-
Annals of General Psychiatry Sep 2022Among forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the association between symptomatology and violence is still not entirely clear in literature, especially... (Review)
Review
Among forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the association between symptomatology and violence is still not entirely clear in literature, especially because symptoms shift both during the acute phase of the illness and after. The aims were to investigate the level of symptomatology in forensic patients and to evaluate if there are differences in the level of symptoms between forensic and non-forensic patients. According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest, using the following key words: "forensic" AND "Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale" OR "PANSS". A total of 27 studies were included in the systematic review, while only 23 studies in the meta-analysis. The overall sample included a total of 1702 participants, most commonly male and inpatients in forensic settings. We found that studies with an entirely male sample had significantly lower Positive PANSS ratings than studies with mixed samples. Although both forensic and non-forensic patients were affected by mild psychopathological symptoms, forensic patients presented higher ratings in all four PANSS scales. This meta-analysis shows that forensic patients reported a mild level of symptomatology, as assessed with the PANSS, and therefore might be considered as patients in partial remission. Among patients with schizophrenia, the association between symptoms and violence is very complex: many factors might be considered as key mediators and thus should be taken into account to explain this association. Further studies are needed.Trial registration all materials and data can be found on the OSF framework: https://osf.io/5ceja (date of registration: 8 September 2021).
PubMed: 36088451
DOI: 10.1186/s12991-022-00413-2 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Nov 2022Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an anti-inflammatory drug with an unclear role in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). This systematic review... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an anti-inflammatory drug with an unclear role in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). This systematic review evaluates the evidence for IVIg in the care of patients with LN.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic search was done in the PubMed, EMBASE, BVS and OVID databases - All EBM Reviews following the PRISMA methodology (registration in PROSPERO CRD42021236662). The variables were extracted: indications for use, dosage, partial or complete response, adverse reactions, initiation of renal replacement therapy, reduction of proteinuria, and mortality. The quality assessment was done with the "The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools for use in Systematic Reviews Checklist". In addition, synthesis reports were prepared through the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis - SWiM guide.
RESULTS
A total of 2328 articles were obtained (28 were considered for inclusion). When the studies were evaluated, IVIg therapy was found to be between 60% to 70% effective (except for patients with class V LN) with overall responses (complete + partial) even for patients who are refractory to first line treatment. Normalization (<0.5 g) of nephrotic proteinuria occurred in 24% of cases with infrequent adverse events and a mortality plus dialysis composite of 11.5% and 24.1% (most representative study).
CONCLUSION
In patients with LN refractory to conventional treatment or co-infection situations, the reported data seem to demonstrate effectiveness of IVIg therapy. There are few adverse reactions and caution is exercised when using it on patients with class V NL. However, given the lack of controlled studies with long-term follow-up, these data should be interpreted cautiously thus encouraging the development of high-quality RCTs.
Topics: Humans; Lupus Nephritis; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Proteinuria; Remission Induction; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 36028194
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103182 -
Journal of Inflammation Research 2022To strengthen the understanding of rheumatic diseases (RDs) as the most common underlying conditions associated with acquired hemophilia (AH), a potentially fatal...
To strengthen the understanding of rheumatic diseases (RDs) as the most common underlying conditions associated with acquired hemophilia (AH), a potentially fatal bleeding condition due to the development of autoantibodies or inhibitors to coagulation factor VIII, and rarely to factor IX, here we presented two cases of RDs associated AH to elucidate the disease progression, treatment, and prognosis. The presented 2 cases showed good responses to glucocorticoid (GC) and immunosuppressive agents. And then, a case-based systematic review was conducted to better understand the clinically practiced diagnosis and treatment of RDs associated AH. A total of 14 articles were included in the final literature review. All the identified 14 patients with underlying RDs and AH presented with bleeding symptoms, increased APTT, decreased FVIII activity, and positive FVIII inhibitors. Twelve of the 14 patients (85.7%) started an eradication of autoantibodies treatment with GC and immunosuppressive agents. Among which six patients achieved partial or complete remission, and four patients (28.6%) switched to Rituximab and responded well. Nine of the 14 patients received hemostasis therapy, including recombinant human FVIIa (rFVIIa). Two patients (14.3%) died due to mass bleeding and key organ failure. AH should be highly suspected in patients with RDs presenting spontaneous mucocutaneous or internal bleeding and an isolated prolonged APTT. Given the high morbidity of AH, it is important to facilitate efficient and proper management.
PubMed: 35945991
DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S369288 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Oct 2022Achievement of remission is a desirable outcome and the identification of predictors of remission may aid in the clinical management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Achievement of remission is a desirable outcome and the identification of predictors of remission may aid in the clinical management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Our aim was to summarise predictors of remission in people with axSpA.
