-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduce glycaemia and weight and improve insulin resistance... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduce glycaemia and weight and improve insulin resistance (IR) different mechanisms. We aim to evaluate and compare the ability of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors to ameliorate the IR of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed) were searched from inception until March 2021. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors with control in adult NAFLD patients with or without T2DM. Network meta-analyses were performed using fixed and random effect models, and the mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. The within-study risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane collaborative risk assessment tool RoB.
RESULTS
25 studies with 1595 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Among them, there were 448 patients, in 6 studies, who were not comorbid with T2DM. Following a mean treatment duration of 28.86 weeks, compared with the control group, GLP-1 RAs decreased the HOMA-IR (MD [95%CI]; -1.573[-2.523 to -0.495]), visceral fat (-0.637[-0.992 to -0.284]), weight (-2.394[-4.625 to -0.164]), fasting blood sugar (-0.662[-1.377 to -0.021]) and triglyceride (- 0.610[-1.056 to -0.188]). On the basis of existing studies, SGLT-2 inhibitors showed no statistically significant improvement in the above indicators. Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RAs decreased visceral fat (-0.560[-0.961 to -0.131]) and triglyceride (-0.607[-1.095 to -0.117]) significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
GLP-1 RAs effectively improve IR in NAFLD, whereas SGLT-2 inhibitors show no apparent effect.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42021251704.
Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Network Meta-Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Triglycerides
PubMed: 35909522
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.923606 -
International Immunopharmacology Oct 2022Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) has received remarkable attention due to the beneficial effects observed in diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) has received remarkable attention due to the beneficial effects observed in diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and kidney disease. Several mechanisms have been proposed for these pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory ones. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on inflammatory markers in experimental models.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted to detect studies examining the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on inflammatory markers [interleukin-6 (IL-6), C reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)]. Consequently, a meta-analysis of the included studies was performed, assessing the differences in the levels of the inflammatory markers between the treatment groups as its primary outcome. Moreover, risk of bias, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were evaluated.
RESULTS
The systematic literature review yielded 30 studies whose meta-analysis suggested that treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor resulted in decreases of IL-6 [standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.56, 95% CI -2.06 to -1.05), CRP (SMD: -2.17, 95% CI -2.80 to -1.53), TNF-α (SMD: -1.75, 95% CI -2.14 to -1.37), and MCP-1 (SMD: -2.04, 95% CI -2.91 to -1.17). The effect on CRP and TNF-α was of lesser magnitude in cases of empagliflozin use. Moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity and possible publication bias were noted. The findings remained largely unaffected after the sensitivity analyses, the exclusion of outlying studies, and trim-and-fill analyses.
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2 inhibition results in reduction of inflammatory markers in animal models, further validating the suggested anti-inflammatory mechanism of action.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; Rodentia; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 35908505
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109080 -
Cardiovascular Diabetology Jul 2022Recent studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) can achieve significant improvement in blood pressure in people with diabetes.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) can achieve significant improvement in blood pressure in people with diabetes. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have established that SGLT2i have a cardioprotective effect in adults with heart failure (HF). Therefore, we performed this systematic review an meta-analysis to determine the effect of SGLT2i on blood pressure in patients with HF.
METHODS
We used the Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases to identify RCTs (published through to April 29, 2022) that evaluated the effect of SGLT2i on HF. The primary endpoint was defined as change in blood pressure. Secondary composite outcomes were heart rate, hematocrit, body weight, and glycated hemoglobin. The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were also evaluated.
RESULTS
After a literature search and detailed evaluation, 16 RCTs were included in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed that SGLT2i were associated with a statistically significant reduction in systolic blood pressure of 1.68 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.7, - 0.66; P = 0.001; I = 45%) but not diastolic blood pressure (mean difference [MD] -1.06 mmHg; 95% CI -3.20, 1.08; P = 0.33; I = 43%) in comparison with controls. Furthermore, SGLT2i decreased body weight (MD - 1.36 kg, 95% CI - 1.68, - 1.03; P < 0.001; I = 61%) and the glycated hemoglobin level (MD - 0.16%, 95% CI - 0.28, -0.04, P = 0.007; I = 91%) but increased hematocrit (MD 1.63%, 95% CI 0.63, 2.62, P = 0.001; I = 100%). There was no significant between-group difference in heart rate (MD - 0.35; 95% CI - 2.05, 1.35, P = 0.69; I = 0).
