-
World Neurosurgery Feb 2024Intracranial dermoid cyst (DC) is a rare benign, slow-growing lesion, most commonly arising along the midline. They can occur in the supratentorial compartment, very... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Intracranial dermoid cyst (DC) is a rare benign, slow-growing lesion, most commonly arising along the midline. They can occur in the supratentorial compartment, very rarely involve the sellar region and only exceptionally are intrasellar. The aim of our study is to address the challenges in the diagnosis and management of sellar DCs.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of sellar DCs, in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and described an intrasellar DC in a 32-year-old female who presented with bilateral blurring vision.
RESULTS
The review identified 4 intrasellar, 29 suprasellar, and 28 parasellar cases. Intrasellar DCs more likely present with progressive visual impairment and pituitary hormone dysfunctions during the fifth decade of life. Suprasellar and parasellar DCs are typically diagnosed during the third decade of life because of diplopia, ptosis, trigeminal hypoaesthesia/para-esthesia or cyst's rupture. Sellar DCs are typically hypodense on computed tomography scans and contain calcifications. Magnetic resonance imaging features include T1 hyperintensity, T2 heterogeneous intensity, no restriction on diffusion-weighted images, and no contrast enhancement. Surgery is the treatment of choice. Gross total resection is achieved in 60% of intrasellar and 61.9% of suprasellar and parasellar DCs. Early postoperative complications are reported in 40.0%, 16.7%, and 23.8% of intrasellar, suprasellar, and parasellar DCs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Intrasellar DCs are rare lesions typically diagnosed later than suprasellar and parasellar DCs due to their different clinical presentations. However, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the sella, including epidermoid cysts, craniopharyngiomas, Rathke's cleft cysts, and teratomas.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adult; Dermoid Cyst; Pituitary Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Cysts; Epidermal Cyst; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sella Turcica
PubMed: 37995988
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.057 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Jan 2024Not every Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is confined within the sella between the posterior and anterior lobes of the pituitary gland. Intracranial ectopic RCCs are extremely...
Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic endonasal transclival marsupialization of an ectopic retrosellar Rathke's cleft cyst: A rare case illustration and systematic review of the literature.
Not every Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is confined within the sella between the posterior and anterior lobes of the pituitary gland. Intracranial ectopic RCCs are extremely rare, with only seven cases reported in the literature. In this study, the authors presented a rare case of a symptomatic ectopic retrosellar RCC posterior to the pituitary gland, causing extensive clival erosion. The surgical nuances of the wide marsupialization of the cyst through intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic endonasal transclival approach are described, and a systematic literature review of intracranial ectopic RCCs is conducted.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Pituitary Gland; Endoscopy; Central Nervous System Cysts; Kidney Neoplasms; Pituitary Neoplasms
PubMed: 37995620
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108050 -
Archives of Medical Research Dec 2023The increased prevalence of Impulse Control Disorders (ICDs) in dopamine agonist (DA) treated patients with Parkinson's disease is well described. Despite the frequent...
BACKGROUND
The increased prevalence of Impulse Control Disorders (ICDs) in dopamine agonist (DA) treated patients with Parkinson's disease is well described. Despite the frequent use of DAs in the management of pituitary tumors, the relationship between DAs and prevalence of ICDs in patients with pituitary tumours is unclear.
AIMS
To establish the prevalence of ICDs in patients with prolactinoma or acromegaly and determine whether prevalence differs in those on DAs to those treated without.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature (registered a priori) reporting prevalence of ICDs in patients with prolactinoma or acromegaly (conducted June 2023). A narrative synthesis describing prevalence of ICDs according to assessment method was performed. Prevalence comparisons between patients with prolactinoma or acromegaly treated with DAs, to patients treated without, were summarised.
RESULTS
Studies were largely retrospective, observational and heterogenous, with few patients with prolactinoma and acromegaly treated without DA. Prevalence of ICDs varied between 0-60% in patients with prolactinoma, and from 5-23% in studies with at least five patients with acromegaly. In most studies comparing DA exposed to non-DA exposed cases, DA use was not associated with ICDs.
