-
Journal of Pregnancy 2019Maternity support garments (MSGs) are widely available and commonly recommended and used for alleviation of lower back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during...
Maternity support garments (MSGs) are widely available and commonly recommended and used for alleviation of lower back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy; however, most studies available use the garments as a conjunct intervention with other therapies, with scarce research demonstrating the effects of the garments as a sole intervention. This study aims to review the available literature on the effects of using MSGs as sole intervention for comfort improvement of women during pregnancy, as well as to discuss the attributes of the garments which may influence their performance. A systematic review was undertaken, which adheres to PRISMA guideline for systematic reviews. Multiple databases, such as ScienceDirect, CINAHL, EBSCO, Elsevier, SCOPUS, Wiley Online Library, ProQuest, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were electronically searched. Six studies met the inclusion criteria and covered three trial studies, two pilot studies and one observational study. Three outcome measurements were identified from the included studies: alleviation of pain, improvement of balance, and improvement of functionality and mobility. The study concluded that wearing MSGs during pregnancy could have beneficial effects in women such as LBP and PGP alleviation, improvement of functionality and mobility, and reduction of risk of fall during pregnancy; however, the mechanisms of the garments' actions as well as the duration of the garments' effectiveness are not elucidated through the studies. This study contributes to the understanding of the effects and effectiveness of the use of MSGs as a sole intervention for improvement of comfort during pregnancy as well as information about the different types of garments commercially available and the attributes that may influence the garment performance.
Topics: Clothing; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Pelvic Pain; Posture; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 31467715
DOI: 10.1155/2019/2163790 -
EFORT Open Reviews Jul 2019Tumour endoprostheses have facilitated limb-salvage procedures in primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and are increasingly being used in symptomatic metastases of the... (Review)
Review
Tumour endoprostheses have facilitated limb-salvage procedures in primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and are increasingly being used in symptomatic metastases of the long bones.The objective of the present review was to analyse articles published over the last three years on tumour endoprostheses and to summarize current knowledge on this topic. The NCBI PubMed webpage was used to identify original articles published between January 2015 and April 2018 in journals with an impact factor in the top 25.9% of the respective category (orthopaedics, multidisciplinary sciences).The following search-terms were used: tumour endoprosthesis, advances tumour endoprosthesis, tumour megaprosthesis, prosthetic reconstruction AND tumour. We identified 347 original articles, of which 53 complied with the abovementioned criteria.Articles were categorized into (1) tumour endoprostheses in the shoulder girdle, (2) tumour endoprostheses in the proximal femur, (3) tumour endoprostheses of the knee region, (4) tumour endoprostheses in the pelvis, (5) (expandable) prostheses in children and (6) long-term results of tumour endoprostheses.The topics of interest covered by the selected studies largely matched with the main research questions stated at a consensus meeting, with survival outcome of orthopaedic implants being the most commonly raised research question.As many studies reported on the risk of deep infections, research in the future should also focus on potential preventive methods in endoprosthetic tumour reconstruction. Cite this article: 2019;4:445-459. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081.
PubMed: 31423328
DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081 -
International Journal of Environmental... Jul 2019Conservative interventions for addressing prenatal and postnatal ailments have been described in the research literature. Research results indicated that maternity...
Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) for Managing Pain, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life during Prenatal and Postnatal Care: A Systematic Review.
Conservative interventions for addressing prenatal and postnatal ailments have been described in the research literature. Research results indicated that maternity support belts assist with reducing pain and other symptoms in these phases; however, compliance in wearing maternity support belts is poor. To combat poor compliance, commercial manufacturers designed dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses (DEFO)/compression garments that target prenatal and postnatal ailments. This systematic review aimed to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize key findings on the effectiveness, the feasibility, and the acceptability of using DEFO to manage ailments during pre-natal and postnatal phases of care. Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies, resulting in 17 studies that met the eligibility criteria. There were variations in DEFO descriptors, including hosiery, support belts, abdominal binders and more, making it difficult to compare findings from the research articles regarding value of DEFO during prenatal and/or postnatal phases. A meta-synthesis of empirical research findings suggests wearing DEFOs during pregnancy has a significant desirable effect for managing pain and improving functional capacity. Further research is required to investigate the use of DEFOs for managing pain in the postnatal period and improving quality life during prenatal and postnatal care.
Topics: Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Orthotic Devices; Pain Management; Postnatal Care; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Quality of Life
PubMed: 31284612
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16132408 -
Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.) Apr 2019The sacrotuberous ligament (STL) has been linked to conditions such as pelvic girdle pain and pudendal nerve entrapment, yet its contribution to pelvic stability is...