CONCLUSIONS
SGLT2i decreased systolic blood pressure in patients with HF but had no effect on diastolic blood pressure. These inhibitors may have numerous potentially beneficial clinical effects in patients with HF.
Topics: Adult; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35879763
DOI: 10.1186/s12933-022-01574-w -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Dec 2022To clarify the importance of HbA1c reduction and antidiabetic drug use in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
AIM
To clarify the importance of HbA1c reduction and antidiabetic drug use in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted an updated systematic review of contemporary large randomized controlled trials assessing the relative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs with less hypoglycaemia risk in adult T2D patients. Mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to examine the associations of HbA1c reduction with subsequent risk of macrovascular and microvascular events. We evaluated the potential mediating role of HbA1c reduction in the relationship between antidiabetic drugs and MACE.
RESULTS
Eighteen placebo-controlled trials comprising 155 610 participants were included. The effects of treatment differed among antidiabetic drug classes for most adverse outcomes with high heterogeneity (I : 63.7%-95.8%). Mean HbA1c reduction was lowest with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (0.30%), followed by sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (0.46%), and was highest with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (0.58%) and thiazolidinediones (0.60%). Lower relative risks of MACE were significantly associated with larger reductions in achieved HbA1c (β -0.3182; 95% CI: -0.5366 to -0.0998; P = .0043), even after adjusting for drug classes. When considering HbA1c lowering as a mediator to be controlled, beneficial effects owing to specific antidiabetic treatment for MACE were not observed (χ = 1.4494; P = .6940). The proportion mediated by HbA1c reduction was 50.0%-63.5% for these antidiabetic agents.
CONCLUSIONS
The main benefits of antidiabetic agents might result from the reduction in blood sugar levels and are generally independent of drugs used. Risk reduction in MACE was proportional to the magnitude of HbA1c decrease conferred by antidiabetic agents with less hypoglycaemic hazard.
Topics: Humans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35848464
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14819 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Jun 2022To examine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary diseases. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary diseases.
DESIGN
Systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from inception until 31 July 2021.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of adult patients with type 2 diabetes who received dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with placebo or other antidiabetes drugs.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and biliary diseases.
DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies. The quality of the evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework (GRADE) approach. The meta-analysis used pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
A total of 82 randomised controlled trials with 104 833 participants were included in the pairwise meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or non-incretin drugs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were significantly associated with an increased risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases (odds ratio 1.22 (95%confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43); risk difference 11 (2 to 21) more events per 10 000 person years) and cholecystitis (odds ratio 1.43 (1.14 to 1.79); risk difference 15 (5 to 27) more events per 10 000 person years) but not with the risk of cholelithiasis and biliary diseases. The associations tended to be observed in patients with a longer duration of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment. In the network meta-analysis of 184 trials, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases and cholecystitis compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors but not compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
CONCLUSIONS
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of cholecystitis in randomised controlled trials, especially with a longer treatment duration, which requires more attention from physicians in clinical practice.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021271647.
Topics: Adult; Cholecystitis; Cholelithiasis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35764326
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068882 -
Acta Gastro-enterologica Belgica 2022Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the evidence of steatosis in the setting of a metabolic risk condition such as type 2 diabetes mellitus... (Review)
Review
Non-invasive screening, staging and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: what do we know so far ?
