-
Operative Neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) Feb 2022Retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors present a surgical challenge. Despite potential advantages, robotic surgery for these tumors has been limited. Identifying and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors present a surgical challenge. Despite potential advantages, robotic surgery for these tumors has been limited. Identifying and sparing functional nerve fascicles during resection can be difficult, increasing the risk of neurological morbidity.
OBJECTIVE
To review the literature regarding robotic resection of retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors and retrospectively analyze our experience with robotic resection of these tumors using a manual electromyographic probe to identify and preserve functional nerve fascicles.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical courses of 3 patients with retroperitoneal tumors treated at the National Institutes of Health by a multidisciplinary team using the da Vinci Xi system. Parent motor nerve fascicles were identified intraoperatively with a bipolar neurostimulation probe inserted through a manual port, permitting tumor resection with motor fascicle preservation.
RESULTS
Two patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 underwent surgery for retroperitoneal neurofibromas located within the iliopsoas muscle, and 1 patient underwent surgery for a pelvic sporadic schwannoma. All tumors were successfully resected, with no complications or postoperative neurological deficits. Preoperative symptoms were improved or resolved in all patients.
CONCLUSION
Resection of retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors confers an excellent prognosis, although their deep location and proximity to vital structures present unique challenges. Robotic surgery with intraoperative neurostimulation mapping is safe and effective for marginal resection of histologically benign or atypical retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors, providing excellent visibility, increased dexterity and precision, and reduced risk of neurological morbidity.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Sheath Neoplasms; Neurilemmoma; Neurosurgical Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; United States
PubMed: 35007270
DOI: 10.1227/ONS.0000000000000051 -
World Journal of Urology Dec 2022The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options.
PURPOSE
The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies published from January 2010 until February 2021 were included. Search items included: seminoma, CS IIA, CS IIB and therapy. Outcome parameters were relapse rate (RR), relapse-free (RFS), overall and cancer-specific survival (OS, CSS). Additionally, acute and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (SMs) were analyzed.
RESULTS
Seven comparative studies (one prospective and six retrospective) were identified with a total of 5049 patients (CS IIA: 2840, CS IIB: 2209). The applied treatment modalities were radiotherapy (RT) (n = 3049; CS IIA: 1888, CSIIB: 1006, unknown: 155) and chemotherapy (CT) or no RT (n = 2000; CS IIA: 797, CS IIB: 1074, unknown: 129). In CS IIA, RRs ranged from 0% to 4.8% for RT and 0% for CT. Concerning CS IIB RRs of 9.5%-21.1% for RT and of 0%-14.2% for CT have been reported. 5-year OS ranged from 90 to 100%. Only two studies reported on treatment-related toxicities.
CONCLUSIONS
RT and CT are the most commonly applied treatments in CS IIA/B seminoma. In CS IIA seminomas, RRs after RT and CT are similar. However, in CS IIB, CT seems to be more effective. Survival rates of CS IIA/B seminomas are excellent. Consequently, long-term toxicities and SMs are important survivorship issues. Alternative treatment approaches, e.g., retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or dose-reduced sequential CT/RT are currently under prospective investigation.
Topics: Male; Humans; Seminoma; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Testicular Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 34779882
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5 -
European Journal of Radiology Open 2021It is essential to see if MRI can be used as an alternative to CT for the detection of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy in patients with testicular neoplasms. By doing...
INTRODUCTION
It is essential to see if MRI can be used as an alternative to CT for the detection of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy in patients with testicular neoplasms. By doing so, the amount of radiation received by these young patients might be reduced.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was carried out in 5 databases between January 1984 until December 2020. The articles included were randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, cross-sectional studies, cohort, case and control, and retrospective studies that compare the accuracy of MRI against CT to detect retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with testicular neoplasms.
RESULTS
The search string initially retrieved 222 non duplicated papers from which a total of 3 studies of diagnostic accuracy were included for analysis. These articles evaluated a total of 127 patients with testicular neoplasm; the sample size per study ranged from 25 to 52 patients, with a mean age between 29-34 years. MRI presented a sensitivity ranging from 98-80% and specificity of 100 % when read by an experienced radiologist. However, when it was read by a radiologist with 1 year of experience, the sensitivity dropped to 78 % and specificity to 91%.