The sacrotuberous ligament (STL) has been linked to conditions such as pelvic girdle pain and pudendal nerve entrapment, yet its contribution to pelvic stability is debated. The purpose of this review was to explore the current understanding of the STL and highlight any gaps in knowledge regarding its anatomy and function. A systematic search of the literature was conducted, focussing on the morphology and attachments of the STL, the relationship of the STL with surrounding structures, and its neurovascular supply and function. A total of 67 papers and four textbooks were obtained. The attachment sites of the STL are largely consistent; however, the extent of its connections with the long head of biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, piriformis, the posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia, and sacrospinous ligament are unclear. Morphometric parameters, such as mean STL length (6.4-9.4 cm), depth (0.3-0.4 cm), and width (1.8-3.5 cm, at its mid-point) are variable within and between studies, and little is known about potential side-, age-, or sex-related differences. The STL is pierced in several sites by the inferior and superior gluteal arteries, but information on its innervation pattern is sparse. Functionally, the STL may limit sacral nutation but it appears to have a limited contribution to pelvic stability. Some morphological aspects of the STL warrant further investigation, particularly its connections with surrounding structures, innervation pattern and function. Knowledge of the detailed anatomy and function of this ligament is important to better understanding its role in clinical conditions. Clin. Anat. 32:396-407, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Buttocks; Female; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Male; Pelvis; Sacroiliac Joint
PubMed: 30592090
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23328 -
British Journal of Sports Medicine Jan 2019The purpose of this review was to investigate the relationship between prenatal exercise, and low back (LBP), pelvic girdle (PGP) and lumbopelvic (LBPP) pain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this review was to investigate the relationship between prenatal exercise, and low back (LBP), pelvic girdle (PGP) and lumbopelvic (LBPP) pain.
DESIGN
Systematic review with random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
DATA SOURCES
Online databases were searched up to 6 January 2017.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies of all designs were eligible (except case studies and reviews) if they were published in English, Spanish or French, and contained information on the population (pregnant women without contraindication to exercise), intervention (subjective or objective measures of frequency, intensity, duration, volume or type of exercise, alone ["exercise-only"] or in combination with other intervention components [eg, dietary; "exercise + co-intervention"]), comparator (no exercise or different frequency, intensity, duration, volume and type of exercise) and outcome (prevalence and symptom severity of LBP, PGP and LBPP).
RESULTS
The analyses included data from 32 studies (n=52 297 pregnant women). 'Very low' to 'moderate' quality evidence from 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed prenatal exercise did not reduce the odds of suffering from LBP, PGP and LBPP either in pregnancy or the postpartum period. However, 'very low' to 'moderate' quality evidence from 15 RCTs identified lower pain severity during pregnancy and the early postpartum period in women who exercised during pregnancy (standardised mean difference -1.03, 95% CI -1.58, -0.48) compared with those who did not exercise. These findings were supported by 'very low' quality evidence from other study designs.
CONCLUSION
Compared with not exercising, prenatal exercise decreased the severity of LBP, PGP or LBPP during and following pregnancy but did not decrease the odds of any of these conditions at any time point.
Topics: Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 30337344
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099400 -
Midwifery Nov 2018Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP) is a very common complaint. Although many women recover after a birth, about a third continue to have symptoms three months...
BACKGROUND
Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP) is a very common complaint. Although many women recover after a birth, about a third continue to have symptoms three months postpartum and 8.5% of women still have persistent symptoms two years afterwards. Knowledge of prognostic factors may help understand the course of PPGP and inform management.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prognostic factors for PPGP by systematically reviewing the literature.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, and ClinicalTrial.gov (15 April 2017) with no filters. Only studies reported in English were included. Two review authors independently selected studies. Any factors that might affect the course of PPGP up to one year postpartum were of interest. We excluded interventions and diagnostic studies. We conducted double independent data extraction, risk of bias and quality of evidence (GRADE) assessment.
FINDINGS
We identified 4374 citations of which three studies were included in our analysis. Previous low back pain, pain in three to four pelvic locations, and being overweight/obese made recovery 12 weeks postpartum less likely. Six months postpartum, Pelvic Girdle Syndrome (PGS) was more likely to persist in women who used crutches or had severe pain in three pelvic locations during pregnancy, had other pain conditions, a younger age of menarche, previous low back pain or a high co-morbidity index, were obese, or experienced emotional distress during pregnancy. For women who used crutches during pregnancy, an instrumental birth or caesarean section was associated with persistent PGS. However, the quality of evidence (GRADE) was low to very low for all factors, hence, findings are uncertain.
KEY CONCLUSIONS
The limited number of studies and lack of replication prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Potentially modifiable factors during pregnancy seem to impact the prognosis of PPGP postpartum.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Prognosis
PubMed: 30142609
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.012 -
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal... 2018Gait is affected in women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), a musculoskeletal condition affecting 20% of pregnant women. Whilst there is evidence of spatiotemporal changes...
