-
Rheumatology International Aug 2021The incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased over recent years in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). PJP prognosis is...
Is cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia needed in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapies?
The incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased over recent years in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). PJP prognosis is poor in those receiving immunosuppressive therapy and glucocorticoids in particular. Despite the effectiveness of cotrimoxazole against PJP, the risk of adverse effects remains significant, and no consensus has emerged regarding the need for PJP prophylaxis in SARD patients undergoing immunosuppressor therapies.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP in SARD adult patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: We performed a systematic review, consulting MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2020. Outcomes covered prevention of PJP, other infections, morbidity, mortality, and safety. The information obtained was summarized with a narrative review and results were tabulated. Of the 318 identified references, 8 were included. Two were randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The quality of studies was moderate or low. Despite disparities in the cotrimoxazole prophylaxis regimens described, results were consistent in terms of efficacy, particularly with glucocorticoid doses > 20 mg/day. However, cotrimoxazole 400 mg/80 mg/day, prescribed three times/ week, or 200 mg/40 mg/day or in dose escalation, exhibited similar positive performances. Conversely, cotrimoxazole 400 mg/80 mg/day showed higher incidences of withdrawals and adverse effects. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP exhibited efficacy in SARD, mainly in patients taking glucocorticoids ≥ 20 mg/day. All cotrimoxazole regimens exposed seemed equally efficacious, although, higher quality trials are needed. Adverse effects were observed 2 months after initiation, particularly with the 400 mg/80 mg/day regimen. Conversely, escalation dosing or 200 mg/40 mg/day regimens appeared better tolerated.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Rheumatic Diseases; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 33656582
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04808-4 -
Medical Mycology Jul 2021The epidemiology of Pneumocystis jirovecii, known to colonize the respiratory tract and cause a life-threatening HIV-associated pneumonia (PCP), is poorly described in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The epidemiology of Pneumocystis jirovecii, known to colonize the respiratory tract and cause a life-threatening HIV-associated pneumonia (PCP), is poorly described in Africa. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate P. jirovecii prevalence in African HIV-positive adults with or without respiratory symptoms.
METHODS
We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Africa-Wide, and Web of Science for studies employing PCR and/or microscopy for P. jirovecii detection in respiratory samples from HIV-positive adults in Africa between 1995 and 2020. Prevalence with respiratory symptoms was pooled using random-effect meta-analysis, and stratified by laboratory method, sample tested, study setting, CD4 count, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. Colonization prevalence in asymptomatic adults and in adults with non-PCP respiratory disease was described, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) thresholds to distinguish colonization from microscopy-confirmed PCP reviewed.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies were included, with 27 studies (87%) at high risk of selection bias. P. jirovecii was detected in 19% [95% confidence interval (CI): 12-27%] of 3583 symptomatic and in 9% [95% CI: 0-45%] of 140 asymptomatic adults. Among symptomatic adults, prevalence was 22% [95% CI: 12-35%] by PCR and 15% [95% CI: 9-23%] by microscopy. Seven percent of 435 symptomatic adults had PCR-detected Pneumocystis colonization without evidence of PCP [95% CI: 5-10%, four studies]. One study established a qPCR cutoff of 78 copies/5μl of DNA in 305 induced sputum samples to distinguish Pneumocystis colonization from microscopy-confirmed PCP.
CONCLUSION
Despite widened access to HIV services, P. jirovecii remains common in Africa. Prevalence estimates and qPCR-based definitions of colonization are limited, and overall quality of studies is low.
Topics: Adult; Africa; Asymptomatic Infections; HIV Infections; Humans; Pneumocystis Infections; Pneumocystis carinii; Prevalence
PubMed: 33578417
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myab002 -
Transplantation Oct 2021There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The 2019 American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (AST IDCOP) guidelines suggested to continue or reinstitute PJP prophylaxis in those receiving intensified immunosuppression for graft rejection, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, higher dose of corticosteroids, or prolonged neutropenia.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through April 22, 2020, using MEDLINE and EMBASE. (The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42019134204).
