-
Journal of Wound Care Apr 2022This study aims to assess the wound healing efficacy in second-degree burns in rats treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD)-a sulfonamide antibiotic. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the wound healing efficacy in second-degree burns in rats treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD)-a sulfonamide antibiotic.
METHOD
This is a systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) strategy.
RESULTS
The review found 100 studies in PubMed, Web of Science and other search engines. Of these, 70 studies were pre-selected after removing duplicates. After independent analysis by two reviewers, only seven studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. All studies except one showed faster wound closure by the application of silver sulfadiazine ointment. Using a random effects model, healing was faster in SSD-treated groups when compared to the control group on day 21, with a statistically significant mean difference of -2.72 days (95% confidence interval: -4.99, -0.45) between treatment and control groups (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The results of this meta-analysis revealed that SSD aided in faster healing of second-degree burns.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Burns; Humans; Ointments; Rats; Silver Sulfadiazine; Soft Tissue Injuries; Wound Healing
PubMed: 35404714
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup4.S31 -
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Jul 2022(), a non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM), rare causes infection including localized pulmonary to disseminated disease in immunocompromised patients. An optimal...
INTRODUCTION
(), a non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM), rare causes infection including localized pulmonary to disseminated disease in immunocompromised patients. An optimal pharmacological management practice has not yet been defined for this infection. This study investigates drug regimens and treatment outcomes in patients with M. simiae to describe different drug regimen with the therapeutic response.
AREAS COVERED
The three databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science were systematically searched from June 1994 to June 2021 to retrieve relevant articles. The inclusion criterion included studies, which reported treatment outcomes in patients with infections. Treatment success was defined as the achievement of culture conversion, and the improvement of the symptoms and radiologic signs among the patients.
EXPERT OPINION
Data of 223 patients were retrieved from 40 studies. Duration of the treatment regimens used in different studies ranged from 2 to 12 months. The most common treatment regimens administered for infection were as follows: clarithromycin, rifampin, ethambutol, moxifloxacin, or ciprofloxacin and amikacin plus cotrimoxazole or pyrazinamide in some regimens. Macrolides, such as clarithromycin, combined with quinolones (such as moxifloxacin) and TMP/SMX, which are used in combination, had the most significant effect on eliminating the pulmonary signs of .
Topics: Clarithromycin; Humans; Moxifloxacin; Mycobacterium; Mycobacterium Infections; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 35306950
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2056019 -
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2022(1) Background: pneumonia (PCP) has a substantial impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients, especially those with autoimmune disorders, thus requiring optimal... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: pneumonia (PCP) has a substantial impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients, especially those with autoimmune disorders, thus requiring optimal dosing strategies of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Therefore, to ensure the safety of TMP-SMX, there is a high demand to review current evidence in PCP patients with a focus on dose optimization strategies; (2) Methods: Various databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2021 for articles in English, focusing on the dose optimization of TMP-SMX. The data were collected in a specific form with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each article was evaluated using a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for retrospective studies, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical checklist for case reports, and Cochrane bias tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs); (3) Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Of the 13 selected studies, nine were retrospective cohort studies, two case reports, and two randomized controlled trials (RCT). Most of the studies compared the high-dose with low-dose TMP-SMX therapy for PCP. We have found that a low dose of TMP-SMX provides satisfactory outcomes while reducing the mortality rate and PCP-associated adverse events. This strategy reduces the economic burden of illness and enhances patients' compliance to daily regimen plan; (4) Conclusions: The large-scale RCTs and cohort studies are required to improve dosing strategies to prevent initial occurrence of PCP or to prevent recurrence of PCP in immune compromised patients.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Retrospective Studies; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 35270525
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052833 -
Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) Aug 2022Edema is one of the cardinal clinical features of nephrotic syndrome (NS). It may vary from mild periorbital edema to severe generalized edema (anasarca). In patients... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Edema is one of the cardinal clinical features of nephrotic syndrome (NS). It may vary from mild periorbital edema to severe generalized edema (anasarca). In patients where edema does not improve with prednisone therapy, the most common supportive medications are diuretics and albumin. However, due to the complex pathophysiology of edema formation in NS patients resulting in intravascular normovolemia or hypovolemia, optimal therapy for edema is still debated. We conducted a systematic review with the objective of evaluating the change in urine volume and urine sodium excretion after treatment with furosemide only versus furosemide with albumin in edematous patients with NS.