INTRODUCTION
Gait is affected in women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), a musculoskeletal condition affecting 20% of pregnant women. Whilst there is evidence of spatiotemporal changes in gait during healthy pregnancy, less is known in relation to women with PGP. Appreciating gait characteristics during healthy pregnancy could inform our understanding of the role of gait in PGP.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this review was to systematically analyse differences in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait in healthy pregnant women and those with PGP, and to make recommendations to improve research methods in investigating gait in PGP women.
METHODS
The review was undertaken following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases and pre-existing literature were electronically and manually searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers. Quality assessment was performed using the NHLBI tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies.
RESULTS
The search returned 2925 results. Fourteen studies were selected for data extraction. Twelve studies investigated gait in healthy pregnant women and two in PGP women. Studies employed either a cohort or cross-sectional design and used various methods to assess gait. Three, nine and two studies were high, medium and low in quality, respectively. Direct comparisons between studies were impeded due to incomparable gestational time-points investigated, in addition to variations in gait parameters and definitions used.
CONCLUSION
Evidence from studies on healthy pregnant women could inform future research on PGP women, for which current evidence is scarce. We recommend the standardisation of critical factors to allow inter-study comparisons for a meta-analysis.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Gait; Humans; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 29865027
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-170828 -
Physiotherapy Research International :... Jan 2018Pelvic girdle pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder which affects women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In previous years, physiotherapists have focused... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pelvic girdle pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder which affects women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In previous years, physiotherapists have focused on managing pelvic girdle pain through stabilizing exercises.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to systematically review studies investigating the effectiveness of the stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
METHODS
The following electronic databases were utilized to search for eligible studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. The quality assessment was performed by the two reviewers independently using the PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence-based Database).
RESULTS
Six studies were identified as eligible with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies evaluated the pain as an outcome measure. The evidence conflicted between the studies. Two studies showed that stabilizing exercises decrease pain and improve the quality of life for pregnant women when they are carried out on a regular basis. There is some limited evidence that stabilizing exercises decrease pain for postpartum women too.
CONCLUSION
In summary, there is limited evidence for the clinician to conclude on the effectiveness of stabilizing exercises in treating pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and the postpartum periods.
Topics: Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Physical Therapy Modalities; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Quality of Life
PubMed: 29115735
DOI: 10.1002/pri.1699 -
Midwifery Jan 2018to systematically review the available studies which relay the experience of pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain and how this affects women psychologically and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
to systematically review the available studies which relay the experience of pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain and how this affects women psychologically and emotionally.
METHOD
a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the experiences of pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain was conducted for qualitative studies dated between 2005 and 2016. Predefined terms were used to search nine central databases and hand searches of two reference lists of identified studies were carried out.
FINDINGS
614 records were identified, eight studies met the inclusion criteria for review. Pain from pelvic girdle pain impacted on women's daily lives both at home and the workplace. This had a negative emotional and psychological impact on women as it took away their feeling of independence. Women reported feelings of frustration, guilt, irritability and upset at being unable to carry out their normal roles. Pelvic girdle pain also affected the women's sense of identity and ability to care for their children.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Health professionals working with pregnant and postnatal women need to be aware of the anger, frustration and negative emotions resulting from PGP. These women may become socially isolated and there is a risk they could abuse analgesics in attempt to manage the pain especially if they do not have the social support. For women with young children, it is important to be aware of safety issues they face with carrying babies and controlling toddlers. It is therefore important that health professionals recognise PGP as a serious health issue, approach this condition sensitively and refer to appropriate treatment as soon as PGP is suspected.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Female; Humans; Mothers; Parturition; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 29096278
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.011 -
Journal of Bodywork and Movement... Oct 2017Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint during pregnancy. This study examined the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for LBP in pregnant or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint during pregnancy. This study examined the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for LBP in pregnant or postpartum women.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials unrestricted by language were reviewed. Outcomes were pain and functional status. Mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) and overall effect size were calculated.
RESULTS
Of 102 studies, 5 examined OMT for LBP in pregnancy and 3 for postpartum LBP. Moderate-quality evidence suggested OMT had a significant medium-sized effect on decreasing pain (MD, -16.65) and increasing functional status (SMD, -0.50) in pregnant women with LBP. Low-quality evidence suggested OMT had a significant moderate-sized effect on decreasing pain (MD, -38.00) and increasing functional status (SMD, -2.12) in postpartum women with LBP.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests OMT produces clinically relevant benefits for pregnant or postpartum women with LBP. Further research may change estimates of effect, and larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials with robust comparison groups are recommended.
Topics: Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Manipulation, Osteopathic; Pain Measurement; Pelvic Girdle Pain; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29037623
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.014