-
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins May 2024To ensure effective administration of probiotics in clinical practice, it is crucial to comprehend the specific strains and their association with human health....
To ensure effective administration of probiotics in clinical practice, it is crucial to comprehend the specific strains and their association with human health. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impact of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum probiotic consumption on human health. Out of 11,831 records, 135 studies were assessed qualitatively, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. This systematic review demonstrated that probiotic supplementation with L. plantarum, either alone or in combination, can significantly improve outcomes for patients with specific medical conditions. Meta-analysis revealed notable benefits in periodontal health, evidenced by reduced pocket depth and bleeding on probing (p < 0.001); in gastroenterological health, marked by significant reductions in abdominal pain (p < 0.001); and in infectious disease, through a reduction in C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular benefits included lowered total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the L. plantarum intervention group (p < 0.05). Our study's clinical significance highlights the importance of considering probiotic strain and their application to specific diseases when planning future studies and clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.
PubMed: 38816672
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10287-3 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jul 2024To conduct a randomized controlled trial meta-analysis and provide concise and specific recommendations for clinical practice optimization of gestational diabetes for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
To conduct a randomized controlled trial meta-analysis and provide concise and specific recommendations for clinical practice optimization of gestational diabetes for probiotics.
METHODS
Up until May 2023, we conducted a thorough, systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Controlled Trials, and Embase. Stata software was used to merge the resulting data from the original studies. Cochran's Q and the I statistics were used to evaluate and quantify heterogeneity. The GRADE method was used to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. Sources of heterogeneity were analyzed through a leave-one-out meta-analysis, a Galbraith plot, and a subgroup analysis.
RESULTS
A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials with a total of 713 participants was finally conducted. Our findings indicated the administration of probiotics at a median dosage of 6 × 10 CFU/day led to a substantial improvement in fasting glucose levels (MD: -4.16 mg/dL [95% CI: -6.78, -1.54]; P < 0.001), fasting insulin levels (MD: -3.33 μIU/ml [95% CI: -4.92, -1.74]; P < 0.001), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (MD: -0.71 [95% CI: -0.97, -0.45]; P < 0.001), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (MD: 0.01 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.02]; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that probiotic intervention exerted a more significant reduction in fasting blood glucose in patients with higher baseline BMI and glucose levels, and reduced fasting insulin more markedly in those with elevated baseline insulin. According to the GRADE assessment, the quality of evidence for fasting blood glucose and QUICKI was rated as "high", while the quality for fasting insulin and HOMA-IR was rated as "moderate".
CONCLUSIONS
Probiotic intervention has been shown to significantly decrease levels of fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR, while elevating QUICKI levels in patients with GDM, underscoring the potential utility of probiotics in the adjunctive management of GDM.
Topics: Probiotics; Humans; Diabetes, Gestational; Pregnancy; Female; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Blood Glucose; Insulin Resistance; Insulin; Adult
PubMed: 38815494
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.020 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024The effectiveness of the supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics as a therapeutic approach in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The aim of this...
INTRODUCTION
The effectiveness of the supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics as a therapeutic approach in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to critically examine the current scientific evidence on the impact of modulating the microbiota, through the use of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics, in patients diagnosed with CRC undergoing treatment, to determine the potential therapeutic use of this approach.
METHODS
This systematic review was made according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the impact of pre-, pro-, or synbiotic supplementation with placebo or standard care in patients with CRC undergoing treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, non-RCTs, and studies in languages other than English or Portuguese. Six databases were consulted, namely, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Scopus, Cinahl, MedicLatina and Web of Science until May of 2023. RAYYAN software was used to manage the search results and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using the Rob 2.0 tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-four RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Administration of pre-, pro-, or synbiotics improved surgical outcomes such as the incidence of infectious and non-infectious postoperative complications, return to normal gut function, hospital length of stay, and antibiotic usage. The supplementation of these microorganisms also alleviated some symptoms from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, mainly diarrhea. Evidence on the best approach in terms of types of strains, dosage and duration of intervention is still scarce.
