-
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2023Both bypass surgery and endovascular treatment are well-recognized interventions for the treatment of peripheral artery disease; however, the effect of failed... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Both bypass surgery and endovascular treatment are well-recognized interventions for the treatment of peripheral artery disease; however, the effect of failed endovascular treatment on subsequent surgeries remains controversial. A systematic review was conducted to compare the outcomes of primary bypass and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment.
METHODS
Three academic databases (Embase, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched from their inception to August 2022. Two independent investigators searched for studies that reported the outcomes of primary bypass surgery and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment in patients with peripheral artery disease. Abstracts and full-text studies were screened independently using duplicate data abstraction. Dichotomous outcome measures were reported using a random-effects model to generate a summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Seventeen retrospective observational studies were selected from 3911 articles and included 8064 patients, 6252 of whom underwent primary bypass surgery and 1812 underwent bypass surgery after endovascular treatment. The mean age was 69.0 years and 61.2% (n = 4938) were male. For perioperative outcomes, the 30-day results showed no difference in mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10), or amputation (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-1.20). For short- to mid-term outcomes, primary patency did not differ at 6 months (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19), 1 year (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.30), or 2 years (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.85-1.61) follow-up. Amputation-free survival did not differ at 6 months (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.30), 1 year (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32), 2 years (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.50), or 3 years (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84-1.40) of follow-up. No significant difference was found in overall survival or second patency.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis of retrospective, nonrandomized, observational studies suggests that prior endovascular treatment of lower extremity arterial disease does not result in worse perioperative, short-term, or mid-term clinical outcomes of subsequent infrainguinal bypass surgery compared with patients without prior endovascular treatment.
PubMed: 37453586
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.07.003 -
Cureus May 2023The current literature strongly supports the use of supervised exercise therapy (SET) as the first-line treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) such... (Review)
Review
The current literature strongly supports the use of supervised exercise therapy (SET) as the first-line treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) such as intermittent claudication (IC). However, this form of treatment remains underutilised in clinical practice. The home-based exercise therapy (HBET), in which patients must conduct themselves unsupervised is generally less effective than SET in terms of improving functional walking capacity. Nevertheless, it may be a useful alternative where SET is unavailable. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of HBET in reducing symptoms of IC in patients with PAD. Studies eligible for inclusion in this systematic review were parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English language that compared the effect of HBET to a comparator arm (SET or no exercise/attention control) in adults with PAD and IC. Studies were eligible if outcome measures were available at baseline and at 12 weeks of follow-up or more. The electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the earliest records up to January 2021. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for RCTs (RoB 2) was used to assess the risk of bias in individual studies, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) classification system was used to appraise the quality of evidence for each outcome across all studies. The primary investigator independently collected, pooled, and analysed the data. The data was then entered into the ReviewManager 5 (RevMan 5) software, and a meta-analysis was performed by using a fixed or random effects model depending on the presence or absence of statistical heterogeneity. The review author identified seven RCTs involving a total of 754 patients which were included in this study. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was moderate. Even though the results were variable, this analysis supported the ability of HBET to improve functional walking capacity and self-reported quality of life (QoL) to an extent. This review shows that a home-based exercise intervention with regular professional support and encouragement is beneficial in improving functional walking capacity as well as some aspects of QoL in patients with PAD and IC when compared to no exercise. However, when HBET is compared to hospital-based supervised exercise intervention, SET yields greater benefits.
PubMed: 37384085
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39206 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Nov 2023Frailty is a risk factor associated with adverse postoperative outcomes following lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with peripheral arterial disease... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Frailty is a risk factor associated with adverse postoperative outcomes following lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the worst form of PAD, and frailty is common among patients presenting with CLTI. Multiple frailty assessment scores have been developed for the past 2 decades; however, a universal clinical assessment tool for measuring frailty has not yet been established due to the complexity of the concept. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of a frailty index as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing LEB.
METHODS
The review protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022358888). A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A total of 3,929 studies were initially selected originally and were eventually left with 6 studies that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review.
RESULTS
Six studies were examined that assessed the relationship between frailty index and long-term mortality following LEB for CLTI were screened. All analyses were published between 2017 and 2020 and included a broad spectrum of patients who underwent LEB. The results of these studies showed inconsistencies in the reporting of postoperative outcomes and the time endpoint of these events. However, all correlated with higher frailty index and increased mortality rate.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher frailty index preoperatively is associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative comorbidities after undergoing LEB. Identifying and addressing the preoperative frailty index of these patients may be a practical approach to reducing postoperative adverse outcomes. A thorough review of the frailty spectrum and standardized reporting of outcomes in the context of frailty could be helpful to have a more comprehensive understanding of this subject.
