-
Journal of the European Academy of... Jun 2024Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis... (Review)
Review
Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.
PubMed: 38943431
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20154 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Jun 2024Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's...
BACKGROUND
Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's efficacy in treating acute major depressive episodes in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, PyscInfo, Scopus and Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and ScanMedicine. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted with RStudio. Evidence quality was assessed with GRADE.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs meeting inclusion criteria encompassed 4877 participants. Cariprazine, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the MADRS score (MD = -1.49, 95 % CI: -2.22 to -0.76) and demonstrated significantly higher response (RR = 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 1.30) and remission (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.06 to 1.34) rates. Subgroup analysis unveiled statistically significant reductions in MADRS score in MDD (MD = -1.15, 95 % CI: -2.04 to -0.26) and bipolar I disorder (BDI) (MD = -2.53, 95 % CI: -3.61 to -1.45), higher response rates for both MDD (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.31) and BDI (RR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 1.46), and higher remission rates only for BDI (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.24 to 1.60). A higher rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was observed.
LIMITATIONS
Reliance solely on RCTs limits generalisability; strict criteria might not reflect real-world diversity.
CONCLUSIONS
Cariprazine demonstrates efficacy in treating major depressive episodes, although variations exist between MDD and BDI and tolerability may be an issue.
PubMed: 38942207
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.099 -
Clinical Cardiology Jul 2024Chronic heart failure (CHF) has always posed a significant threat to human survival and health. The efficacy of thiamine supplementation in CHF patients remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic heart failure (CHF) has always posed a significant threat to human survival and health. The efficacy of thiamine supplementation in CHF patients remains uncertain.
HYPOTHESIS
Receiving supplementary thiamine may not confer benefits to patients with CHF.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases up until May 2023 to identify articles investigating the effects of thiamine supplementation in CHF patients. Predefined criteria were utilized for selecting data on study characteristics and results.
RESULTS
Seven randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (five parallel trials and two crossover trials) involving a total of 274 patients were enrolled. The results of the meta-analysis pooling these studies did not reveal any significant effect of thiamine treatment compared with placebo on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD = 1.653%, 95% CI: -1.098 to 4.405, p = 0.239, I = 61.8%), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (WMD = -6.831 mL, 95% CI: -26.367 to 12.704, p = 0.493, I = 0.0%), 6-min walking test (WMD = 16.526 m, 95% CI: -36.582 to 69.634, p = 0.542, I = 66.3%), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (WMD = 258.150 pg/mL, 95% CI: -236.406 to 752.707, p = 0.306, I = 21.6%), or New York Heart Association class (WMD = -0.223, 95% CI: -0.781 to 0.335, p = 0.434, I = 87.1%). However, it effectively improved the status of thiamine deficiency (TD).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis indicates that thiamine supplementation does not have a direct therapeutic effect on CHF, except for correcting TD.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Thiamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dietary Supplements; Chronic Disease; Ventricular Function, Left; Stroke Volume; Vitamin B Complex; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38940395
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24309 -
JACC. Advances Nov 2023Guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) thresholds are often not achieved in women. The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitor...
BACKGROUND
Guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) thresholds are often not achieved in women. The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) monoclonal antibodies can help further reduce LDL-C and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) although differences in efficacy by sex and type are less understood.
OBJECTIVES
The authors sought to determine if there are differences in the efficacy of LDL-C lowering and reduction in the risk of MACE by sex and type of PCSK9i.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was done through October 17, 2022, for published trials comparing PCSK9i vs control. Outcomes assessed were LDL-C reduction and incidence of MACE following the use of PCSK9i vs placebo, stratified by sex and type of PCSK9i used.
RESULTS
We identified 16 trials with 54,996 adults, and 15,143 (27.5%) of them were female. PCSK9i significantly reduced MACE compared to placebo in both women (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-0.97, < 0.001) and men (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.91, < 0.001) with no significant sex difference (MD -0.01, 95% CI: -0.14 to -0.13, = 0.930). PCSK9i also significantly reduced LDL-C levels in both sexes at 12 weeks (females: MD -62.57, 95% CI: -70.24 to -54.91, < 0.001; males: MD -66.19, 95% CI: -72.03 to -60.34, < 0.001) and 24 weeks (females: MD -47.52, 95% CI: -52.94 to -42.09, < 0.001; males: MD -54.07, 95% CI: -59.46 to -48.68, < 0.001). Significant sex difference was seen in the LDL reduction of PCSK9i for both 12 weeks (males vs females: MD -4.55, 95% CI: -7.34 to -1.75, < 0.01) and 24 weeks (males vs females: MD -7.11, 95% CI: -9.99 to -4.23, < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of PCSK9i results in significant LDL-C and MACE reduction in both males and females. While there is no significant sex difference in MACE reduction, LDL-C reduction is greater in males than in females. Our data support the equal use of PCSK9i in all eligible patients, regardless of sex.