CONCLUSION
This systematic literature review shows a knowledge gap since not much has been published regarding this topic; therefore, randomized clinical trials are mandatory. Research on when to use MRI over CT is necessary to reduce radiation exposure. The authors strongly suggest that readers start researching on this subject.
PubMed: 34458506
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100372 -
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) Jun 2021Post-chemotherapy surgery constitutes an integral part of the management of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours with a residual mass in the retroperitoneum....
INTRODUCTION
Post-chemotherapy surgery constitutes an integral part of the management of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours with a residual mass in the retroperitoneum. Published data on recurrence rates and complications to bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), unilateral template RPLND, and resection of residual mass only according to different surgical techniques (open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery) were reviewed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases were searched systematically. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
In total, 28 studies were included. Eight studies reported on open surgery with the bilateral template, seven on the unilateral template, and three on resection of mass only. Median follow-up was 39, 39, and 70 months, respectively. Recurrences were found in 11, 12, and 14%, respectively. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo III or more) were observed in 18, 8, and 17%, respectively. Two studies reported on laparoscopic bilateral surgery, eight on unilateral, and two on residual mass only. A total of Median follow-up was 52, 29, and 55 months, respectively. Recurrences were found in 0, 1, and 9%, respectively. Major complications were not documented for bilateral but were observed in 4% for unilateral and 0% for resection of tumour only. Four studies on robotic bilateral surgery, three on unilateral and two on resection of tumour only were included. Follow-up was 18, 35, and 30 months, respectively. Recurrences were found in 0, 0, and 2%, respectively. Major complications were observed in 0, 10. and 2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
When patient selection is made, recurrence rates for the open unilateral template are comparable to the bilateral template. The risk of complications is highest after an open bilateral template. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery should not be used as a standard procedure. More studies are required with larger patient populations and longer follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Retroperitoneal Space; Retrospective Studies; Testicular Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33819117
DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1905176 -
Revista Espanola de Patologia :... 2021Retroperitoneal lipomas are extremely rare tumors that must be differentiated from well-differentiated liposarcomas (WD-LPS).
BACKGROUND
Retroperitoneal lipomas are extremely rare tumors that must be differentiated from well-differentiated liposarcomas (WD-LPS).
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the evidence about giant retroperitoneal lipomas or liposarcomas; and to elaborate recommendations for their management.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search from January 1985 to December 2019 and a review of our own cases was performed.
RESULTS
Our series comprises four patients, two females and two males. The diagnosis was incidental in two cases. The medium size was 26 cm, being two cases located exclusively in the retroperitoneum, one in the inguinal region and one in the buttock via pelvic space. All cases were surgically removed being confirmed the initial diagnosis of retroperitoneal lipomas in two cases, as the rest two cases were classified as WD_LPS after MDM2/CDK4 genetic analysis. The review of the available literature plus our own cases revealed 30 cases, of which 58% were woman. Only two cases were asymptomatic. The main symptom was abdominal mass (53%) followed by abdominal pain (40,6%). The median size of the lesions was 24,9 cm with a median weight of 4.576,3 g. All cases were surgically removed, being necessary to remove contiguous organs in only four cases (12,5%).
CONCLUSIONS
Retroperitoneal lipoma is a rare tumor which must be differentiated from WD-LPS. This is a very difficult task, being necessary to determinate MDM2 status (by FISH or MLPA), present in liposarcoma but not in lipomas, for its correct diagnosis. The treatment must be based on a complete surgical resection with negative margins.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Buttocks; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Female; Humans; Incidental Findings; Inguinal Canal; Lipoma; Liposarcoma; Male; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33726894
DOI: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.06.006 -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... 2021There is currently no consensus on optimal management of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The objective of this...
