-
Iranian Journal of Public Health Jan 2021Cancer is the third cause of death following cardiovascular disease and accidents, in Iran. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the economic burden of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cancer is the third cause of death following cardiovascular disease and accidents, in Iran. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the economic burden of cancer studies in Iran.
METHODS
This systematic review examined the types of direct medical and non-medical costs and indirect costs in cancer patients and includes studies in English and Persian that were reviewed in Scopus, Web of science, SID, Iranmedex, Magiran and databases of Medline, etc., from 1995-2019.
RESULTS
Twenty-one articles were included. Most studies have examined the direct costs of all types of cancers. The articles reviewed different types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (n=2), colorectal cancer (n=2), breast cancer (n=4), gastric cancer (n=2), oral and pharyngeal cancer (n=1), lung cancer (n=3), and blood cancer (n=4). The great number of studies were related to the gastrointestinal, breast and blood cancers. The gastrointestinal (gastric and colorectal) and breast cancer had the major economic burden than others.
CONCLUSION
It is necessary that special attention to patients, supportive measures to reduce the share of costs, and more budget allocation for prevention, screening and early detection being at priorities in the health system planning.
PubMed: 34178762
DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i1.5070 -
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Apr 2023There is no consensus on the optimal tonsillectomy technique in adult patients. The study aims to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of coblation versus bipolar... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS
There is no consensus on the optimal tonsillectomy technique in adult patients. The study aims to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of coblation versus bipolar diathermy in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Primary outcomes were hemorrhage and postoperative pain. Secondary outcome measures included return to theatre, analgesia, intraoperative bleeding, diet, tonsillar healing, and operation time. Fixed-effects modeling was used for the analysis.
RESULTS
Six studies were identified enrolling a total of 1824 patients. There were no significant differences in terms of reactionary hemorrhage (OR = 1.81, = .51), delayed hemorrhage (OR = 0.72, = .20), or postoperative pain (mean difference = -0.15, = .45); however, there is a general trend favuring coblation. For secondary outcomes, no significant differences noted in terms of intraoperative bleeding, diet, and cases returning to theatre. Analgesia administration was either insignificant or higher in the coblation group. The coblation group had longer operation time and greater healing effect on tonsillar tissue.
CONCLUSIONS
There were no significant differences in outcomes for coblation and bipolar diathermy for adult tonsillectomy patients in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Tonsillectomy; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Palatine Tonsil; Pain, Postoperative; Diathermy
PubMed: 33719616
DOI: 10.1177/0145561321994995 -
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal... Sep 2021The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend positive pressure ventilation via face mask or nasal prongs at birth. Using a nasal interface may have the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend positive pressure ventilation via face mask or nasal prongs at birth. Using a nasal interface may have the potential to improve outcomes for newborn infants.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether nasal prong/nasopharyngeal tube versus face mask during positive pressure ventilation of infants born <37 weeks' gestation in the delivery room reduces in-hospital mortality and morbidity.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE (through PubMed), Google Scholar and EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2019.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomised controlled trials comparing nasal prong/nasopharyngeal tube versus face mask during positive pressure ventilation of infants born <37 weeks' gestation in the delivery room.
DATA ANALYSIS
Risk of bias was assessed using the Covidence Collaboration Tool, results were pooled into a meta-analysis using a random effects model.
MAIN OUTCOME
In-hospital mortality.
RESULTS
Five RCTs enrolling 873 infants were combined into a meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in in-hospital mortality (risk ratio (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.52, p=0.92, I=11%), rate of chest compressions in the delivery room (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.33, p=0.13, I=28%), rate of intraventricular haemorrhage (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.70, p=0.13, I=0%) or delivery room intubations in infants ventilated with a nasal prong/tube (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39,1.02, p=0.06, I=52%).
CONCLUSION
In infants born <37 weeks' gestation, in-hospital mortality and morbidity were similar following positive pressure ventilation during initial stabilisation with a nasal prong/tube or a face mask.
Topics: Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage; Delivery Rooms; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Equipment Failure; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Intubation; Masks; Nasopharynx; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33504574
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319460 -
PLoS Pathogens Oct 2020Since SARS-CoV-2 appeared in the human population, the scientific community has scrambled to gather as much information as possible to find good strategies for the...