Topics: Humans; Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; Frailty; Endovascular Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Ischemia; Risk Factors; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Lower Extremity; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37356656
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.044 -
Nutrition, Metabolism, and... Aug 2023The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition (undernutrition) that can be calculated from albumin concentration,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition (undernutrition) that can be calculated from albumin concentration, total peripheral lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol concentration. CONUT score has been proposed as a promising prognostic marker in several clinical settings; however, a consensus on its prognostic value in patients with stroke is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke based on all current available studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Systematic research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to February 2023 was performed on the association between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. Pooled effect estimation was calculated by a random-effect model. Through the initial literature search, 15 studies (all high-quality) including 16 929 patients were found to be eligible and analysed in the meta-analysis. A significant risk of malnutrition (in most studies defined by a CONUT score ≥5) was directly associated with mortality, higher risk of poor functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale and total infection development. Evidence was consistent for acute ischaemic stroke and preliminary for acute haemorrhagic stroke.
CONCLUSION
CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator, and it is associated with major disability and infection development during hospitalisation.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42022306560.
Topics: Humans; Nutritional Status; Brain Ischemia; Stroke; Malnutrition; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Nutrition Assessment
PubMed: 37336716
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.05.012 -
Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews Mar 2024This publication represents a scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to...
BACKGROUND
This publication represents a scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to classify foot ulcers in people with diabetes in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are based on a systematic review of the available literature that identified 28 classifications addressed in 149 articles and, subsequently, expert opinion using the GRADE methodology.
METHODS
First, we have developed a list of classification systems considered as being potentially adequate for use in a clinical setting, through the summary of judgements for diagnostic tests, focussing on the usability, accuracy and reliability of each system to predict ulcer-related complications as well as use of resources. Second, we have determined, following group debate and consensus, which of them should be used in specific clinical scenarios. Following this process, in a person with diabetes and a foot ulcer we recommend: (a) for communication among healthcare professionals: to use the SINBAD (Site, Ischaemia, Bacterial infection, Area and Depth) system (first option) or consider using WIfI (Wound, Ischaemia, foot Infection) system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise is available and it is considered feasible) and in each case the individual variables that compose the systems should be described rather than a total score; (b) for predicting the outcome of an ulcer in a specific individual: no existing system could be recommended; (c) for characterising a person with an infected ulcer: the use of the IDSA/IWGDF classification (first option) or consider using the WIfI system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise is available and it is considered as feasible); (d) for characterising a person with peripheral artery disease: consider using the WIfI system as a means to stratify healing likelihood and amputation risk; (e) for the audit of outcome(s) of populations: the use of the SINBAD score.
CONCLUSIONS
For all recommendations made using GRADE, the certainty of evidence was judged, at best, as being low. Nevertheless, based on the rational application of current data this approach allowed the proposal of recommendations, which are likely to have clinical utility.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Ulcer; Reproducibility of Results; Foot Ulcer; Ischemia; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37179483
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3648 -
Artificial Organs Sep 2023To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the techniques and outcomes associated with percutaneous decannulation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the techniques and outcomes associated with percutaneous decannulation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) using the Manta vascular closure device.
BACKGROUND
Peripheral VA-ECMO can be used to treat critically ill patients with conditions such as refractory cardiogenic shock. After percutaneous implantation of VA-ECMO, VA-ECMO can also be decannulated completely percutaneously by using a vascular closure device. The Manta vascular closure device is a dedicated device used in the closure of large-bore arteriotomies by sandwiching the arteriotomy with an intra-arterial toggle and an extraluminal collagen plug.
METHODS
We performed a thorough literature search using various electronic databases. We included studies that reported outcomes after peripheral femorofemoral VA-ECMO decannulation with the Manta vascular closure device. We performed a meta-analysis of proportions on outcome measures, including technical success, bleeding complications, vascular complications, wound complications, major amputation, and procedural-related deaths.
RESULTS
We included seven studies with a total of 116 patients. The overall technical success of percutaneous decannulation of VA-ECMO with the Manta vascular closure device was 93.7%. The overall incidence of bleeding, vascular and wound complications was 1.7%, 13.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. No patient required lower limb amputation or died due to VA-ECMO decannulation.
CONCLUSION
Percutaneous decannulation with the Manta vascular closure device is an effective and safe procedure that should be considered in suitable patients on VA-ECMO.
Topics: Humans; Vascular Closure Devices; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Shock, Cardiogenic; Hemorrhage; Device Removal; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37161616
DOI: 10.1111/aor.14554 -
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 2023Recently, increased risk of amputation under sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors has been debated. Similar concerns have been raised with other "traditional"... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Recently, increased risk of amputation under sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors has been debated. Similar concerns have been raised with other "traditional" diuretics, more particularly in patients with or at risk of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD).
AIM
To collect all available data on any potential risk of amputation associated with diuretics in patients with or at risk of LEAD. Additionally, we looked for other limb-related events in these patients.
METHODS
We searched in PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases up to February 2021 for references, using peripheral or lower extremity arterial disease, diuretics and amputation keywords, excluding case reports, experimental animal studies and non-English reports.
RESULTS
Among the 1376 hits identified in the databases, six studies were finally included in this review, including one cross-sectional and five longitudinal studies (total of 47,612 participants). One study was limited to thiazide diuretics, one focused on loop diuretics and the remainder mixed all diuretics. All studies reported a significant association between diuretic use and amputation risk in patients with or at high risk of LEAD. Despite some limitations in several studies, the meta-analysis showed an increased risk of amputation associated with diuretics (odds ratio: 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.53-1.99; P<0.001). Beyond amputation, patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics appeared to be at increased risk of other lower limb events, mostly in the presence of other comorbidities, including diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the amount of data in the literature is scarce, this first systematic review and meta-analysis favours an increased risk of amputation in patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics. Further prospective studies must be conducted to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms. Meanwhile, the use of diuretics in these patients should be parsimonious, considering alternatives whenever possible.
