-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2024People affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) are interested in dietary therapies as treatments that can improve their health and quality of life. Prebiotics are a category... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
People affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) are interested in dietary therapies as treatments that can improve their health and quality of life. Prebiotics are a category of food ingredients theorised to have health benefits for the gastrointestinal system through their effect on the growth and activity of intestinal bacteria and probiotics.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of prebiotics for the induction and maintenance of remission in people with active UC.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 24 June 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on people with UC. We considered any type of standalone or combination prebiotic intervention, except those prebiotics combined with probiotics (known as synbiotics), compared to any control intervention. We considered interventions of any dose and duration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed standard Cochrane methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 9 RCTs involving a total of 445 participants. Study duration ranged from 14 days to 2 to 3 months for induction and 1 to 6 months for maintenance of remission. All studies were on adults. Five studies were on people with mild to moderate active disease, three in remission or mild activity, and one did not mention. We judged only one study as at low risk of bias in all areas. Two studies compared prebiotics with placebo for induction of remission. We cannot draw any conclusions about clinical remission (70% versus 67%; risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.94); clinical improvement (mean Rachmilewitz score on day 14 of 4.1 versus 4.5; mean difference (MD) -0.40, 95% CI -2.67 to 1.87); faecal calprotectin levels (mean faecal calprotectin on day 14 of 1211 μg/mL versus 3740 μg/mL; MD -2529.00, 95% CI -6925.38 to 1867.38); interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels (mean IL-8 on day 7 of 2.9 pg/mL versus 5.0 pg/mL; MD -2.10, 95% CI -4.93 to 0.73); prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) levels (mean PGE-2 on day 7 of 7.1 ng/mL versus 11.5 ng/mL; MD -4.40, 95% CI -20.25 to 11.45); or withdrawals due to adverse events (21% versus 8%; RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 14.55). All evidence was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported. Two studies compared inulin and oligofructose 15 g with inulin and oligofructose 7.5 g for induction of remission. We cannot draw any conclusions about clinical remission (53% versus 12.5%; RR 4.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.96); clinical improvement (67% versus 25%; RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.06 to 6.70); total adverse events (53.5% versus 31%; RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.06); or withdrawals due to adverse events (13% versus 25%; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.50). All evidence was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported. One study compared prebiotics and anti-inflammatory therapy with anti-inflammatory therapy alone for induction of remission. We cannot draw any conclusions about clinical improvement (mean Lichtiger score at 4 weeks of 6.2 versus 10.3; MD -4.10, 95% CI -8.14 to -0.06) or serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (mean CRP levels at 4 weeks 0.55 ng/mL versus 0.50 ng/mL; MD 0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.47). All evidence was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported. Three studies compared prebiotics with placebo for maintenance of remission. There may be no difference between groups in rate of clinical relapse (44% versus 33%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.31), and prebiotics may lead to more total adverse events than placebo (77% versus 46%; RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.40). The evidence was of low certainty. We cannot draw any conclusions about clinical improvement (mean partial Mayo score at day 60 of 0.428 versus 1.625; MD -1.20, 95% CI -2.17 to -0.22); faecal calprotectin levels (mean faecal calprotectin level at day 60 of 214 μg/mL versus 304 μg/mL; MD -89.79, 95% CI -221.30 to 41.72); quality of life (mean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score at day 60 of 193.5 versus 188.0; MD 5.50, 95% CI -8.94 to 19.94); or withdrawals due to adverse events (28.5% versus 11%; RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.73). The evidence for these outcomes was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported. One study compared prebiotics with synbiotics for maintenance of remission. We cannot draw any conclusions about quality of life (mean IBDQ score at 4 weeks 182.4 versus 176.1; MD 6.30, 95% CI -6.61 to 19.21) or withdrawals due to adverse events (23% versus 20%; RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.62). All evidence was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported. One study compared prebiotics with probiotics for maintenance of remission. We cannot draw any conclusions about quality of life (mean IBDQ score at 4 weeks 182.4 versus 168.6; MD 13.60, 95% CI 1.22 to 25.98) or withdrawals due to adverse events (22.5% versus 22.5%; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.26). All evidence was of very low certainty. No other outcomes were reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There may be no difference in occurrence of clinical relapse when adjuvant treatment with prebiotics is compared with adjuvant treatment with placebo for maintenance of remission in UC. Adjuvant treatment with prebiotics may result in more total adverse events when compared to adjuvant treatment with placebo for maintenance of remission. We could draw no conclusions for any of the other outcomes in this comparison due to the very low certainty of the evidence. The evidence for all other comparisons and outcomes was also of very low certainty, precluding any conclusions. It is difficult to make any clear recommendations for future research based on the findings of this review given the clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies. It is recommended that a consensus is reached on these issues prior to any further research.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Colitis, Ulcerative; Interleukin-8; Inulin; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Prebiotics; Recurrence; Remission Induction