Since SARS-CoV-2 appeared in the human population, the scientific community has scrambled to gather as much information as possible to find good strategies for the containment and treatment of this pandemic virus. Here, we performed a systematic review of the current (pre)published SARS-CoV-2 literature with a focus on the evidence concerning SARS-CoV-2 distribution in human tissues and viral shedding in body fluids. In addition, this evidence is aligned with published ACE2 entry-receptor (single cell) expression data across the human body to construct a viral distribution and ACE2 receptor body map. We highlight the broad organotropism of SARS-CoV-2, as many studies identified viral components (RNA, proteins) in multiple organs, including the pharynx, trachea, lungs, blood, heart, vessels, intestines, brain, male genitals and kidneys. This also implicates the presence of viral components in various body fluids such as mucus, saliva, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, semen and breast milk. The main SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor, ACE2, is expressed at different levels in multiple tissues throughout the human body, but its expression levels do not always correspond with SARS-CoV-2 detection, indicating that there is a complex interplay between virus and host. Together, these data shed new light on the current view of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and lay the foundation for better diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Female; Humans; Lung; Male; Pandemics; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Pneumonia, Viral; Receptors, Virus; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 33125439
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009037 -
Cellular and Molecular Biology... Sep 2020Investigating the infectivity of body fluid can be useful for preventative measures in the community and ensuring safety in the operating rooms and on the laboratory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Investigating the infectivity of body fluid can be useful for preventative measures in the community and ensuring safety in the operating rooms and on the laboratory practices. We performed a literature search of clinical trials, cohorts, and case series using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library, and downloadable database of CDC. We excluded case reports and searched all-language articles for review and repeated until the final drafting. The search protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. Thirty studies with urinary sampling for viral shedding were included. A total number of 1,271 patients were enrolled initially, among which 569 patients had undergone urinary testing. Nine studies observed urinary viral shedding in urine from 41 patients. The total incidence of urinary SARS-CoV-2 shedding was 8%, compared to 21.3% and 39.5 % for blood and stool, respectively. The summarized risk ratio (RR) estimates for urine positive rates compared to the pharyngeal rate was 0.08. The pertaining RR urine compared to blood and stool positive rates were 0.20 and 0.33, respectively. Our review concludes that not only the SARS-CoV-2 can be excreted in the urine in eight percent of patients but also its incidence may have associations with the severity of the systemic disease, ICU admission, and fatality rates. Moreover, the findings in our review suggest that a larger population size may reveal more positive urinary cases possibly by minimizing biases.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; COVID-19 Vaccines; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Coronavirus Infections; Feces; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Patient Admission; Pneumonia, Viral; RNA, Viral; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Severity of Illness Index; Urine; Viremia; Virus Shedding; Young Adult
PubMed: 33040802
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Medicine 2020After the global spread of a severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), factors that influence viral diffusion have gained great attention....
After the global spread of a severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), factors that influence viral diffusion have gained great attention. Human-to-human transmission mainly occurs through droplets, but viral RNA clearance in different biological fluids in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We aimed to correlate the presence and the relevant temporal patterns of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in biological specimens (stool, urine, blood, and tears) of the transmission with clinical/epidemiological features in patients with COVID-19. We focused on the time window between the positivity of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests from different specimens. We used the Mantel-Cox log rank test to verify the differences in terms of viral shedding duration, while we employed the Mann-Whitney -test for subgroup analysis. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO number: CRD42020183629. We identified 147 studies; we included 55 (1,348 patients) for epidemiological analysis, of which we included 37 (364 patients) for statistical analysis. The most frequently used specimens other than respiratory tract swabs were stool samples (or anal/rectal swabs), with a positivity rate of 48.8%, followed by urine samples, with a positivity rate of 16.4%; blood samples showed a positivity rate of 17.5%. We found that fecal positivity duration (median 19 days) was significantly ( < 0.001) longer than respiratory tract positivity (median 14 days). Limited data are available about the other specimens. In conclusion, medical and social communities must pay close attention to negativization criteria for COVID-19, because patients could have longer alternative viral shedding.
