-
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Evaluation of post-nephrectomy social health in living kidney donors is essential. This systematic review examines their emotional need for social relatedness... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Evaluation of post-nephrectomy social health in living kidney donors is essential. This systematic review examines their emotional need for social relatedness post-donation.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.
RESULTS
Among the screened records, 32 quantitative and 16 qualitative papers met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative research predominantly utilized questionnaires featuring generic items on social functioning. However, a minority delved into emotional and social dimensions, aligning with qualitative studies emphasizing the importance of social connection and perceived social support post-donation. Specifically, post-donation changes in connecting with others encompass a sense of belongingness, heightened autonomy, shifts in concern for the recipient's health, and continued care by shielding the recipient from personal health issues. Social acknowledgment and social support from both close and extended networks are reported as relevant for recovery after nephrectomy.
DISCUSSION
These findings underscore the necessity for targeted measures of emotional needs and social functioning to effectively assess post-donation adjustment. They also inform the identification of key health themes for kidney donor Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questions.
PubMed: 38921330
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121216 -
Frontiers in Psychology 2024Patients with cancer experience significant psychosocial distress. Stressors include interpersonal difficulties like loneliness, isolation, thwarted belongingness,...
OBJECTIVE
Patients with cancer experience significant psychosocial distress. Stressors include interpersonal difficulties like loneliness, isolation, thwarted belongingness, communication impediments, and conflicts. Interventions are required that address their specific psychosocial needs. Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) is a promising concept for the treatment of psychosocial distress associated with cancer because it addresses patients' interactions and role transformations. This review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence regarding interventions for patients with cancer based on IPT.
METHODS
A systematic review following PRISM guidelines was conducted, including randomized controlled trials of IPT-based interventions in patients with cancer, assessing effects on distress, depression, and anxiety.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included, sampling 390 patients in total. Seven out of eight studies assessed exclusively women with breast cancer. Two studies described IPT interventions and showed stronger improvement in depression and anxiety compared to TAU and equal improvement in depression compared to other psychotherapy interventions. Six studies described remote Interpersonal Counselling (IPC). One found remote IPC to be superior to control conditions regarding depression, and one found remote IPC to be superior to attention control, but not active control conditions. No study found remote IPC to be superior to control conditions regarding distress.
DISCUSSION
There are few randomized controlled trials of IPT for patients with cancer. Results regarding depression and anxiety are promising for in-person IPT, but mixed for remote IPC.
CONCLUSION
The review suggests in-person IPT, but not remote IPC, may yield benefits for patients with cancer. Research on the subject is scarce, and to inform implementation of IPT interventions, research with diverse groups of patients with cancer is required.
SYSTEMATIC TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, Identifier CRD42023410687.
PubMed: 38873503
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367807 -
PloS One 2024To understand the experiences of informal carers and the impact of role and activity changes on their health and wellbeing. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To understand the experiences of informal carers and the impact of role and activity changes on their health and wellbeing.
METHODS
A systematic search of CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies were eligible if they included informal stroke carers (≥18 years), used a qualitative methodology, explored the roles and valued activities of stroke carers, and were published in English. The 10-item Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies was used to assess methodological quality. The results of the included studies were thematically synthesised.
RESULTS
A total of 36 qualitative studies were included and four overarching themes were identified: (1) Life adjustment; (2) Changing role and identity; (3) Changing activities: From meaningful to purposeful; and (4) Understanding and supporting carers.
CONCLUSION
The sudden nature of stroke requires major readjustment in the carers life that has implications on their relationships, roles, and activities, subsequently impacting on their health and wellbeing. Health professionals and researchers should collaborate with stroke carers to identify their valued activities and implement realistic strategies to maintain these activities. Future interventions designed for carers should implement education about the importance of participating in valued activities and strategies to maintain these activities.
