-
PloS One 2013Emerging evidence showed that common functional -31G>C polymorphism (rs9904341 G>C) in the promoter region of the survivin gene is involved in the regulation of survivin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Emerging evidence showed that common functional -31G>C polymorphism (rs9904341 G>C) in the promoter region of the survivin gene is involved in the regulation of survivin expression, thus increasing an individual's susceptibility to gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancer; but individually published results are inconclusive. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to derive a more precise estimation of the association between survivin -31G>C polymorphism and GIT cancer risk.
METHODS
A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CBM databases was conducted from inception through July 1st, 2012. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association.
RESULTS
Nine case-control studies were included with a total of 2,231 GIT cancer cases and 2,287 healthy controls. The results indicated that survivin -31G>C polymorphism was associated with increased risk of GIT cancer. In the stratified analysis by cancer types, significant associations were observed between survivin -31G>C polymorphism and increased risk of colorectal and gastric cancers. However, the lack of association of survivin -31G>C polymorphism with esophageal cancer risk may be due to a lack of a sufficient number of eligible studies and the influence of different genetic and environmental factors.
CONCLUSION
Results from the current meta-analysis suggests that survivin -31G>C polymorphism might increase the risk of GIT cancer, especially among gastric and colorectal cancers.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Polymorphism, Genetic; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Risk; Risk Factors; Survivin
PubMed: 23405077
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054081 -
Molecular Biology Reports Feb 2013Among new biological markers that could become useful prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survivin is one of the most commonly over-expressed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Among new biological markers that could become useful prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survivin is one of the most commonly over-expressed oncogenes, however, its role in NSCLC remains controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis to clarify this issue. Electronic databases were used to identify published studies before August 2011. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to estimate the strength of the association of survivin expression with survival of NSCLC patients. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Overall 29 relevant published studies including 2,517 lung cancer patients were identified from electronic databases. We found that overexpression of survivin in NSCLC patients might be a poor prognostic factor for survival 1.95 (95 % CI: 1.65-2.29; P < 0.001). Heterogeneity testing indicated that there was heterogeneity among studies. When stratified by histology types, the heterogeneity was absent. We should point out that the publication bias may partly account for the result, but the conclusion might not be affected deeply by the publication bias. When we accounted for publication bias using the trim and fill method, the results remained significant (HR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.44-2.02, P < 0.001), suggesting the stability of our results. Therefore, our study suggested that survivin overexpression had a poor prognosis value in patients with NSCLC.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Gene Expression; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Lung Neoplasms; Publication Bias; Survivin
PubMed: 23065255
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-012-2132-8 -
PloS One 2012The potential prognostic value of survivin in resected non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is variably reported. The objective of this study was to conduct a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The potential prognostic value of survivin in resected non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is variably reported. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literatures evaluating survivin expression in resected NSCLC as a prognostic indicator.
METHODS
Relevant literatures were identified using PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedicine Databases. We present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between survivin expression and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients. Studies were pooled and summary hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. Subgroup analyses and publication bias were also conducted.
RESULTS
We performed a final analysis of 2703 patients from 28 evaluable studies. Combined HRs suggested that survivin overexpression had an unfavorable impact on NSCLC patients' survival with no evidence of any significant publication bias (HR = 2.03, 95%CI: 1.78-2.33, Egger's test, P = 0.24) and no severe heterogeneity between studies (I² = 26.9%). Its effect also appeared significant when stratified according to the studies categorized by histological type, HR estimate, patient race, cutoff point (5%, 10%), detection methods and literature written language except for disease stage. Survivin was identified as a prognostic marker of advanced-stage NSCLC (HR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.49-2.51), but not early-stage NSCLC (HR = 1.97, 95%CI: 0.76-5.14), in spite of the combined data being relatively small.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that survivin expression appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of overall survival in surgically treated NSCLC. Large prospective studies are now needed to confirm the clinical utility of survivin as an independent prognostic marker.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Lung Neoplasms; Prognosis; Survivin
PubMed: 22457815
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034100 -
