-
Urologia Internationalis 2020Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option in erectile dysfunction patients, being implant procedures safe with a low risk of infection. However, when...
INTRODUCTION
Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option in erectile dysfunction patients, being implant procedures safe with a low risk of infection. However, when infection occurs, it represents a concrete problem for both surgeon and patient.
METHODS
This is a comprehensive review of all issues relating to prosthesis infection, including causes and risk factors, methods of prevention, and management. We analyzed all preoperative and perioperative factors, which can play a role in infection of the device.
RESULTS
Infection of penile prosthesis implant is hard to manage and correct. While the incidence of infection following first implant is up to 3%, in cases of re-implant surgery, the rate can reach as high as 18%. Many articles were found addressing prevention and treatment of penile prosthesis infection, and many analyzed all relevant pre- and perioperative factors associated with penile prosthesis implant. Although such factors have been well studied, there is no clear consensus worldwide on certain topics.
CONCLUSIONS
Penile prosthesis implant is a safe and effective option. Despite infection is a rare event, surgeons should follow strictly pre-, intra- and postoperative recommendations in order to reduce the risk of device's infection. An appropriate antibiotic therapy should be tailored on patient's characteristics and pathogens isolated.
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Prosthesis; Prosthesis-Related Infections
PubMed: 32541156
DOI: 10.1159/000508472 -
Actas Urologicas Espanolas Jun 2020Reduction in penile size is due to numerous conditions including Peyronie's disease, previous penile surgeries, diabetes, trauma, erectile dysfunction, pelvic surgery,...
INTRODUCTION
Reduction in penile size is due to numerous conditions including Peyronie's disease, previous penile surgeries, diabetes, trauma, erectile dysfunction, pelvic surgery, and aging. Elasticity of the tunica albuginea is adversely affected by any of the above. Fibrosis then triggers progressive erectile dysfunction OBJECTIVES: When a penile prosthesis is indicated, it is important to determine whether the penis has already diminished in size prior to insertion of the implant. Because a prosthesis only provides axial rigidity and is not associated with the enlargement of the penis, reflection of strategies to simultaneously enlarge the size of the penis while implanting a device is recommended.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review of current scientific literature regarding procedures and tactics currently available for penile implants and enlargement was conducted.
RESULTS
The literature demonstrates that the evolution of penile implant surgery, accompanied by consideration of enlargement, has evolved through 5 fundamental techniques: Incision with Grafting; Sliding with Grafting; Modified Sliding without Grafting (MoST); Multiple Slit without Grafting (MUST); and the Egydio Paradigm for Tunica Expansion Procedures (TEP), a further evolution of previous strategies to achieve state of the art penile implantation accompanied by maximum penile enlargement. Evolving technology of tunica expansion procedures has led to diminution of the size of tunica defects and avoidance of grafts to prevent bulging and indentation, while developing solutions to preserve the strength of the tunica albuginea for firm positioning of the cylinders in the interior of the corpora cavernosa.
CONCLUSIONS
The evolution of these techniques is the transformation of larger tunica defects into smaller ones. While grafts are often used to reinforce the penile structure due to large defects, multiple incisions of the tunica albuginea are gaining popularity to promote girth and length enlargement without grafts and without the loss of tunica strength necessary to support the cylinders inside the corpora.
Topics: Humans; Male; Organ Size; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Prosthesis Design; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
PubMed: 32278614
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.10.015 -
International Journal of Impotence... Jan 2021Successful treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with improvements in quality of life; however, treatment utilisation is sub-optimal. The aim of this...
Successful treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with improvements in quality of life; however, treatment utilisation is sub-optimal. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the rates of ED treatment utilisation and the barriers and enablers men experience when using treatment. We searched: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library; AMED; HMIC; HTA; CINAHL; PsychARTICLES; PsychINFO up to August 2018. Data on rates of treatment utilisation and barriers and enablers of utilisation were extracted and summarised. Fifty studies were included. Discontinuation rates ranged from 4.4 to 76% for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, 18.6 to 79.9% for intracavernosal injections, and 32 to 69.2% for urethral suppositories. In relation to those with a penile prosthesis, 30% discontinued having sex due to, e.g. device complications, lack of partner or a loss of sexual interest. Most research included in the current review examined barriers to treatment utilisation and therefore focussed on reasons for discontinuing treatment. However, a small number explored factors that men found helpful with regards to treatment utilisation. The most prevalent barriers to utilisation were treatment ineffectiveness, side effects, the quality of men's intimate relationships and treatment costs. With regards to treatment enablers, the most salient finding was that men who reported side effects to a healthcare professionals (HCPs) were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment. There were limitations in methodology in that the studies did not use validated measures of treatment utilisation or barriers and enablers and no study used psychological theory to inform the examination of factors that influenced treatment utilisation. This review identifies a number of influential factors relating to ED treatment utilisation and highlights the importance of men's beliefs with regards to ED and its treatment. Beliefs are potentially modifiable and therefore the findings of this review highlight important considerations for HCPs with regards to supporting men to make better use of treatment.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Sexual Behavior; Sexual Partners
PubMed: 32231275
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0249-1 -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2020
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Male; Penile Diseases; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32152469
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0250-8 -
Actas Urologicas Espanolas Jun 2020Penile prosthesis surgery is currently the most effective treatment for erectile dysfunction when medical treatment is ineffective or contraindicated. Among the surgical...
