-
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Sep 2022Trichoderma spp. are filamentous fungi causing invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies and in peritoneal dialysis patients.
BACKGROUND
Trichoderma spp. are filamentous fungi causing invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies and in peritoneal dialysis patients.
OBJECTIVES
To analyse clinical presentation, predisposing factors, treatment and outcome of Trichoderma infections.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted for published cases of invasive Trichoderma infection in PubMed until December 2021 and by reviewing the included studies' references. Cases from the FungiScope® registry were added to a combined analysis.
RESULTS
We identified 50 invasive infections due to Trichoderma species, including 11 in the FungiScope® registry. The main underlying conditions were haematological malignancies in 19 and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in 10 cases. The most prevalent infection sites were lung (42%) and peritoneum (22%). Systemic antifungal therapy was administered in 42 cases (84%), mostly amphotericin B (n = 27, lipid-based formulation 13/27) and voriconazole in 15 cases (30%). Surgical interventions were performed in 13 cases (26%). Overall mortality was 48% (n = 24) and highest for allogeneic HSCT and solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients [80% (4/5) and 77% (7/9), respectively]. In patients treated with amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin, mortality was 55% (15/27), 46% (7/15) and 28% (2/7), respectively. Three out of four patients treated with a combination therapy of voriconazole and caspofungin survived.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite treatment with antifungal therapies and surgery, invasive Trichoderma infections are life-threatening complications in immunocompromised patients, especially after HSCT and SOT. In addition, Trichoderma spp. mainly affect the lungs in patients with haematological malignancies and the peritoneum in CAPD patients.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Caspofungin; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Registries; Trichoderma; Voriconazole
PubMed: 35929089
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac235 -
Medicine Jul 2022Abdominal cocoon or sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis is an uncommon condition in which the small bowel is completely or partially encased by a thick fibrotic...
BACKGROUND
Abdominal cocoon or sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis is an uncommon condition in which the small bowel is completely or partially encased by a thick fibrotic membrane. Our study presents a case of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis and conducts a literature review.
METHODS
A bibliographic research was conducted. Our research comprised 97 articles. Gender, age, symptoms, diagnostic procedures, and treatment were all included in the database of patient characteristics.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 51-year-old man complaining of a 2-day history of minor diffuse abdominal pain, loss of appetite, and constipation was presented in emergency department. Physical examination was indicative of intestinal obstruction. Laboratory tests were normal. Diffuse intraperitoneal fluid and dilated small intestinal loops were discovered on computed tomography (CT). An exploratory laparotomy was recommended, in which the sac membrane was removed and adhesiolysis was performed. He was discharged on the tenth postoperative day.
RESULTS
There were 240 cases of abdominal cocoon syndrome in total. In terms of gender, 151 of 240 (62.9%) were male and 89 of 240 (37%) were female. Ages between 20 and 40 are most affected. Symptoms include abdominal pain and obstruction signs. For the diagnosis of abdominal cocoon syndrome, CT may be the gold standard imaging method. The surgical operation was the treatment of choice in the vast majority of cases (96.7%). Only 69 of 239 patients (28.9%) were detected prior to surgery, and CT was applied in these cases.
CONCLUSION
Abdominal cocoon is a rare condition marked by recurrent episodes of intestinal obstruction. Surgical therapy is the most effective treatment option.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Female; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Intestine, Small; Male; Middle Aged; Peritoneal Fibrosis; Peritonitis; Young Adult
PubMed: 35801789
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029837 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2022ESKD is a total or near-permanent failure in renal function. It is irreversible, progressive and ultimately fatal without peritoneal dialysis (PD), haemodialysis (HD) or... (Review)
Review
Health Education Programmes to Improve Foot Self-Care Knowledge and Behaviour among Older People with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) Receiving Haemodialysis (A Systematic Review).