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the evidence of steatosis in the setting of a metabolic risk condition such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Indeed, T2DM and liver steatosis share common pathophysiological mechanisms, and one can lead to the other. MAFLD can progress from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis and cirrhosis as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the lack / disparity of guidelines for MAFLD screening, which is asymptomatic in its early stages, it is not rare that diabetic patients are belatedly diagnosed with NASH cirrhosis or HCC. We therefore recommend systematic non-invasive tests (NITs) that calculate an estimate of the risk based on readily available anthropometric and biological parameters. These include the fatty liver index (FLI) for steatosis detection and at least one of the following for fibrosis: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) or Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS). Indeed, NFS and FIB-4 are the best predictors of liver-related events, while FIB-4 and HFS correlate with overall mortality. Systematic literature review found only few retrospective or cross-sectional studies using NITs for systematic steatosis and fibrosis screening in T2DM patients, with a crucial need for prospective studies. This screening strategy will allow targeted patients to be referred for further liver investigation (e.g. ultrasound, elastometry) and care. Current treatment modalities of MAFLD in T2DM patients range from lifestyle and dietary interventions to specific glucose-lowering drugs that recently showed some benefits regarding MAFLD, such as pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Other treatments are currently under investigation.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35709779
DOI: 10.51821/85.2.9775 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022This study aimed to assess the impact of different antidiabetic agents on individuals with diabetes and COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
This study aimed to assess the impact of different antidiabetic agents on individuals with diabetes and COVID-19.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to October 31, 2021 and included seven antidiabetic agents. The data were pooled traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The pairwise meta-analysis included 35 studies. Metformin (odds ratio (OR), 0.74; P=0.001), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) (OR, 0.88; P=0.04), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) (OR, 0.82; P=0.001), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) (OR, 0.91; P=0.02) treatment were associated with lower COVID-19 mortality in individuals with diabetes compared to respective non-users. However, insulin treatment resulted in higher mortality (OR, 1.8; P=0.001). Mortality did not significantly differ in sulfonylurea (OR, 0.97; P=0.56) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) (OR, 1.00; P=0.96) users. Furthermore, due to limited data, we analyzed five antidiabetic agents (metformin, DPP4i, sulfonylurea, insulin, and SGLT2i) and found no association between them and severe disease risk (all P>0.05). The Bayesian network meta-analysis included 18 studies. GLP1RA and SGLT2i had the highest first and second rank probability (67.3% and 62.5%, respectively). Insulin showed the maximum probability of ranking seventh (97.0%). Metformin had the third and fourth highest rank probability of 44.8% and 38.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, DPP4i had the fifth-highest rank probability of 42.4%, followed by sulfonylurea at 45.1%.
CONCLUSION
Metformin, DPP4i, SGLT2i, and GLP1RA treatments were highly possible to reduced COVID-19 mortality risk in individuals with diabetes, while insulin might be related to increased mortality risk. Sulfonylurea and TZDs treatments were not associated with mortality. None of the antidiabetic agents studied were associated with the risk of severe disease. Additionally, GLP1RA probably had the most significant protective effect against death, followed by SGLT2i and metformin.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42021288200).
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Metformin; Network Meta-Analysis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35692410
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.895458 -
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research 2022While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is commonly used to monitor therapy response in type 2 diabetes (T2D), GV is emerging as an essential additional metric for optimizing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is commonly used to monitor therapy response in type 2 diabetes (T2D), GV is emerging as an essential additional metric for optimizing glycemic control. Our goal was to learn more about the impact of hypoglycemic agents on HbA1c levels and GV in patients with T2D. A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials were performed to assess the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, sulfonylurea and thiazolidinediones on Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE) and HbA1c. Searches were performed using PubMed and EMBASE. A random-effect model was used in the NMA, and the surface under the cumulative ranking was used to rank comparisons. All studies were checked for quality according to their design and also for heterogeneity before inclusion in this NMA. The highest reduction in MAGE was achieved by GLP-1 RAs (SUCRA 0.83), followed by DPP-4 inhibitors (SUCRA: 0.72), and thiazolidinediones (SUCRA: 0.69). In terms of HbA1c reduction, GLP-1 RAs were the most effective (SUCRA 0.81), followed by DPP-4 inhibitors (SUCRA 0.72) and sulfonylurea (SUCRA 0.65). Our findings indicated that GLP-1 RAs have relatively high efficacy in terms of HbA1c and MAGE reduction when compared with other hypoglycemic agents and can thus have clinical application. Future studies with a larger sample size and appropriate subgroup analyses are warranted to completely understand the glycemic effects of these agents in various patients with T2D. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021256363).