BACKGROUND
There is currently no consensus on optimal management of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The objective of this study was to document the outcomes of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS treated in our center with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and to perform a systematic review on the topic.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of consecutive RPS patients treated in our center between 2000 and 2019 was performed. All consecutive patients who underwent definitive conformal RT with image guidance for primary or recurrent non-resectable or macroscopically residual RPS were included. Additionally, a systematic review compliant with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed.
RESULTS
The study enrolled 14 patients who met the aforementioned criteria. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, RT and response to treatment were assessed. RT allowed achieving prolonged local control of the disease, i.e. no local progression of the disease for more than 12 months after RT in 10 patients. Local control lasted more than 24 months in 6 cases, with minimal or no toxicity. A systemic review of 11 studies revealed concordance of our results with previous reports of primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS.
CONCLUSIONS
RT provided satisfactory local disease control with acceptable treatment tolerance in patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS and represents a valuable treatment modality in the selected group of patients. Additional RT modalities i.e. BT, particle therapy, MRI-guided RT, or GRID/Lattice RT may be introduced to improve local control and further minimize toxicity.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm, Residual; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33567904
DOI: 10.1177/1073274820983028 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2020To compare perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes between transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy...
BACKGROUND
To compare perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes between transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN).
METHODS
A literature searching of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was performed in August, 2020. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed-effect or random-effect model. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots. Only comparative studies with matched design or similar baseline characteristics were included.
RESULTS
Eleven studies embracing 2,984 patients were included. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding conversion to open (P = 0.44) or radical (P = 0.31) surgery, all complications (P = 0.06), major complications (P = 0.07), warm ischemia time (P = 0.73), positive surgical margin (P = 0.87), decline in eGFR (P = 0.42), CKD upstaging (P = 0.72), and total recurrence (P = 0.66). Patients undergoing TRPN had a significant higher minor complications (P = 0.04; OR: 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91), longer operative time (P < 0.001; WMD: 21.68; 95% CI, 11.61 to 31.76), more estimated blood loss (EBL, P = 0.002; WMD: 40.94; 95% CI, 14.87 to 67.01), longer length of hospital stay (LOS, P < 0.001; WMD: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.37). No obvious publication bias was identified.
CONCLUSION
RRPN is more favorable than TRPN in terms of less minor complications, shorter operative time, less EBL, and shorter LOS. Methodological limitations of the included studies should be considered while interpreting these results.
PubMed: 33489891
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.592193 -
Journal of Endourology May 2021To systematically explore the superiority of the transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (TP-RAPN) and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To systematically explore the superiority of the transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (TP-RAPN) and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RP-RAPN). Several databases were searched including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wan Fang, and VIP to identify relevant studies that reported the comparison of the TP-RAPN and RP-RAPN. Outcomes of data were pooled and analyzed with Review Manager 5.3 to compare the intraoperative and postoperative variables and postoperative complications. Based on the heterogeneity of the studies, odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model or fixed-effect model. The sensitivity analysis and the subgroup analysis were used to minimize the effects of heterogeneity. And, publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. In all, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 2336 TP-RAPN patients and 1705 RP-RAPN patients. This meta-analysis reviewed 16 studies on RAPN, and the RP-RAPN showed shorter operative time (OT) (WMD 13.18 minutes; 95% CI 5.04-21.31; = 0.001), shorter postoperative bowel function recovery (WMD 1.97 days; 95% CI 0.43-3.52; = 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (WMD 0.51 days; 95% CI 0.25-0.77; = 0.0001), and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 7.08 mL; 95% CI 1.41-12.74; = 0.01) than the TP-RAPN. Additionally, no significant differences were found in other outcomes. In comparison, the RP-RAPN had significantly shorter OT, postoperative bowel function recovery time, LOS, and lower EBL. The RP-RAPN is associated with better value for posterior and laterally located tumors and is faster and equally safe and low costs for the patient.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33076702
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0432 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Sep 2020Ganglioneuromas (GNs) are extremely rare, slowly growing, benign tumors that can arise from Schwann cells, ganglion cells, and neuronal or fibrous tissues. Due to their...