Topics: Humans; Caregivers; Stroke; Qualitative Research; Adaptation, Psychological; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38820455
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304501 -
European Journal of Oncology Nursing :... Jun 2024To identify intervention strategies for improving illness perception (IP) of cancer patients and/or family caregivers; and to examine the effects of IP interventions by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSES
To identify intervention strategies for improving illness perception (IP) of cancer patients and/or family caregivers; and to examine the effects of IP interventions by meta-analysis.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed to identify literature that focused on improving the IP of cancer patients and/or family caregivers from the establishment of eight databases to August 2023. Manual screening was also applied. The IP intervention strategies for cancer populations were synthesized basing the CSM. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of IP interventions on health outcomes. Multiple subgroup analyses of the same intervention conditions were conducted to explore the optimal IP-focused intervention.
RESULTS
18 studies were included. 11 studies were conducted in a meta-analysis. No studies on family caregivers' IP were identified. Compared to general care, subgroup analysis revealed that IP interventions had favorable effects on cancer patients' IP as well as quality of life and other outcomes. Six IP intervention strategies (information support, cognitive reframing, emotion adjustment, active coping, effective appraisal, and self-social identification) were generated. Meta-analysis showed that compared with theory-less studies (Z = 8.64, p < 0.01) and single delivery formats (Z = 3.66, p < 0.01), the theory-based interventions (Z = 10.86, p < 0.01) and mixed delivery formats (Z = 7.15, p < 0.01) had higher positive effects on IP outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The positive outcomes of IP intervention focusing on cancer patients were highlighted. IP traits and patients' and their caregivers' needs in coping with specific cancer types should be explored before the intervention design. More IP interventions targeting cancer dyads are warranted to develop in the future.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Caregivers; Adaptation, Psychological; Quality of Life; Perception
PubMed: 38810586
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102599 -
BMJ Open May 2024Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a common treatment for prostate cancer, has debilitating impacts on physical and psychological quality of life. While some...
Effectiveness of educational and psychological survivorship interventions to improve health-related quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a common treatment for prostate cancer, has debilitating impacts on physical and psychological quality of life. While some interventions focus on managing the physical side effects of ADT, there is a paucity of interventions that also address psychosocial and educational needs. The objective of this systematic review was to identify psychological and educational survivorship interventions targeting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in men on ADT.
DESIGN
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
DATA SOURCES
Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO Host, PubMed, SCOPUS from inception (1984) to 28 January 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Psychological and/or educational survivorship interventions targeting HRQoL outcomes for men on ADT; minimum 80% of participants on ADT; used a validated HRQoL outcome measure; published in English in a peer-reviewed journal.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data extraction using pre-specified study criteria was conducted. Heterogeneity of eligible studies precluded a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 3381 publications were identified with eight meeting the criteria. Interventions were either psychological with a cognitive behavioural approach (n=4), or educational with (n=2) or without (n=2) psychoeducational components.Two studies reported a statistically significant improvement using a specific HRQoL measure. Most studies were not adequately powered and/or included small sample sizes limiting the conclusions that can be drawn on effectiveness. The most effective interventions were (i) individually based, (ii) educational with a psychoeducational component, (iii) supplemented with information packages and/or homework and (iv) included personalised needs assessments.
CONCLUSION
There is a paucity of literature reporting psychological and educational survivorship interventions targeting HRQoL outcomes for men on ADT. What is urgently needed are person-centred survivorship interventions that are flexible enough to identify and address individual needs, taking into account the impact ADT has on both physical and psychological quality of life.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD4202230809.
Topics: Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgen Antagonists; Patient Education as Topic; Cancer Survivors; Survivorship; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38777593
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080310 -
JBI Evidence Synthesis May 2024The objective of this review was to identify lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review was to identify lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management.
INTRODUCTION
Lung transplantation is an established treatment to improve the survival of patients with end-stage lung diseases and has been performed on over 40,000 patients worldwide. The current focus of care for lung transplant recipients is on their long-term management. Patients need to adapt and adhere to complex self-management tasks to prevent complications and to enable them to keep the transplanted graft as long as possible. However, to date, no qualitative systematic review exists that identifies lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
This review included adults over 18 years of age who had received a lung transplant and were able to perform their self-management tasks independently. All studies that investigated lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management in any setting were included in this review. All types of studies that focused on qualitative data, including, but not limited to, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research were considered for inclusion. Mixed methods studies were included only when qualitative data could be extracted separately, and if they reported results relating to the phenomena of interest. Studies published in English or German were considered for inclusion in this review.
