-
Ophthalmologica. Journal International... Jun 2024To examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to...
INTRODUCTION
To examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to RVO, and DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy.
METHODS
A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 2006 to March 2024. Studies comparing visual or anatomic outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy, stratified by magnitudes of RT fluctuation, were included. ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools were used to assess risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model. Primary outcomes were final BCVA and change in BCVA relative to baseline.
RESULTS
15725 articles were screened; 15 studies were identified in the systematic review and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Final ETDRS VA was significantly worse in eyes with the highest level of RT fluctuation (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 7.86 letters; 95% CI, 4.97, 10.74; p < 0.00001; I² = 81%; 3136 eyes). RT at last observation was significantly greater in eyes with high RT fluctuations (WMD = -27.35 μm; 95% CI, -0.04, 54.75; p = 0.05; I2 = 88%; 962 eyes).
CONCLUSIONS
Final visual outcome is associated with magnitude of RT fluctuation over the course of therapy. It is unclear whether minimizing RT fluctuations would help to optimize visual outcomes in patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy. These findings are limited by a small set of studies, risk of bias, and considerable heterogeneity.
PubMed: 38857572
DOI: 10.1159/000539648 -
Journal of Neurology Jun 2024This study aimed to examine the existing literature that investigated the effectiveness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to examine the existing literature that investigated the effectiveness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) as a biomarker for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Our search was conducted on January 17th, 2024, and included the databases, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Our final review included 84 articles. In 74 studies, OCT was utilized as the primary ocular imaging method, while OCT-A was employed in two studies including eight studies that utilized both modalities. Overall, the results indicated that IIH patients exhibited significant increases in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, total retinal and macular thickness, optic nerve head volume, and height, optic disc diameter and area, rim area, and thickness compared to controls. A significant correlation was observed between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and OCT parameters including RNFL thickness, total retinal thickness, macular thickness, optic nerve head volume, and optic nerve head height. Interventions aimed at lowering CSF pressure were associated with a substantial improvement in these parameters. Nevertheless, studies comparing peripapillary vessel density using OCT-A between IIH patients and controls yielded conflicting results. Our systematic review supports OCT as a powerful tool to accurately monitor retinal axonal and optic nerve head changes in patients with IIH. Future research is required to determine the utility of OCT-A in IIH.
PubMed: 38856724
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12481-3 -
PloS One 2024Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have emerged as the most common therapeutic approach for the management of diabetic macular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Comparative efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on diabetic macular edema diagnosed with different patterns of optical coherence tomography: A network meta-analysis.
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have emerged as the most common therapeutic approach for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Despite their proven superiority over other interventions, there is a paucity of data regarding the relative effectiveness of anti-VEGF agents in treating DME diagnosed with different patterns of optical coherence tomography (OCT). In this regard, we conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept in the management of DME with diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), and serous retinal detachment (SRD) patterns identified using OCT. Our study encompassed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan Fang Data from their inception until January 25, 2023. The network meta-analysis involved the inclusion of 1606 patients from 20 retrospective studies with a moderate risk of bias but no evidence of publication bias. The DRT group had the highest increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with anti-VEGF, while the SRD group had the greatest reduction in Central Macular Thickness (CMT). Furthermore, conbercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively, showed the best treatment outcomes for patients with DRT, CME, and SRD in terms of improvement in BCVA. And, conbercept exhibited the highest reduction in CMT in the DRT, CME, and SRD groups. In conclusion, our study highlights the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents in the management of DME and provides valuable insights into the selection of anti-VEGF agents tailored to the individual needs of patients.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Edema; Network Meta-Analysis; Ranibizumab; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 38848379
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304283 -
Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and... 2024The convergence of smartphone technology and artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the landscape of ophthalmic care, offering unprecedented opportunities for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The convergence of smartphone technology and artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the landscape of ophthalmic care, offering unprecedented opportunities for diagnosis, monitoring, and management of ocular conditions. Nevertheless, there is a lack of systematic studies on discussing the integration of smartphone and AI in this field.