BACKGROUND
ESKD is a total or near-permanent failure in renal function. It is irreversible, progressive and ultimately fatal without peritoneal dialysis (PD), haemodialysis (HD) or kidney transplantation. Dialysis treatments can create new and additional problems for patients, one of which is foot amputation, as a result of non-healing wounds and vascular complications. The association between dialysis therapy and foot ulceration is linked to several factors: physical and psychological health; peripheral arterial disease (PAD); mobility; tissue oxygenation; manual dexterity; neuropathy; visual acuity; anaemia; nutrition; leg oedema; hypoalbuminemia; infection; inadequacy of dialysis; and leg/foot support during dialysis. The potential risk factors for foot ulceration may include: not routinely receiving foot care education; incorrect use of footwear; diabetes duration; neuropathy; and peripheral arterial disease.
AIM
The aim of this review is to examine the factors that help or hinder successful implementation of foot care education programmes for ESKD patients receiving haemodialysis.
METHOD
A comprehensive literature search was completed using five electronic databases. Medline; CINAHL; Embase; PsycINFO; and Cochrane Library. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) was used to quality appraise full text papers included in the review. The systematic review was not limited to specific categories of interventions to enable optimal comparison between interventions and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence in this important field of foot care.
RESULTS
We found no previously published studies that considered foot care education programmes for haemodialysis patients who are not diabetic; thus, the present systematic review examined four studies on diabetic patients receiving haemodialysis exposed to foot care education programmes from various types of intervention designs.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review has provided evidence that it is possible to influence foot care knowledge and self-care behaviours in both diabetic patients receiving haemodialysis and healthcare professionals.
PubMed: 35742194
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061143 -
Mycoses Sep 2022We evaluated the magnitude and factors contributing to poor outcomes among cirrhosis patients with fungal infections (FIs). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We evaluated the magnitude and factors contributing to poor outcomes among cirrhosis patients with fungal infections (FIs).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid and WOS and included articles reporting mortality in cirrhosis with FIs. We pooled the point and relative-risk (RR) estimates of mortality on random-effects meta-analysis and explored their heterogeneity (I ) on subgroups, meta-regression and machine learning (ML). We assessed the study quality through New-Castle-Ottawa Scale and estimate-asymmetry through Eggers regression. (CRD42019142782).
RESULTS
Of 4345, 34 studies (2134 patients) were included (good/fair/poor quality: 12/21/1). Pooled mortality of FIs was 64.1% (95% CI: 55.4-72.0, I : 87%, p < .01), which was 2.1 times higher than controls (95% CI: 1.8-2.5, I :89%, p < .01). Higher CTP (MD: +0.52, 95% CI: 0.27-0.77), MELD (MD: +2.75, 95% CI: 1.21-4.28), organ failures and increased hospital stay (30 vs. 19 days) were reported among cases with FIs. Patients with ACLF (76.6%, RR: 2.3) and ICU-admission (70.4%, RR: 1.6) had the highest mortality. The risk was maximum for pulmonary FIs (79.4%, RR: 1.8), followed by peritoneal FIs (68.3%, RR: 1.7) and fungemia (55%, RR: 1.7). The mortality was higher in FIs than in bacterial (RR: 1.7) or no infections (RR: 2.9). Estimate asymmetry was evident (p < 0.05). Up to 8 clusters and 5 outlier studies were identified on ML, and the estimate-heterogeneity was eliminated by excluding such studies.
CONCLUSIONS
A substantially worse prognosis, poorer than bacterial infections in cirrhosis patients with FIs, indicates an unmet need for improving fungal diagnostics and therapeutics in this population. ACLF and ICU admission should be included in the host criteria for defining IFIs.
Topics: Bacterial Infections; Humans; Length of Stay; Liver Cirrhosis; Machine Learning; Mycoses
PubMed: 35713607
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13482 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Sep 2022End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the advanced stage of a progressive loss of kidney function. About 10% of all patients with lupus nephritis (LN) eventually progress to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the advanced stage of a progressive loss of kidney function. About 10% of all patients with lupus nephritis (LN) eventually progress to ESRD, which may necessitate renal replacement therapy (RRT), such as hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and/or kidney transplant. Research hasn't confirmed which dialysis options, prior to kidney transplantation, are beneficial to patients' prognoses.
