-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2024Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the obstruction or narrowing of the large arteries of the lower limbs, which can result in impaired oxygen supply to the muscle and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the obstruction or narrowing of the large arteries of the lower limbs, which can result in impaired oxygen supply to the muscle and other tissues during exercise, or even at rest in more severe cases. PAD is classified into five categories (Fontaine classification). It may be asymptomatic or various levels of claudication pain may be present; at a later stage, there may be ulceration or gangrene of the limb, with amputation occasionally being required. About 20% of people with PAD suffer from intermittent claudication (IC), which is muscular discomfort in the lower extremities induced by exertion and relieved by rest within 10 minutes; IC causes restriction of movement in daily life. Treatment for people with IC involves addressing lifestyle risk factors. Exercise is an important part of treatment, but supervised exercise programmes for individuals with IC have low engagement levels and high attrition rates. The use of mobile technologies has been suggested as a new way to engage people with IC in walking exercise interventions. The novelty of the intervention, low cost for the user, automation, and ease of access are some of the advantages mobile health (mhealth) technologies provide that give them the potential to be effective in boosting physical activity in adults.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of mobile health (mhealth) technologies to improve walking distance in people with intermittent claudication.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist conducted systematic searches of the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, and also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most recent searches were carried out on 19 December 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people aged 18 years or over with symptomatic PAD and a clinical diagnosis of IC. We included RCTs comparing mhealth interventions to improve walking distance versus usual care (no intervention or non-exercise advice), exercise advice, or supervised exercise programmes. We excluded people with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Fontaine III and IV).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were change in absolute walking distance from baseline, change in claudication distance from baseline, amputation-free survival, revascularisation-free survival. Our secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, above-ankle amputation, quality of life, and adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs involving a total of 614 participants with a clinical diagnosis of IC. The duration of intervention of the four included RCTs ranged from 3 to 12 months. Participants were randomised to either mhealth or control (usual care or supervised exercise programme). All four studies had an unclear or high risk of bias in one or several domains. The most prevalent risk of bias was in the area of performance bias, which was rated high risk as it is not possible to blind participants and personnel in this type of trial. Based on GRADE criteria, we downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low, due to concerns about risk of bias, imprecision, and clinical inconsistency. Comparing mhealth with usual care, there was no clear evidence of an effect on absolute walking distance (mean difference 9.99 metres, 95% confidence interval (CI) -27.96 to 47.93; 2 studies, 503 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on change in claudication walking distance, amputation-free survival, or revascularisation-free survival. Only one study reported on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and found no clear difference between groups (risk ratio 1.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 28.17; 1 study, 305 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on major adverse limb events (MALE) or above-ankle amputations.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Mobile health technologies can be used to provide lifestyle interventions for people with chronic conditions, such as IC. We identified a limited number of studies that met our inclusion criteria. We found no clear difference between mhealth and usual care in improving absolute walking distance in people with IC; however, we judged the evidence to be low certainty. Larger, well-designed RCTs are needed to provide adequate statistical power to reliably evaluate the effects of mhealth technologies on walking distance in people with IC.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Intermittent Claudication; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Exercise Therapy; Walking; Lower Extremity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38353263
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014717.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2024The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the general population is about 12% to 14% and it increases with age. PAD increased from 164 million people in 2000...
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the general population is about 12% to 14% and it increases with age. PAD increased from 164 million people in 2000 to 202 million people in 2010. More than two-thirds of people with PAD are based in low- or middle-income countries. Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) occurs in 1% to 2% of people with intermittent claudication over five years. One third of people with CLI have isolated below the knee (BTK) lesions. CLI and isolated BTK lesions are associated with a higher incidence of limb loss when compared with people with multilevel arterial disease. Endovascular procedures such as angioplasty (with or without stenting) are widely used to treat isolated BTK lesions, aiming to improve blood flow and limb salvage. The technical success of any angioplasty procedure depends on the ability to cross the target lesion. Failed attempts are underestimated in the literature and failures in the real world appear to be higher than reported. People with isolated BTK lesions undergoing angioplasty by conventional femoral access present a high failure rate to cross these lesions. Retrograde distal access may provide some advantages that can lead to successful crossing of the target lesion.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for people undergoing below the knee angioplasty.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 September 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing people undergoing retrograde distal access versus people undergoing conventional femoral access (ipsilateral antegrade or contralateral retrograde) for BTK angioplasty.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed identified studies for potential inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Our primary outcomes were technical success of angioplasty procedure and major procedural complications. Our secondary outcomes were mortality rate, amputation-free survival, primary patency, minor procedural complications and wound healing. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared retrograde distal access versus femoral access for BTK angioplasty. High-quality studies that compare retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for BTK angioplasty are needed.