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Network Meta-Analysis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones
PubMed: 35686694
DOI: 10.1177/14791641221106866 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Aug 2022To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy of novel antidiabetic drugs on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
AIMS
To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD).
METHODS
Phase III or IV randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1RAs or DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with DKD were identified from the MEDLINE database. The outcomes of interest were a kidney-specific composite outcome, kidney disease progression, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and cardiovascular death. A network meta-analysis was conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Sixteen trials representing a total of 46 292 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the kidney-specific composite outcome by 26% compared to GLP-1RAs (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88) and by 36% compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.79). The risk of MACE was significantly reduced with SGLT2 inhibitors (by 18%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93), and with GLP-1RAs (by 18%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.96), compared to DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of HHF by 28% compared to GLP-1RAs (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92) and by 41% compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71).
CONCLUSIONS
A clear advantage was demonstrated by SGLT2 inhibitors in reducing the risks of CV and renal events in patients with DKD, compared to GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors. We recommend that SGLT2 inhibitors be considered the treatment of choice in patients with DKD.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Kidney; Network Meta-Analysis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35665989
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14702 -
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and... 2022The efficacy of novel glucose-lowering drugs in treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with and without type-2 diabetic patients (T2DM) remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of novel glucose-lowering drugs in treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with and without type-2 diabetic patients (T2DM) remains unclear.
AIM
To conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of 3 novel glucose-lowering drug classes, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors on hepatic parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Bilirubin, and FIB-4 (Fibrosis).
METHODS
MEDLINE was searched from inception through October 2021 for randomized placebo or active glucose-lowering drug-controlled trials. A random-effects model was used to pool the results. A p-value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Results were presented as weighted mean differences (WMD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Our pooled analysis consisted of 40 studies. A significant reduction was seen in AST with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD = -2.31 IU/L, 95%CI: -3.16 to -1.47 IU/L, P < 0.00001) and GLP-1RA (WMD = -3.29 IU/L, 95%CI: -5.98 to -0.61 IU/L, P = 0.02). Similarly, significant reduction was seen in ALT with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD = -5.93 IU/L, 95%CI: -7.70 to -4.16 IU/L, P < 0.00001) and GLP-1RAs (WMD = -9.92 IU/L, 95%CI: -19.89 to 0.05 IU/L, P = 0.05). In contrast, DPP-4 inhibitors showed no significant reduction in AST (WMD = -3.20 IU/L, 95%CI: -11.13 to 4.73 IU/L, P = 0.43) or ALT (WMD = -4.81 IU/L, 95%CI: -15.83 to 6.21 IU/L, P = 0.39). A significant reduction in GGT was seen with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD = -6.49 IU/L, 95%CI: -11.09 to -1.89 IU/L, P = 0.006) and GLP-1RAs (WMD = -12.38 IU/L, 95%CI: -15.69 to -9.07 IU/L, P < 0.00001). However, significant results were not observed with DPP-4 inhibitors (WMD = -0.92 IU/L, 95%CI: -5.80 to 3.96 IU/L, P = 0.71). There was a statistically significant reduction in FIB-4 index with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD = -0.21, 95%CI: -0.40 to -0.03, P = 0.02) and GLP-1 RA (WMD = -0.15, 95%CI: -0.29 to 0.00, P = 0.05). Lastly, SGLT2 inhibitors led to a significant change in bilirubin levels (WMD = 2.03, 95%CI: 0.76 to 3.30, P = 0.002) while the change in bilirubin was not significant with GLP-1 agonists (WMD = -0.21, 95%CI: -1.09 to 0.66, P = 0.63) and DPP-4 inhibitors (WMD = 0.14, 95%CI: -1.55 to 1.83, P = 0.87).
CONCLUSION
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have a beneficial effect on hepatic parameters in patients with NAFLD. However, further research is needed to evaluate the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on hepatic function properly.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 35659603
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101970