PubMed: 38501688
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015084.pub2 -
JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral... Mar 2024
PubMed: 38491963
DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2621 -
Cytotherapy May 2024Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is classified as a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of immature blood cells within the bone marrow (BM), resulting... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AIMS
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is classified as a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of immature blood cells within the bone marrow (BM), resulting in an aberrant and unregulated cellular growth. The primary therapeutic modalities for AML include chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, it is important to note that these treatments are accompanied by important adverse effects and mortality rates. Therefore, the need for more effective treatment options seems necessary, and dendritic cell (DC) vaccine therapy can be one of these options. In this study, we aim to investigate the effectiveness of DC vaccination therapy for the management of AML.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for this systematic review. The articles were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria of this study and initially compared in terms of titles or abstracts. Finally, the articles related to the topic of this review were obtained in full text. The complete remission and partial remission, survival, correlative immune assays, and health-related metrics were used to evaluate this cellular immunotherapy effectiveness. The quality of the studies was assessed independently using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. The compiled data were input into a standard Excel spreadsheet. Each domain was evaluated as having either a "low risk," "high risk," or "unclear risk" of bias.
RESULTS
Among the 3986 studies that were determined, a total of 11 correlated trials were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. DC vaccine therapy was effective in inducing complete and partial remission, and stabilization of the disease. Additionally, it was discovered that the treatment strengthened the immune system as seen by increased levels of CD4 and CD8 T cells, Th1 cytokines, WT1-specific T cells, and activated NK cells.
CONCLUSION
We conducted a systematic review that supports the use of DC vaccine therapy as an effective treatment for AML. The therapy demonstrated potentials in achieving remission, enhancing the immune system function, and increasing overall survival. However, more studies are required to improve the methods of preparing and delivering the DC vaccine, and to confirm its long-term safety and effectiveness.
Topics: Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Dendritic Cells; Cancer Vaccines; Vaccination; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 38483358
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.02.009 -
Cancers Feb 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) for central nervous system lymphoma... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL).
METHODS
A systematic review was carried out to identify relevant studies from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, CNKI, and CBM databases. The studies included patients with CNSL who received BTKis and reported the overall response (OR), complete remission (CR), and partial response (PR). An overall effect analysis was performed using STATA 15.0. A random-effects model was utilized to calculate the pooled rates, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for all outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies involving 368 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For newly diagnosed CNSL, due to the small simple size, we conducted a quantitative description, and the ORR could reach up to 100%. For relapsed/refractory patients, the pooled ORR was 72% (95% CI: 64-80%, I = 54.89%, = 0.00), with a pooled CR and PR of 43% (95% CI: 33-54%, I = 65.40%, = 0.00) and 23% (95% CI: 13-35%, I = 78.05%, = 0.00), respectively. Most adverse events were hematology-related and generally manageable.
CONCLUSION
BTKis showed acceptable efficacy and safety in treating patients with CNSL. However, large and well-designed trials are still required to confirm BTKis as a treatment for CNSL.
PubMed: 38473226
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050860 -
International Archives of Allergy and... 2024A growing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors in treating non-radiographic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
A growing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors in treating non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of nr-axSpA.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant RCTs using specific keywords up to June 2023. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40). Secondary outcomes included ASAS20, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50% (BASDAI50), ASAS partial remission, and ASAS5/6.