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies with 413 276 SOT recipients were included. The following factors were associated with PJP development: acute rejection (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.26); study heterogeneity index [I2] = 23.4%), CMV-related illnesses (pOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.30-4.29; I2 = 48%), absolute lymphocyte count <500 cells/mm3 (pOR, 6.29; 95% CI, 3.56-11.13; I2 = 0%), BK polyomavirus-related diseases (pOR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.22-5.49; I2 = 0%), HLA mismatch ≥3 (pOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.17; I2 = 0%), rituximab use (pOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.82-5.04; I2 = 0%), and polyclonal antibodies use for rejection (pOR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.87-8.19; I2 = 0%). On the other hand, sex, CMV mismatch, interleukin-2 inhibitors, corticosteroids for rejection, and plasmapheresis were not associated with developing PJP.
CONCLUSIONS
PJP prophylaxis should be considered in SOT recipients with lymphopenia, BK polyomavirus-related infections, and rituximab exposure in addition to the previously mentioned risk factors in the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice guidelines.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Female; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Opportunistic Infections; Organ Transplantation; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33323766
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003576 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Dec 2020Pneumocystis jiroveci (P jiroveci) is an important opportunistic fungus and causes pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). By using...
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE
Pneumocystis jiroveci (P jiroveci) is an important opportunistic fungus and causes pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). By using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of PJP prophylaxis clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and to help develop, update or improve guideline.
METHODS
A search was conducted for PJP prophylaxis CPGs using PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), WanFang data, VIP Database, Google and guideline websites (until 18 January 2020). Data extraction and quality assessment were independently assessed by two appraisers, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater reliability. The specific recommendations were evaluated based on the quality results.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 6 CPGs were included. The highest median scores were in the clarity of presentation domain (92%), and the lowest median scores were in the applicability domain (25%). The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and Renal Association (RA)/British Transplantation Society (BTS) CPGs were strongly recommended. The specific recommendations were inconsistent, such as the dose, frequency and duration.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
The KDIGO and RA/BTS CPGs were strongly recommended. Not only the quality of the PJP prophylaxis CPGs needs to be improved during the development progress, but also the specific recommendations should be further refined.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Observer Variation; Opportunistic Infections; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 32710453
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13213 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are life-threatening opportunistic infections that occur in immunocompromised or critically ill people. Early detection and treatment...
BACKGROUND
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are life-threatening opportunistic infections that occur in immunocompromised or critically ill people. Early detection and treatment of IFIs is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in these populations. (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) is a component of the fungal cell wall that can be detected in the serum of infected individuals. The serum BDG test is a way to quickly detect these infections and initiate treatment before they become life-threatening. Five different versions of the BDG test are commercially available: Fungitell, Glucatell, Wako, Fungitec-G, and Dynamiker Fungus.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of commercially available tests for serum BDG to detect selected invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among immunocompromised or critically ill people.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE (via Ovid) and Embase (via Ovid) up to 26 June 2019. We used SCOPUS to perform a forward and backward citation search of relevant articles. We placed no restriction on language or study design.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all references published on or after 1995, which is when the first commercial BDG assays became available. We considered published, peer-reviewed studies on the diagnostic test accuracy of BDG for diagnosis of fungal infections in immunocompromised people or people in intensive care that used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria or equivalent as a reference standard. We considered all study designs (case-control, prospective consecutive cohort, and retrospective cohort studies). We excluded case studies and studies with fewer than ten participants. We also excluded animal and laboratory studies. We excluded meeting abstracts because they provided insufficient information.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed the standard procedures outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews. Two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and performed a quality assessment for each study. For each study, we created a 2 × 2 matrix and calculated sensitivity and specificity, as well as a 95% confidence interval (CI). We evaluated the quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-Revised (QUADAS-2). We were unable to perform a meta-analysis due to considerable variation between studies, with the exception of Candida, so we have provided descriptive statistics such as receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and forest plots by test brand to show variation in study results.
MAIN RESULTS
We included in the review 49 studies with a total of 6244 participants. About half of these studies (24/49; 49%) were conducted with people who had cancer or hematologic malignancies. Most studies (36/49; 73%) focused on the Fungitell BDG test. This was followed by Glucatell (5 studies; 10%), Wako (3 studies; 6%), Fungitec-G (3 studies; 6%), and Dynamiker (2 studies; 4%). About three-quarters of studies (79%) utilized either a prospective or a retrospective consecutive study design; the remainder used a case-control design. Based on the manufacturer's recommended cut-off levels for the Fungitell test, sensitivity ranged from 27% to 100%, and specificity from 0% to 100%. For the Glucatell assay, sensitivity ranged from 50% to 92%, and specificity ranged from 41% to 94%. Limited studies have used the Dynamiker, Wako, and Fungitec-G assays, but individual sensitivities and specificities ranged from 50% to 88%, and from 60% to 100%, respectively. Results show considerable differences between studies, even by manufacturer, which prevented a formal meta-analysis. Most studies (32/49; 65%) had no reported high risk of bias in any of the QUADAS-2 domains. The QUADAS-2 domains that had higher risk of bias included participant selection and flow and timing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We noted considerable heterogeneity between studies, and these differences precluded a formal meta-analysis. Because of wide variation in the results, it is not possible to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the BDG test in specific settings. Future studies estimating the accuracy of BDG tests should be linked to the way the test is used in clinical practice and should clearly describe the sampling protocol and the relationship of time of testing to time of diagnosis.