MAIN TEXT
This review includes 52 studies, and explores the integration of smartphones and AI in ophthalmology, delineating its collective impact on screening methodologies, disease detection, telemedicine initiatives, and patient management. The collective findings from the curated studies indicate promising performance of the smartphone-based AI screening for various ocular diseases which encompass major retinal diseases, glaucoma, cataract, visual impairment in children and ocular surface diseases. Moreover, the utilization of smartphone-based imaging modalities, coupled with AI algorithms, is able to provide timely, efficient and cost-effective screening for ocular pathologies. This modality can also facilitate patient self-monitoring, remote patient monitoring and enhancing accessibility to eye care services, particularly in underserved regions. Challenges involving data privacy, algorithm validation, regulatory frameworks and issues of trust are still need to be addressed. Furthermore, evaluation on real-world implementation is imperative as well, and real-world prospective studies are currently lacking.
CONCLUSIONS
Smartphone ocular imaging merged with AI enables earlier, precise diagnoses, personalized treatments, and enhanced service accessibility in eye care. Collaboration is crucial to navigate ethical and data security challenges while responsibly leveraging these innovations, promising a potential revolution in care access and global eye health equity.
PubMed: 38846624
DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.03.003 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2024Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive eye disease characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and is a leading cause of vision loss... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
RATIONALE
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive eye disease characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and is a leading cause of vision loss and disability worldwide. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is an effective treatment option that helps to prevent vision loss or to improve visual acuity in people with neovascular AMD, treatment imposes a significant financial burden on patients and healthcare systems. A biosimilar is a biological product that has been developed to be nearly identical to a previously approved biological product. The use of biosimilars may help reduce costs and so may increase patient access to effective biologic medicines with similar levels of safety to the drugs on which they are based.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of anti-VEGF biosimilar agents compared with their corresponding anti-VEGF agents (i.e. the reference products) that have obtained regulatory approval for intravitreal injections in people with neovascular AMD.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registries together with reference checking and contact with study authors to identify studies that are included in the review. The latest search date was 2 June 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared approved anti-VEGF biosimilars with their reference products for treating the eyes of adult participants (≥ 50 years) who had an active primary or recurrent choroidal neovascularization lesion secondary to neovascular AMD.
OUTCOMES
Our outcomes were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), vision-related quality of life, serious ocular and non-ocular adverse events (AE), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and serum concentrations of biosimilars and reference drugs.
RISK OF BIAS
We assessed the risk of bias (RoB) for seven outcomes reported in a summary of findings table by using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.
SYNTHESIS METHODS
We synthesized results for each outcome using meta-analysis, where possible, by calculating risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes, respectively. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we summarized the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for prespecified outcomes.
INCLUDED STUDIES
We included nine parallel-group multi-center RCTs that enrolled a total of 3814 participants (3814 participating eyes), with sample sizes that ranged from 160 to 705 participants per study. The mean age of the participants in these studies ranged from 67 to 76 years, and the proportion of women ranged from 26.5% to 58.7%. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) was the reference product in seven studies, and aflibercept (Eyelea) was the reference product in two others. All the included studies had been supported by industry. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 52 weeks (median 48 weeks). Five studies (56%) were conducted in multi-country settings across Europe, North America and Asia, two studies in India, and one each in Japan and the Republic of Korea. We judged all the included studies to have met high methodological standards.
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS
With regard to efficacy, our meta-analyses demonstrated that anti-VEGF biosimilars for neovascular AMD resulted in little to no difference compared with the reference products for BCVA change at 8 to 12 weeks (MD -0.55 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.07; 8 studies, 3603 participants; high-certainty evidence) and the proportion of participants who lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA at 24 to 48 weeks (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01; 7 studies, 2658 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Almost all participants (96.6% in the biosimilar group and 97.0% in the reference product group) lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA. The evidence from two studies suggested that there was no evidence of difference between biosimilars and reference products in vision-related quality of life measured by the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) summary scores at 24 to 48 weeks (MD 0.82, 95% CI -0.70 to 2.35; 2 studies, 894 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). With regard to the safety profile, meta-analyses also revealed little to no difference between anti-VEGF biosimilars and the reference products for the proportion of participants who experienced serious ocular AEs (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.26; 7 studies, 3292 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and for TEAEs leading to investigational product discontinuation or death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.46; 8 studies, 3497 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Overall, 1.4% of participants in the biosimilar group and 1.2% in the reference product group experienced serious ocular adverse events. The most frequently documented serious ocular AEs were retinal hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Although the evidence is of low certainty due to imprecision, meta-analysis suggested that anti-VEGF biosimilars led to no difference compared with the reference products for cumulative incidence of ADAs (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; 8 studies, 3066 participants; low-certainty evidence) or mean maximum serum concentrations (MD 0.42 ng/mL, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.05; subgroup of 3 studies, 100 participants; low-certainty evidence). We judged the overall risk of bias to be low for all studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In our review, low to high certainty evidence suggests that there is little to no difference, to date, between the anti-VEGF biosimilars approved for treating neovascular AMD and their reference products in terms of benefits and harms. While anti-VEGF biosimilars may be a viable alternative to reference products, current evidence for their use is based on a limited number of studies - particularly for comparison with aflibercept - with sparse long-term safety data, and infrequent assessment of quality of life outcomes. Our effect estimates and conclusions may be modified once findings have been reported from studies that are currently ongoing, and studies of biosimilar agents that are currently in development.