RESULTS
A total of eight RCTs involving 1,376 patients were included. Patients receiving anti-TNF therapy exhibited a higher rate of ASAS40 (pooled RR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.63-3.42; p < 0.001). In addition, the TNF-α inhibitor group showed higher BASDAI50 rates (pooled RR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.48-2.89), ASAS20 rates (pooled RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31-1.67), ASAS partial remission rates (pooled RR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.58-3.43), and ASAS5/6 rates (RR = 3.46; 95% CI: 2.05-5.83) than the placebo group.
CONCLUSION
The TNF-α inhibitors were effective in treating nr-axSpA.
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Treatment Outcome; Spondylarthritis; Antirheumatic Agents; Spondylitis, Ankylosing
PubMed: 38432201
DOI: 10.1159/000536601 -
The Australasian Journal of Dermatology Mar 2024Recent literature highlights the potential of biologics in the management of inherited disorders of keratinisation. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of...
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Recent literature highlights the potential of biologics in the management of inherited disorders of keratinisation. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of existing literature on treatment outcomes of inherited keratinisation disorders treated with biologics.
METHODS
Eligible records were retrieved through searches of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Databases were searched from inception to July 2023 for eligible records. A snowballing method was employed to search the references of the retrieved records for the identification of potentially relevant articles.
RESULTS
One hundred and four eligible studies consisting of a total of 166 patients with an inherited disorder of keratinisation were included. Patients had a median age of 19 years (range: 0.5 to 70 years). The most common disorders were Netherton syndrome (n = 63; 38%), autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses (n = 27; 16%), CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruptions (n = 17; 10%) and familial pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) (n = 15; 9%).Of the 207 times biologics were employed, the three most frequently employed biologics were secukinumab (n = 47; 23%), dupilumab (n = 44; 21%) and ustekinumab (n = 37; 18%). Complete remission was observed in 10 (5%) instances, partial remission in 129 (62%), no or limited response to biologic therapy in 68 (32%) cases, and results are still pending in one case. A total of 33 adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Whilst biologics may be considered in cases of inherited keratinisation disorders recalcitrant to standard therapy, definitive conclusions are prohibited by the low-level of evidence and substantial heterogeneity in methodology across the included studies. Establishment of consensus definitions, and randomised clinical trials may help ascertain the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in this context and establish the best agent and dosing protocol for each disorder.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Biological Products; Ustekinumab; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris; Guanylate Cyclase; Membrane Proteins; CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins
PubMed: 38126177
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.14197 -
Renal Failure 2023This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents, specifically Voclosporin, when used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents, specifically Voclosporin, when used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).
METHODS
A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted on randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of immunosuppressant-induced therapy for LN. The random effects model was used in the analysis. I was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the model. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed to assess and compare the relative effectiveness and safety of various treatment protocols.
