31, p = 0.69]. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the RP group [MD - 0.27 (- 0.45, - 0.08), p = < 0.00001].
CONCLUSIONS
RP approach, compared to TP, has significantly lower complication rates, EBL, need for BT and LOS. However, due to the lack of randomized studies on the topic, further data is required.
Topics: Humans; Blood Transfusion; Length of Stay; Nephrectomy; Odds Ratio; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38358565
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04796-7 -
International Urology and Nephrology Jun 2024Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common comorbidities in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), was proven to be an important prognostic factor of overall... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common comorbidities in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), was proven to be an important prognostic factor of overall survival for these patients. Regarding the influence on renal function after nephrectomy, evidence is still scant. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to provide a more reliable analysis of the association between DM and long-term renal functional outcomes after nephrectomy.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases were searched for eligible studies from inception to January 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to evaluate the association between DM and renal functional outcomes using a random effects model. Stata 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included thirteen studies consisting of 8562 RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy. Preoperative comorbidity of DM was significantly associated with poor renal functional outcomes (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.48, p < 0.0001), regardless of ethnicity, follow-up time, body mass index (BMI) and age. However, in the radical nephrectomy subgroup, DM was not significantly associated with renal function decline (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.93-3.90, p = 0.0781).
CONCLUSIONS
The aggregate evidence indicated that preexisting DM may be associated with poor renal functional outcomes in patients with RCC after nephrectomy, especially in patients receiving partial nephrectomy. Urologists should focus more on the glycemic management of these patients after nephrectomy. More high-quality studies are needed to explore the influence of DM on renal function outcomes in postoperative patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Nephrectomy; Kidney Neoplasms; Diabetes Mellitus; Treatment Outcome; Kidney
PubMed: 38300449
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03885-7 -
European Urology Focus Jan 2024Partial nephrectomy (PN) with intraoperative guidance by biophotonics has the potential to improve surgical outcomes due to higher precision. However, its value remains... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Partial nephrectomy (PN) with intraoperative guidance by biophotonics has the potential to improve surgical outcomes due to higher precision. However, its value remains unclear since high-level evidence is lacking.
OBJECTIVE
To provide a comprehensive analysis of biophotonic techniques used for intraoperative real-time assistance during PN.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a comprehensive database search based on the PICO criteria, including studies published before October 2022. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts followed by full-text screening of eligible studies. For a quantitative analysis, a meta-analysis was conducted.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
In total, 35 studies were identified for the qualitative analysis, including 27 studies on near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green, four studies on hyperspectral imaging, two studies on folate-targeted molecular imaging, and one study each on optical coherence tomography and 5-aminolevulinic acid. The meta-analysis investigated seven studies on selective arterial clamping using NIRF. There was a significantly shorter warm ischemia time in the NIRF-PN group (mean difference [MD]: -2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.6, -0.1; p = 0.04). No differences were noted regarding transfusions (odds ratio [OR]: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.2, 1.7; p = 0.27), positive surgical margins (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.2, 2.0; p = 0.46), or major complications (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.2; p = 0.08). In the NIRF-PN group, functional results were favorable at short-term follow-up (MD of glomerular filtration rate decline: 7.6; 95% CI: 4.6, 10.5; p < 0.01), but leveled off at long-term follow-up (MD: 7.0; 95% CI: -2.8, 16.9; p = 0.16). Remarkably, these findings were not confirmed by the included randomized controlled trial.
CONCLUSIONS
Biophotonics comprises a heterogeneous group of imaging modalities that serve intraoperative decision-making and guidance. Implementation into clinical practice and cost effectiveness are the limitations that should be addressed by future research.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We reviewed the application of biophotonics during partial removal of the kidney in patients with kidney cancer. Our results suggest that these techniques support the surgeon in successfully performing the challenging steps of the procedure.
PubMed: 38278713
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.01.005 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The primary aim of this present study is to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes associated with...
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The primary aim of this present study is to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes associated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) as interventions for the treatment of complex renal tumors, defined as PADUA or RENAL score ≥ 7.
METHODS
We systematically carried out an extensive search across four electronic databases, namely PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. Our objective was to identify pertinent studies published in the English language up to December 2023, and encompassed controlled trials comparing LPN and OPN as interventions for complex renal tumors.