Topics: Aspergillosis; Biomarkers; Candidiasis, Invasive; Case-Control Studies; Critical Illness; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Invasive Fungal Infections; Pneumocystis Infections; Pneumocystis carinii; Prospective Studies; ROC Curve; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; beta-Glucans
PubMed: 32693433
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009833.pub2 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Sep 2020Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) can be a life-threatening opportunistic infection in immunocompromised hosts. The diagnosis can be challenging, often requiring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) can be a life-threatening opportunistic infection in immunocompromised hosts. The diagnosis can be challenging, often requiring semi-invasive respiratory sampling. The serum 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay has been proposed as a minimally invasive test for the presumptive diagnosis of PJP.
METHOD
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis using articles in the English language published between January 1960 and September 2019. We estimated the pooled sensitivity and specificity of BDG testing using a bivariate random effects approach and compared test performance in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and non-HIV subgroups with meta-regression. Data from the pooled sensitivity and specificity were transformed to generate pre- and post-test probability curves.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of serum BDG testing for PJP were 91% (95%CI 87-94%) and 79% (95%CI 72-84%) respectively. The sensitivity in patients with HIV was better than in patients without (94%, 95%CI 91-96%) versus 86% (95%CI 78-91%) (p 0.02), with comparable specificity (83%, 95%CI 69-92% versus 83%, 95%CI 72-90%) (p 0.10). A negative BDG was only associated with a low post-test probability of PJP (≤5%) when the pre-test probability was low to intermediate (≤20% in non-HIV and ≤50% in HIV).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with a higher likelihood of PJP, the pooled sensitivity of BDG is insufficient to exclude infection. Similarly, for most cases, the pooled specificity is inadequate to diagnose PJP. Understanding the performance of BDG in the population being investigated is therefore essential to optimal clinical decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Serologic Tests; beta-Glucans
PubMed: 32479781
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.024 -
European Journal of Clinical... Nov 2019Although there is controversy, some evidences proposed increased risk of post-transplant Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients receiving mammalian target of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Although there is controversy, some evidences proposed increased risk of post-transplant Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients receiving mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. This study aimed to examine the association between m-TOR inhibitors and the risk of developing PCP in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed to find the eligible studies that investigated the incidence of PCP in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors after SOT. Random effect model was applied for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Combination of 15 effect sizes showed a significant positive association between mTOR inhibitor administration and the risk of PCP (OR = 1.90, 95%CIs = 1.44, 2.75). There was no heterogeneity between studies (I = 3.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed increased risk of PCP after the first year of transplantation (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, administration of mTOR inhibitors is a potential risk factor for late-onset PCP after SOT. Targeted PCP prophylaxis based on recipients' risk factors rather universal prophylaxis may lessen the risk.
Topics: Humans; Organ Transplantation; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Risk Factors; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 31377892
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-019-02730-0 -
Journal of Infection in Developing... Oct 2018Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ) pneumonia (PJP) is an important opportunistic infection affecting various types of immunocompromised patients and is associated with an...
INTRODUCTION
Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ) pneumonia (PJP) is an important opportunistic infection affecting various types of immunocompromised patients and is associated with an increased risk of mortality. PJ is a unique fungal pathogen which is increasingly common and maybe associated with a higher mortality rate in patients without AIDS. We present the characteristics of PJP, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes between AIDS and non-AIDS patients.
METHODOLOGY
We conducted a review of studies of AIDS and non-AIDS patients with PJP using PubMed to search for studies until December 2017.