METHODS
The search strategy aimed to find published studies from 6 databases from the database inception to March 2022. Methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI checklist for qualitative research. A standardized data extraction tool from JBI was used by 2 reviewers for data collection. Meta-aggregation was undertaken to synthesize the data, and the final synthesis of the findings was reached through discussion. Results were graded according to ConQual.
RESULTS
Ten studies with a sample size from 8 to 73 participants from North America and Central/Northern Europe were included in the review. The critical appraisal scores of the included studies varied from 3 to 9 out of 10. A total of 137 findings were extracted and aggregated to form 19 categories and the following 4 aggregated syntheses: i) Changes in routines, beliefs, and sense of responsibility are essential for better adaptation and self-management after lung transplantation; ii) Life after transplantation is characterized by both positive and negative feelings and experiences; iii) Better adjustment and self-management after a lung transplant require dealing with one's own feelings and beliefs; iv) After transplantation, engaging with relatives, friends, medical team and donors is essential to improve experiences and adapt to being a transplant recipient. Based on the ConQual scores, 2 synthesized findings were graded as moderate and 2 as low.
CONCLUSIONS
Nuanced emotional, social, relational, and psychological adjustment is required of lung transplant recipients to be able to successfully self-manage. Loved ones and health professionals contribute significantly to this process, but psychosocial or peer support may further facilitate this transition.
SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT
A German-language version of the abstract of this review is available as Supplemental Digital Content [http://links.lww.com/SRX/A46].
PubMed: 38757171
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00070 -
Rheumatology International May 2024The multifaceted nature of Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) symptoms has been explored through clusters analysis.
BACKGROUND
The multifaceted nature of Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) symptoms has been explored through clusters analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize the cluster research on FM (variables, methods, patient subgroups, and evaluation metrics).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review following the PRISMA recommendations. Independent searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, employing the terms "fibromyalgia" and "cluster analysis". We included studies dated to January 2024, using the cluster analysis to assess any physical, psychological, clinical, or biomedical variables in FM subjects, and descriptively synthesized the studies in terms of design, cluster method, and resulting patient profiles.
RESULTS
We included 39 studies. Most with a cross-sectional design aiming to classify subsets based on the severity, adjustment, symptomatic manifestations, psychological profiles, and response to treatment, based on demographic and clinical variables. Two to four different profiles were found according to the levels of severity and adjustment to FMS. According to symptom manifestation, two to three clusters described the predominance of pain versus fatigue, and thermal pain sensitivity (less versus more sensitive). Other clusters revealed profiles of personality (pathological versus non-pathological) and psychological vulnerability (suicidal ideation). Additionally, studies identified different responses to treatment (pharmacological and multimodal).
CONCLUSION
Several profiles exist within FMS population, which point out to the need for specific treatment options given the different profiles and an efficient allocation of healthcare resources. We notice a need towards more objective measures, and the validation of the cluster results. Further research might investigate some of the assumptions of these findings, which are further discussed in this paper.
PubMed: 38748219
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05616-2 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Apr 2024People with advanced or metastatic cancer and their caregivers may have different care goals and face unique challenges compared to those with early-stage disease or...
PURPOSE
People with advanced or metastatic cancer and their caregivers may have different care goals and face unique challenges compared to those with early-stage disease or those nearing the end-of-life. These MASCC-ASCO standards and practice recommendations seek to establish consistent provision of quality survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer.
METHODS
An expert panel comprising MASCC and ASCO members was formed. Standards and recommendations relevant to the provision of quality survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer were developed through conducting: (1) a systematic review of unmet supportive care needs; (2) a scoping review of cancer survivorship, supportive care, and palliative care frameworks and guidelines; and (3) an international modified Delphi consensus process.