PubMed: 32984389
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00562 -
Journal of Medical Virology Feb 2021Testing is one of the commendable measures for curbing the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). But, it should be done using the most appropriate specimen and an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Testing is one of the commendable measures for curbing the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). But, it should be done using the most appropriate specimen and an accurate diagnostic test such as real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to determine the positive detection rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different clinical specimens using qRT-PCR. A total of 8136 pooled clinical specimens were analyzed to detect SARS-CoV-2, the majority were nasopharyngeal swabs (69.6%). A lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens had a positive rate (PR) of 71.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.3%-82.3%) while no virus was detected in the urinogenital specimens. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLF) specimen had the PR of 91.8% (95% CI: 79.9%-103.7%), followed by rectal swabs; 87.8% (95% CI: 78.6%-96.9%) then sputum; 68.1% (95% CI: 56.9%-79.4%). A low PR was observed in oropharyngeal swabs; 7.6% (95% CI: 5.7%-9.6%) and blood samples; 1.0% (95% CI: -0.1%-2.1%) whereas no SARS-CoV-2 was detected in urine samples. Feces had a PR of 32.8% (95% CI:1 5.8%-49.8%). Nasopharyngeal swab, a widely used specimen had a PR of 45.5% (95% CI: 31.2%-59.7%). In this study, SARS-CoV-2 was highly detected in LRT specimens while no virus was detected in urinogenital specimens. BLF had the highest PR followed by rectal swab then sputum. Nasopharyngeal swab which is widely used had moderate PR. Low PR was recorded in oropharyngeal swab and blood samples while no virus was found in urine samples. Last, the virus was detected in feces, suggesting SARS-CoV-2 transmission by the fecal route.
Topics: Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Feces; Humans; Nasopharynx; Oropharynx; RNA, Viral; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Specimen Handling; Sputum
PubMed: 32706393
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26349 -
European Archives of... Mar 2021To assess all available data regarding the comparative benefit of intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ICT) versus extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ECT) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To assess all available data regarding the comparative benefit of intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ICT) versus extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ECT) in children.
METHODS
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Springerlink databases as well as other sources were searched by two independent reviewers. Controlled studies comparing ICT versus ECT in paediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or recurrent tonsillitis were included. Overall postoperative pain was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hemorrhage, diet and activity, duration of operation and tonsillar regrowth. In case of homogenous, processable data (I < 60%), a meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Six studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed significant difference between the two methods in terms of late postoperative pain with the ICT being less painful (SMD - 0.78, 95% CI [- 1.03, - 0.53]). However, there was no significant difference in early postoperative pain (≤ 48 h) between the two techniques (SMD - 0.18, 95% CI [- 0.47, 0.12]). All the rest of the secondary outcomes are presented in a qualitative synthesis due to published data limitations of the included studies.
CONCLUSION
Intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy appears to be a less painful operation in comparison to extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy. This seems to occur due to prevention of late pain flare up that normally happens several days after the procedure (described as postoperative dip) and not due to reduced pain at the immediate postoperative period. However, as all studies published are small sized, high-quality, large-sample studies need to be performed in the future for more concrete conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Palatine Tonsil; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Tonsillectomy; Tonsillitis
PubMed: 32623507
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06178-2 -
Rhinology Aug 2020Throat packs are placed around the airway in patients undergoing upper airway surgical procedures under general anaesthetic to prevent aspiration or ingestion of blood,...
BACKGROUND
Throat packs are placed around the airway in patients undergoing upper airway surgical procedures under general anaesthetic to prevent aspiration or ingestion of blood, and consequent chest infections or postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). There is no definitive evidence for this, and each time a pack is placed, it risks being retained and obstructing the upper airway. This study aimed to determine whether throat packs are of benefit to patients undergoing upper airway surgical procedures.
METHODS
Medline, Embase and Central were searched from conception to 15th January 2018 using individualised search strategies. A systematic search of multiple databases was undertaken using custom strategies to identify all relevant randomised controlled trials. Screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction were undertaken independently by two authors. Primary outcomes included throat pain and PONV. Secondary outcomes included any adverse event documented.
RESULTS
Thirteen papers were eligible for inclusion. No studies reported any instances of retained throat packs. Ten studies assessed the effect of throat packs on post-operative throat pain, with four papers showing a significantly higher incidence of pain when throat packs were used. One study showed throat pain to be slightly, but significantly, worse 24 hours post-surgery when a pack was not used. No paper showed throat packs to be of benefit in preventing PONV.
CONCLUSION
The study was limited by methodological flaws of included trials, overall relatively low numbers of patients and difficulty in contacting authors to clarify information and obtain raw data. However, this systematic review found no evidence to support the use of throat packs. This supports the proposal that there is no indication for the routine use of throat packs in ENT, maxillofacial and dental procedures.