CONCLUSIONS
Reported prevalence of ICDs in patients with prolactinoma and acromegaly varies considerably. Given ICDs were reported to be highly prevalent in some studies, clinicians should be mindful of these potentially serious disorders. ICD screening tools validated for use in patients with pituitary tumors combined with prospective studies including appropriate controls, are necessary to accurately establish prevalence of ICDs and true impact of DAs in their development.
Topics: Humans; Dopamine Agonists; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prolactinoma; Acromegaly; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
PubMed: 37985276
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.102910 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Feb 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Adenoma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Endoscopy; Risk Factors; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Neuroendoscopy
PubMed: 37977934
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.11.010 -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2023Recently, advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have allowed a more thorough understanding of tumorigenesis in aggressive PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine... (Review)
Review
Recently, advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have allowed a more thorough understanding of tumorigenesis in aggressive PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors) through the identification of specific essential genes, crucial molecular pathways, regulators, and effects of the tumoral microenvironment. Target therapies have been developed to cure oncology patients refractory to traditional treatments, introducing the concept of precision medicine. Preliminary data on PitNETs are derived from preclinical studies conducted on cell cultures, animal models, and a few case reports or small case series. This study comprehensively reviews the principal pathways involved in aggressive PitNETs, describing the potential target therapies. A search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English papers published between 1 January 2004, and 15 June 2023. 254 were selected, and the topics related to aggressive PitNETs were recorded and discussed in detail: epigenetic aspects, membrane proteins and receptors, metalloprotease, molecular pathways, PPRK, and the immune microenvironment. A comprehensive comprehension of the molecular mechanisms linked to PitNETs' aggressiveness and invasiveness is crucial. Despite promising preliminary findings, additional research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm the indications and effectiveness of target therapies for PitNETs.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Pituitary Neoplasms; Pituitary Gland; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Aggression; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37958702
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115719 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics Jan 2024The optimal surgical approach for pediatric craniopharyngiomas (CPs) remains a matter of debate, with selection bias classically precluding a fair comparison of outcomes...
OBJECTIVE
The optimal surgical approach for pediatric craniopharyngiomas (CPs) remains a matter of debate, with selection bias classically precluding a fair comparison of outcomes between the transcranial approach (TCA) and endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the current role of EEA in the treatment of pediatric CPs and to determine whether, upon expansion of its indications, a comparison with TCA is valid.
METHODS
A systematic review of English-language articles published between February 2010 and June 2022 was performed to identify studies in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases reporting on the resection of pediatric CPs. Included were articles reporting on pediatric CPs removed through TCA or EEA. Case reports, review articles, and earlier or less comprehensive series by the same center were excluded. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Prediction intervals (PIs), heterogeneity (Q, I2, and τ2 statistics), and publication bias (funnel plot analysis) were assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 835 patients underwent TCA (18 articles) and 403 patients underwent EEA (19 articles). Preoperatively, the mean patient age (p = 0.055, PI = 5.05-15.11), visual impairment (p = 0.08, PI = 19.1-90.5, I2 = 80%), and hypothalamic syndrome (p = 0.17, PI = 6.5-52.2, I2 = 62%) did not significantly differ between the EEA and TCA groups. Endocrine deficit (anterior pituitary deficit [p < 0.001, PI = 16.5-92.9, I2 = 81%] and diabetes insipidus [p < 0.001, PI = 6.3-60.6, I2 = 43%]) was more frequent in the EEA group. Hydrocephalus and signs/symptoms of raised intracranial pressure were significantly higher (p < 0.001, PI = 5.2-73.3, I2 = 70% vs p < 0.001, PI = 4.6-73, I2 = 62%, respectively) in the TCA group. Recurrent lesions (p = 0.52, PI = 2.7-87.3, I2 = 13%), tumor size (p = 0.25, PI = 22.1-56.8), third ventricle involvement (p = 0.053, PI = 10.9-81.3, I2 = 69%), and hypothalamic involvement (p = 0.06, PI = 8.5-83.6, I2 = 79%) did not differ significantly between the approaches. EEA was preferred (p = 0.006, PI = 26.8-70.8, I2 = 40%) for sellar-suprasellar CPs, whereas TCA was preferred for purely suprasellar CPs (p = 0.007, PI = 13.5-81.1, I2 = 61%). There was no difference between the approaches for purely intrasellar lesions (p = 0.94, PI = 0-62.7, I2 = 26%). The breadth of PIs, I2 values, and analysis of publication bias showed substantial variability among the pooled data, hindering the possibility of outcome meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
With the adoption of extended approaches, the use of EEA became appropriate for a wider spectrum of pediatric CPs, with associated excellent outcomes. Although a fair comparison between outcomes in the EEA and TCA groups was hindered because of the differences in patient populations and tumor subtypes, given the increased versatility of EEA and improved expertise in its use, surgeons can now select the optimal surgical approach based on the unique benefits and drawbacks of each pediatric CP.