CONCLUSIONS
Pre-, pro-, and synbiotics supplementation appears to be a beneficial therapeutic approach in CRC treatment to improve surgical outcomes and to alleviate side-effects such as treatment toxicity. More RCTs with larger sample sizes and less heterogeneity are needed to confirm these potential benefits and to determine the best strains, dosage, and duration of administration in each situation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023413958.
PubMed: 38807764
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395966 -
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins May 2024Increasing evidence suggests the beneficial immunomodulatory effects of probiotics can reduce inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, there is no... (Review)
Review
Increasing evidence suggests the beneficial immunomodulatory effects of probiotics can reduce inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, there is no summary of the existing evidence available. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on SLE in a lupus mouse model by examining various markers, including inflammatory cytokines, Treg cells, disease activity, and gut microbiota. A systematic search was conducted using three databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) to identify animal studies that reported the therapeutic benefits of probiotics against SLE. Data extracted from the selected articles were qualitatively synthesized. The SYRCLE risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Out of a total of 3205 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Probiotic strains, quantities, and routes of administration varied among the studies. The treatment ranged from 8 to 47 weeks. Probiotic strains such as L. fermentum CECT5716, L. casei B255, L. reuteri DSM 17509, L. plantarum LP299v, and L. acidophilus can significantly reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-12, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-17, and IFN-γ) levels while increasing anti-inflammatory IL-10 and Treg cells. Probiotics also delay the production of autoantibodies, thus prolonging the remission period, decreasing flare frequency, and delaying disease progression. Furthermore, probiotic administration prevents gut dysbiosis, increases intestinal stability, and prevents pathogen colonization. In conclusion, probiotics can be considered a new alternative therapeutic approach for the management of SLE. Further clinical studies are required to investigate and validate the safety and effectiveness of probiotics in humans.
PubMed: 38806966
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10297-1 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... May 2024The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotics as an adjunct treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotics as an adjunct treatment for preventing and treating gynecological infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study adopted a systematic review of scientific databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE, using defined MeSH terms. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were set to refine the search, with the data extraction and quality assessment being conducted by two independent investigators.
RESULTS
A total of 35 articles, comprising 3751 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The application of probiotics demonstrated a notable increase in the cure rates of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) as compared to control groups. A significant BV cure rate (OR: 5.972; 95% CI: 2.62-13.59; p-value: 0.01) was noted with probiotic use, which was even more pronounced when used as an adjunctive treatment with antibiotics (OR: 2.504; 95% CI: 1.03-6.06; p-value: 0.04). Additionally, probiotic use significantly reduced the recurrence rates of BV (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.167-0.71; p-value: 0.004). For VVC, a significant increase in the cure rate was observed in the probiotic group (OR: 3.425; 95% CI: 2.404-4.879; p-value: 0.01), along with a lower recurrence rate (OR: 0.325; 95% CI: 0.175-0.606; p-value: 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Our findings underscore the potential role of probiotics as a beneficial adjunctive treatment for gynecological infections, indicating an improved cure rate and decreased recurrence. However, additional well-designed studies are necessary to corroborate these findings.