OBJECTIVE
The study intended to compare the risks-related to disease activity, exercise, all-cause infection, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality-of the use of HD and PD for LN-ESRD adults, as the initial alternative treatment before renal transplantation.
DESIGN
The research team performed a narrative review and analyzed the data obtained about clinical outcomes for HD and peritoneal dialysis. For the review, the research team searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. The search used the keywords: end-stage renal disease, renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
SETTING
The study made in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, China.
PARTICIPANTS
The studies included 15 636 patients who had been diagnosed with LN-ESRD prior to renal transplantation.
OUTCOME MEASURES
For the data analysis, the research team divided the data into two groups, one of which included the data on the clinical outcomes for HD patientsand one of which included the data on the clinical outcomes for PD patients. The study evaluated four types of risks: lupus-flare risks, all-cause infection risks, all-cause cardiovascular events risk, and risk of mortality.
RESULTS
The 16 studies found in the review reported one or more outcomes of interest for the two dialysis modalities, HD and PD. The analysis of the data from the 16 studies showed that HD was associated with a higher risk than PD: (1) of lupus flares, with RR = 1.23 (confidence interval: 0.82, 1.85), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .31); (2) of all-cause infection risk, with RR = 1.02 (confidence interval: 0.66, 1.59), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .92); (3) of all-cause cardiovascular events, with RR = 1.44 (confidence interval: 1.02, 2.04), and the difference reached statistical significance (P = .04); and (4) of mortality risk, with RR = 1.29 (confidence interval: 0.95, 1.75), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .10).
CONCLUSIONS
The current study may have reference significance for clinical treatment of ESRD. Except for all-cause cardiovascular events in which PD was superior to HD, offering better outcomes, both treatment modalities provide more or less similar clinical outcomes as effective initial choices for RRT in LN-ESRD patients prior to renal transplant. The current research team, however, encourages further research on the question, addressing better the possible sources of biases encountered in the current study.
Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lupus Nephritis; Peritoneal Dialysis; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 35648699
DOI: No ID Found -
Microorganisms Apr 2022, a member of the family of , although isolated widely in nature, rarely causes infections in humans. Herein, we report a case of isolation of from pigtail end culture,...
BACKGROUND
, a member of the family of , although isolated widely in nature, rarely causes infections in humans. Herein, we report a case of isolation of from pigtail end culture, urine culture and blood culture in a 76-year-old patient.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically address all the relevant information regarding through literature.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Scopus databases up to January 2022 and performed a qualitative synthesis of published articles reporting infection from in humans.
RESULTS
We identified 25 records on PubMed and 43 additional records on Scopus. After removing duplicates, we examined in detail 15 articles. Ten studies with a total of 17 cases were included in our systematic review. Nine studies described isolated case reports, while 1 study described 8 cases. The origin of the infection was the alimentary tract in 9 cases, gallbladder in 4 cases, peritoneal cavity in 2 cases, respiratory tract in 1 case and hemodialysis catheter insertion site in 1 case. In 3 of the aforementioned cases was also isolated in blood cultures.
CONCLUSION
Physicians should be aware that can be present in multiple clinical specimens and that the antibiotic resistance profile of the isolates may pose significant challenges.
