-
Farmacia Hospitalaria : Organo Oficial... May 2024To review and analyze the available literature on peripheral administration of noradrenaline (NA) with the aim of providing recommendations to ensure correct use and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To review and analyze the available literature on peripheral administration of noradrenaline (NA) with the aim of providing recommendations to ensure correct use and patient safety.
METHODS
Systematic review on the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Science Direct, using the following search terms: ("Noradrenaline" [Mesh]) AND ("Norepinephrine" [Mesh]) AND ("Vasopressors" [Mesh]) AND ("Peripheral infusions" [Mesh]) OR ("Extravasations" [Mesh]). A total of 1,040 articles were identified. Animal studies and studies written in languages other than English were excluded. Finally, 83 articles were included.
RESULTS
NA can be administered peripherally. The risk of extravasation should be taken into account, with phentolamine being the first pharmacological line of treatment. It has also been related to the appearance of thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, limb ischemia and gangrene, although its incidence seems to be low. The use of peripheral NA in children seems to be carried out without obvious complications. The use of standard concentrations is suggested to reduce the risk of errors. It is recommended to use 0.9% saline as the default diluent for peripheral NA.
CONCLUSIONS
Peripheral infusions of NA could be a safe and beneficial option in early resuscitation provided that a number of guidelines are followed that reduce the likelihood of complications associated with this route.
PubMed: 38724402
DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.003 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Apr 2024The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to determine the clinical outcome differences between patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who underwent... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to determine the clinical outcome differences between patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who underwent direct versus indirect angiosome revascularization using either the surgical or endovascular approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The data sources used for article selection included PubMed, Embase/Medline, Cochrane reviews, and Web of Science (All studies were in English and included up to September 2023). All articles included were comparative in design, including retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled trials that compared the clinical outcomes between direct and indirect angiosome-guided revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. A random-effects model was used to determine the measure of association between direct revascularization and amputation-free survival, wound healing, and overall survival. Publication bias was assessed with both Begg's and Egger's test, and heterogeneity was calculated using an I.
RESULTS
Data from 9 articles were analyzed and reported in this review. Direct revascularization was associated with improved amputation-free survival (odds ratio [OR]=2.632, confidence interval [CI]: 1.625, 4.265), binary wound healing (OR=2.262, CI: 1.518, 3.372), and overall survival (OR=1.757, CI: 1.176, 2.625). Time until wound healed was not associated with either direct or indirect revascularization (Standard Mean Difference [SMD]=-2.15, p=0.11). There was a low risk of bias across all studies according to the RoB 2.0 tool.
CONCLUSION
Direct revascularization is associated with improved amputation-free survival, overall survival, and wound healing in chronic limb-threatening ischemic patients compared to the indirect approach.
CLINICAL IMPACT
Preservation of the lower extremity is critical for preventing mortality and maintaining independence. The benefit of angiosome-guided revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia remains controversial. The authors of this article aim to review the current literature and compare direct and indirect angiosome-guided intervention for preserving the lower extremity. Current findings suggest direct angiosome-guided intervention reduces amputation rates and improves survival; however, many trials neglect to address the multifactorial approach needed in wound care management.
PubMed: 38687701
DOI: 10.1177/15266028241248524 -
Journal of Liver Cancer Apr 2024To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in...
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LI-RADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment.
METHODS
Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 24 eligible studies with 5,163 hepatic observations were included. The pooled κ values were 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.78) for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, 0.52 (0.39-0.65) for peripheral washout, 0.60 (0.50-0.70) for delayed central enhancement, 0.68 (0.57-0.78) for targetoid restriction, 0.74 (0.65-0.83) for targetoid transitional phase/hepatobiliary phase appearance, 0.64 (0.49-0.78) for infiltrative appearance, 0.49 (0.30-0.68) for marked diffusion restriction, and 0.61 (0.48-0.73) for necrosis or severe ischemia. Substantial study heterogeneity was observed for all LR-M features (Cochran's Q test: p < 0.01; I2 ≥ 89.2%). Studies with a mean observation size of <3 cm, those performed using 1.5-T MRI, and those with multiple image readers, were significantly associated with poor agreement of LR-M features.
CONCLUSIONS
The agreement for peripheral washout and marked diffusion restriction was limited. The LI-RADS should focus on improving the agreement of LR-M features.
PubMed: 38616543
DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2024.04.05 -
Catheterization and Cardiovascular... May 2024Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison between the outcomes of transfemoral access and transfemoral access with adjunct upper extremity access in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Catheterization, Peripheral; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; Femoral Artery; Pilot Projects; Punctures; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 38584518
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31048 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Aug 2024Endovascular deep vein arteriaization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Endovascular deep vein arteriaization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This study aims to review contemporary literature on the efficacy, safety, and durability of DVA on patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI).