METHODS
In this systematic literature review (SLR), we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from their inception to May 20, 2022, and 2020-2021 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) meeting abstracts. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in which prognostic factors associated with remission were investigated by multivariable analysis.
RESULTS
The SLR comprised 21 articles from 4592 citations. Three studies investigated "sustained remission" (≥3 consecutive visits), while the other assessed "point remission" (at single points in time, varying from 12 weeks to 8 years). The most used remission criteria were Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (14 studies) and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society partial remission criteria (11 studies). Younger age, HLA-B27 positivity, male gender, lower baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), lower baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), lower baseline ASDAS-C-reactive protein, treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), were the most consistent predictors of remission. Additionally, shorter disease duration, lower Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies and TNFi naivety were predictors of remission in two studies. Other factors were found to be predictors of remission in one study only.
CONCLUSIONS
Predictors of remission in axSpA were identified. However, many of these predictors were only identified in 1-2 studies. Considering the differences in study design, further well-designed prognostic studies are needed to confirm and allow generalisation of these predictors to the general axSpA population.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Axial Spondyloarthritis; Humans; Male; Severity of Illness Index; Spondylarthritis; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 35944350
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152078 -
Leukemia Research Oct 2022Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk molecular subtype with a gene expression profile similar to Philadelphia-positive ALL, but... (Review)
Review
Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk molecular subtype with a gene expression profile similar to Philadelphia-positive ALL, but not harboring the BCR-ABL1 gene fusion. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of target therapy with the Janus kinase inhibitor, ruxolitinib, in patients with Ph-like ALL and molecular signature of JAK-STAT signaling pathway. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify reports concerning administration of ruxolitinib in Ph-like ALL patients. Additionally, Polish Pediatric ALL registries were searched for patients with Ph-like ALL treated with ruxolitinib. Extracted information included epidemiological background, somatic aberrations, treatment response, and patient outcome. After PubMed database search, twelve patients were identified, and one was identified in the Polish Pediatric ALL registry. In nine patients gene fusions affecting JAK2 (n = 7) and EPOR (n = 2) were detected. Surface overexpression of CRLF2 and IKZF1 deletions were observed in two and three patients, respectively. Induction failure occurred in all the patients. Therapy with ruxolitinib led to complete (n = 7) and partial (n = 2) remission, in three individuals no information was found. Based on the limited number of studies describing the efficacy of ruxolitinib as an additional compound administrated with standard ALL therapy, we conclude that this approach can be considered in patients with aberrations activating JAK-STAT pathway.
Topics: Child; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Nitriles; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; STAT Transcription Factors; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 35939887
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106925 -
Medicine Jul 2022This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on epithelioid trophoblastic tumors (ETTs), the rarest type of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on epithelioid trophoblastic tumors (ETTs), the rarest type of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
METHODS
A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed, using ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The only filter used was the English language. Eligibility/inclusion criteria: retrospective observational studies (case reports, case series) including full case description of epithelioid trophoblastic tumor lesions.
RESULTS
Seventy studies were assessed for synthesis, including 147 cases. 66.7% of patients with ETT presented with irregular vaginal bleeding. Pretreatment β-hCG levels ranged up to 1000 mIU/mL in 58.5% patients. Of most patients, 42.2% had stage I disease, 10.9% stage II, 25.2% stage III, and 21.8% of patients had stage IV. The most common sites of metastatic disease were the lungs, followed by the liver and brain. After treatment, complete remission was achieved in 75.5% of patients, partial remission in 10.2% of patients, and 14.3% of patients died. On univariate and multivariate analyses, stage IV disease was an independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS
Hysterectomy and metastatic lesion resection are essential for controlling ETT. Investigational studies on molecules like EGFR, VEGF, PD-1, CD105, and LPCAT1 are potential therapeutic targets for metastatic ETT.
Topics: Female; Gestational Trophoblastic Disease; Humans; Hysterectomy; Pregnancy; Trophoblastic Neoplasms; Uterine Neoplasms
PubMed: 35905248
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029934 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease of the skin. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause serious...
BACKGROUND
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease of the skin. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause serious adverse events. Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab should be explored as alternative treatment options to improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab treatment outcomes in bullous pemphigoid.
METHODS
A PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library search were conducted on March 10, 2022. A total of 75 studies were included using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
Use of rituximab (n=122), omalizumab (n=53) and dupilumab (n=36) were reported in 211 patients with BP. Rituximab led to complete remission in 70.5% (n=86/122) and partial remission in 23.8% (n=29/122) of patients within 5.7 months, with a recurrence rate of 20.5% (n=25/122). 9.0% (n=11/122) of patients died and infection (6.6%, n=8/122) was the most common adverse event. Omalizumab led to complete remission in 67.9% (n=36/53) and partial remission in 20.8% (n=11/53) of patients within 6.6 months, with a recurrence rate of 5.7% (n=3/53). 1.9% (n=1/53) of patients died and thrombocytopenia (1.9%, n=1/53) was observed as the most common adverse event. Dupilumab led to complete remission in 66.7% (n=24/36) and partial remission in 19.4% (n=7/36) of patients within 4.5 months of treatment without any reported adverse events, with a recurrence rate of 5.6% (n=2/36).