PubMed: 38938736
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100669 -
Drugs Jun 2024Although paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with other analgesics can reduce pain intensity in some pain conditions, its effectiveness in managing low back pain and...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Although paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with other analgesics can reduce pain intensity in some pain conditions, its effectiveness in managing low back pain and osteoarthritis is unclear. This systematic review investigated whether paracetamol combination therapy is more effective and safer than monotherapy or placebo in low back pain and osteoarthritis.
METHODS
Online database searches were conducted for randomised trials that evaluated paracetamol combined with another analgesic compared to a placebo or the non-paracetamol ingredient in the combination (monotherapy) in low back pain and osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was a change in pain. Secondary outcomes were (serious) adverse events, changes in disability and quality of life. Follow-up was immediate (≤ 2 weeks), short (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months), intermediate (> 3 months but < 12 months) or long term (≥ 12 months). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the original Cochrane tool, and quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included. Pain was reduced with oral paracetamol plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) at immediate term in low back pain (paracetamol plus ibuprofen vs ibuprofen [mean difference (MD) - 6.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.4 to -2.0, moderate evidence]) and in osteoarthritis (paracetamol plus aceclofenac vs aceclofenac [MD - 4.7, 95% CI - 8.3 to - 1.2, moderate certainty evidence] and paracetamol plus etodolac vs etodolac [MD - 15.1, 95% CI - 18.5 to - 11.8; moderate certainty evidence]). Paracetamol plus oral tramadol reduced pain compared with placebo at intermediate term for low back pain (MD - 11.7, 95% CI - 19.2 to - 4.3; very low certainty evidence) and osteoarthritis (MD - 6.8, 95% CI - 12.7 to -0.9; moderate certainty evidence). Disability scores improved in half the comparisons. Quality of life was infrequently measured. All paracetamol plus NSAID combinations did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to NSAID monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports the oral use of some paracetamol plus NSAID combinations for short-term pain relief with no increased risk of harm for low back pain and osteoarthritis compared to its non-paracetamol monotherapy comparator.
PubMed: 38937394
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02065-w -
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Jun 2024Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects patients' quality of life and treatment effectiveness. Gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, are...
INTRODUCTION
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects patients' quality of life and treatment effectiveness. Gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, are often used for CIPN treatment, but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study reviews and analyses randomised controlled trial data on this topic.
MATERIALS/METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL until 29 August 2022 for studies on gabapentinoid use in CIPN. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.4 and the Metafor package in R. Outcomes included pain scores, quality of life and adverse drug events.
RESULTS
For the prevention setting, our meta-analysis shows that pregabalin did not significantly improve average pain (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.14, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.23; I=26% (95% CI 0% to >98%)) or quality of life (mean difference (MD) 2.5, 95% CI -4.67 to 9.67; p=0.49) in preventing CIPN compared with placebo. However, it showed a potential trend towards reducing the worst pain (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.01; I=0% (95% CI 0% to 98%; p=0.06)). For the treatment setting, some studies have shown a potential therapeutic effect of gabapentinoids. However, the results are not consistent between studies. Given the studies' heterogeneity, a meta-analysis in treatment setting was not performed.
CONCLUSION
There is limited evidence to support the use of gabapentinoids in CIPN. In prevention setting, gabapentinoids do not significantly prevent CIPN. In treatment setting, studies have been inconsistent in their conclusions, lacking definitive benefits over placebo. More comprehensive and higher quality research is needed in the future.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022361193.
PubMed: 38936970
DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004362 -
Journal of Dentistry Jun 2024To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the effectiveness of different adjunctive local treatments combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) to reduce pocket depth (PD), gain clinical attachment level (CAL), and/or reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and periodontitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Publications were searched in Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, opengrey.eu, and www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov up to May 29, 2024 with no language restriction.
STUDY SELECTION
Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Network meta-analysis utilized frequentist models.
DATA
The network meta-analysis of 30 RCTs involving 1224 patients revealed that, in short-term (2-3 months) and medium-term (4-6 months), adjunctive local treatment involving statins or metformin significantly outperformed scaling and root planning (SRP) with/without additional interventions such as photodynamic and laser therapies (PDT/LT), phytotherapy, doxycycline, bisphosphonates, antibiotics, antiseptics, or placebo for reducing PD and/or gaining CAL. In the long-term (>6 months), statins yielded the most significant additional PD reduction and CAL gain, followed by antibiotics, compared to SRP with antiseptics or placebo. Only PDT/LT demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction in the short term compared to SRP with/without statins, antiseptics, or placebo.
CONCLUSION
This study moderately supports that adding metformin or statins locally to NSPT may enhance PD reduction and CAL gain compared to SRP with/without placebo.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Clinicians are guided to optimize adjunctive therapies, enhancing the health of patients with type 2 diabetes and periodontitis. A strategic approach is proposed to tackle systemic and oral health challenges simultaneously.