Topics: Humans; Probiotics; Female; Vaginosis, Bacterial; Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Treatment Outcome; Combined Modality Therapy; Recurrence
PubMed: 38802199
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2024.03.004 -
Current Issues in Molecular Biology Apr 2024Gut microbiome-targeted interventions such as fecal transplant, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and antibiotic gut depletion are speculated to be of potential use in... (Review)
Review
Gut microbiome-targeted interventions such as fecal transplant, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and antibiotic gut depletion are speculated to be of potential use in delaying the onset and progression of Parkinson's disease by rebalancing the gut microbiome in the context of the gut-brain axis. Our study aims to organize recent findings regarding these interventions in Parkinson's disease animal models to identify how they affect neuroinflammation and motor outcomes. A systematic literature search was applied in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SCOPUS for gut microbiome-targeted non-dietary interventions. Studies that investigated gut-targeted interventions by using in vivo murine PD models to follow dopaminergic cell loss, motor tests, and neuroinflammatory markers as outcomes were considered to be eligible. A total of 1335 studies were identified in the databases, out of which 29 were found to be eligible. A narrative systematization of the resulting data was performed, and the effect direction for the outcomes was represented. Quality assessment using the SYRCLE risk of bias tool was also performed. Out of the 29 eligible studies, we found that a significant majority report that the intervention reduced the dopaminergic cell loss (82.76%, 95% CI [64.23%, 94.15%]) produced by the induction of the disease model. Also, most studies reported a reduction in microglial (87.5%, 95% CI [61.65%, 98.45%]) and astrocytic activation (84,62%, 95% CI [54.55%, 98.08%]) caused by the induction of the disease model. These results were also mirrored in the majority (96.4% 95% CI [81.65%, 99.91%]) of the studies reporting an increase in performance in behavioral motor tests. A significant limitation of the study was that insufficient information was found in the studies to assess specific causes of the risk of bias. These results show that non-dietary gut microbiome-targeted interventions can improve neuroinflammatory and motor outcomes in acute Parkinson's disease animal models. Further studies are needed to clarify if these benefits transfer to the long-term pathogenesis of the disease, which is not yet fully understood. The study had no funding source, and the protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with the ID number CRD42023461495.
PubMed: 38785512
DOI: 10.3390/cimb46050244 -
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences Sep 2023Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most common vaginal infections worldwide. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most common vaginal infections worldwide. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of probiotics in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Scientific Information Database (SID), IranMedex, and Google Scholar search engine was performed. The search was conducted from inception to 1 October 2022, to identify published English or Persian language randomized control trials (RCTs) of women with vulvovaginal candidiasis who received probiotics as medical treatment. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine checklist All statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) version 2.
RESULTS
Six RCTs were included in this review. The results showed that treatment with probiotic was not different from placebo regarding the rate of positive culture (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.390 to 3.26, P=0.825); treatment with probiotic was more effective compared to placebo regarding the rate of recurrence. (OR: 0.14; P= 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.028-0.7).
CONCLUSION
Probiotics have a beneficial effect in the treatment of women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Our results provide evidence for an alternative treatment modality for vaginal candidiasis using probiotics.
Topics: Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal; Probiotics; Humans; Female; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38784519
DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i5.18 -
Allergy May 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate evidence on dietary interventions for atopic eczema/dermatitis (AD) skin symptoms in children without food... (Review)
Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional and dietary interventions in randomized controlled trials for skin symptoms in children with atopic dermatitis and without food allergy: An EAACI task force report.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate evidence on dietary interventions for atopic eczema/dermatitis (AD) skin symptoms in children without food allergies, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Systematic review updates were conducted in May 2022 and June 2023, focusing on randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) involving children with AD but without food allergies. Specific diets or supplements, such as vitamins, minerals, probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, or postbiotics, were explored in these trials. Exclusions comprised descriptive studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, letters, case reports, studies involving elimination diets, and those reporting on food allergens in children and adolescents. Additionally, studies assessing exacerbation of AD due to food allergy/sensitization and those evaluating elimination diets' effects on AD were excluded. Nutritional supplementation studies were eligible regardless of sensitization profile. Evaluation of their impact on AD clinical expression was performed using SCORAD scores, and a meta-analysis of SCORAD outcomes was conducted using random-effect models (CRD42022328702). The review encompassed 27 RCTs examining prebiotics, Vitamin D, evening primrose oil, and substituting cow's milk formula with partially hydrolyzed whey milk formula. A meta-analysis of 20 RCTs assessing probiotics, alone or combined with prebiotics, revealed a significant reduction in SCORAD scores, suggesting a consistent trend in alleviating AD symptoms in children without food allergies. Nonetheless, evidence for other dietary interventions remains limited, underscoring the necessity for well-designed intervention studies targeting multiple factors to understand etiological interactions and propose reliable manipulation strategies.