RESULTS
The study included a total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2444 patients with LN. The analysis results indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of partial remission (PR) between the drugs. However, when considering complete remission (CR), the combination of Voclosporin with MMF showed the highest remission rate, followed by Tacrolimus (TAC). Unfortunately, Voclosporin in combination with MMF had the highest risk of infection and serious infection, indicating a lower safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS
Voclosporin in combination with MMF demonstrated the highest efficacy as an induction therapy for LN. However, it should be noted that the risk of infection and serious infection was found to be high with this regimen. On the other hand, TAC not only showed efficacy but also had a lower risk of infection and serious infection, making it a favorable option in terms of safety. This study did' not include results on other adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Lupus Nephritis; Cyclophosphamide; Induction Chemotherapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Immunosuppressive Agents; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Remission Induction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38087473
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2290365 -
Archives of Women's Mental Health Apr 2024Pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period are considered at high risk for women who have already received a previous psychiatric diagnosis and might represent a... (Review)
Review
Pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period are considered at high risk for women who have already received a previous psychiatric diagnosis and might represent a stressful event favoring the onset of new psychiatric disorders. The electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is effective for the treatment of severe, treatment-resistant mental disorders, and it could represent a therapeutic choice for psychiatric conditions during pregnancy. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the safety of ECT during pregnancy and to update the state of the art of its use. An extensive literature search on PubMed, APA PsycInfo, and Scopus databases for relevant articles published from inception to September 2023 has been performed. A final number of 45 articles (34 case reports and 11 case series, for a total of 130 pregnant women) were included in the present review. The limited evidence confirmed that ECT is effective in determining a partial remission of symptoms in women suffering from severe mental disorders, especially in the presence of suicidal ideation or psychosis, during all pregnancy epochs. However, ECT is not free from side effects, although the majority of possible complications were of low- or moderate-grade and not life-threatening for the women. Exposure to pharmacological treatment before or during the ECT or to the anesthetic during ECT might have contributed to the onset of these complications. ECT techniques evolved over years, increasing the degree of its safety, and according to our review it appears to be relatively safe and effective during pregnancy in the majority of cases.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Psychotic Disorders; Pregnancy Complications; Postpartum Period; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37957411
DOI: 10.1007/s00737-023-01394-1 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) May 2024To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F and IL-17A, with those of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F and IL-17A, with those of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) and AS.
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials until January 2023 for inclusion in Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs), including three b/tsDMARDs exposure networks: predominantly-naïve, naïve, and experienced. Outcomes were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20, ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission (PR) response rates at 12-16 weeks. A safety NMA investigated discontinuations due to any reason and serious adverse events at 12-16 weeks.
RESULTS
The NMA included 36 trials. The predominantly-naïve network provided the most comprehensive results. In the predominantly-naïve nr-axSpA analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS20 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg [with loading dose (LD)/without LD], and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. In the predominantly-naïve AS analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS40 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (without LD), significantly higher ASAS-PR response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (with LD) and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. Bimekizumab demonstrated similar safety to that of other b/tsDMARDs.
CONCLUSION
Across ASAS outcomes, bimekizumab was comparable with most b/tsDMARDs, including ixekizumab, TNF inhibitors and upadacitinib, and achieved higher response rates vs secukinumab for some ASAS outcomes in predominantly b/tsDMARD-naïve nr-axSpA and AS patients at 12-16 weeks. In a pooled axSpA network, bimekizumab demonstrated comparable safety vs other b/tsDMARDs.
Topics: Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Network Meta-Analysis; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Treatment Outcome; Axial Spondyloarthritis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Interleukin-17
PubMed: 37947318
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead598 -
BMJ Mental Health Nov 2023Partial remission of major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and distressing clinical state related to chronicity, morbidity and relapse. Although one-third of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
QUESTION
Partial remission of major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating and distressing clinical state related to chronicity, morbidity and relapse. Although one-third of patients remit partially, evidence for treatment efficacy is unclear. We provide an overview of treatment options and their efficacy.
STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS
Embase, PsycINFO, Medline and SCOPUS were systematically searched through February 2023. Included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining any treatment in patients with partially remitted MDD aged 13-65 years, reporting data on severity, remission or relapse.
FINDINGS
Seven RCTs examining psychotherapy including 1024 patients were eligible. There were not enough RCTs to examine effects of pharmacotherapy. Psychotherapy was associated with lower depressive symptom severity at post-treatment (Hedges' g=0.50; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.76), but not at follow-up up to 1 year (Hedges' g=0.36; 95% CI -0.30 to 1.02) or longer (Hedges' g=0.02; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.12). Psychotherapy was associated with superior remission rates at post-treatment (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.71 to 3.87) and follow-up 6 months or longer (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.53), although not with improved relapse rates at post-treatment (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.01 to 4.83) or follow-up 6 months or longer (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.03). Overall methodological quality was poor.
CONCLUSIONS
Psychotherapy targeting partial remission may be effective in lowering depressive symptom severity and patients may potentially achieve full remission twice as likely. Yet, long-term and prophylactic effects are lacking. Given the risk of chronicity, more high-quality RCTs are needed.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020188451.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Psychotherapy; Treatment Outcome; Recurrence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37914347
DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300827