Topics: Humans; Diuretics; Cross-Sectional Studies; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Lower Extremity; Amputation, Surgical; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37150644
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.04.002 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Sep 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to describe the prognostic implications of sex on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing interventions for chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to describe the prognostic implications of sex on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing interventions for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).
METHODS
Studies were systematically searched across 7 databases from inception to August 25, 2021 and rerun on October 11, 2022. Studies focusing on patients with CLTI undergoing open surgery, endovascular treatment (EVT), or hybrid procedures were included if sex-based differences were associated with a clinical outcome. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Primary outcomes included inpatient mortality, major adverse limb events (MALE), and amputation-free survival (AFS). Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models and reported pooled odds ratio (pOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
A total of 57 studies were included in the analysis. A meta-analysis of 6 studies demonstrated that female sex was associated with statistically higher inpatient mortality compared to male sex undergoing open surgery or EVT (pOR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11-1.23). Female sex also demonstrated a trend toward increased limb loss in those undergoing EVT (pOR, 1.15; 95% CI: 0.91-1.45) and open surgery (pOR 1.46; 95% CI: 0.84-2.55). Female sex also had a trend toward higher MALE (pOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.21) in 6 studies. Finally, female sex had a trend toward worse AFS (pOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.03) in 8 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Female sex was significantly associated with higher inpatient mortality and a trend toward higher MALE following revascularization. Female sex trended toward worse AFS. The reasons for these disparities are likely multifaceted on patient, provider, and systemic levels and should be explored to identify solutions for decreasing these health inequities across this vulnerable patient population.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; Endovascular Procedures; Limb Salvage; Risk Factors; Chronic Disease; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Treatment Outcome; Ischemia; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37075836
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.03.007 -
European Neurology 2023Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe cerebrovascular event with high mortality and disability rate. Neuroinflammation is involved in the brain injury after SAH, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe cerebrovascular event with high mortality and disability rate. Neuroinflammation is involved in the brain injury after SAH, but the exact association between SAH progression and peripheral blood inflammatory factors is unknown. Therefore, to determine the relationship between inflammatory factors and the prognosis of SAH, we performed a meta-analysis.
METHOD
A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing the relationship between inflammatory factors (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-10 [IL-10], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α]) and prognosis of SAH were included in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted based on mRS, GOS, and the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and delayed ischemic neurologic deficits. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. For continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
1,469 patients from 18 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. The results found that patients in the good outcome group had significantly lower CRP levels than those in the poor outcome group (SMD: -1.15, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.66, p < 0.00001, I2 = 87%), and peripheral IL-6 levels were significantly lower in SAH patients with the good functional outcome than those with the poor functional outcome (SMD: -0.99, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.51, p < 0.0001, I2 = 88%). As for IL-10 (SMD: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.97 to 0.42, p = 0.43, I2 = 88%) and TNF-α (SMD: -0.40, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.19, p = 0.18, I2 = 79%), due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn.
CONCLUSION
SAH patients with good prognoses have significantly lower peripheral CRP and IL-6 levels. In addition, due to the small number of studies, heterogeneity, and uncontrollable factors, robust conclusions cannot be drawn for IL-10 and TNF-α. More high-quality studies are needed in the future to provide more specific recommendations for the clinical practice of inflammatory factors.
Topics: Humans; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-6; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Prognosis; C-Reactive Protein
PubMed: 36972578
DOI: 10.1159/000530208 -
Coronary Artery Disease Jun 2023Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which can cause significant morbidity and mortality from systemic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which can cause significant morbidity and mortality from systemic embolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors that have been shown in studies to be independently predictive of LVT post-AMI. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria with 1 047 785 patients. The proportion of patients with LVT ranged from 0.2% in the nationwide study in the USA to 36.1% in the cohort of patients with LV aneurysm. Pooled results from nine studies suggest that greater values for left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with reduced odds of LVT formation [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-0.93; I2 = 76%]. Left ventricular aneurysm was a significant predictor of LVT formation (OR 6.07; 95% CI, 2.27-16.19; I2 = 91%; seven studies) and anterior location of MI was also a significant predictor (OR 7.72; 95% CI, 2.41-24.74; I2 = 69%; four studies). Three studies suggest that there was an increase in odds of LVT formation with greater values of C-reactive protein (OR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.07-3.97; I2 = 89%; three studies). The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR 2.52; 95% CI, 1.55-4.10; I2 = 0%; two studies) and greater SYNTAX score (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.36; I2 = 46%; two studies) were associated with LVT. In conclusion, patients with reduced ejection fraction, AMI and with left ventricular aneurysm are at risk of LVT formation and careful imaging evaluation should be performed to identify LVT in these patients to prevent stroke or peripheral embolism.
Topics: Humans; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Embolism
PubMed: 36951727
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001223