RESULTS
This study encompassed a total of seven comparative trials, involving 934 patients. LPN exhibited a noteworthy reduction in the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.06 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.62, -1.50; p < 0.00001), blood loss (WMD -34.05mL, 95% CI -55.61, -12.48; p = 0.002), and overall complications (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19, 0.79; p = 0.009). However, noteworthy distinctions did not arise between LPN and OPN concerning parameters such as warm ischemia time, renal function, and oncological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This study reveals that LPN presents several advantages over OPN. These benefits encompass a shortened hospital stay, diminished blood loss, and a reduced incidence of complications. Importantly, LPN achieves these benefits while concurrently upholding comparable renal function and oncological outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=457716, identifier CRD42023453816.
PubMed: 38273858
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1283935 -
BMC Urology Jan 2024This study aims to compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of cryoablation (CA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) for managing small renal masses in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes after cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for small renal masses in solitary kidneys: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
AIM
This study aims to compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of cryoablation (CA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) for managing small renal masses in patients with solitary kidneys. The study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of both interventions, evaluating their impact on kidney function and their ability to mitigate cancer recurrence.
METHODS
Searches were systematically conducted on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, SinoMed, and Google Scholar, identifying seven observational studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata v.12.0 and Review Manager version 5.2. Results for dichotomous variables are expressed using odds ratios, and weighted mean differences are used for continuous variables.
RESULTS
Our findings revealed that patients undergoing CA experienced significantly shorter operative time (p < 0.0001), reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.00001), a shorter length of stay (p = 0.0001), and fewer postoperative complications (p = 0.02) compared to those undergoing PN. Although the CA group exhibited a lower transfusion rate (p = 0.69) compared with the PN group, the difference was not statistically significant. The combined data analysis demonstrated a significantly lower increase in serum creatinine levels after surgery in the CA group compared with the PN group (p = 0.003). Similarly, there was a noteworthy decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate after surgery in the PN group compared with the CA group (p < 0.0001). While not statistically significant, the CA group showed a lower postoperative dialysis rate (p = 0.11). Regarding oncological outcomes, the analysis revealed no significant differences between CA and PN concerning local recurrence (p = 0.2) and distant metastasis (p = 0.12), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis indicates comparable efficacy between PN and CA in controlling tumour recurrence and metastasis. However, CA is associated with superior preservation of renal function, significantly enhanced perioperative outcomes, and fewer postoperative complications. Based on our data, it can be inferred that the scope for applying CA might be expanded to encompass more patients seeking a less invasive treatment option.
Topics: Humans; Cryosurgery; Kidney; Nephrectomy; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38268005
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01406-x -
Journal of Endourology Mar 2024Assessing whether Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) levels affect perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). This systematic review and meta-analysis were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Assessing whether Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) levels affect perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search of the literature published before February 1, 2023 was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, Cochran, and Web of Science libraries. We included all articles evaluating adherent perirenal fat by MAP during PN. A total of 1807 patients from 7 studies meeting the criteria were included. In the high MAP group, the operation time was longer, and the estimated blood loss and postoperative complications were increased. There was no significant difference in positive surgical margin, warm ischemia time, and hospitalization time. As a simple and easy scoring method, MAP can predict the perioperative outcome of PN patients, especially when ≥3 is the boundary. However, more cohort studies are still needed to determine the optimal cutoff point of MAP.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Kidney; Warm Ischemia; Probability; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38185844
DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0419 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Apr 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Robotics; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 38185554
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.142 -
Journal of Endourology Apr 2024A variety of surgical and nonsurgical management options for small renal masses (SRMs) now exist. Surgery in the form of partial nephrectomy (PN) has three different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A variety of surgical and nonsurgical management options for small renal masses (SRMs) now exist. Surgery in the form of partial nephrectomy (PN) has three different approaches. It is unclear which PN approach, if any, offers superior clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in patients with SRMs <4 cm undergoing PN through the open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), or robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) approach and to establish the advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches. A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing at least two of the above techniques. Eighteen studies and 17,013 patients were included in our study. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework was performed. OPN was used as the baseline comparator. The prespecified primary outcome was R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes included operating time, ischemia time, blood loss, transfusion rates, urine leak rates, significant morbidity, length of stay, and recurrence. There was no significant difference between the techniques in terms of R0 rates, tumor recurrence, urine leak rates, renal function, and >3a Clavien-Dindo complications. LPN had a longer ischemic time and operating time. OPN had a longer length of stay and higher average intraoperative blood loss. RPN had lower blood transfusion rates. All approaches are acceptable from an oncological perspective. The minimally invasive approaches (i.e., RPN and LPN) offer advantages in terms of morbidity; however, LPN may increase ischemic time and operative duration. Variations between perioperative outcomes may influence the choice of approach on a case-by-case and institutional basis.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Network Meta-Analysis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy
PubMed: 38149582
DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0107 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Mar 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Laparoscopy; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38135539
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.052