METHODS
The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using predefined search terms of "percutaneous deep vein arterialization" or "percutaneous deep venous arterialization" in PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and Embase. Only studies with 5 or more patients were included, and studies involving open or hybrid DVA were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success and primary amputation rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound healing, complication, reintervention, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS
Ten studies encompassing a total of 233 patients were included. Patients were primarily those deemed to have NO-CLI. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 1-63 months). The technical success rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2%-97.9%) and the major amputation rate was 21.8% (95% 21.1%-22.4%). The wound healing rate was 69.5% (95% CI 67.9-71.0%), complication rate was 13.8% (95% CI 11.7%-15.9%), reintervention rate was 37.4% (95% CI 34.9%-39.9%), and all-cause mortality rate was 15.7% (95% CI 14.1%-17.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that endovascular DVA is safe for patients with NO-CLI. Nonetheless, studies were small with follow-up period of less than 1 year. There is currently lack of level 1 evidence to recommend routine use in patients with NO-CLI.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Amputation, Surgical; Limb Salvage; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Endovascular Procedures; Aged; Female; Male; Veins; Middle Aged; Wound Healing; Critical Illness; Aged, 80 and over; Ischemia
PubMed: 38579910
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.008 -
PloS One 2024Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Heart rate variability (HRV) represents the modulatory capacity of the autonomous... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Heart rate variability (HRV) represents the modulatory capacity of the autonomous nervous system and influences mortality. By surveying this meta-analysis, we investigated the impact of physical activity on HRV.
METHODS
Databases, online journal libraries and clinical trial registries were searched for publications of randomized controlled and non-randomized controlled trials concerning adults with coronary artery disease (CAD)/ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) joining an intervention group with physical activity or a control group with usual care or no intervention. Extracted time-domain and frequency-domain parameter of HRV were analyzed in a meta-analysis using a random effect model. Subgroup analyses concerning intervention type, study design and type of heart disease and sensitivity analysis were performed.
RESULTS
Significant results were obtained for RR-Interval (p = 0.05) and standard deviation of Normal-to-Normal intervals (SDNN) (p = 0.01) for short-term assessment and for the ratio of low-frequency power (LF) to high-frequency power (HF) (p = 0.05) for 24-hour assessment. Subgroup analyses also resulted significant: root-mean-square difference of successive normal R-R intervals (RMSSD) (p = 0.01), SDNN (p = 0.02) and HF (p < 0.01) concerning CHF.
CONCLUSION
We were able to demonstrate the positive impact of physical activity on HRV, especially in patients with CHF. Cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs need to be individualized to identify the most beneficial method of training for improving the prognosis of patients with CVD.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Heart Rate; Coronary Artery Disease; Myocardial Ischemia; Heart Failure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38578755
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299793 -
Clinical and Applied... 2024Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial diseases, although the optimal duration of this treatment is still debated. Previous meta-analyses reported conflicting results about the effects of long-term and short-term as well as non-DAPT use in various clinical settings. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different durations of DAPT.
METHODS
We reviewed relevant articles and references from database, which were published prior to April 2023. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane Collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. The inclusion criteria involved randomization to long-term versus short-term or no DAPT; the endpoints included at least one of total or cardiovascular (CV) mortalities, IVD recurrence, and bleeding.
RESULTS
A total of 34 randomized studies involving 141 455 patients were finally included. In comparison with no or short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT reduced MI and stroke, but did not reduce the total and CV mortalities. Meanwhile, bleeding events were increased, even though intracranial and fatal bleedings were not affected. Besides, the reduction of MI and stroke recurrence showed no statistical significance between long-term and short-term DAPT groups.
CONCLUSION
Long-term DAPT may not reduce the mortality of IVD besides increasing bleeding events, although reduced the incidences of MI and stroke early recurrence to a certain extent and did not increase the risk of fatal intracranial bleeding.