FUNDING
Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Project is supported by grant UG1EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Takeshi Hasegawa and Hisashi Noma were supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant numbers: 22H03554, 19K03092, 24K06239).
REGISTRATION
Protocol available via doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015804.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Aptamers, Nucleotide; Bevacizumab; Bias; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Choroidal Neovascularization; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Degeneration; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ranibizumab; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Visual Acuity; Middle Aged; Male; Female
PubMed: 38829176
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015804.pub2 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery May 2024Subretinal injection (SI) is a novel drug delivery method, directly to retina for treatment of various eye disease. However, manual injection requires surgical... (Review)
Review
Subretinal injection (SI) is a novel drug delivery method, directly to retina for treatment of various eye disease. However, manual injection requires surgical experience and precision due to physiological factors. Robots offer solution to this issue, by reducing hand tremor and increased accuracy. This systematic review analyzes current status on robot-assisted SI compared to conventional techniques. Systematic search across 5 databases was conducted to identify studies comparing manual and robot-assisted SI procedures. Extracted data included robotic systems, complications, and success rates. Four studies, including one human trial, two ex vivo porcine eye studies, and one artificial eye model study were included in the synthesis. The findings show early advantages of robot-assisted SI. Compared to traditional interventions, robot procedures result in reduced tremor, what potentially lowers the risk of complications, including retinal tears and reflux. The first in-human randomized trial showed encouraging results, with no significant differences in surgical times or complications between robot-assisted and manual SI. However, major limitation of robot-assisted procedures is longer procedure time. Robot-assisted SI holds promise by offering increased precision and stability, reducing human error and potentially improving clinical outcomes. Challenges include cost, availability, and learning curve. Overall, early stage of robot-assisted SI suggests advantages in precision, complication reduction, and potentially improved drug delivery. Further research in human randomized trials is needed to fully assess its full-scale clinical application.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Retina; Drug Delivery Systems; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Swine; Injections, Intraocular
PubMed: 38819533
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01991-x -
American Journal of Ophthalmology May 2024To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil compared to gas tamponade for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil compared to gas tamponade for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to September 2023 for comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of PPV with either silicone oil or gas tamponade in the setting of uncomplicated RRD. Our primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of retinal reattachment, retinal thickness, and the incidence of adverse events. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Nine observational studies reporting on 491 RRD eyes were included. The mean best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation was significantly better in the gas tamponade group than in the silicone oil group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.17 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.06, 0.27], P = .002). Rates of primary retinal reattachment were similar between the silicone oil and gas tamponade groups (P = .89). The ganglion cell layer was significantly thinner in the silicone oil group compared to the gas tamponade group (WMD =-3.70 µm, 95% CI = [-5.87, -1.53, P = .0008), as was the inner plexiform layer (WMD = -2.45, 95% CI = [-4.50, -0.40], P = .02) and outer nuclear layer (WMD = -11.74 µm, 95% CI = [-18.39, -5.10], P = .0005).
CONCLUSIONS
PPV with gas tamponade was associated with better functional outcomes compared to PPV with silicone oil, although both tamponades yielded comparable primary reattachment rates. The absence of randomized trials and the potential for selection bias underscore the importance of further investigation in diverse patient populations.
PubMed: 38815844
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.05.008 -
Journal of Glaucoma May 2024Peripapillary retinoschisis may bias optical coherence tomography's monitoring of glaucoma progression. Its impact on glaucoma still remains uncertain. Only two out of...