OBJECTIVES
(1) To evaluate efficacy of furosemide alone versus furosemide with albumin in the treatment of nephrotic edema in adults and children. (2) To compare the harms and benefits of different doses of furosemide for treating nephrotic edema.
SEARCH METHODS
The search included all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in English and French using MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL Trials Registry of the Cochrane Collaboration using the Ovid interface.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were also searched.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all RCTs and randomized cross-over studies in which furosemide and furosemide plus albumin are used in the treatment of children or adults with nephrotic edema. We excluded patients with hypoalbuminemia of non-renal origin and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate below 30 ml/min/1.74 m and patients with congenital NS.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
All abstracts were independently assessed by at least two authors to determine which studies met the inclusion criteria. Information on study design, methodology, and outcome data (urine volume, urine sodium excretion, adverse effects) from each identified study was entered into a separate data sheet. The differences in outcomes between the types of therapy were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
The search yielded 525 records, and after screening, five studies were included in the systematic review and four of those studies in the meta-analysis. One study had high risk of bias and the remaining three studies were deemed to have some concerns. Urine excretion was greater after treatment with furosemide and albumin versus furosemide (SMD 0.85, 95% CI = 0.33 to 1.38). Results for sodium excretion were inconclusive (SMD 0.37, 95%CI = - 0.28 to 1.02).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The current evidence is not sufficient to make definitive conclusions about the role of albumin in treating nephrotic edema. High-quality randomized studies with adequate samples sizes are needed. Including an assessment of intravascular volume status may be helpful.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Prospero: CRD4201808979. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Topics: Adult; Albumins; Child; Edema; Furosemide; Humans; Nephrotic Syndrome; Sodium
PubMed: 35239032
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05358-4 -
PloS One 2021It has been a matter of much debate whether the co-administration of furosemide and albumin can achieve better diuresis and natriuresis than furosemide treatment alone.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It has been a matter of much debate whether the co-administration of furosemide and albumin can achieve better diuresis and natriuresis than furosemide treatment alone. There is inconsistency in published trials regarding the effect of this combination therapy. We, therefore, conducted this meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of furosemide and albumin co-administration and the factors potentially influencing the diuretic effect of such co-administration.
METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Prospective studies with adult populations which comparing the effect of furosemide and albumin co-administration with furosemide alone were included. The outcomes including diuretic effect and natriuresis effect measured by hourly urine output and hourly urine sodium excretion from both groups were extracted. Random effect model was applied for conducting meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity of treatment effects.
RESULTS
By including 13 studies with 422 participants, the meta-analysis revealed that furosemide with albumin co-administration increased urine output by 31.45 ml/hour and increased urine excretion by 1.76 mEq/hour in comparison to furosemide treatment alone. The diuretic effect of albumin and furosemide co-administration was better in participants with low baseline serum albumin levels (< 2.5 g/dL) and high prescribed albumin infusion doses (> 30 g), and the effect was more significant within 12 hours after administration. Diuretic effect of co-administration was better in those with baseline Cr > 1.2 mg/dL and natriuresis effect of co-administration was better in those with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2.
CONCLUSION
Co-administration of furosemide with albumin might enhance diuresis and natriuresis effects than furosemide treatment alone but with high heterogeneity in treatment response. According to the present meta-analysis, combination therapy might provide advantages compared to the furosemide therapy alone in patients with baseline albumin levels lower than 2.5 g/dL or in patients receiving higher albumin infusion doses or in patients with impaired renal function. Owing to high heterogeneity and limited enrolled participants, further parallel randomized controlled trials are warranted to examine our outcome.
REGISTRATION
PROSEPRO ID: CRD42020211002; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.
Topics: Albumins; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Furosemide; Humans; Nephrotic Syndrome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34851962
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260312 -
International Urogynecology Journal May 2022In the present study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of quinolones with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and β-lactams... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
In the present study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of quinolones with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and β-lactams for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adults.