PubMed: 35630337
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10050892 -
International Journal of Infectious... Sep 2022The aim of this study was to estimate global TB incidence in patients with CKD. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to estimate global TB incidence in patients with CKD.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was followed to perform the study. Electronic and gray literature sources were investigated for studies published between 2000 and 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies, and STATA version 16 was used for analysis. The I heterogeneity test was employed to assess heterogeneity. To examine publication bias, funnel plots and Egger's regression tests were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 104 studies with a sample size of 1,548,774 were included. TB incidence in patients with CKD ranges from 60 per 100,000 in the UK to 19,270 per 100,000 in China. The pooled TB incidence was estimated as 3718 per 100,000 (95%CI; 3024, 4411). Higher pooled TB incidence was found in the African region (9952/100,000, 95%CI; 6854, 13,051), followed by the South-East Asian (7200/100,000, 95%CI; 4537, 9863) and Eastern Mediterranean (5508/100,000, 95%CI; 3470, 7547) regions. In particular, patients on hemodialysis (5611/100,000) and on peritoneal dialysis (3533/100,000) had higher incidence of TB than did renal transplantation patients (2700/100,000) and patients with predialysis CKD (913/100,000). Furthermore, extrapulmonary TB (2227/100,000) was more common than pulmonary TB (1786/100,000).
CONCLUSION
This study identifies high TB incidence in patients with CKD with regional disparities. Thus, the authors recommend active TB screening in this group of individuals.
Topics: Humans; Incidence; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sample Size; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35609860
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.046 -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... 2022Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a bacterial infection associated with a high mortality rate in cirrhotic patients. The gold standard for the detection of SBP...
BACKGROUND
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a bacterial infection associated with a high mortality rate in cirrhotic patients. The gold standard for the detection of SBP is a manual cell count from ascitic fluid; however, alternative screening methods are under investigation. In particular, leukocyte esterase reagent strips (LERS) has been studied as an alternative method to detect SBP with a low cost and instant turnaround time. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the performance of LERS in the detection of SBP.
METHODS
A literature search was performed for studies evaluating LERS for the detection of SBP on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries. Summary sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odds ratio (LDOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated according to the respective manufacturer.
RESULTS
In total, 31 studies were evaluated. The summary sensitivity of Aution Sticks, Combur, Multistix, Periscreen reagent strips was 0.962 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.926, 0.998), 0.892 (95% CI 0.846, 0.938), 0.806 (95% CI 0.738, 0.874), and 0.939 (95% CI 0.900, 0.979), respectively. The summary specificity of Aution Sticks, Combur, Multistix, and Periscreen reagent strips was 0.940 (95% CI 0.904, 0.976), 0.922 (95% CI 0.874, 0.970), 0.974 (95% CI 0.962, 0.985), and 0.672 (95% CI 0.381, 0.963), respectively.
CONCLUSION
LERS appears to have a notable overall performance for the detection of SBP. LERS appeared to be an acceptable alternative to diagnose SBP in facilities without ability to perform cell count. However, there were significant differences in performance between each manufacturer.
PubMed: 35535110
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.05.002 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2022Management of the open abdomen is a considerable burden for patients and healthcare professionals. Various temporary abdominal closure techniques have been suggested for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Management of the open abdomen is a considerable burden for patients and healthcare professionals. Various temporary abdominal closure techniques have been suggested for managing the open abdomen. In recent years, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in some centres for the treatment of non-trauma patients with an open abdomen; however, its effectiveness is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on primary fascial closure for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients in any care setting.