PRCIS
Peripapillary retinoschisis may bias optical coherence tomography's monitoring of glaucoma progression. Its impact on glaucoma still remains uncertain. Only two out of the ten included studies illustrated a correlation between peripapillary retinoschisis and glaucoma progression.
PURPOSE
The frequent use of optical coherence tomography increased the detection of peripapillary retinoschisis, which poses challenges in the follow-up of glaucoma patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature regarding peripapillary retinoschisis in glaucoma, exploring its prevalence, impact on disease, and clinical management implications.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus with tailored search queries for each platform. All studies had to report peripapillary retinoschisis in glaucoma patients. Exclusion criteria included studies with less than 10 eyes, studies focusing on schisis outside the disc area, with concomitant retinal or optic nerve lesions, with animals, reviews, studies written in non-English language and congress abstracts.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included, of which 7 were case-control, one was a cohort study and two were case series.Six studies showed that peripapillary retinoschisis often overlapped pre-existing retinal nerve fiber layer defects. One study reported that the de novo development of peripapillary retinoschisis was more frequent in eyes with glaucoma progression than in eyes without progression.Visual field findings were inconsistent, with just one study (out of six) showing that glaucoma patients with peripapillary retinoschisis experienced faster visual field deterioration than those without it. Overall, solely two studies (out of seven) associated peripapillary retinoschisis with faster glaucoma progression.
CONCLUSIONS
Peripapillary retinoschisis biases optical coherence tomography analysis in glaucoma. Caution is needed against overestimation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness when peripapillary retinoschisis develops, and misinterpretation of its resolution as rapid progression. Peripapillary retinoschisis' exact impact on glaucoma progression remains unclear.
PubMed: 38771637
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002437 -
Ophthalmic Research 2024Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have a variable effect on patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that has been attributed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Association of the Complement Factor H Y402H Polymorphism and Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have a variable effect on patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that has been attributed to several causes, including genetic factors. We evaluated the effects of Complement Factor H (CFH) rs1061170/Y402H polymorphism on the response to anti-VEGF therapy among AMD patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used for a literature search. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the effects of CFH Y402H polymorphism on the response to anti-VEGF therapy in AMD. I2 was used to present the amount of heterogeneity. We used STATA version 14.0 software.
RESULTS
Twenty-five papers reporting data for 4,681 patients were included in this study. Better response to anti-VEGF therapy was seen in T over C (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04-1.50), TT over CC (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.06-2.4), and TT + TC over CC (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.23-2.28) genotypes. There was no significant difference in the three other genetic models (TT vs. TC, TT vs. TC + CC, TC vs. TT + CC). In Asians, no significant difference was observed in all six genetic models. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab had similar efficacy; however, conbercept was more effective in homozygous genotypes. The literature indicated that TT and TC genotypes and T allele were associated with a better functional response, while the CC genotype and C alleles had a better anatomical response. The combination of risk alleles in ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924), VEGF-A (rs699947), and VEGF-A (rs833069) with Y420H is a predictor of non-respondents.
CONCLUSION
In patients with AMD, the CFH Y402H is a predictor of the response to anti-VEGF agents and should be considered in the treatment plan.
Topics: Humans; Complement Factor H; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Macular Degeneration; Genotype
PubMed: 38754401
DOI: 10.1159/000539377 -
Survey of Ophthalmology May 2024Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting various organs. Ocular involvement, particularly retinopathy, is common, emphasizing the... (Review)
Review
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting various organs. Ocular involvement, particularly retinopathy, is common, emphasizing the significance of early detection. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), a non-invasive imaging technique, reveals microvascular changes, aiding SLE diagnosis and monitoring. This study evaluates OCTA's effectiveness in detecting SLE-related retinal alterations. A systemic search was undertaken across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify studies presenting OCTA measurements in SLE patients compared to healthy controls. The meta-analysis, employing either fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity levels, was conducted. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and quality assessments were carried out. Thirteen studies of 565 eyes in the SLE group and 560 eyes in the control group were included. The meta-analyses revealed that SLE patients had a significantly lower retinal vessel density in the superficial and deep capillary plexus layers, choriocapillaris flow area, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) circularity index compared to healthy controls, but that there were no significant differences in the FAZ area and perimeter. These findings highlight how OCTA can provide a noninvasive assessment of SLE effects on the retinal microvasculature, potentially presenting a reliable biomarker for more precise detection of SLE and disease activity monitoring.
PubMed: 38744406
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.04.007