CONTEXT
Penile prosthesis surgery is currently the most effective treatment for erectile dysfunction when medical treatment is ineffective or contraindicated. Among the surgical approaches described in the literature, the scrotal, infrapubic and subcoronal are the most common in the daily clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
The main objectives were to describe the infrapubic surgical technique evaluating its indications and complications, as well as comparing its advantages and disadvantages with the penoscrotal approach.
ACQUISITION AND SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE
A literature review from 1983 until current date was carried out in Medline (PubMed and Cochrane Library databases) following PRISMA standards. Sixteen studies were included: 4 prospective, 4 retrospective, one systematic review, one randomized trial, one original article, 5 expert opinion/surgical technique descriptive paper.
DISCUSSION
According to the literature reviewed, although the penoscrotal approach is the most applied, the infrapubic approach showed a shorter operative time and a tendency for an earlier recovery of sexual activity after surgery. Complications are rare, having similar rates to the penoscrotal approach; no cases of glans hypoesthesia have been reported and peri-prosthetic infection rates were less than 3%. Satisfaction rates of infrapubic penile prosthesis were higher than 80%.
CONCLUSIONS
Penile prosthesis implantation requires of a profound knowledge of the different surgical approaches in order to best adapt each technique based on each individualized case. The infrapubic approach, even if it is not the most used, is as feasible and reliable as the penoscrotal approach. The infrapubic approach is effective and safe, with high level of both, patients and partners' satisfaction.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Implantation; Pubic Bone
PubMed: 32115278
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.10.010 -
International Journal of Impotence... Nov 2020The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with infection in patients who undergo penile prosthesis implantation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with infection in patients who undergo penile prosthesis implantation.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis, including clinical trials, quasi-experiments, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and case-control studies. Searching was done in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. Participants were patients who had erectile dysfunction, regardless of the etiology, and underwent penile prosthesis implantation. Two researchers reviewed each reference by title and abstract. The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan® 5.3).
RESULTS
A total of 513 studies were found with the search strategies. After excluding duplicates, 40 studies with a total of 175,592 patients were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. Among patient characteristics, we found that diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression appear to have increase odds of infection. Related to the procedure, infection-retardant-coated penile prosthesis and primary (first) surgery appear to lower odds of infection.
CONCLUSIONS
Diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression were associated with increased infection rates; infection-retardant coating of the prosthesis and primary surgery were associated with reduced infection rates.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32015525
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0232-x -
European Urology Focus Sep 2020The genesis of neurogenic sexual dysfunction (NSD) can be central, peripheral, or both. The correct stratification of the level of sexual dysfunction allows the...
CONTEXT
The genesis of neurogenic sexual dysfunction (NSD) can be central, peripheral, or both. The correct stratification of the level of sexual dysfunction allows the clinician to choose the best type of treatment, in order to reduce sexual complaints.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of our review is to focus on the management of NSD due to central nervous system disorders and peripheral neuropathy.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of the English-language literature was completed until July 2019 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The following terms were included: [(neurogenic sexual dysfunction) OR neurogenic erectile dysfunction)] AND (treatment OR management). An Excel file was created respecting the following criteria: participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design (PICOS).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Overall, from 505 identified records, 52 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 46 original researches were included in quantitative analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil were proved to be effective and safe in first-line therapy of erectile dysfunction caused by neurogenic disorders. In addition, intracavernous injections of prostaglandin E1, papaverine, or phentolamine and vacuum systems have been a mainstay of second-line treatment for NSD, extremely successful in the spinal cord injury population. Surgical therapy via penile prosthesis implantation remains a viable alternative as a third-line approach and may also be utilised to assist men with bladder management, despite higher complication rates of infections. Despite poor evidence, a better understanding of female sexual dysfunction due to neurological complaints is needed, in order to find more efficacious therapies for intercourse and orgasmic phase. Further prospective studies are required to better clarify the more successful treatment in improving sexual function and quality of life of these patients.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Management of neurogenic sexual dysfunction includes phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernous injections/vacuum devices, and penile prosthesis implantation. Female sexual dysfunction due to neurological disease needs to be better investigated.