CONCLUSIONS
Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab have similar clinical benefits for BP patients. However, rituximab resulted in higher recurrence rates, adverse events, and mortality rates.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022316454.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Humans; Omalizumab; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35769474
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.928621 -
Annals of Hematology Aug 2022Nelarabine is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients who relapse following at least two different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Nelarabine is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients who relapse following at least two different chemotherapy regimens. Previous studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of nelarabine with chemotherapy in the treatment of R/R T-ALL. However, the results are inconsistent. This review aimed to summarize findings on efficacy and safety data in R/R T-ALL patients administered with the drug nelarabine. The present review conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), WHO Clinical Trial Registry, Clinical Trials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 15 January 2022. Thirteen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria with a total of 2508 patients. The efficacy of nelarabine was studied in terms of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR). Included studies reported overall random-effects pooled prevalence of CR and PR were 37.2 (95% CI: 22.8, 51.5) and 10.2 (95% CI: 4.9, 15.5), respectively. Most common adverse events associated with nelarabine were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, infections, and reversible peripheral neuropathy. Nelarabine is being used as salvage therapy as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the findings of this meta-analysis indicate that it is an effective and safe treatment to be used in addition to the first-line treatment for R/R T-ALL.
Topics: Arabinonucleosides; Humans; Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Salvage Therapy; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 35727338
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04880-1 -
Translational Cancer Research Apr 2022Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a common method for the clinical treatment of malignant lymphomas that recur after conventional...
Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of malignant lymphoma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a common method for the clinical treatment of malignant lymphomas that recur after conventional chemotherapy. It has been reported that its efficacy is better than conventional chemotherapy, but the efficacy of its first-line treatment is controversial, and the existing clinical randomized controlled trials have not yet reached a unified conclusion. This work intended to use meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of AHSCT in the treatment of malignant lymphoma after high-dose chemotherapy, and draw reliable conclusions to provide reference and basis for clinical application.
METHODS
The inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated based on the PICOIS principle. Relevant articles were retrieved from Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Elton B. Stephens. Company (EBSCO), Ovid Technologies (OVID), China Biomedical Database, and Wanfang. The search period was limited the study published between January 1, 1980 and November 2021. The search terms included malignant lymphoma, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AHSCT, high-dose chemotherapy, etc. The study subjects were diagnosed as malignant lymphoma patients. The experimental group was defined as AHSCT after high-dose chemotherapy, and the control group was defined as conventional chemotherapy (the chemotherapy regimen was not limited). The outcome indicators were overall survival (OS), complete remission rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)], and event-free survival (EFS). RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 6 pieces of literature were included, with 264 cases in the experimental group and 389 cases in the control group. There was no risk of bias in the included literature. The intervention method in the control group was conventional chemotherapy (chemotherapy regimen was not limited). The differences in the rates of overall survival and progression-free survival between the groups were compared, and it was found that the overall survival between groups was [odds ratio (OR) =2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.78-4.66; Z=4.31; P<0.0001] and progression-free survival rate was (OR =2.70; 95% CI: 1.86-3.92, Z=5.21; P<0.00001).
DISCUSSION
AHSCT treatment can significantly prolong the overall survival and progression-free survival rates of patients with malignant lymphoma after chemotherapy.
PubMed: 35571654
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-595 -
Cureus Apr 2022A compelling intervention to maintain healthy gut microbiota in graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is fecal microbial transplantation (FMT). To examine its role in GVHD,... (Review)
Review
A compelling intervention to maintain healthy gut microbiota in graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is fecal microbial transplantation (FMT). To examine its role in GVHD, we conducted a systemic literature search using multiple electronic databases. Upon pooling of data, 79 patients from six studies and five case reports were included. Complete remission (CR) occurred in 55.9% of patients, and partial remission (PR) occurred in 26.5% of patients (82.4% overall response rate). A limited number of patients had treatment-related mortality (TRM), while few showed mild gastrointestinal (GI)-related and non-GI adverse effects. None of the studies directly examined the role of FMT in the prevention of GVHD. In conclusion, FMT seems to be a safe and effective strategy for the management of GVHD based on the current evidence. Due to the small number of patients evaluated and the absence of randomized data, one cannot portray FMT as a standard of care yet; however, the low toxicity along with the clinical improvement justifies this modality to be tested in a randomized fashion.
PubMed: 35530905
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23873