SEARCH METHODS
In October 2021 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL EBSCO Plus. To identify additional studies, we also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses, and health technology reports. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication, or study setting.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NPWT with any other type of temporary abdominal closure (e.g. Bogota bag, Wittmann patch) in non-trauma patients with open abdomen in any care setting. We also included RCTs that compared different types of NPWT systems for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed the study selection process, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, and GRADE assessment of the certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two studies, involving 74 adults with open abdomen associated with various conditions, predominantly severe peritonitis (N = 55). The mean age of the participants was 52.8 years; the mean proportion of women was 39.2%. Both RCTs were carried out in single centres and were at high risk of bias. Negative pressure wound therapy versus Bogota bag We included one study (40 participants) comparing NPWT with Bogota bag. We are uncertain whether NPWT reduces time to primary fascial closure of the abdomen (NPWT: 16.9 days versus Bogota bag: 20.5 days (mean difference (MD) -3.60 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.16 to 0.96); very low-certainty evidence) or adverse events (fistulae formation, NPWT: 10% versus Bogota: 5% (risk ratio (RR) 2.00, 95% CI 0.20 to 20.33); very low-certainty evidence) compared with the Bogota bag. We are also uncertain whether NPWT reduces all-cause mortality (NPWT: 25% versus Bogota bag: 35% (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88); very low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay compared with the Bogota bag (NPWT mean: 28.5 days versus Bogota bag mean: 27.4 days (MD 1.10 days, 95% CI -13.39 to 15.59); very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report the proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure of the abdomen, participant health-related quality of life, reoperation rate, wound infection, or pain. Negative pressure wound therapy versus any other type of temporary abdominal closure There were no randomised controlled trials comparing NPWT with any other type of temporary abdominal closure. Comparison of different negative pressure wound therapy devices We included one study (34 participants) comparing different types of NPWT systems (Suprasorb CNP system versus ABThera system). We are uncertain whether the Suprasorb CNP system increases the proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure of the abdomen compared with the ABThera system (Suprasorb CNP system: 88.2% versus ABThera system: 70.6% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.14); very low-certainty evidence). We are also uncertain whether the Suprasorb CNP system reduces adverse events (fistulae formation, Suprasorb CNP system: 0% versus ABThera system: 23.5% (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.92); very low-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (Suprasorb CNP system: 5.9% versus ABThera system: 17.6% (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.89); very low-certainty evidence), or reoperation rate compared with the ABThera system (Suprasorb CNP system: 100% versus ABThera system: 100% (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.12); very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report the time to primary fascial closure of the abdomen, participant health-related quality of life, length of hospital stay, wound infection, or pain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available trial data, we are uncertain whether NPWT has any benefit in primary fascial closure of the abdomen, adverse events (fistulae formation), all-cause mortality, or length of hospital stay compared with the Bogota bag. We are also uncertain whether the Suprasorb CNP system has any benefit in primary fascial closure of the abdomen, adverse events, all-cause mortality, or reoperation rate compared with the ABThera system. Further research evaluating these outcomes as well as participant health-related quality of life, wound infection, and pain outcomes is required. We will update this review when data from the large studies that are currently ongoing are available.
Topics: Abdomen; Adult; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Wound Healing; Wound Infection
PubMed: 35514120
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2 -
European Review For Medical and... Apr 2022For end-stage renal disease (ESRD), patients receiving kidney transplantation, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are both appropriate modes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
For end-stage renal disease (ESRD), patients receiving kidney transplantation, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are both appropriate modes of pre-transplant dialysis. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of pre-transplant PD compared to HD on kidney transplant outcomes in ESRD patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive search in digital databases, like PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE and a manual search were conducted to identify cohort studies comparing the kidney transplant outcomes of both pre-transplant dialysis modalities. The data were subjected to both qualitative and quantitative analysis. A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate the effect estimate for patient survival, graft survival and delayed graft function, death-censored graft survival, acute rejection-free graft survival, graft vessel thrombosis, urological complications, surgical complications, any infections, and onset of diabetes after transplantation. The qualities of the included studies were judged by the New-castle Ottawa scale.
RESULTS
The overall patient survival is shown to be better with patients who underwent pre-transplant PD compared to HD with OR 1.34 95% CI [1.11, 1.61], p = 0.002. Delayed graft function was found to be highly associated with HD compared to PD with OR 0.60 [0.52, 0.70], p<0.0001 with moderate heterogeneity (i2 = 48%). However, no difference was observed in terms of graft survival, complications, infections, and new onset of diabetes mellitus compared to patients undergoing pre-transplant HD.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of the review, it can be concluded that ESRD patients undergoing pre-transplant PD were found to have better patient survival and lower incidence of delayed graft function.
Topics: Delayed Graft Function; Female; Graft Survival; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Renal Dialysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35442484
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202204_28459