Topics: Central Nervous System Diseases; Female; Humans; Male; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
PubMed: 31879263
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.12.002 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020With the onset of a metabolic syndrome epidemic and the increasing life expectancy, erectile dysfunction (ED) has become a more common condition. As incidence and...
With the onset of a metabolic syndrome epidemic and the increasing life expectancy, erectile dysfunction (ED) has become a more common condition. As incidence and prevalence increase, the medical field is focused on providing more appropriate therapies. It is common knowledge that ED is a chronic condition that is also associated with a myriad of other disorders. Conditions such as aging, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, prostatic hypertrophy, and prostate cancer, among others, have a direct implication on the onset and progression of ED. Characterization and recognition of risk factors may help clinicians recognize and properly treat patients suffering from ED. One of the most reliable treatments for ED is penile prosthetic surgery. Since the introduction of the penile prosthesis (PP) in the early seventies, this surgical procedure has improved the lives of thousands of men, with reliable and satisfactory results. The aim of this review article is to characterize the epidemiology of men undergoing penile prosthetic surgery, with a discussion about the most common conditions involved in the development of ED, and that ultimately drive patients into electing to undergo PP placement.
Topics: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Hypertension; Impotence, Vasculogenic; Male; Pelvic Bones; Penile Implantation; Penile Induration; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiation Injuries; Radiotherapy; Reoperation; Spinal Cord Injuries; Vascular Diseases; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 31793443
DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_124_19 -
International Journal of Impotence... Jan 2020Penile fracture is a rare condition that describes the rupture of the corpus cavernosum following direct, high-pressure trauma to the erect penis. There is no... (Review)
Review
Penile fracture is a rare condition that describes the rupture of the corpus cavernosum following direct, high-pressure trauma to the erect penis. There is no standardized management algorithm for these patients. We performed a systematic review of the past 10 years regarding management of penile fractures. A complete PRISMA-P 2015 checklist was performed where we reviewed English articles published over the past 10 years to identify 105 articles, where 63 articles were of relevance and subsequently narrowed to a total of 28 articles into the final review for this study. We determined that immediate penile exploration and tunica repair is considered the most common and current management of penile fractures with experts demonstrating that it leads to the fastest in recovery in erectile function and positive cosmetic outcomes. However, we also determined that the specific algorithm can be variable-down to the suture material, use of catheterization, urethroplasty when involved, and length of recovery/follow-up. In the last several decades, men with penile fracture have been treated, in most cases, with immediate surgical intervention. This review highlights the varying practices regarding surgical exploration, injury repair, and postoperative management in men with a penile fracture. Immediate penile exploration and tunica repair have been the mainstay approach of management.
Topics: Catheterization; Humans; Male; Penile Erection; Penile Prosthesis; Penis; Postoperative Care; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Rupture; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 31685943
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0212-1 -
Sexual Medicine Reviews Apr 2020Erectile dysfunction is a common problem that may be definitively treated with the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). The preponderance of available...
INTRODUCTION
Erectile dysfunction is a common problem that may be definitively treated with the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). The preponderance of available data on IPP surgery derives from institutional studies, most notably from academic centers or large single-surgeon series, where the majority of procedures are performed in a hospital setting. Because insurance companies and health systems look to reduce health care costs, IPP surgery in outpatient freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) is becoming more prevalent.
AIM
To review the utility of surgery in an ASC setting and to explore its role in the modern practice of urology, focusing on IPP implantation.
METHODS
A critical review was performed of the literature on ambulatory surgery, with specific focus on IPP surgery, using the PubMed database. Key search terms and phrases included erectile dysfunction, penile prosthesis, ambulatory surgery, ambulatory surgery center, outpatient surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The main outcome measure was the use of IPP implantation in an ASC.
RESULTS
In contemporary surgical practice, the implementation of ambulatory surgery in free-standing centers is increasing. The principal benefits include reducing cost and improving efficiency. Studies on the modern use of IPPs support the prospect of implantation in an ambulatory setting, which can achieve similar outcomes to surgeries classically performed in the inpatient hospital setting. Novel approaches to anesthesia, surgical, and nursing care have revolutionized IPP surgery so that it can now be safely and effectively performed in the ambulatory setting.
CONCLUSION
The role of ambulatory IPP implantation has increased, with the majority of cases being performed outside the hospital. Although there will always be a need for hospital-based surgery, such as significant medical comorbidities, more studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of ambulatory surgery are needed. For those men who would otherwise be candidates for ambulatory surgery but whose insurance mandates hospital-based treatment, such studies proving utility, safety, and reduced cost could inspire policy change and broaden the ambulatory practice of IPP surgery. Segal RL, Siegelbaum MH, Lerner BD, et al. Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Ambulatory Setting: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:338-347.
Topics: Ambulatory Care; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Implantation
PubMed: 31562047
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.07.006