BJU International Sep 2012What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although many tests for identifying patients with new or recurrent bladder cancer have been used, a reliable... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although many tests for identifying patients with new or recurrent bladder cancer have been used, a reliable method has yet to be established. Recently, increasing attention has focused on the role of survivin in bladder cancer detection. Because urine survivin tests have better sensitivity than cytology, urine survivin could potentially replace routine cytology and might be used as an adjunct method for cystoscopy. However, the clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker identified in the present study remains to be elucidated. To determine the clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker we systematically reviewed the available evidence. A comprehensive literature review was performed, from August 1997 to March 2011, using three search engines in English including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS. Two reviewers independently evaluated both trial eligibility and methodological quality and data extraction. We included studies that evaluated urine survivin, used cystoscopy and/or histopathology as the reference standard, and allowed the construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table. Bivariate random effect meta-analyses were used to calculate the summary estimated of sensitivity and specificity and to construct a summary receiver-operating characteristics curve of urine survivin tests. In all, 14 studies were included in the present review; two studies had two subsets of data. There were 2051 subjects, including 1038 in the case group and 1013 in the control group, and heterogeneity was present among diagnostic studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for urine survivin tests were 0.772 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.745-0.797) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.899-0.934), respectively. The area under the curve of urine survivin tests was 0.9392. When a subgroup analysis with six studies was performed, urine survivin tests had better sensitivity than cytology, but did not match cytology for specificity. The clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker identified in the present study remains to be elucidated.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Early Detection of Cancer; Female; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Survivin; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 22353238
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10884.x -
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Aug 2011Despite intensive research efforts, within-stage survival rates for melanoma vary widely. Pursuit of molecular biomarkers with improved prognostic significance over... (Review)
Review
Despite intensive research efforts, within-stage survival rates for melanoma vary widely. Pursuit of molecular biomarkers with improved prognostic significance over clinicohistological measures has produced extensive literature. Reviews have synthesized these data, but none have systematically partitioned high-quality studies from the remainder across different molecular methods nor examined system properties of that output. Databases were searched for studies analyzing protein expression by immunohistochemistry (n = 617, extending the only systematic review to date by 102 studies) or for gene expression microarray studies (n = 45) in melanoma in relation to outcome. REMARK-derived criteria were applied to identify high-quality studies. Biomarkers and pathways were functionally assessed by using gene ontology software. Most manuscripts did not meet REMARK-based criteria, an ongoing trend that can impede translational research. Across REMARK-compliant literature, 41 proteins were significantly associated with outcome. Multimarker tests consistently emerged among the most promising potential biomarkers, indicating a need to continue assessing candidates in that composite setting. Twenty-one canonical pathways were populated by outcome-related proteins but not by those that failed to show such an association; we propose that this set of pathways warrants closer investigation to understand drivers of poor outcome in melanoma. Two-gene expression microarray studies met REMARK-based criteria reflecting a genuine paucity of literature in the area. The 254 outcome-related genes were examined for correspondences with the systematically identified protein signature. This analysis highlighted proliferating cell nuclear antigen and survivin as priorities for further examination as biomarkers in melanoma prognosis, and illustrated ongoing need to integrate alternative approaches to biomarker discovery in melanoma translational research.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Computational Biology; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Melanoma; Prognosis
PubMed: 21659462
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0901 -
The British Journal of Surgery Aug 2011Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis. There is a need to identify prognostic subtypes of PDAC to predict clinical and therapeutic outcomes... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis. There is a need to identify prognostic subtypes of PDAC to predict clinical and therapeutic outcomes accurately, and define novel therapeutic targets. The purpose of this review was to provide a systematic summary and review of available data on immunohistochemical (IHC) prognostic and predictive markers in patients with PDAC.
METHODS
Relevant articles in English published between January 1990 and June 2010 were obtained from PubMed searches. Other articles identified from cross-checking references and additional sources were reviewed. The inclusion was limited to studies evaluating IHC markers in a multivariable setting.
RESULTS
Database searches identified 76 independent prognostic and predictive molecular markers implicated in pancreatic tumour growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion and resistance to chemotherapy. Of these, 11 markers (Ki-67, p27, p53, transforming growth factor β1, Bcl-2, survivin, vascular endothelial growth factor, cyclo-oxygenase 2, CD34, S100A4 and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1) provided independent prognostic or predictive information in two or more separate studies.
CONCLUSION
None of the molecular markers described can be recommended for routine clinical use as they were identified in small cohorts and there were inconsistencies between studies. Their prognostic and predictive values need to be validated further in prospective multicentre studies in larger patient populations. A panel of molecular markers may become useful in predicting individual patient outcome and directing novel types of intervention.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 21644238
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7574 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... May 2011The management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to present a great challenge particularly with regard to prediction of outcome following... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to present a great challenge particularly with regard to prediction of outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Molecular markers have been extensively investigated by numerous groups with the aim of enhancing prognostication; however, despite hundreds of studies that have sought to assess the potential prognostic value of molecular markers in predicting the clinical course following resection of PDAC, at this time, no molecular marker assay forms part of recommended clinical practice.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature for immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers of PDAC outcome. A dual search strategy was applied to the PubMed database on January 6, 2010, to identify cohort studies that reported associations between immunohistochemical biomarker expression and survival outcomes in PDAC, and conformed to the REMARK (REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies) criteria.