Topics: Humans; Angioplasty; Femur; Knee Joint; Peripheral Arterial Disease
PubMed: 38193637
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013637.pub2 -
Medical Decision Making : An... Feb 2024Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs published since 2013 and 2) critically appraise UK-relevant estimates and calculate corresponding baseline utility multipliers.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and Embase (April 22, 2021) using CVD and utility terms. We screened results for primary studies reporting utility distributions for people with experience of heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, stable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina. We extracted characteristics from studies included. For UK estimates based on the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) measure, we assessed risk of bias and applicability to a decision-analytic model, pooled arms/time points as appropriate, and estimated baseline utility multipliers using predicted utility for age- and sex- matched populations without CVD. We sought utility sources from directly applicable studies with low risk of bias, prioritizing plausibility of severity ordering in our base-case model and highest population ascertainment in a sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
Most of the 403 studies identified used EQ-5D ( = 217) and most assessed Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development populations ( = 262), although measures and countries varied widely. UK studies using EQ-5D ( = 29) produced very heterogeneous baseline utility multipliers for each type of CVD, precluding meta-analysis and implying different possible severity orderings. We could find sources that provided a plausible ordering of utilities while adequately representing health states.
CONCLUSIONS
We cataloged international CVD utility estimates and calculated UK-relevant baseline utility multipliers. Modelers should consider unreported sources of heterogeneity, such as population differences, when selecting utility evidence from reviews.
HIGHLIGHTS
Published systematic reviews have summarized estimates of utility associated with cardiovascular disease published up to 2013.We 1) reviewed utility estimates for 7 types of cardiovascular disease published since 2013, 2) critically appraised UK-relevant studies, and 3) estimated the effect of each cardiovascular disease on baseline utility.Our review 1) recommends a consistent and reliable set of baseline utility multipliers for 7 types of cardiovascular disease and 2) provides systematically identified reference information for researchers seeking utility evidence for their own context.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Myocardial Infarction; United Kingdom
PubMed: 38174427
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231214782 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Mar 2024To assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
To assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
METHODS
A systematic review of Medline, Embase, and online CPG databases was carried out. Four CPGs on CLTI were identified: Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Two independent appraisers analyzed the 4 CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. CPGs were ranked across 6 domains with 23 items that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). A scaled domain score was calculated as a percentage of the maximum possible score achievable. A domain score of ≥50% and an overall average domain score of ≥80% reflected a CPG of adequate quality recommended for use.
RESULTS
GVG had the highest overall score (82.9%), as an average of all domains, and ESC had the lowest score (50.2%). GVG and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines had all domains scoring >50%, while American College of Cardiology had 5 and ESC had 3. Two domains, rigor of development and applicability, scored the lowest among the CPGs. There was a lack of detail in describing systematic methods used in the literature review, how guidelines were formulated with minimal bias, and the planned procedure for updating the guidelines. Implications of guideline application and monitoring of outcomes after implementations were not explicitly discussed.
CONCLUSIONS
The GVG guideline published in 2019 discussing CLTI is assessed to be of high quality and recommended for use. This review helps to improve clinical decision-making and quality of future CPGs for CLTI.
Topics: Humans; Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; Treatment Outcome; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Cardiology; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 38122972
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.025 -
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Jun 2024Femoral cannulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been associated with neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Femoral cannulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been associated with neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation. There is uncertainty about the prevalence of these complications and their mechanisms of development.
OBJECTIVE
Aim of this systematic review was to investigate the prevalence of neurological complications after ECMO and to describe possible underlying mechanisms.
METHOD
A systematic literature search was performed in Medline-Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PEDro until April 2021 for clinical trials in English or German language which quantified neurologic complications in the lower extremity ipsilateral to the ECMO cannulation of adults. The complications had to be delimitable to intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 independent investigators using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
RESULTS
Eight observational studies were included in the synthesis. Study quality was good to fair in 88% of the papers. Overall, 47 of 202 patients (23.3%; ranging from 3% to 48% across studies) with femoral ECMO cannulation showed neurologic complications of the lower extremity ipsilateral to the cannulation. Peripheral ischemia and compression of nerves by the ECMO cannula are discussed as mechanisms of injury.