Topics: Child; Humans; Craniopharyngioma; Hydrocephalus; Neuroendoscopy; Pituitary Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37948683
DOI: 10.3171/2023.9.PEDS23117 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Dec 2023The initial management of craniopharyngioma is generally either gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The initial management of craniopharyngioma is generally either gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). However, the optimal management strategy for recurrent/progressive craniopharyngioma remains unclear. In this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of surgery and/or RT for the first recurrence/progression of craniopharyngioma after resection alone. The exposure was the treatment that was administered for the first recurrence/progression, and the outcomes were tumor regrowth and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed by age at the treatment for the first recurrence/progression (<18 or ≥ 18 years old), duration between the first treatment and the first recurrence/progression (<2 or ≥ 2 years), and the initial treatment that was administered (STR or GTR). Of the 2932 studies screened, 11 studies reporting a total of 80 patients were included. Across almost all subgroups, patients who received RT for the first recurrence/progression had a significantly lower risk of tumor regrowth than those who did not, regardless of whether surgery was performed and the extent of resection. There was no significant association between the treatment administered for the first recurrence/progression and OS, except for patients with a recurrence/progression < 2 years after the first treatment, where GTR was associated with a higher risk of mortality. For patients with the first recurrence/progression of craniopharyngioma after resection alone, RT should be considered for better local control. In cases where RT is not administered, GTR is preferred over STR provided it can be safely performed, for improved local control.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Craniopharyngioma; Treatment Outcome; Pituitary Neoplasms; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37922728
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.10.014 -
Neurosurgical Focus Nov 2023Pituitary surgery is a frequent neurosurgical procedure for the management of pituitary adenomas, but little research has been done on the impact of healthcare...
OBJECTIVE
Pituitary surgery is a frequent neurosurgical procedure for the management of pituitary adenomas, but little research has been done on the impact of healthcare disparities on surgical results. Healthcare inequity/disparity in terms of race and socioeconomic status (SES), in addition to age and gender, was evaluated in this study to see if they affect the results of pituitary surgery.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was carried out utilizing the MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases from conception to 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment of the included studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies yielded a total of 381,643 patients, and removal of the studies with temporal overlap resulted in 134,832 patients with a mean ± SD age of 51.52 ± 0.41 years. Based on the available data, 46.63% of patients were male. Black patients were more likely to be recommended against surgery, while Asian or Pacific Islander patients were more likely to be recommended for surgery. Postoperative course and outcome showed mixed results, with some studies reporting higher rates of transient diabetes insipidus and stroke in racial minority populations. Private hospitals admitted more White patients, and certain racial groups had reduced access to high-volume centers. SES disparities were assessed in terms of insurance and income. Patients with government insurance or without insurance were more likely to be recommended active surveillance instead of definitive treatment. Furthermore, high SES was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving surgical treatment, better treatment outcomes, and better access to high-volume centers. In terms of age and gender disparity, older patients and females were less likely to be recommended for surgical treatment. Age and gender did not consistently impact postoperative course and treatment outcomes, with varying results across studies. No significant age and gender disparities were observed in hospital admissions and charges.