Topics: Anesthesia; Humans; Nose; Oral Surgical Procedures; Pain, Postoperative; Pharynx; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
PubMed: 32452470
DOI: 10.4193/Rhin19.308 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2020Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) is a condition encompassing breathing problems when asleep due to upper airway obstruction. In children, hypertrophy of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) is a condition encompassing breathing problems when asleep due to upper airway obstruction. In children, hypertrophy of the tonsils and/or adenoids is thought to be the commonest cause. As such, (adeno)tonsillectomy has long been the treatment of choice. A rise in partial removal of the tonsils over the last decade is due to the hypothesis that tonsillotomy is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and fewer complications.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether partial removal of the tonsils (intracapsular tonsillotomy) is as effective as total removal of the tonsils (extracapsular tonsillectomy) in relieving signs and symptoms of oSDB in children, and has lower postoperative morbidity and fewer complications.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The search date was 22 July 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of (adeno)tonsillectomy with (adeno)tonsillotomy in children aged 2 to 16 years with oSDB.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods and assessed the certainty of the evidence for our pre-defined outcomes using GRADE. Our primary outcomes were disease-specific quality of life, peri-operative blood loss and the proportion of children requiring postoperative medical intervention (with or without hospitalisation). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, return to normal activity, recurrence of oSDB symptoms as a result of tonsil regrowth and reoperation rates.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 22 studies (1984 children), with predominantly unclear or high risk of bias. Three studies used polysomnography as part of their inclusion criteria. Follow-up duration ranged from six days to six years. Although 19 studies reported on some of our outcomes, we could only pool the results from a few due both to the variety of outcomes and the measurement instruments used, and an absence of combinable data. Disease-specific quality of life Four studies (540 children; 484 (90%) analysed) reported this outcome; data could not be pooled due to the different outcome measurement instruments used. It is very uncertain whether there is any difference in disease-specific quality of life between the two surgical procedures in the short (0 to 6 months; 3 studies, 410 children), medium (7 to 13 months; 2 studies, 117 children) and long term (13 to 24 months; 1 study, 67 children) (very low-certainty evidence). Peri-operative blood loss We are uncertain whether tonsillotomy reduces peri-operative blood loss by a clinically meaningful amount (mean difference (MD) 14.06 mL, 95% CI 1.91 to 26.21 mL; 8 studies, 610 children; very low-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analysis (restricted to three studies with low risk of bias) there was no evidence of a difference between the groups. Postoperative complications requiring medical intervention (with or without hospitalisation) The risk of postoperative complications in the first week after surgery was probably lower in children who underwent tonsillotomy (4.9% versus 2.6%, risk ratio (RR) 1.75, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.91; 16 studies, 1416 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Postoperative pain Eleven studies (1017 children) reported this outcome. Pain was measured using various scales and scored by either children, parents, clinicians or study personnel. When considering postoperative pain there was little or no difference between tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy at 24 hours (10-point scale) (MD 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.29; 4 studies, 368 children); at two to three days (MD 0.93, 95% CI -0.14 to 2.00; 3 studies, 301 children); or at four to seven days (MD 1.07, 95% CI -0.40 to 2.53; 4 studies, 370 children) (all very low-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analysis (restricted to studies with low risk of bias), we found no evidence of a difference in mean pain scores between groups. Return to normal activity Tonsillotomy probably results in a faster return to normal activity. Children who underwent tonsillotomy were able to return to normal activity four days earlier (MD 3.84 days, 95% CI 0.23 to 7.44; 3 studies, 248 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Recurrence of oSDB and reoperation rates We are uncertain whether there is a difference between the groups in the short (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.22; 3 studies, 186 children), medium (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.23; 4 studies, 206 children) or long term (RR 0.21 95% CI 0.01 to 4.13; 1 study, 65 children) (all very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For children with oSDB selected for tonsil surgery, tonsillotomy probably results in a faster return to normal activity (four days) and in a slight reduction in postoperative complications requiring medical intervention in the first week after surgery. This should be balanced against the clinical effectiveness of one operation over the other. However, this is not possible to determine in this review as data on the long-term effects of the two operations on oSDB symptoms, quality of life, oSDB recurrence and need for reoperation are limited and the evidence is of very low quality leading to a high degree of uncertainty about the results. More robust data from high-quality cohort studies, which may be more appropriate for detecting differences in less common events in the long term, are required to inform guidance on which tonsil surgery technique is best for children with oSDB requiring surgery.
Topics: Adolescent; Blood Loss, Surgical; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Palatine Tonsil; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Reoperation; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 32347984
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011365.pub2