CONCLUSION
The occurrence of neurological complications after ECMO was common and can lead to long-term impairment. The mechanisms are largely unknown but currently there is no sufficient evidence for the involvement of ECMO. Standardized assessments are needed to systematically screen for neurological complications early after ECMO, to enable countermeasures and prevent further complications.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Lower Extremity; Nervous System Diseases; Observational Studies as Topic; Prevalence
PubMed: 38018080
DOI: 10.1177/08850666231217679 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2023Perinatal stroke refers to a diverse but specific group of cerebrovascular diseases that occur between 20 weeks of fetal life and 28 days of postnatal life. Acute... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Perinatal stroke refers to a diverse but specific group of cerebrovascular diseases that occur between 20 weeks of fetal life and 28 days of postnatal life. Acute treatment options for perinatal stroke are limited supportive care, such as controlling hypoglycemia and seizures. Stem cell-based therapies offer a potential therapeutic approach to repair, restore, or regenerate injured brain tissue. Preclinical findings have culminated in ongoing human neonatal studies.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of stem cell-based interventions for the treatment of stroke in newborn infants compared to control (placebo or no treatment) or stem-cell based interventions of a different type or source.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and three trials registries in February 2023. We planned to search the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews for studies not identified by the database searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We attempted to include randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, and cluster trials that evaluated any of the following comparisons. • Stem cell-based interventions (any type) versus control (placebo or no treatment) • Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) of a specifictype (e.g. number of doses or passages) or source (e.g. autologous/allogeneic or bone marrow/cord) versus MSCs of another type or source • Stem cell-based interventions (other than MSCs) of a specific type (e.g. mononuclear cells, oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, neural stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cells) or source (e.g. autologous/allogeneic or bone marrow/cord) versus stem cell-based interventions (other than MSCs) of another type or source • MSCs versus stem cell-based interventions other than MSCs We planned to include all types of transplantation regardless of cell source (bone marrow, cord blood, Wharton's jelly, placenta, adipose tissue, peripheral blood), type of graft (autologous or allogeneic), and dose.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause neonatal mortality, major neurodevelopmental disability, and immune rejection or any serious adverse event. Our secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality prior to first hospital discharge, seizures, adverse effects, and death or major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months of age. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified no completed or ongoing randomized trials that met our inclusion criteria. We excluded three studies: two were phase 1 trials, and one included newborn infants with conditions other than stroke (i.e. cerebral ischemia and anemia). Among the three excluded studies, we identified the first phase 1 trial on the use of stem cells for neonatal stroke. It reported that a single intranasal application of bone marrow-derived MSCs in term neonates with a diagnosis of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) was feasible and apparently not associated with severe adverse events. However, the trial included only 10 infants, and follow-up was limited to three months.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
No evidence is currently available to evaluate the benefits and harms of stem cell-based interventions for treatment of stroke in newborn infants. We identified no ongoing studies. Future clinical trials should focus on standardizing the timing and method of cell delivery and cell processing to optimize the therapeutic potential of stem cell-based interventions and safety profiles. Phase 1 and large animal studies might provide the groundwork for future randomized trials. Outcome measures should include all-cause mortality, major neurodevelopmental disability and immune rejection, and any other serious adverse events.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Infant; Humans; Infant Mortality; Stem Cell Transplantation; Stroke; Seizures
PubMed: 37994736
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015582.pub2 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Mar 2024Biomimetic stents are peripheral infrainguinal self expanding stents that mimic the anatomy of the vasculature and artery movement. They are indicated for use in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Biomimetic stents are peripheral infrainguinal self expanding stents that mimic the anatomy of the vasculature and artery movement. They are indicated for use in infrainguinal arteries. This research aimed to synthesise all current evidence on the use of biomimetic stents as adjuncts for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD), helping to guide clinical decision making.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases.
REVIEW METHODS
Random effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022385256). Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools checklist, and certainty assessment through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Endpoints included primary patency, target lesion revascularisation, stent fracture, secondary patency, and Death at one year.
RESULTS
In total, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis (33 cohort studies, two case series, and two randomised controlled trials [RCTs]), representing 4 480 participants. Of these, 34 studies included data on the Supera (81.5% of participants) and three studies reported data on the BioMimics 3D (18.5% of participants) stents. The pooled primary patency rate of 33 studies at one year follow up was 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.7 - 83.9%), and the pooled target lesion revascularisation rate of 18 studies at one year was 12.2% (95% CI 9.6 - 15.0%). The certainty of evidence outcome rating as qualified by GRADE was very low for both. Only one study reported a positive stent fracture rate at one year follow up of 0.4% with a certainty of evidence outcome of low.
CONCLUSION
Using biomimetic stents for infrainguinal PAD may be associated with acceptable one year primary patency and target lesion revascularisation rates, with a near negligible one year stent fracture rate. Their use should be considered in those presenting with infrainguinal PAD undergoing endovascular revascularisation. A RCT is necessary to determine their clinical and cost effectiveness.
Topics: Humans; Biomimetics; Endovascular Procedures; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 37931680
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.007 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Mar 2024To systematically review and meta-analyse adjusted risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after lower limb revascularisation surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and meta-analyse adjusted risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after lower limb revascularisation surgery.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to 28 April 2022).
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. After protocol registration, databases were searched. Studies reporting adjusted risk factors for SSI in adults who underwent lower limb revascularisation surgery for peripheral artery disease were included. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty.