Topics: Humans; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38571479
DOI: 10.1177/10760296241244772 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2024We aimed to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and major cerebrovascular/cardiovascular risks through a systematic approach. Databases were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We aimed to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and major cerebrovascular/cardiovascular risks through a systematic approach. Databases were systematically searched from their inception to October 10, 2023 for studies comparing cerebrovascular/cardiovascular event rates between patients with SSc and controls. The primary outcome was the stroke risk in patients with SSc. Secondary outcomes included risk of myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular disease (CVD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Seventeen studies with 6,642,297 participants were included. SSc was associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke (HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.01), CVD (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.36-3.3), MI (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.23-3.77), VTE (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.77-4.28), and PVD (HR, 5.23; 95% CI, 4.25-6.45). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly increased stroke risk in the non-Asian group (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26-1.9), while the Asian group displayed a higher but not statistically significant risk (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.97-3.55). The study found that SSc is associated with a significantly increased risk of cerebrovascular/cardiovascular events. These findings highlight the importance of vasculopathy in SSc and suggest the need for enhanced clinical monitoring and preventive measures in this high-risk population.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Venous Thromboembolism; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Scleroderma, Systemic
PubMed: 38499699
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57275-9 -
Heliyon Mar 2024Many clinical management strategies have been proposed to deal with diabetic foot ulcers. However, the occurrence and recurrence of foot ulcers remain the major problems...
Many clinical management strategies have been proposed to deal with diabetic foot ulcers. However, the occurrence and recurrence of foot ulcers remain the major problems for diabetics. This study aims to identify, visualize, and characterize the meta-analyses on diabetic foot ulcer research. Articles published online were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection database using a search query incorporating MeSH terms and topics related to diabetic foot ulcers and meta-analysis. The publications were then analyzed for basic characteristics, including publication year, countries, topics covered, references, and keywords discussed in the articles. Data visualization was performed using CiteSpace. 334 meta-analyses and systematic reviews on diabetic foot ulcers were identified. The number of publications has experienced rapid growth in recent years (nearly 6-fold since 2016). The United States, China, Netherlands, England, and Australia had a strong collaboration in the contribution of publication. 7 primary topics were summarized from the top 100 highly cited publications: #1 Interventions (proportion: 59%), #2 Risk factors and Prevention (22%), #3 Epidemiology analysis (6%), #4 Cost-effectiveness of interventions (5%), #5 Long-term prognosis (3%), #6 Quality of life analysis (3%), and #7 Economic burden analysis (2%). Footwear and offloading interventions, multidisciplinary care, hyperbaric oxygen, platelet-rich plasma, and negative pressure wound therapies are highly regarded in terms of intervention. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis, peripheral diabetic neuropathy, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and infections are the main comorbidities. In recent years, offloading interventions, debridement, telemedicine, long-term prognosis, and economic burden analyses have gradually received attention. Individualized treatment, multidisciplinary collaboration, quality of life considerations, and economic burden analyses are the long-term concerns.
PubMed: 38496839
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27534 -
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2024Cerebral ischaemic stroke is a common disease that poses a serious threat to human health. Butyrate is an important metabolite of intestinal microorganisms. Recent...
INTRODUCTION
Cerebral ischaemic stroke is a common disease that poses a serious threat to human health. Butyrate is an important metabolite of intestinal microorganisms. Recent studies have shown that butyrate has a significant protective effect in animal models of cerebral ischaemic injury.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of butyrate on cerebral ischaemic stroke by meta-analysis, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the clinical application of butyrate in patients with cerebral ischaemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was conducted for all relevant studies published before 23 January 2024, in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Methodological quality was assessed using Syrcle's risk of bias tool for animal studies. Data were analysed using Rev Man 5.3 software.
RESULTS
A total of nine studies were included, and compared with controls, butyrate significantly increased BDNF levels in the brain (SMD = 2.33, 95%CI = [1.20, 3.47], < 0.005) and P-Akt expression (SMD = 3.53, 95% CI = [0.97, 6.10], < 0.05). Butyrate also decreased IL-β levels in the brain (SMD = -2.02, 95% CI = [-3.22, -0.81], < 0.005), TNF-α levels (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI = [-1.60, -0.12], < 0.05), and peripheral vascular IL-1β levels (SMD = -2.10, 95%CI = [-3.59, -0.61], < 0.05). In addition, butyrate reduced cerebral infarct volume (MD = -11.29, 95%CI = [-17.03, -5.54], < 0.05), mNSS score (MD = -2.86, 95%CI = [-4.12, -1.60], < 0.005), foot fault score (MD = -7.59, 95%CI = [-9.83, -5, 35], < 0.005), and Morris water maze time (SMD = -2.49, 95%CI = [-4.42, -0.55], < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study indicate that butyrate has a protective effect on cerebral ischaemic stroke in animal models, and the mechanism is related to reducing inflammation and inhibiting apoptosis. It provides an evidence-based basis for the future clinical development of butyrate in the treatment of ischaemic stroke.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023482844.
PubMed: 38486971
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1304906