PubMed: 38783644
DOI: 10.1111/all.16160 -
Cureus May 2024Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. The dysbiotic gut... (Review)
Review
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. The dysbiotic gut microbiome likely contributes to IBD pathogenesis. Microbiome-directed therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, and synbiotics may help induce and maintain remission. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of microbiome interventions compared to standard therapy or placebo for IBD treatment. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials on microbiome interventions in IBD from inception to October 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. Outcomes included disease activity, endoscopy, histology, quality of life, and adverse events. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials were included. Three trials found intensive (i.e., high frequency of administration and/or large volumes of fecal material) multi-donor FMT superior to autologous FMT or glucocorticoids for UC remission induction. Seven placebo-controlled trials demonstrated higher remission rates with FMT, especially intensive protocols, versus control for mild-to-moderate UC. However, a single FMT did not prevent relapses. Seven probiotic trials showed the potential to improve UC activity and maintain remission. One synbiotic trial reported reduced inflammation and symptoms versus placebo. Serious adverse events were rare. Small sample sizes and protocol heterogeneity limited the conclusions. Current evidence indicates the potential benefits of microbiome interventions, particularly intensive multi-donor FMT, for inducing and maintaining remission in UC. Probiotics may also improve outcomes. Adequately powered trials using standardized protocols are still needed to firmly establish efficacy and safety. Microbiome-directed therapies represent a promising approach for improving IBD outcomes.
PubMed: 38779440
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60786 -
Gut Microbes 2024Repeated exposure to antibiotics and changes in the diet and environment shift the gut microbial diversity and composition, making the host susceptible to pathogenic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Repeated exposure to antibiotics and changes in the diet and environment shift the gut microbial diversity and composition, making the host susceptible to pathogenic infection. The emergence and ongoing spread of AMR pathogens is a challenging public health issue. Recent evidence showed that probiotics and prebiotics may play a role in decolonizing drug-resistant pathogens by enhancing the colonization resistance in the gut. This review aims to analyze available evidence from human-controlled trials to determine the effect size of probiotic interventions in decolonizing AMR pathogenic bacteria from the gut. We further studied the effects of prebiotics in human and animal studies. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL were used to collect articles. The random-effects model meta-analysis was used to pool the data. GRADE Pro and Cochrane collaboration tools were used to assess the bias and quality of evidence. Out of 1395 citations, 29 RCTs were eligible, involving 2871 subjects who underwent either probiotics or placebo treatment to decolonize AMR pathogens. The persistence of pathogenic bacteria after treatment was 22%(probiotics) and 30.8%(placebo). The pooled odds ratio was 0.59(95% CI:0.43-0.81), favoring probiotics with moderate certainty ( = 0.0001) and low heterogeneity ( = 49.2%, = 0.0001). The funnel plot showed no asymmetry in the study distribution (Kendall'sTau = -1.06, = 0.445). In subgroup, showed the highest decolonization (82.4%) in probiotics group. -based probiotics and decolonize 71% and 77% of pathogens effectively. The types of probiotics ( < 0.018) and pathogens ( < 0.02) significantly moderate the outcome of decolonization, whereas the dosages and regions of the studies were insignificant ( < 0.05). Prebiotics reduced the pathogens from 30% to 80% of initial challenges. Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that probiotics and prebiotics may decolonize pathogens through modulation of gut diversity. However, more clinical outcomes are required on particular strains to confirm the decolonization of the pathogens. Protocol registration: PROSPERO (ID = CRD42021276045).
Topics: Probiotics; Humans; Prebiotics; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Bacteria; Animals; Treatment Outcome; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Gastrointestinal Tract
PubMed: 38778521
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2356279