METHODS
All controlled clinical trials assessing quinolones for uncomplicated UTIs in adults were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analyses were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
RESULTS
A total of 47 RCTs consisting of 8992 patients were included in the present analysis. The clinical and bacteriological remission rates of quinolones were significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared with β-lactams and nitrofurantoin, while quinolones showed similar clinical and bacteriological remission rates compared with TMP/SMX and fosfomycin. Moreover, the bacterial resistance and relapse rates of quinolones were significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared with TMP/SMX, β-lactams, and nitrofurantoin. Regarding the adverse drug reactions (ADRs), quinolones did not bring higher risks, while the incidence of ADRs in the quinolone group was also even significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared with the TMP/SMX and nitrofurantoin groups, including the most reported ADRs associated with the gastrointestinal tract.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with other anti-UTI drugs, quinolones exerted an excellent effect on clinical remission and bacteriological eradication, and the application of quinolones did not bring a higher risk of ADRs.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Fosfomycin; Humans; Nitrofurantoin; Quinolones; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Urinary Tract Infections; beta-Lactams
PubMed: 34748035
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05013-4 -
Transactions of the Royal Society of... Apr 2022Malaria is one of the most serious global problems. The objective of this study is to assess whether intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) using artemisinin-based... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine vs artemisinin-based drugs for malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Malaria is one of the most serious global problems. The objective of this study is to assess whether intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) using artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) was a promising alternative to IPT with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPT-SP).
METHODS
We searched the following sources up to 12 August 2020: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Database from inception. The randomized controlled trials comparing SP with ACTs for malaria were included. Data were pooled using Stata.14 software. We performed subgroup analysis based on the different types of ACTs groups and participants.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies comprising 5180 people were included. The meta-analysis showed that ACTs had the lower risk of number of any parasitemia (RR=0.46; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96, p=0.039; I2=90.50%, p<0.001), early treatment failure (RR=0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.48, p<0.001; I2=66.60%, p=0.011) and late treatment failure (RR=0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92, p<0.001; I2=87.80%, p<0.001) compared with SP. There was no significant difference in adequate clinical response, average hemoglobin and adverse neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Combinations with ACTs appear promising as suitable alternatives for IPT-SP.
Topics: Antimalarials; Artemisinins; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Malaria; Malaria, Falciparum; Pyrimethamine; Sulfadoxine
PubMed: 34651193
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trab158 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Aug 2022Pneumococcal serotypes differ in antimicrobial susceptibility. However, patterns and causes of this variation are not comprehensively understood. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pneumococcal serotypes differ in antimicrobial susceptibility. However, patterns and causes of this variation are not comprehensively understood.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review of epidemiologic studies of pneumococci isolated from carriage or invasive disease among children globally from 2000-2019. We evaluated associations of each serotype with nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. We evaluated differences in the prevalence of nonsusceptibility to major antibiotic classes across serotypes using random-effects meta-regression models and assessed changes in prevalence of nonsusceptibility after implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs). We also evaluated associations between biological characteristics of serotypes and their likelihood of nonsusceptibility to each drug.
RESULTS
We included data from 129 studies representing 32 187 isolates across 52 countries. Within serotypes, the proportion of nonsusceptible isolates varied geographically and over time, in settings using and those not using PCVs. Factors predicting enhanced fitness of serotypes in colonization as well as enhanced pathogenicity were each associated with higher likelihood of nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Increases in prevalence of nonsusceptibility following PCV implementation were evident among non-PCV serotypes, including 6A, 6C, 15A, 15B/C, 19A, and 35B; however, this pattern was not universally evident among non-PCV serotypes. Postvaccination increases in nonsusceptibility for serotypes 6A and 19A were attenuated in settings that implemented PCV13.