RESULTS
A total of 103 distinct proteins met all inclusion criteria. Promising markers that emerged for the prediction of overall survival included BAX (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.71-0.56), Bcl-2 (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.63), survivin (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.73), Ki-67: (HR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.87-3.14), COX-2 (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.71), E-cadherin (HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.33-2.42), and S100 calcium-binding proteins, in particular S100A2 (HR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.58-6.62).
CONCLUSIONS
We noted that that there was incomplete adherence to the REMARK guidelines with inadequate methodology reporting as well as failure to perform multivariate analysis. Addressing the persistent incomplete adoption of these criteria may eventually result in the incorporation of molecular marker assessment within PDAC management algorithms.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Algorithms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Tissue Distribution; Validation Studies as Topic
PubMed: 21444679
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3284 -
Journal of Surgical Oncology Jun 2011Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is an uncommon and locally aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Currently, no standard therapy is available. The... (Review)
Review
Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is an uncommon and locally aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Currently, no standard therapy is available. The biology of this disease is still poorly understood. We performed a systematic search of relevant studies on clinical management and biological research of DMPM. Trials were selected using a predetermined protocol. The current evidence suggests that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) results in improved survival. Biological understanding of DMPM is currently evolving.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Mesothelioma; Neoplasm Proteins; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Prognosis; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Survivin; Telomerase
PubMed: 21283990
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21787 -
Chinese Journal of Cancer Apr 2010Survivin has gradually become an important target in diagnosis, prognosis prediction and treatment of tumor. There are many studies on urine-based survivin mRNA test... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Survivin has gradually become an important target in diagnosis, prognosis prediction and treatment of tumor. There are many studies on urine-based survivin mRNA test using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a noninvasive examination for bladder cancer. However, its clinical value remains controversial. This study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of urine survivin mRNA detection with RT-PCR for bladder cancer by a systematic review of related studies.
METHODS
With the search terms such as bladder neoplasm, survivin, RT-PCR, sensitivity, specificity and diagnosis, we systematically searched through PubMed, EMBASE, SCI, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database (CSJD), China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), Chinese Medical Association (CMA) digital periodicals and Google Scholar totally from January 1997 to April 2009 for diagnostic trials with RT-PCR detection of urine survivin mRNA for bladder cancer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) items were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Meta-disc software was used to calculate outcome indicators.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies, totally 2 416 patients, were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that compared with pathologic examination, the summary values of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) of urine-based survivin mRNA test using RT-PCR for bladder cancer were 88%, 94%, 14.56, 0.13 and 0.9736, respectively. Nested RT-PCR got the highest sensitivity, specificity and SROC and the values were 91%, 95% and 0.9805, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of general RT-PCR were the second highest, which were 87% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity of quantitative RT-PCR was 80% and the specificity was 93%.
CONCLUSIONS
Comparing with pathologic examination, the sensitivity and specificity of urine-based survivin mRNA test using RT-PCR are relatively high. It can be used as an important adjunct method for cystoscope in early screening and postoperative monitoring of bladder cancer.
Topics: Databases, Bibliographic; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; RNA, Messenger; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sensitivity and Specificity; Survivin; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 20346223
DOI: 10.5732/cjc.009.10509 -
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII Oct 2009This review summarizes studies on humoral immune responses against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) with a focus on antibody frequencies and the potential diagnostic,... (Review)
Review
This review summarizes studies on humoral immune responses against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) with a focus on antibody frequencies and the potential diagnostic, prognostic, and etiologic relevance of antibodies against TAAs. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and identified 3,619 articles on humoral immune responses and TAAs. In 145 studies, meeting the inclusion criteria, humoral immune responses in cancer patients have been analyzed against over 100 different TAAs. The most frequently analyzed antigens were p53, MUC1, NY-ESO-1, c-myc, survivin, p62, cyclin B1, and Her2/neu. Antibodies against these TAAs were detected in 0-69% (median 14%) of analyzed tumor patients. Antibody frequencies were generally very low in healthy individuals, with the exception of few TAAs, especially MUC1. For several TAAs, including p53, Her2/neu, and NY-ESO-1, higher antibody frequencies were reported when tumors expressed the respective TAA. Antibodies against MUC1 were associated with a favorable prognosis while antibodies against p53 were associated with poor disease outcome. These data suggest different functional roles of endogenous antibodies against TAAs. Although data on prediagnostic antibody levels are scarce and antibody frequencies for most TAAs are at levels precluding use in diagnostic assays for cancer early detection, there is some promising data on achieving higher sensitivity for cancer detection using panels of TAAs.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Neoplasm; Antibody Formation; Antigens, Neoplasm; Autoantibodies; Humans; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms
PubMed: 19562338
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-009-0733-4