BACKGROUND
Ganglioneuromas (GNs) are extremely rare, slowly growing, benign tumors that can arise from Schwann cells, ganglion cells, and neuronal or fibrous tissues. Due to their origin from the sympathetic neural crest, they show neuroendocrine potential; however, most are reported to be hormonally inactive. Nevertheless, complete surgical removal is recommended for symptom control or for the prevention of potential malignant degeneration.
CASE REPORT
A 30-year-old female was referred to our oncologic center due to a giant retroperitoneal and mediastinal mass detected in computed tomography (CT) scans. The initial symptoms were transient nausea, diarrhea, and crampy abdominal pain. There was a positive family history including 5 first- and second-degree relatives. Presurgical biopsy revealed a benign ganglioneuroma. Total resection (TR) of a 35 × 25 × 25 cm, 2550-g tumor was obtained successfully via laparotomy combined with thoracotomy and partial incision of the diaphragm. Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis. Surgically challenging aspects were the bilateral tumor invasion from the retroperitoneum into the mediastinum through the aortic hiatus with the need of a bilateral 2-cavity procedure, as well as the tumor-related displacement of the abdominal aorta, the mesenteric vessels, and the inferior vena cava. Due to their anatomic course through the tumor mass, the lumbar aortic vessels needed to be partially resected. Postoperative functioning was excellent without any sign of neurologic deficit.
CONCLUSION
Here, we present the largest case of a TR of a GN with retroperitoneal and mediastinal expansion. On review of the literature, this is the largest reported GN resected and was performed safely. Additionally, we present the first systematic literature review for large GN (> 10 cm) as well as for resected tumors growing from the abdominal cavity into the thoracic cavity.
Topics: Adult; Female; Ganglioneuroma; Humans; Mediastinal Neoplasms; Prognosis; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Retroperitoneal Space; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32948207
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02016-1 -
The Journal of Urology Feb 2021Cancer specific survival for men with early stage (I to IIB) testicular germ cell tumors is greater than 90% with any management strategy. The data regarding the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Comparative Effectiveness of Surveillance, Primary Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for the Management of Early Stage Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review.
PURPOSE
Cancer specific survival for men with early stage (I to IIB) testicular germ cell tumors is greater than 90% with any management strategy. The data regarding the comparative effectiveness of surveillance, primary chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were synthesized with a focus on oncologic outcomes, patient reported outcomes, and short and long-term toxicities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1980 to 2018 for studies addressing the effectiveness of surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, according to pathology and clinical stage, for men with an early stage testicular germ cell tumor.
RESULTS
Cancer specific survival ranged from 94% to 100% for patients with early stage testicular germ cell tumors regardless of tumor histology and initial management strategy. For men with seminoma the median cancer specific survival was 99.7% (range 97% to 100%), 99.5% (96.8% to 100%) and 100% (100% to 100%) among those managed by surveillance, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Median cancer specific survival for men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors was 100% (range 98.6% to 100%), 100% (96.9% to 100%) and 100% (94% to 100%) when managed by surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence rates and toxicities varied by management strategy. For men with seminoma surveillance, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with median recurrence rates of 15%, 2% and 3.7%, respectively. For men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors the median recurrence rates were 20.5%, 3.3% and 11.1% for surveillance, chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. Surveillance was associated with minimal toxicities compared to other approaches. Primary chemotherapy had the highest rate of short-term toxicities and was associated with long-term risks of metabolic syndrome, hypogonadism, renal impairment, neuropathy, infertility and secondary malignancies. Toxicities with radiotherapy included acute dermatitis and long-term gastrointestinal complications, infertility and high rates of secondary malignancies (2% to 3%). Patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had significant risk of toxicity perioperatively and long-term infertility in men with anejaculation. Transient detriments in patient reported outcomes and quality of life were noted with all management options.
CONCLUSIONS
Men with early stage testicular germ cell tumors experience excellent cancer specific survival regardless of management strategy. Management options, however, differ in terms of associated recurrence rates, short and long-term toxicities, and patient reported outcomes. The profile for each approach should be clearly communicated to patients and matched with patient preferences to offer the best individual outcome.
Topics: Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Retroperitoneal Space; Testicular Neoplasms; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 32915080
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001364