RESULTS
The annual incidence of AIDS-PJP decreased from 13.4 to 3.3 per 1000 person-years in industrialized countries, while the incidence of non-AIDS-PJP varied widely. Both groups had similar clinical manifestations and radiological features, but the non-AIDS-PJP group potentially had a more fulminant course, more diffuse ground glass opacities, and fewer cystic lesions. The mortality rate decreased in the AIDS-PJP group after the advent of antiretroviral therapy; however, the mortality rate remained high in both groups. A laboratory diagnosis was usually nonspecific; CD4+ T-cell < 200 cells/mL or < 14% favored AIDS-PJP. Serum 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) had a high diagnostic odds ratio. Combining BDG and lactic dehydrogenase improved the diagnosis of AIDS-PJP. Histopathological staining and polymerase chain reactions could not discriminate infection from colonization when the result was positive. The use of antibiotics, prophylaxis, and adjunctive corticosteroids was controversial.
CONCLUSIONS
Early diagnosis and treatment can be achieved through vigilance, thereby improving the survival rate for PJP in immunocompromised patients.
Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Case-Control Studies; Early Diagnosis; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 32004150
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.10357 -
Sixteen-year history of rituximab therapy for 1085 pemphigus vulgaris patients: A systematic review.International Immunopharmacology Jan 2018Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare autoimmune disease due to the production of pathogenic autoantibodies directed against desmoglein 1 and 3, usually affecting both skin... (Review)
Review
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare autoimmune disease due to the production of pathogenic autoantibodies directed against desmoglein 1 and 3, usually affecting both skin and mucous membranes. Recently, rituximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody which targets the CD20 molecules have been regarded as a promising treatment for PV. In this study, a systematic review was conducted to conclude on how and which PV patients could benefit from rituximab infusion. Search in PubMed results in 114 relevant studies, which met the criteria. Total of 1085 PV patients with different conditions, including unresponsive childhood/juvenile or adult PV patients, women of childbearing age, those with chronic infections with the risk of reactivation have been evaluated. Although the majority of these patients well responded to rituximab, some of them did not respond, and the paucity of patients experienced exacerbation of disease. In addition to the rituximab monotherapy or its combination with conventional therapies, different novel combination therapies of rituximab with immunoadsorption and/or IVIg have shown promising results. Moreover, using rituximab as the first-line treatment has emerged recently. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and septicemia were found as the two fatal and serious adverse events associated with rituximab. Moreover, development or reactivation of herpes simplex and herpes zoster and cytomegalovirus should be warned. Similar to the adults, those with childhood and juvenile PV could be successfully treated with rituximab. Although rituximab seems to trigger reactivation of chronic infections, such as viral hepatitis and HIV infection, no related report was found. Administration of rituximab in approximately ten months before conception also was found safe and effective for a successful pregnancy. In conclusion, rituximab is very effective in adult and childhood/juvenile PV. However, there is a risk of not responding, exacerbation of disease and development of fatal infections. Moreover, it seems to be a promising first-line treatment for refractory PV.
Topics: Antigens, CD20; Autoantibodies; Combined Modality Therapy; Desmoglein 1; Desmoglein 3; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Herpesviridae; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunotherapy; Mucous Membrane; Pemphigus; Rituximab; Skin; Virus Activation
PubMed: 29132070
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.11.005 -
Transplant Infectious Disease : An... Apr 2017In recent years, the incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased in immunocompromised patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)... (Review)
Review
The role of CD4 cell count as discriminatory measure to guide chemoprophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-negative immunocompromised patients: A systematic review.
BACKGROUND
In recent years, the incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased in immunocompromised patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Chemoprophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is highly effective in preventing PJP in both HIV-positive and -seronegative patients. In HIV-positive patients, the risk of PJP is strongly correlated with decreased CD4 cell count. The role of CD4 cell count in the pathogenesis of PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients is less well studied. For most immunosuppressive conditions, no clear guidelines indicate whether to start TMP-SMX.
METHOD
We conducted a systematic literature review with the aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the role of CD4 cell counts in managing the risk of PJP in HIV-seronegative patients.
RESULTS
Of the 63 individual studies retrieved, 14 studies report on CD4 cell counts in a variety of immunosuppressive conditions. CD4 cell count were <200/μL in 73.1% of the patients.
CONCLUSION
CD4 cell count <200/μL is a sensitive biomarker to identify non-HIV immunocompromised patients who are at risk for PJP. Measuring CD4 cell counts could help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from TMP-SMX prophylaxis.
Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Kidney Transplantation; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 28035717
DOI: 10.1111/tid.12651