PubMed: 38936456
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105212 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024The efficacy and necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated surgery remains controversial.
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated surgery remains controversial.
METHODS
The studies were screened and extracted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov according to predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing any clean or clean-contaminated surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 16,189 participants in 48 RCTs were included in the primary meta-analysis following the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53-0.68). The pooled OR among gastrointestinal, oncology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, oral, and urology surgery was 3.06 (95% CI: 1.05-8.91), 1.16 (95% CI: 0.89-1.50), 2.04 (95% CI: 1.09-3.81), 3.05 (95% CI: 1.25-7.47), 3.55 (95% CI: 1.78-7.06), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.12-4.55), respectively. Furthermore, the summary mean difference (MD) for patients' length of hospitalization was -0.91 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.16). The results of sensitivity analyses for all combined effect sizes showed good stability.
CONCLUSION
Antibiotics are both effective, safe, and necessary in preventing surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated procedures, attributed to their reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections as well as the length of patient hospitalization.
PubMed: 38935088
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001882 -
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2024The rehabilitation of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a complex clinical challenge, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely applied in...
BACKGROUND
The rehabilitation of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a complex clinical challenge, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely applied in the research of neurofunctional recovery following stroke. However, there is currently no reliable evidence-based medicine supporting the efficacy of rTMS in central post-stroke pain. This review aims to evaluate the effects of rTMS on central post-stroke pain.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted searches on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wan Fang Data Knowledge Service Platform. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of rTMS in treating central post-stroke pain, and conducted screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Characteristics of the included RCTs were extracted. The heterogeneity of the trials was assessed using the I2 statistic. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17 software. Bias risk and methodological quality were evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the Pedro scale.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled trials involving 288 patients met our inclusion criteria. In our analysis, rTMS was more effective in treating patients with CPSP compared to the placebo group (SMD=-1.15, 95% CI: -1.69, -0.61, < 0.001). Furthermore, results from subgroup analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the improvement of pain for durations exceeding 6 months when comparing rTMS to conventional treatment (SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.63, 0.03, = 0.059).
CONCLUSION
TMS can alleviate pain in CPSP patients and improve their motor function, but its effects on depression, anxiety, and MEP-latency are not significant.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42024497530.
PubMed: 38933817
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1367649 -
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic... Jun 2024Although several randomized clinical trials have tested the effect of prenatal dietary supplements on plasma glucose and lipid levels in non-pharmacologically managed...
The dietary supplements effect on metabolic markers in non-pharmacologically managed gestational diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Although several randomized clinical trials have tested the effect of prenatal dietary supplements on plasma glucose and lipid levels in non-pharmacologically managed gestational diabetes mellitus patients (GDM), a rigorous meta-analytic compendium lacks in the context. Therefore, this study aims to address this evidence gap.
METHOD
Eligible trials retrieved from searches in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were appraised using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The weighted mean differences (WMD) between dietary supplements and placebo were estimated using random-effect meta-analysis models for plasma glycemic and lipid markers. Meta-regression analysis ensued for effect modifier identification. The statistical significance estimation happened at < 0.05 (95% confidence interval).
RESULTS
This review included 19 trials (mostly Iranian and of low risk of bias primarily) of > 8000 GDM patients. Meta-analysis showed favorable effects of dietary supplementation on fasting plasma glucose (WMD: -5.42 mg/dL, p < 0.001), homeostasis model assessment indexes- insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; WMD: -1.02, p < 0.001), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (WMD: 0.01, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (TC; WMD: -7.70 mg/dL, = 0.006), triglycerides (WMD: -10.23 mg/dL, = 0.0083), TC/high-density lipoprotein (WMD: -0.31 mg/dL, < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (WMD: -5.79 mg/dL; < 0.001) and very-low-density lipoprotein (WMD: -5.67 mg/dL, < 0.001) levels. However, the HOMA- ß-cell function didn't increase (WMD: -17.91, < 0.001). Baseline maternal age ( = 0.28, = 0.014) and GDM diagnostic criteria ( = 0.90, = 0.012) were effect moderators of HOMA-IR and body mass index (BMI) ( = 6.07, = 0.022) and supplement type (solo versus combined) ( = 14.99, = 0.006) were effect moderators of triglyceride levels.
CONCLUSION
Altogether, antenatal dietary supplements achieved control over plasma glycemic and lipid profiles in non-pharmacologically treated GDM patients. Maternal age and GDM diagnostic criteria moderated HOMA-IR levels. BMI and supplement-type moderated triglyceride levels.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01369-0.
PubMed: 38932907
DOI: 10.1007/s40200-023-01369-0