CONCLUSIONS
In pneumococci, nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is associated with more frequent opportunities for antibiotic exposure during both prolonged carriage episodes and when serotypes cause disease. These findings suggest multiple pathways leading to resistance selection in pneumococci.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Humans; Infant; Macrolides; Nasopharynx; Penicillins; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Serogroup; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Vaccines, Conjugate
PubMed: 34599811
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab852 -
Transplant Infectious Disease : An... Dec 2021Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The conventional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The conventional treatment of PJP is sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) dosed at 15-20 mg/kg/day of the trimethoprim component. Several studies have suggested similar mortality outcomes and an improved adverse effect profile using a lower dose (<15 mg/kg/day) SMX-TMP regimen. Our objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lower dose SMX-TMP for PJP pneumonia.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2020, for studies in English evaluating low-dose SMX-TMP (<15 mg/kg/day) compared to conventional dosing for the treatment of PJP. Outcomes evaluated in our meta-analysis include survival and adverse reactions.
RESULTS
After excluding studies that did not meet our inclusion criteria, four studies were analyzed for adverse reactions and three for mortality. Overall, there was no significant difference in mortality between low-dose and conventional-dose SMX-TMP groups (relative risk [RR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.70). There was a significant decrease in the rate of adverse reactions for the low-dose group compared with the conventional-dose group (RR: 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.91).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis shows a significant decrease in adverse reactions and similar mortality rates with lower-dose SMX-TMP compared to conventional dosing. A low-dose SMX-TMP regimen in the treatment of PJP should be considered a viable option as it could potentially decrease treatment discontinuation rates and reduce patient harm.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Opportunistic Infections; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Retrospective Studies; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 34553814
DOI: 10.1111/tid.13737 -
The Lancet. Microbe Sep 2021Pneumococcal diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children globally, and the burden of these diseases might be worsened by antimicrobial...
BACKGROUND
Pneumococcal diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children globally, and the burden of these diseases might be worsened by antimicrobial resistance. To understand the effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) deployment on antimicrobial resistance in pneumococci, we assessed the susceptibility of paediatric pneumococcal isolates to various antimicrobial drugs before and after PCV implementation.
METHODS
We did a systematic review of studies reporting antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of paediatric pneumococcal isolates between 2000 and 2020 using PubMed and the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database (ATLAS; Pfizer). Population-based studies of invasive pneumococcal disease or nasopharyngeal colonisation were eligible for inclusion. As primary outcome measures, we extracted the proportions of isolates that were non-susceptible or resistant to penicillin, macrolides, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, third-generation cephalosporins, and tetracycline from each study. Where available, we also extracted data on pneumococcal serotypes. We estimated changes in the proportion of isolates with reduced susceptibility or resistance to each antibiotic class using random-effects meta-regression models, adjusting for study-level and region-level heterogeneity, as well as secular trends, invasive or colonising isolate source, and countries' per-capita gross domestic product.
FINDINGS
From 4910 studies screened for inclusion, we extracted data from 559 studies on 312 783 paediatric isolates. Susceptibility of isolates varied substantially across regions both before and after implementation of any PCV product. On average across all regions, we estimated significant absolute reductions in the proportions of pneumococci showing non-susceptibility to penicillin (11·5%, 95% CI 8·6-14·4), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (9·7%, 4·3-15·2), and third-generation cephalosporins (7·5%, 3·1-11·9), over the 10 years after implementation of any PCV product, and absolute reductions in the proportions of pneumococci resistant to penicillin (7·3%, 5·3-9·4), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (16·0%, 11·0-21·2), third-generation cephalosporins (4·5%, 0·3-8·7), macrolides (3·6%, 0·7-6·6) and tetracycline (2·0%, 0·3-3·7). We did not find evidence of changes in the proportion of isolates non-susceptible to macrolides or tetracycline after PCV implementation. Observed changes in penicillin non-susceptibility were driven, in part, by replacement of vaccine-targeted serotypes with non-vaccine serotypes that were less likely to be non-susceptible.
INTERPRETATION
Implementation of PCVs has reduced the proportion of circulating pneumococci resistant to first-line antibiotic treatments for pneumonia. This effect merits consideration in assessments of vaccine impact and investments in coverage improvements.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Cephalosporins; Child; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Macrolides; Penicillins; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Regression Analysis; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Sulfamethoxazole; Tetracycline; Trimethoprim; Vaccines, Conjugate
PubMed: 34485957
DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00064-1