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed the presence of disparities in pituitary adenoma surgery based on race, SES, age, and gender. These disparities highlight the need for further research and interventions to ensure equitable access to appropriate surgical treatment and improved outcomes for all patients with pituitary adenomas.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Healthcare Disparities; Pituitary Neoplasms; Racial Groups; Socioeconomic Factors; United States; Ethnicity
PubMed: 37913542
DOI: 10.3171/2023.8.FOCUS23467 -
Pituitary Dec 2023Heterogeneous reporting in baseline variables in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma precludes meaningful meta-analysis. We therefore...
PURPOSE
Heterogeneous reporting in baseline variables in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma precludes meaningful meta-analysis. We therefore examined trends in reported baseline variables, and degree of heterogeneity of reported variables in 30 years of literature.
METHODS
A systematic review of PubMed and Embase was conducted on studies that reported outcomes for transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma 1990-2021. The protocol was registered a priori and adhered to the PRISMA statement. Full-text studies in English with > 10 patients (prospective), > 500 patients (retrospective), or randomised trials were included.
RESULTS
178 studies were included, comprising 427,659 patients: 52 retrospective (29%); 118 prospective (66%); 9 randomised controlled trials (5%). The majority of studies were published in the last 10 years (71%) and originated from North America (38%). Most studies described patient demographics, such as age (165 studies, 93%) and sex (164 studies, 92%). Ethnicity (24%) and co-morbidities (25%) were less frequently reported. Clinical baseline variables included endocrine (60%), ophthalmic (34%), nasal (7%), and cognitive (5%). Preoperative radiological variables were described in 132 studies (74%). MRI alone was the most utilised imaging modality (67%). Further specific radiological baseline variables included: tumour diameter (52 studies, 39%); tumour volume (28 studies, 21%); cavernous sinus invasion (53 studies, 40%); Wilson Hardy grade (25 studies, 19%); Knosp grade (36 studies, 27%).
CONCLUSIONS
There is heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline variables in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. This review supports the need to develop a common data element to facilitate meaningful comparative research, trial design, and reduce research inefficiency.
Topics: Humans; Adenoma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37843726
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01357-w -
World Neurosurgery Jan 2024Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) is emerging as an effective, minimally invasive surgery technique for brain tumors of the pituitary fossa. Using a surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) is emerging as an effective, minimally invasive surgery technique for brain tumors of the pituitary fossa. Using a surgical endoscope, surgeons can obtain a broader, nearer, and more apparent visual field with minimal keyhole entrance. However, ETSS may require a steep learning curve to achieve technical competence and relevant outcomes. Moreover, there is no consensus on the learning process of ETSS. We aimed to review and determine the technical proficiency points of ETSS and discuss how to accelerate the learning curve.
METHODS
Core databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched for learning curve studies that demonstrated the clinical outcomes and learning status of ETSS for pituitary adenomas using numerical data. Quality assessments of the included articles were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The cutoff points were evaluated based on various outcome measures.
RESULTS
Eleven full-text articles, representing 2780 cases, were selected from 317 screened studies. The outcome measures were operative time, tumor removal, endocrinological results, visual field, and surgical complications. The plateaus or cutoff points in the learning curve varied with a mean of 103 ± 139.43 (range, 9-500) cases.
CONCLUSIONS
ETSS is an efficient and minimally invasive alternative surgical option for pituitary tumors. Plateau points may differ according to outcome measures, patient selection, training status, and surgical conditions. Therefore, great care should be taken when interpreting the learning curve. A systematic training program is essential to improve the learning process of endoscopic neurosurgical procedures.
Topics: Humans; Learning Curve; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Endoscopy; Pituitary Neoplasms
PubMed: 37838158
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.029