RESULTS
A systematic review involving 81 studies and a scoping review of 17 guidelines and frameworks informed the initial standards and recommendations. Subsequently, 77 experts (including 8 people with lived experience) across 33 countries (33% were low-to-middle resource countries) participated in the Delphi study and achieved ≥ 94.8% agreement for seven standards (1. Person-Centred Care; 2. Coordinated and Integrated Care; 3. Evidence-Based and Comprehensive Care; 4. Evaluated and Communicated Care; 5. Accessible and Equitable Care; 6. Sustainable and Resourced Care; 7. Research and Data-Driven Care) and ≥ 84.2% agreement across 45 practice recommendations.
CONCLUSION
Standards of survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer are provided. These MASCC-ASCO standards will support optimization of health outcomes and care experiences by providing guidance to stakeholders in cancer care (healthcare professionals, leaders, and administrators; governments and health ministries; policymakers; advocacy agencies; cancer survivors and caregivers. Practice recommendations may be used to facilitate future research, practice, policy, and advocacy efforts.
Topics: Humans; Cancer Survivors; Delphi Technique; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasms; Palliative Care; Patient-Centered Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Health Care; Survivorship
PubMed: 38679639
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08465-8 -
Medicine Apr 2024From the time of new diagnosis to treatment, cancer patients experience a variety of health problems that can affect the patient's health outcomes. Individuals with...
BACKGROUND
From the time of new diagnosis to treatment, cancer patients experience a variety of health problems that can affect the patient's health outcomes. Individuals with cancer are being given increasing responsibility for the self-management of their health and illness. The self-regulating common-sense model (CSM) is effective in patients' disease management. This article briefly introduces the common-sense model intervention, in which patients with cancer are affected by these interventions, what they are about, and what effects they have.
METHODS
The authors systematically review evidence for the common-sense model of self-regulation for cancer using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we searched the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, CNKI, and WanFang databases. The included studies underwent a quality assessment using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP).
RESULTS
Eleven empirical studies illustrated the aspects of common-sense model interventions for cancer patients. It is concluded that common-sense model intervention has an effect on symptoms in cancer treatment, behavior, and quality of life, but more studies are needed to verify the use of common-sense model intervention to explore in patients with different cancers. The systematic review summarized a four-point paradigm about intervention content, including assessing the current situation, setting goals, having a disease education and psychological adjustment, and getting feedback for further response. However, the application of intervention requires specific analysis of patient behavior and outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Common-sense model interventions are beneficial for the self-management of cancer patients; however, more intervention studies are needed to specify the cognitive, emotional, and coping styles of people with a particular cancer.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Self-Management
PubMed: 38669411
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037777 -
Oncology Nursing Forum Apr 2024Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) encounter varying degrees of objective and subjective cognitive impairment. The prevalence of objective and subjective cognitive...
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) encounter varying degrees of objective and subjective cognitive impairment. The prevalence of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, factors affecting cognitive impairment, and interventions are presented in this review.
LITERATURE SEARCH
The CINAHL Plus®, Cochrane Library, Embase®, PsycINFO®, PubMed®, and CNKI databases were systematically searched from the time of the database's establishment to May 2023. Manual searches for the relevant articles in the literature's references were also conducted.
DATA EVALUATION
The results were independently assessed by two reviewers.
SYNTHESIS
25 studies were included. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in individuals with CRC was measured differently according to study designs. A model of factors contributing to cognitive impairment guided the integration of factors, including cancer treatments, psychosocial factors, and physical and emotional health conditions. Incorporated intervention programs could be integrated between objective and subjective aspects. Interventions relieved cognitive impairment in individuals with CRC.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
The results of this review supported enhanced assessment and monitoring of cognitive impairment, particularly subjective cognitive impairment.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cognitive Dysfunction; Female; Male; Aged; Middle Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Prevalence
PubMed: 38668912
DOI: 10.1188/24.ONF.275-288