RESULTS
Among 6 377 citations identified, 50 studies (n = 271 125 patients) were included. The cumulative incidence of SSI was 12 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10 - 13) per 100 patients. Studies reported 139 potential SSI risk factors adjusted for a median of 12 (range 1 - 69) potential confounding factors. Risk factors that increased the pooled adjusted odds of SSI included: female sex (pooled OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20 - 1.64; high certainty); dependent functional status (pooled OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.35; low certainty); being overweight (pooled OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.29 - 2.56; moderate certainty), obese (pooled OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.44 - 3.36; high certainty), or morbidly obese (pooled OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.52; moderate certainty); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (pooled OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.71; high certainty); chronic limb threatening ischaemia (pooled OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.29; moderate certainty); chronic kidney disease (pooled OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.18 - 3.83; moderate certainty); intra-operative (pooled OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.49), peri-operative (pooled OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.27 - 2.90), or post-operative (pooled OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.44 - 3.39) blood transfusion (moderate certainty for all); urgent or emergency surgery (pooled OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.22 - 3.70; moderate certainty); vein bypass and or patch instead of endarterectomy alone (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.33 - 2.59; moderate certainty); an operation lasting ≥ 3 hours (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.33 - 2.59; moderate certainty) or ≥ 5 hours (pooled OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18 - 2.17; moderate certainty); and early or unplanned re-operation (pooled OR 4.50, 95% CI 2.18 - 9.32; low certainty).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review identified evidence informed SSI risk factors following lower limb revascularisation surgery. These may be used to develop improved SSI risk prediction tools and to identify patients who may benefit from evidence informed SSI prevention strategies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Surgical Wound Infection; Prognosis; Obesity, Morbid; Reoperation; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 37925099
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.10.038 -
Journal of Women's Health (2002) Dec 2023Endometriosis is a common disease affecting 10% of reproductive-age women globally and is associated with chronic systemic inflammation. Some studies suggest that women... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Endometriosis is a common disease affecting 10% of reproductive-age women globally and is associated with chronic systemic inflammation. Some studies suggest that women with endometriosis have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas others have conflicting findings. This study aims to further investigate the association between endometriosis and cardiovascular disease. A systematic review was conducted using the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception to October 2022. The search strategy comprised terms for "endometriosis" and "cardiovascular disease." Eligible studies had to include one group of patients with endometriosis and another group of individuals without endometriosis. The study must then compare the incidence or prevalence of cardiovascular disease (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], ischemic heart disease [IHD], cerebrovascular accident [CVA], or peripheral artery disease [PAD]). A total of 5,401 articles were identified, and 9 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed an increased prevalence of IHD (pooled odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.74-2.02), CVA (pooled OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.53), and PAD (pooled OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.35-1.78). Pooled analysis showed an increased incidence of MACE (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14-1.33), IHD (pooled HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.28-1.59), and CVA (pooled HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.11-1.30). This systematic review and meta-analysis found a statistically significant association between endometriosis and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (MACE, IHD, CVA, PAD).
Topics: Humans; Female; Cardiovascular Diseases; Endometriosis; Myocardial Ischemia; Stroke
PubMed: 37856152
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0091 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... Feb 2024Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects millions of individuals associated with an increased risk of mortality and macrovascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects millions of individuals associated with an increased risk of mortality and macrovascular complications. We aimed to synthesize the benefit of metabolic surgery (MS) on macrovascular outcomes in adult patients with T2D.We included both cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated MS added to medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in the treatment of adult patients with T2D. Studies must have evaluated the incidence of any macrovascular complication of the disease for a period of at least 6 months. We performed our search using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and COCHRANE Central database which was performed from inception date until March 2022. The trial protocol was previously registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021243739). A total of 6338 references were screened throughout the selection process from which 16 studies involving 179,246 participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. MS reduced the risk of any cardiovascular event by 44% (relative risk .56 [95% CI, .42-.75]; P = < .001), myocardial infarction by 54% (.46 [95% CI, .26-.83]; P = .009), coronary artery disease by 40% (.60 [95% CI, .42-.85]; P = .004) and heart failure by 71% (.29 [95% CI, .14-.61]; P = .001). It also provided a risk reduction of stroke by 29% (.71 [95% CI, .51-.99]; P = .04) and 38% (.62 [95% CI, .46-.85]; P = .001) for cerebrovascular events. On mortality, MS yields a risk reduction of 55% (.45 [95% CI, .36-.57]; P <.001) in overall mortality and 69% in cardiovascular mortality (relative risk .31 [95% CI, .22-.42]; P < .001). Peripheral vascular disease risk was also reduced. MS in adult patients with T2D can reduce the risk of mortality and of any macrovascular outcomes. However, there is a need for the planning of randomized clinical trials to further analyze and confirm the results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bariatric Surgery; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Myocardial Infarction
PubMed: 37845131
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.016